Mocking, Bashing and Blaming

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Amazing as it may seem I was recently asked the question "How do you talk to victims of sexual abuse?"

The person who asked was an attorney and activist for sex offenders. In fact, it was none other than Margie Slagle of the Ohio Justice and Policy Center.....a sort of mini ACLU.

Now we all know that Margie is ignorant about the real facts regarding sex offenders, and we all know that she has aligned herself with people who are clearly dangerous propagandists and liars. Jan Kruska, for example, who believes that the sex offender registry should be abolished along with long prison sentences, life sentences, the death penalty, civil commitments AND age of consent laws. Or, Tom Madison of SoClear Media Productions whose chief operating officer Jackie Sparling said
"The sex offender laws affect ALL sex offenders. We all know that. Therefore whether you or your loved one was charged with CP, got caught in a Romeo/Juliet type situation, or was charged with sexual assault/rape doesn't even come into play with our organization"
So, we've established the mindset. What we haven't talked about is the numerous emails Margie has sent me. From her first contact in which she lied about her purpose for reading AZ, to her accusations that I didn't know how to spell pedophile, to her attempts at intimidation and manipulation, and even blaming me because she didn't know how to navigate this blog, her attempts to harass sex abuse victims and undermine their meeting in regards to victim issues all the way to her blatant mockery of someone she believed to be a victim of child sexual abuse, point clearly to what she in fact really is. Evil.

You see, Margie told me that I didn't "walk in the path of the Lord" to which I responded:
"What would the path of the Lord entail? Telling people to put liquid latex on their face to try and deceive authorities? Registering thousands of fake email accounts to over burden the system, waste tax payer dollars and keep people from being able to do their part of a 'fun and games' thumb your nose at society sort of thing perhaps? Maybe it's ignoring the fact that there are thousands upon thousands of young children brutalized every year, for which they carry the scars forever only to have a nitwit say 'oh but there are worse things in life, let's think about the offender's rights' Take your condescending crap elsewhere you wouldn't know 'path of the Lord' if he jumped off the trail and said BOO."
That's when she pulled out the big guns. Yeah Baby. The old victim mockery trick.
"The path of the Lord is not contained in any of your ramblings. Obviously someone hurt you, and tragically it seems that your own mother allowed someone to hurt you. Perhaps it was someone she brought into your life or maybe she simply ignored other signs and failed to protect you. Perhaps she was so neglectful that you were forced into the state system."
Personally I think it appears that Margie has dyslexia or some other learning disability. Perhaps she simply has a low IQ and was ignored in school and her mother failed to teach her. But obviously her own mother dropped her on her head then tragically failed to seek treatment for her.

Now, six months later, she's claiming that wasn't mockery, oh NOooo, that was genuine concern!! NOW she tells me that she's ignorant about such things and says "I am not sure how to speak to a victim of sexual assault" And since the answer is so simple, so elementary, we'll save that for last and instead talk about things you DON'T say.

Jan Kruska:
"While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life. Most children do not die or become permanently disfigured as a result."
Shirley Lowery:
"Parents are passing their warped views on to their children. Children are taught that anything inappropriate that happens to them is the fault of someone else."
Zman aka Michael Gregg:
"Why can't we let the police do their job, and let PJ geeks get real jobs? They could be protecting the country with their hacking skills or something, yet they want to go after defenseless child predators instead of OSAMA, terrorists or other hackers!"
"If a victim does not go on with their lives, they are lost forever. If they allow hatred to control their lives, then they are, at best, no better than the one who perpetrated a crime against them."
Derek Logue:
I've noticed they're REALLY proficient at playing the victim role.
"I send a clear message to these stupid assclowns: It ain't the awful memories or humiliation that fucked you up; it's pure lack of self-support. You ain't dead, you ain't a paraplegic, and you're still alive"
"there is ALOT more wrong with our nation than just child molesters. when ones life ends up shity(mostly due to neglect and poor decision making skills)its always easier to find a scapegoat than it is to take responsibility for your own fuckups."
"Who knows for sure whether Couey did or did not do that poor little girl a favor?"
"I had a pic at one time ,wish i still had it, its called the Adam Walsh Bear,its a pic of Adam with a baseball suit and bat and his head is on a spring,kind of like a bobble head doll and at the bottom of the pic it says,,Includes spring loaded head.Search party not included."
The question Margie asked was stupid. The answer is simple: You speak to them the same way you do anyone else.

