"Hate to tell you but in the US its called freedom of speech which means if I want to say for example that I would fuck your hot 10yo son then I have the right to say that."Update:
For those that don't know who John Tartaglia is, John first made a name for himself working as a puppeteer on the childrens television show, 'Sesame Street,' but became most well known for the lead role he played in the Walt Disney childrens television series "Johnny and the Sprites."i love my parents so much and i know they love me, but they don't understand the situation very clearly at all. and, they are both so convinced that i am not capable of hurting a child. but the thing is, i don't know that i'm not capable of it. sometimes i get scared that i am very capable of it indeed, and so maybe it is good that i am talking to this stranger. and something else my parents told me. they told me not to tell this lady too much. because i think they know the extent of some of my fantasies....
I keep having these dreams where i'm trying to fondle this little girl and crush her and bite her neck to draw blood--and i like it in the dreams--and i hate that i like it. Sometimes when i'm walking and i see someone boy or girl who i think is beautiful the first thing that comes through my mind is how erotic it would be to hurt them.....
i never couold expect a little girl to love me back. i know that when i was a little girl i wouldn't have wanted a relationship like that. Actually, i'm not even sure if i can truly consider myself to be a girllover--after all, most of my fantasies are purely physical and include hurting little girls. there is no way that can be considered girllove.
However, I am extremely hesitant to call myself a girl-lover. This is because pretty much all my fantasies are extremely violent, and although I know I’m not supposed to say this, I DO think about hurting girls – gentle romance and sexual imagery do nothing for me and never have.
But I don’t know what to do with all these feelings inside of me. I don’t know how to transfer my desire to strangle into a desire to cuddle.
TORONTO - A York University research fellow who killed himself after being charged with child pornography offences likely couldn't live with his tarnished image, a colleague says.
Police said Richard Dyde committed suicide Thursday at age 47 — one day after his arrest was made public.
Police announced on Wednesday that Dyde was among 57 men charged in connection with an international child pornography network.
York University spokesman Alex Bilyk said Dyde had been on leave from his job at the Toronto-based university since his arrest.
Police have said hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of child pornography images were traded by the network in Canada, the United States and Europe.
Police said 25 children victimized by the network were rescued, including a dozen in Canada, during the year-long investigation known as Project Sanctuary.First Childdriver AKA Jerry Douglas Ray and now this guy; I hope this is a new trend developing...
Those arrested included 25 Canadians, 26 Americans and six Europeans. Together, the 57 men faced 218 charges.
I would have loved to have seen the expression on Jeffrey Bezos' (pictured right - Amazon.coms owner) face when he saw the news.
catch a predator arrest bogus
Posted by childdriver on Friday, June 1 2007 at 09:40:23pm
...After phone contact failed, the Terrell police's tactical team was called in to serve a search warrant. When they broke in the door they heard a single shot. Conradt shot himself in the head.
Update - Based on information provided by Wikisposure, Jerry Ray was arrested on child pornography charges; he was found to have horrific videos that included very young children being raped and forced to perform sexual acts. Ray subsequently committed suicide while out on bail, rather than face the legal consequences of his choice to prey on children.
We would like to thank the Stone County Sheriff's Office for their concern and dedication. Children in the SCSO's jurisdiction are fortunate to have such fantastic law enforcement watching out for them.
 | Eric Risch AKA Eric_risch "I love boys in diapers aged 10 and under" |
 | Michael Guebara "i have some boy experiances to tell but i don't wwant to post here beause i don't want to get into trouble. i like to tell my experiances to help deal with some guilt i have. most of my experiances have sexual content." |
 | Joe Schramer AKA Joeglass626 "I am debating if I should tell my 21yo nephew that i am a pedo" |
 | Daryl Clark AKA Yogi and 'I Love Boys Undies' "I love to see boys who have wet their pants or in a nappy and plastic pants, the older te better." |
 | Jon Wesley Elam AKA JonWesley "Re: Kindergarten Children should be Encouraged to Dance Naked and Masturbate in Pre-Schools I'm all for advanced methods of teaching, but I'd rather we use these methods on older children 1st." |
"Little boys want and fucking need sex.Why cant the fucking parent see that. I believe the time is now to rise up and take our rights to hav e sex with any little boy we want. Yea I said any little boy we want. We are men with a sexual desier that needs to be for fulled. Yea I wont take no for an answer."Yeah, why can't parent's see that!?!?! Men like Mikeie have desires involving their children that need to be fulfilled! What a shining example of humanity as it stands today, here's what else this creature had to say:
"We have to take our rights by force because the fucking dods arnt going to give them to us. Brothers we have as much right to a little boy as his parents have. We have the right to take any boy willing to have sex with us into nour position to live with us we want. As far as I'm concerned boys were made for sex with men and it's our right to have any kind of sex we wish with them"Thankfully, as far as society's concerned, adult men raping little boys is highly illegal, but Mikeie doesn't stop there:
"Brothers we will take our rights and rule this world. Yea I am the Adolf Hitler of boylovers, and I'm fucking proud of it too. We must stop being cowereds, and christians, and take our place. We must do it now. Are you with me. If it takes blood so be it."You can read more about this 'wonderful' man on Wikisposure.
 | Steven Villarreal AKA SKUV "So even though you say you no longer have a specific AOA, do you have a favorite age? Mine is 8! They are extremely cute at that age, and it's possible that my attraction to them stems from the fact that the first girl I was ever attracted to was 8, when I was in 2nd grade." |
 | Leisa Drafts AKA Leisa34f "It was almost the same with my little lover she shed a few tears of embarrassment (before I touched her) but afterward we have an ever deeper bond and now she still blushes a little when I ask her to lay across my lap but she doesn’t hesitate now she knows it means I really love her." |
 | John Crowley AKA Buffalo204 "Because Of the nature of thid forum I say I'm a pedo. To say it any place else is like walking around with a chip on my shoulder. Just asking for trouble. I'm not willing to take point in the fight for pedo rights." |
 | Thayne Miller AKA Awiggin "I have been collecting sets and videos of young models for many years and I have come across some truly great models in that time. Among the greatest are Tori, Lil’ Amber (the original), Elain and a few others but Tessa is definitely in the top five." |
 | Josh "I've played a little bit with a friend's son while I was babysitting, nothing heavy, just playing and sucking his cock. He loved it, giggled all the time" |
 | Willard Dee Burkhamer AKA Movieman "The boy had a small toy car to play with. He was on his knees, setting back with his legs and feet as a setting place. Then laying on his stomach. Finally he set back on his butt with both knees bent to where they were under his chin. He had on short wide leg trouseres and no shorts. The lighting was bright enough that in the position he was setting did shine down his trousers legs. The scenery was beautiful, it was about this long laying very contentedly over his little jewel sack. Just for a few seconds then he moved again." |
Randy English, the new COO of Sosen has decided to make a splash and draw attention to himself."...we also know that it is not healthy for a family who has been devastated by a loss such as this to be cast into the spotlight, rather than having time to deal with the pain and anger in order to recover mentally and emotionally. Their pain and anger begins to rule their lives. It becomes who they are and only they know the true toll it is taking on them."This is a continuing theme among the radical extremists of Sosen - to point the finger at victims and tell them they aren't doing it right. They aren't recovering correctly or well enough or soon enough or in a way that they deem appropriate. That victims who aren't interested in rationalizing on behalf of an offender are "haters", not "true survivors", not "true victims" or "not moving on".
"At SOSEN, we do not condone what former offenders have done. In many cases the harm done by former offenders is horrendous. No one can take that away. However, we feel that with proper treatment the victims can move on with their lives and put the pain and anger behind them. We know that this is the best thing for them as many members of SOSEN are former victims who have reached out for healing and now live normal productive lives."The truth is, of course, that the only victims associated with Sosen are those who are now offenders themselves or are associated with - and advocating for an offender. Don Sweeney (a sex offender therapist turned activist) who Mary claims is an "expert" told her how amazing it was to him how many offenders went on to marry victims of child sexual abuse. But that's not amazing at all. It is a fact that offenders have a talent for targeting those most vulnerable to their manipulations. They find victims who ARE the most vulnerable and they marry them and begin another co-dependent relationship. The victims who are the strongest of all are those who don't fall prey again to this garbage, who speak up and tell their story without making excuses for their offender, who do support strict management of people who have committed these horrible crimes and in return for their strength and commitment are faced with a daily barrage of victim-bashing, mockery, badgering, and blatant victim-blaming. And yet they carry on. They ARE the "true survivors" to use Mary's term.