Your Questions Answered...

Monday, February 18, 2008

Shirley, I'm not one to make a mountain into a mole hill although apparently you are. But, since I'm a nice person and I firmly believe that even the simplest of rabid animals can be enlightened, I'm going to do you a favor.

# Outstanding warrant for violation of probation charge stemming from a 2004 arrest for possession of marijuana under 20 grams and possession of drug paraphernalia.
# Arrested multiple times on various charges, including burglary, carrying a concealed weapon, disorderly intoxication, driving under the influence, indecent exposure, disorderly conduct, fraud, insufficient funds and larceny.
# Arrested in 1991 on charges of a sex offense, fondling a child under the age of 16.
# Registered sexual offender in Citrus County.
# Has absconded more than once.
# Driver's license suspended for 99 years.

And don't forget that this very same person was arrested in Kissimmee in 1991 on a charge of fondling a five-year-old child or that during a house burglary in 1978, John Couey was accused of grabbing a girl in her bedroom, placing his hand over her mouth, and kissing her.

That, my sadly misguided idiot is a tad more than just being a 'two-bit burglar with no history of violence and absolutely nothing to raise red flags'. In fact, it's everything needed to raise not just one, but a lot of red flags. And yet, you would have people believe that the person with that record, the person who later committed a violent and heinous crime in which he kidnapped a child in the night from her own bedroom, help her captive for days while raping her and then forced her into garbage bags- in which he buried the 9 year old child alive in behind his mobile home, was nothing of a danger.

After reading your 'spewed from the mouth of a rotting pile of doo' commentary titled 'Victim and Victimizer: Are They the Same?', I'm left not only with a sickening feeling in my head- but a rare glimpse of a person so confused and demented by the sexual revolution that is currently being dreamed up by rapist, child molesters and other sexually deviant freaks- who would rather the laws regarding sexual abuse of anyone be wiped away so that they can carry on their hearts desires- that she can't see the truth for what it is. Couey was no innocent man lost only because of a drug problem. He was a vile creature waiting for a chance to muster the courage to carry out his heinous daydreams.

You said, and let me quote your insanity on this one:
This case was presented to a nation in such a manner as to induce public hysteria. It is time for us to remember that this is America where that sort of thing will not be tolerated.
For the health and welfare of this nation we had a right to know that the search was for a junkie rather than a sex fiend. Such careless, political power play has done irreparable harm to our country.

Let me remind you... he had a past history of sexual offenses. He broke into that home that horrible night- not to look for drugs, not to steal money... but to snatch a child from her bed. And after fillfulling that need- he didn't trade her for drugs, didn't ransom her out for money to buy drugs- but rather held her hostage for days acting out his cruel sexual desires. And even then, he didn't return her home, didn't walk away from her... didn't even allow her to walk away-

He raped her on this bed, leaving her blood and DNA

he bound her with this cord:

placed her in these bagsAnd buried her alive.

That is not a junkie... it's the deliberate acts of a sexual fiend who cared so little about the life of his victim he willingly tossed her away as if she was trash.

You continue to spew your filth by giving the suggestion of what should happen in families where sexual offender have taken as a victim of their own relatives:
The hunger for revenge is what keeps these incidents as front-burner items. There are high-profile individuals who will tell you that a child deserves what he or she gets if they aren't willing to give up a loved one for 25 years. This is typical thinking for someone who has not experienced the situation. Most kids are not going to buy in to a 25-year future of public misery. We bide our time until we can walk away legally. The family is intact and there is no stigma. It is called survival.

We bide our time? What, the public, the loving members of the family, and the child should just turn their heads, and continue living with the sexual abuse until the child is old enough to walk away? I'm suppose to look at a child and tell her 'I'm sorry your daddy rapes you every night, but just grin and bare it till you're old enough to move out'? What the fuck sort of help is that? NO Shirley, let me tell you how we save that child the proper way- we take the monster who is hurting the child, and send their sorry nasty ass to prison, then we surround the child with love, care and concern- helping them heal by undoing all of the mental abuse they experienced- also known as 'grooming' and assuring them that they aren't at fault for what was done to them. We extend a hand to them, leading them cautiously through their journey to become survivors- and rejoice as they taste life without the constant fear of 'daddy' coming over every night and raping them.