"It is time to bring in the experts and remove the decision making process from grieving families and politicians that have a political bias. Though we sympathize with their cause and feel angry that this has happened to their children, they are ill-equipped to make good choices when it comes to managing issues that are exceedingly diverse."Does Randy believe, that as an offender himself, he is better equipped to make decisions on these issues? Randy, along with all the Sosenites keep referring to "the experts" and yet experts all agree that everything we do regarding the management of sex offenders MUST be victim-centered.
"I would like to thank the ACLU for standing up for the truly weak, the RSO’s"I was reminded of the infamous statement from Zman:
"Why can't we let the police do their job, and let PJ geeks get real jobs? They could be protecting the country with their hacking skills or something, yet they want to go after defenseless child predators instead of OSAMA, terrorists or other hackers!"Victims of sexual abuse are "haters" and the offenders who created the victims are the weak and defenseless. That is the attitude of the extremists of Sosen.
"The mission of SOSEN is to educate the public, media, law-enforcement, and legislators regarding the facts, based on current research, of sexual abuse."Then I am quite sure that Randy English would be interested in fixing some of the errors he has made when quoting "facts".
Another Girliscious Day with Mary
Posted by Sethon Tuesday, August 17 2010 at 04:37:41pm
Yesterday I went over to see Mary's mom, Ann, and immediately Mary jumped into my arms and mentioned something about swimming. I had told Ann the day before that I wanted to take her swimming, as it may be the last time this summer we got to go. Ann can't keep a secret either, so Mary was already excited about the idea when I arrived. So we went to the pool for a couple of hours, and again for a large part of the time we were there we had it all to ourselves. Mary has this habit of clinging to me while she's in the pool, which can be charming sometimes and annoying at other times. But I didn't mind it yesterday; I was in a good mood all day.
Later we went back to my house, and I set Mary up on my computer playing games. She loves the pinball game that comes with Windows, as well as Minesweeper, although she still hasn't completely grasped the concept of the latter. I made some pizza rolls and we had a great time just hanging out. Later, after I took her home, I stayed for awhile to visit with Ann and her friend. We watched TV for a bit, with Mary in my lap the whole time. She still hadn't changed out of her swimsuit, so her behind was a bit damp in my lap, but I didn't care. I spent the whole time rubbing and scratching her back, she directing me where to scratch; she was relaxed and limber in no time. Eventually I had to slip out from under her and go home because I was getting a little too relaxed myself.
So went another girliscious day with Mary. I can't wait till I get to do it all over again. :)
My organization has done so much on the national level to shift the focus to the truly dangerous. An organization that you don't think too highly of. What's the deal?- Jim Freeman
Executive Director SoHopeful
Remember this guy? The one with the little white face? In case you've forgotten that's Jim Freeman, former executive director of SoHopeful. He's the guy who claimed he wasn't a pedophile. He's the guy who claimed he was low risk. He's the guy who claimed he didn't pose any danger -- after all he was the perfect example of "non-dangerous" sex offender wasn't he?A child named Lunsford or Kanka or Walsh with a little white face attached to it will attract more voters and PAC money. You probably will not see a "Christopher’s" law. His last name is Barrios. He has a brown face and looks too much like the dirty illegal’s the politicians and their pundits love to rant about.And
it is obvious these laws are rooted in racism and discriminationWow! Not only do they compare their struggle to escape the consequences of their own actions to the historically widespread mistreatment of other minority groups - those minority groups who weren't labeled because they had harmed someone else but merely because they were born with it. Richard Schalich has taken it to a whole new level.
Parents of murdered children are actually encouraged by law enforcement to do such things - to focus their energy - to volunteer - to lobby - to keep busy doing something to help with their grieving process. But of course Richard Schalich wouldn't be aware of that. Like the other Sosenites he's too busy trying to find someone else to blame.
What have we here? Another little white face it appears. John Couey's sex crimes went back over 20 years before he abducted, raped and murdered Jessica Lunsford then buried her alive. Of course, he'd never exhibited such horrific violence before, he wasn't considered especially dangerous. Who could have predicted what he'd go on to do? Even experts now agree that it's practically impossible to accurately predict who will or will not re-offend. Which reminds me........
This is Michael Jacques, a twice-convicted sex offender, in fact a violent rapist - who was allowed off probation early because Richard Kearney of the Department of Corrections called him a rehabilitation success. In fact Richard told the court "When I make comments about successes in sex offender treatment, I have three names of which Michael Jacques is one." Of course the court didn't know that Jacques also had other convictions........a sexual assault he'd managed to have expunged from his record. And of course Richard Kearney didn't know that at the time he told the court these things - Michael Jacques was molesting a little girl and had been since she was nine years old and continued to for the next 5 years. And of course they didn't know that he would go on to rape and kill his own niece. He had groomed everyone it appears, not only his family members but the DOC as well. He was a model sex offender alright. He also had a little white face.
Sex offenders vary widely in their risk to re-offend. Estimates suggest that 40%-45% of untreated sexual offenders will sexually re-offend in their lifetime. These rates are considerably lower than rates of re-offense for other types of violent offenders.
The most important thing California can do to reduce sexual recidivism is to implement the full Containment Model, requiring communication between an approved treatment provider, a supervising parole or probation officer, and a polygraph examiner. This approach would be victim-centered, guided by policy that protects victims and prevents future victimization.Regarding community notification the California Sex Offender Management Board says:
Alerting the community of the presence and the address of a sex offender acts as a containment tool of supervision. Effective containment strategies help to limit an offender’s contact with potential victims.And:
Each registering agency should make compliance with the state’s registration laws a priority, regardless of budgetary concerns.Mary Duval says that sex offender treatment helps over 95% of offenders who receive it. I wonder which expert she got that statistic from. Perhaps she would be so kind as to "educate our ignorance" and tell us where she learned this because I've not seen anything like that in any of the publications I read. But - the California Sex Offender Management Board did publish a nice summary of the different studies done on the effectiveness in reducing the rates of sex offender recidivism. Some of them showed a slight reduction, Karl Hanson's showed a 5% reduction, some showed no reduction at all - but the highest reduction that ANY of them showed was 40%. Which one of these should we believe, if any? Does the methodology and reliability of a study have any bearing or should that only relate to whether or not the researcher was an "expert"? The California Sex Offender Management Board said:
One of the few studies known for a superior experimental design was California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project. Final results of the relapse prevention program over an 8-year follow up period found no results for the treatment group in reduced recidivism rates.But what about recidivism? It seems we always come back to this as those people intent on proving something which is not true stubbornly and stupidly hold on to a DOJ recidivism statistic which does not accurately reflect recidivism and they KNOW IT. Admitting the truth of the matter however would disturb their agenda. So, let's again go to "the experts" - you know, the ones Kevin says we should listen to and see what they have to say. The California Sex Offender Management Board spoke of a study by Meithei, Olson, and Mitchell (2006) that followed 38,000 released prisoners in 1994 and found that sex offenders recidivated with a new sex crime less than other criminals. In fact that study said that 56% of property offenders committed another property offense while only 26% of sex offenders were rearrested for another sex crime. The California Sex Offender Management Board says:
Nevertheless it remains true that sex crimes can have such a devastating impact on their victims that even “comparatively low” recidivism rates are still unacceptably high and efforts to reduce them even further are deserving of considerable investment of efforts, resources and funding.What do you think about that? Do you think 26% recidivism with a new sex crime is a low number? Well, sure compared to thieves I suppose it is - lower, but does that make it low? Do you think that one in four sex offenders re-offending with a new sex crime is acceptable? Do you think that's a low number?