Of course you would see it a tad differently than I would- but I think most will understand it's because one of us is intent on helping stop these sexual predators- and you still open your bed to one.

So, to answer your question: Victim and Victimizer, are they the same?... I have to say, no way in hell.

Wikisposure on KPTV

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Xavier was interviewed by this news team on the Wikisposure Website! great interview!
Watch the coward Gabe refuse an interview! LOL!!!

"The most amazing feeling in the world"

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Meet Graham Christensen

AKA Cangee from GirlChat.

Graham is obsessed with science

And little girls.

Graham is a pedophile.

In fact, Graham has little girl friends.

Graham describes his ideal girl:

9 years old with bright red-orange almost shoulder length hair with bangs down to her eyebrows, skinny, fair skin and wearing cutoff jeans, choker (!!), barefeet, and a T-shirt with JAILBAIT stenciled on the front. Intelligent, talkative and friendly but maybe a little quiet at first meeting her. Physically and verbally affectionate (loves to say "I love you"). And probably the most important, curiosity, empathy and optimism.

*sigh* I'd be set for life....if only she would stay 9
Graham says he first realized he was a pedophile when he was 14 years old but thought that made him a bad person until he discovered GirlChat and discovered that his deviant desires were perfectly normal! So normal in fact that he says:

When you really get to know the right little girl it's the most amazing feeling in the world. It's not just about her body, you love everything about her. The way she smiles and giggles at all the silly things you say warms your heart and makes your whole day worthwhile living, no matter what else has happened

Graham also replies to the question "do you ever think that it is wrong?" With this:

Nope. Attraction is a feeling, not an action. Feelings are never wrong or right, only actions can be reasonably judged as being one or the other. And my attraction has never led me to take any action that was what I consider wrong.

Considering that he doesn't think sexually abusing children is wrong, I don't have much faith in that statement personally. Especially considering the ages of children he desires:

If you're asking what the youngest age is that I'm typically attracted to, it usually drops off below 4. Although there was this one really cute sweetheart of a 3 year old I thought had the sexiest little legs and feet, along with her pretty face

I couldn't help but think about Harold Spurling and Jeffrey Brisson when Graham answered the question about whether or not anyone in his real life knew about his pedophilia

The only person who knows in real life is my roommate,
who is also a GLer.

Red flags are going off here. I wonder if the parents of those little girls he's involved with know about Graham and how they would feel about the time he spends with their daughters if they knew?

I've never had a lgf that was this affectionate! When we watch a movie she'll cuddle up on the couch with me under a blanket and pull my arm around her. I think I'm falling in love.

Please visit Graham's wikisposure page, learn more about him, please let your voice be heard by letting someone know of any children you're aware of who may be in contact with him.

Graphics Courtesy of Jacey

"Hello! My name is John Clennon, and I am a pedophile"

Sunday, February 10, 2008

So speaks John Harold Clennon aka Humboldt

John, a member of GirlChat, is a pedophile who admits to uncontrollable urges regarding children.

Keyword here being uncontrollable. I think we need to know more about John and his self-control issues.

I think we need to learn why he believes that legalized child pornography would make the world a safer place for children. Yes that's what he said.

Why just the other day he stated his views that pedophiles without a visual outlet choose to rape and therefore legalizing it would help them control themselves and not violate a child. He believes child pornography is illegal because people really hate pedophiles and society is simply lying when they try to protect children from being exploited by filthy pedophiles.

I believe John is a dangerous pedophile. I believe John needs to be watched, and watched closely. Here's some things he's said. You decide.

"I think society's way of thinking is perverted, too. Look at the rest of the animal kingdom. Just get up and hump, no questions asked! What makes us so high and mighty to call the rest of the animal kingdom evil and dirty and sinful? I think the concept of humanity being anything more than or different from the rest of the animal kingdom is a perverted, distorted way of thinking."
Ah yes. The old distorted way of thinking.....
"My suggestion earlier was to selectively test and assign permits to children under the legal age who want to be sexually active. Much like driving, except way way easier, and available to much much younger people.

Naturally, parents will want their children to be safe while this activity is going on, and they'll want to make sure that no abuse or physical harm is taking place. As parents should do with any activities their child gets into, they should be within a earshot of distance, so that they can interject if any unfair abusive treatment happens. "OWWWW MOMMM!! DAAADDD!!" Child rescued, problem solved.