"On average most sex offenders are never caught again for a new sex offense, after five years, between 10 and 15 percent of sex offenders are detected, often convicted, of committing a new sex offense. If you follow them for ten years the rates go up somewhat, if you follow them as long as we’ve been able to follow them, which is about 20 years, the rates go up to somewhere between 30 to 40 percent of the total sample will eventually be caught for a new sex offense."And take a look at his chart:
WHAT IS THE “TRUE” RATE OF SEX OFFENDER RECIDIVISM?ATSA - (Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers) says:
Underreporting of sex offenses is another factor that influences the accuracy and reliability of recidivism rates of sex offenses. Theoretically speaking, the true rate of recidivism may have been and will always be unknown since a significant number of sex crimes are never reported by victims or are undetected by the criminal justice system. The recidivism rate is normally only estimated from officially recorded crime statistics. Therefore, all recidivism rates, including those for sex offenders will be underestimated for one reason or another.
Because not all sex offenses are reported, it is difficult to accurately measure the true rate of repeat offenses. However, based on convictions for sex offenses, Hanson (2006) estimated the following rates of recidivism:
It has come to the attention of CASOMB that there has been some controversy about the dissemination, use and possible misuse of some draft papers about recidivism which had been distributed and discussed at Board meetings and which had been posted on the CASOMB website for a time. This statement is an attempt to clarify the matter and preclude any misuse of these two papers.Of course none of this explains why Sosen - attempting to back up their claim - would quote Anderson Cooper saying sex offenders had lower rates of recidivism than other criminals - as though that had any bearing on how many sex offenders DO reoffend. But seriously... Anderson Cooper? I didn't realize he was a recidivism expert. They sure got one on me there! Blind-sided me! On the other hand, anyone can clearly see that I must be one of those "uneducated ignorant sheeple" turned rogue vigilante out here flapping my lips trying to educate people about the misinformation Mary Duval is trying to educate them with. For God's sake, beware.
CASOMB wishes to state clearly that the papers in question have never been officially approved, sanctioned or published as finished statements by the Board. In fact, precisely because they are regarded by the Board as being misleading and easily subject to misinterpretation, they should not be seen as anything but provisional drafts reflecting the Board’s work process – a process which is not now and which may never be completed - due largely to the elusiveness of the data which would allow the Board to produce a complete and acceptable statement.
Tim Merrigan was initially exposed during Wikisposures Alice Day outings for his postings on the pedophile message board "TKGL.""Birth to puberty. I absolutely adore their bald little slits, and it's everything I can do to resist fingering them."Warped is an understatement, it get's worse. Here's one of Tims "fantasies" involving his own children:
"In Reply to: #1 fantasy posted by pumper on March 20, 2008 at 23:08:44:My two or three year old daughter hears me opening the front door and runs to me, naked, shouting "Daddy's home!" takes out my cock and sucks me off."
In this next comment pay attention to the way Merrigan describes children:
"IME most people writing in these taboo areas write (and read) about their fantasies, and/or to exorcise psychic demons. I, for instance, like stories involving very young, newborn through early childhood, girls in sexual situations, including but not limited to non-consensual, violent, rape, snuff, and cannibalism. Also however, including loving gentile sex from loved ones. A lot of that is incest simply because of access.This is how pedophile activists really think of children, behind the lie of "childlove." Kids are objects, not people to them, there to be used and passed around.I haven't actually experienced any of that, either as giver or recipient. If the social and legal climate were different I might have enjoyed a loving sexual relationship with my sister, 40 to 50 years ago, and/or with my daughter(s) and/or granddaughter(s) now, starting as soon as they were born, and continuing till they were giving me new daughters to play with"
"This group is for fantasy, saying it's anything other than fantasy is too dangerous, that would be confessing to a crime."I wonder what exactly Tim means by this?