This is, of course, a temporary solution until society eases itself into acceptance. After that, we probably won't need permits."
He left the church in 2005 and suddenly feels "just so!"

"I definitely am a struggling man when I'm around LGs in real life. Ever since high school, back when I was in church (I had been off the porn for a while), the kids all absolutely loved me. I always played tag with them, I would throw them up in the air, swing them around, and let them sit in my lap during the sermon. After I discovered the fantasy of a child being a potential sexual being, I couldn't control my thoughts anymore when I was around them. When I threw them up in the air, I kept uncontrollably wanting to grab them where I wasn't supposed to, and when they sat in my lap, I started getting erections, right there in the middle of the sermon with the kids in my lap!"
He likes prepubescent children. Little girls specifically 5 to 12 year olds.

"I'm a 5-12yo GL (unknown in the real world) and I'm happy to have found a place where I can be accepted to share my innermost secrets about myself"
More self-control issues. He's afraid to have children of his own, unless it's a boy of course. He's not sexually attracted to boys. He's afraid he might molest his own little girls. I wonder if he's also afraid of what he might do to YOUR children

"All my life, I've wanted to have kids. Kids would be really really cool, but ever since I went pedo, I've been afraid to have them. I feel like I'd be a danger to them if I had them. Don't get me wrong, I'm really really good with kids! I would keep any child from getting hurt as if my life depended on it. But in the heat of passion, I have no idea what I'd do. I already know I can't control myself with my computer!"

"I wouldn't mind having a boy. I could totally relate to a boy without worrying about being sexual in any way towards him. I'm afraid of it being a girl, though. My sexual preferences would probably get way out of hand over the course of 18 years with a girl."

If you agree that this man poses a danger to children, visit his wikisposure page and learn more about John Harold Clennon aka Humboldt.

Graphics courtesy of Jacey

Do you believe in monsters?

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

"Do monsters really exist? Psychologist have a name for something similar to a monster it is a person with anti-social personality disorder. Psychologists consider personality disorders nearly incurable. This would make the psychologist version of a monster incurable. I however doubt the existence of monsters."
Danny Edwin Foster

Danny is a pedophile.

You may know him as Hierophant.

Or you may know him as Dan of Dark Forces.

You may simply know him as a monster.

One of many, who have spent years chatting it up with other monsters, other pedophiles over at GirlChat and sometimes BoyChat.

But one thing is for certain: He has many faces. Take a long hard look at his inner face so that you may recognize him. Remember his face.

Remember his words
"I know at what age children are mature enough to consent to sex. It is at the day of conception. At no time before the day of conception is a child mature enough to give consent to sex.

If a new born gets a hand job by some some retired old person and that new born demonstrates it's happiness with the interaction there is your consent. If however the newborn demonstrates it's discontent there is your rejection and the retired old person should stop."
His dreams
"Little girl dating services where big boys can meet little girls. That would be one definite mark of are emancipation.

Can you imagine this personals? I think they would look something like this.

Hi I am Alice. I am seven years old blond hair blue eyes. I weigh 60 pounds. I enjoy the power puff girls and barbie. I am looking for a man who will snuggle with me, spin me around, and give me baths."
Hi fetish
"Little girls in diapers

Not talking babies here. Talking 4 and up in diapers."
His self-absorption
"Why is it important to know the feelings of the partner before going ahead and doing something that is pleasurable? So the child didn't know. Why should we care?"
His cognitive distortions
"Step on thier toes and they sing.

Both AZ and PJ do us as a group more good than harm."

We're just doing our part Danny. Just doing our part. Glad you like it!

To learn more head over to Wikisposure and read all about Hierophant. The pedophile. The monster.

Zero tolerance for bad Judges/bad politicians

Sunday, February 03, 2008

Now, I'm no conspiracy theorist by any means. Quite frankly, I put most of those people in the stupid category of whom I have zero patience for. Those who believe no man ever flew into the atmosphere to land on the moon or those who think the U.S. concocted the whole 911 attacks (as if our government is that clever and adept at keeping secrets). Nope, I don’t buy it. Go figure.

However, something smells rotten in Denmark, a country whose many values systems are coincidentally shared by those in Taxachussetts (MA). Both places seem to be full of sex offender, apologizing politicians and Judges.