Wikisposure celebrates Alice Day 2010 with some fresh new Wikisposure articles for members of the pedophile activist community: | Raimund Wild "I state Boy-LOVE and they accuse me of using it as a codeword for child sexual abuse. However this is not what I stand for. When I use the word LOVE I do mean LOVE and not SEX. And in the same token one has to begin to define CHILD restricted to a person below the age of puberty and teenage years, and not call a 15 or 17- year-old a “Child”." |
Mavrick AKA Daniel Bellows "In the church that I serve we have five bls [pedophiles] that I know of, and perhaps more that have not come forward as of yet. There are two of them that work with the youth group on a regular basis.... They told me of thier orientation and I have not held that against them. If they want to work with the youth group, fine, but they must adbide by the rules that all the other adult sponsers do." | |
 | WikidJuggalo101 AKA Michael Koza "what would u do if your syf (Special Young Friend) said, "i love u"? "My YF says those words all the time i say it back to him"" |
 | Technikal AKA Glenn Whittaker "Topic: Emo boys "Emo boys are just sooooooooo hot...and interesting...."" |
 | Joe Power "Once again I will assert that the persecution of man/boy relationships is a symptom of a much deeper societal disease - the artificially manipulated fear of sexual freedom..." |
 | Wzzzy AKA Steve McNabb "I have a YF, and we are not sexual....but anyone can see our deep love for each other...I, as the adult, have chosen not to be sexual with him...he wants to be sometimes...but that would be unfair for him at this point in his life....and I will not take advantage of his vulnerability(sp)" |
 | Tim Merrigan In response to a story written about a drugged girl, Tim replies: "Left leaving her unconscious and naked on the floor? He could have at least left her laid out on the bed, ready for the next guy. (And left the door open to show she wasn't being used at the moment.)" |
PersonInMyOwnEyes AKA John-Paul Vitale "If anything, I'd probably say "just once". As weird as it might sound, I feel, being her father, that I should be the one to take her virginity but that it should only be a 1-time thing. Most people probably find this weird but that's how I feel right now." | |
 | Libertarian777 AKA Robert Stotzky "Sexuality and attraction is a touchy subject. I should know. I am after all a "girllover" of sorts myself, but not a pedophile. My attraction is not to prepubescent children, but to teenagers, adolescents. More specifically teenage girls. But when you're 30 that's bad enough in the minds of most people." |
Ch0hag AKA Matthew King "To me, thinking about sex with little girls other than the one I want to be my girlfriend is somehow disrespectful or (for want of a better word) adulterous. On the other hand, I feel (slightly?) ashamed when I fantasize about her because she herself is much more important to me than the one small part of her that is to do with sex." | |
 | Hugger AKA Walter Davis BoyChat Member |
 | Redpalm AKA Randy Higby "Leo, I knew a little 9 year old girl quite a few years back that loved to have her bottom rubbed and spanked! She layed across my lap several times and let me spank her. She had the cutest little bubble butt to spank. I loved it and would love to discuss this topic with you soon." |
How much are we willing to sacrifice to "save one child?"Let's ask Mary Duval and see what she has to say on the subject - of saving one child.
Whatever we do it could help our sons. And, you know, it's a huge fight, I mean - It's us against the people and the government and so we must start with education and hopefully educate America
In the end I'm sure Cathy and Lisa agree you know, as long as we save one child it does give me a little peace in my heart. My heart breaks every day but I know if I can save one child - a boy or girl - then you know, at least I've done something good for this country.
Little boy,Harold Spurling does not fit Mary Duval's definition of "truly dangerous".
Pull me inside
The sweet dream that is you.
Let me hold you;
Let me breathe you in.
You justify my beating heart.
With you, the world and its endless troubles
Ceases to exist ...
Paradise doesn't hold a candle
To you.
Sweet expression of perfection;
Infantile bliss.
You run through my veins,
My lifeblood.
"The problem is, MOST child sex crimes or child abuse is caused by someone the child knows and trusts such as a family member. It is also mostly due to parental neglect. IF a child is NOT left alone or unattended, such as walking to and from school or the park then they could not and would not be abducted."We know that most young children do know their abuser in some way but I fail to see how that fits into Donna's philosophy. I found it quite interesting that while Donna was screaming "there's no stranger crimes" as her Pillar Number One she forgot about her own husband.--Donna Kistler
We're after violent sex offenders who rape, commit sexual battery, murder, aggravated murder, kidnapping with a sexual motivation and prey on our children. Those are the kind of offenders we're after.Ken Lanning replied:
What we have to understand is that the major distinction between the sexual victimization of adults and the sexual victimization of children is one simple word: consent.
With adults in order for it to be a sex crime you have to have lack of consent and violence. You can have sexual criminals, sexual assault of children, without there being any violence.
And because an offender happens to groom and manipulate and seduce a child who cooperates in their victimization, those individuals, in my opinion, can be very dangerous. They are the most persistent and prolific of all known child molesters.
And to simply exclude individuals who happen to groom and seduce adolescent children doesn't make any sense to me.