Repeat Sex Offender
Corey Saunders

A recent example of this is a sex offender loving Judge who allowed a level 3 sex offender to go free after serving 7 years in prison. The Judge made his case by basically suggesting the sex offender was really a pretty good guy with a low IQ, who probably just had a bad day. He let this compulsive abuser of children go back into a free society, free to rape a random, small child again. Seems that the Judge pretty much dismissed any harm this creep inflicted upon the children he abused as ‘no big deal.

Now, back to the conspiracy theories...the Judge made special note that the child rapist had not sexually assaulted anyone in 7 years.

The DOJ (Department of Justice) would surely put that on their list of non re-offending sex offenders – skewing the recidivism rates. Put that one in the -- "Score one for the baby rapers" column too! For this child hating sociopath has gone 7 whole years without sodomizing a little boy. What a swell guy! Where’s the nearest daycare center to help this poor, sodomizing, violent, child hating baby raper out? A "decent" guy, the Judge might say, who just happens to love baby boys a little too much?? (Have we not heard this ad nauseam from the pedo activists who annoy us with their inane comments on this and who are driven insane by their need for the blood of a child?)

Of course, the Judge dismissed the many experts who warned of his high risk and likelihood to rape a child again.

Here's where you have to wonder where this jerk-off Judge got his law degree, or if he has enough brain cells to put his right shoe on the right foot:


And violently raping a random 6 year old is exactly what happened when this Judge opened his heart to this dangerous child predator and trusted him to have full access to OUR CHILDREN.

Less than a year after Superior Court Judge Richard Moses let the rapist go, Corey Saunders raped a 6 year old boy in a library - in the corner of a library, where it was reported by many Boston media outlets that the little boy, completely paralyzed with fear was forced to give the man his address and was told if he told anyone, he would go to his house and rape him again. Apparently, a librarian noticed something strange and alerted his mother. (Remember, the Judge said this man had a very low IQ and was sent him on his merry way, deeming him harmless.)

Now please take special note, the former Massachusetts Governor that appointed this Judge Moses, Jane Swift, is now campaigning for Republican Treason candidate, John McCain.

Why are ACLU/sex offender supporting politicians endorsing John McCain?

One has to wonder what would happen if the truth about level 3 offenders were made public? You see, the DOJ can’t accommodate all the child rapists in prisons. They don't have the room or the resources to deal with them and loopholes make it nearly impossible to institutionalize them, so the DOJ resorts to DISHONEST information and statistics, KNOWING FULL WELL that most child rapes are NEVER reported. Their “research” is solely based on the ones that are caught by on the RAPISTS FUCKING WORD!

If the librarian hadn't of come forward about that small boy at her MA library, and later Corey Saunders was asked by his parole officer if he had had contact with a child, what do you suppose his answer would be??

It is in the DOJ's best interest to sweep this problem under the rug and claim that the SOR is managing it, but the truth is, it's not enough. THE SOR is only a tiny piece of a large puzzle where every one of our accomplishments is met by many unscrupulous people -- bad politicians – who simply want to create the illusion that they are doing everything they can to protect children when they aren't.

It is 2008 and we are only recently holding those teachers accountable for sexually terrorizing their students. Seven states are currently implementing new laws to safeguard children against predators that go into the teaching profession, in order to have easy access to children. It's hard to believe that state laws would need to invented and created in order to keep predators from assaulting children without any repercussions. Too many teachers were sexually assaulting children and then going on to teach again (and getting amnesty from the SOR). As it stands now and before new legislature prevents the continuation of this egregious act of injustice, a teacher that sexually abuses a student can go quietly, move to another district, teach again and the previous school where the unofficial charges were made simply do not get passed onto the new school.

It's also hard to believe, that teachers are fighting this kind of accountability, complaining that it puts them under too much scrutiny. God forbid, teachers are scrutinized for professional accountability and entrusting our children's safety to them.

This is an outrage but alas, the doors are about to be closed for predators that use our tax dollars to abuse our children. One by one, loopholes will be closed. Laws will be changed. Politicians will be accountable and it’s easy to do too. The more the public knows, the more they demand justice and safety for our children. This is a non-partisan issue.

We are winning, but we are also working with some people in power that don't always have children's best interests in mind, but rather look for easy solutions to atrocities that they hope only will go unreported, under-reported and unnoticed.

AZ notices though, don't we?

And we will get others to notice too. Presidential candidates will be well vetted as to whether they will sacrifice our children to rapists or if they're committed to keeping them safe. AZ is WATCHING YOU!