Alfred Kinsey, Scientist or Baby Raper?

Concerning Steve Diamond, his wiki says:

Diamond is very cocky and full of himself. He believes he has been through all the hardships life has to offer, and therefore everyone needs to listen to what he says.

For those that don't remember him, Steve's the guy that had so many blogs hijacked by Rez from Acme Cleaning Services. Rez hijacked his blog, Stevie boy started another one and Rez promptly hijacked that one, etc. Some of his blogs only lasted mere hours. Steve is a pedophile. He's a boyhater. He's a pervert, and a stupid one at that. Why just today on BoyChat, a haven for the cognitively distorted, Steve proves once again his stupidity. He quoted Dr. Judith Reisman as saying:

"For his wholly unscientific sex experiments on at least 317 children, Kinsey’s pederast team used stopwatches to record their little victims,’ “convulsions” and “hysterical weeping (especially among the younger children)” and “striking” the [adult] “partner” who was violently sodomizing the child. Kinsey testified these torturous cries of terror were “orgasms” that the babies enjoyed."

Well what's wrong with that, you may ask. Nothing. Nothing at all. But what is wrong is what Steve had to say about it.

• she makes it sound like hundreds of infants were being tortured
• Is this woman delusional?...
• she litters her essay with very emotion laden terminologies
• she crosses the line with this behavior, to an obscene extreme
• This is a cheap, low handed tactic, for which people like her are considered infamous
• This has fundamentalist, extremest written all over it
• those sorts are in utter lack of objectivity
• They don't see clearly enough, to have the ability to make any sort of sound judgement
• This is clearly somebody who already had their thoughts set in stone, right from the beginning...and she ran to whatever sources she could find that would back up her own bigotry...and, of course...there are many bigots like her, in this field.
• A fine example of a moral imperialist, and a moral elitist, if ever there was one

Here's your answer Stevie boy Diamond. You quoted Dr. Reisman's words, but in your haste to look like an idiot.....you didn't realize that she was quoting Kinsey himself. Those words were his words. Those descriptions were his descriptions. He was the radical, he was the nonobjective one, he was the one unable to see clearly enough to make a sound judgment, he was the cheap, low handed, bigoted obscene extremist. So why don't YOU get YOUR facts straight first, eh Stevie? It seems to me that it is you who is clueless, not Dr. Reisman

Originally posted July 20, 2006:

As you may know Alfred Kinsey is considered The Father of the Sexual Revolution. His infamous publications Sexual Behavior in the Human Male 1948, and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female 1953 are directly linked to the current attitude Anything Goes.

These publications have created change in our legal system, our educational system, penal system, health care system, and societal values and mores.

His reports are widely quoted by pedophiles and those seeking abolishment of age of consent laws. However, most of us don't really know much about those reports or the far reaching effect they've had on all of our lives.

While I had intended giving you a thorough report about him, there is simply too much information out there to include here on a blog entry. So instead I'll give you a few brief facts. Enough so that you will know to dismiss pedofreaks claims with reference to Kinsey's work.

• Much of his data was retrieved from the diaries of convicted child molesters
  
• Much of his data was retrieved from a Nazi's experiments on Jewish children during WWII
  
• 25-48% of his subjects were in prison and/or deviant males, of which 1400 were classified as sex offenders.
  
• 'Married' women included prostitutes (as long as they lived with a pimp)
  
• Much of his 'scientific' data came from pedophiles, not 'technically trained' experts as he claimed.

In 1979, after Alfred Kinsey died, Paul Gebhard his co-author and the Director of the Kinsey Institute, released some of the data used, its quite impressive, if you know what I mean.

Gebhard revealed that of the 18,000 interviews, 5,300 white males accounted for the research base in the Male Volume; of that 5,300, 2,446 were designated as convicts, 1,003 homosexuals, 50 transvestites, 117 mentally ill, 342 “Other,” 650 sexually abused boys. This yielded 4,628 n=Aberrant and 873 n=“Normal” Male subjects.
NIMH Grant The Kinsey Data; Marginal Tabulations, 1979, p. 3. -6

In Chapter 5 of Kinsey's Male volume, he reports his findings on child orgasms. His famous Table 34 gives the age of the child (a total of 317 children experimented on) ranging in age from 2 months to 14 years. He has documented the number of orgasms that he was able to illicit from them and the time it took to achieve them, measured on a stop watch. The results are appalling, including an 11 month old, 7 orgasms reported in 9 minutes. A 2.5 year old, 4 recorded in 2 minutes. A 13 year old, 3 recorded in 70 seconds. And on and on and on.

But how did they measure those orgasms on those young babies and toddlers we might wonder. From Sexual Behavior in the Human Male pp160-161

Orgasm was defined as follows:

"Extreme tension with violent convulsions: ...sudden heaving and jerking of the whole body... gasping... hands grasping, mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding; whole body or parts of it spasmodically twitching...violent jerking of the penis...groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children).... hysterical laughing, talking, sadistic or masochistic reactions... extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting of subject.... some...suffer excruciating pain and may scream ...if the penis is even touched....some...before the arrival of orgasm, will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax although they derive definite pleasure from the situation."

Need I really say anything else about Kinsey?

Interview: Dr Judith Reisman

Dr Reisman is the President of the Institute for Media Education. She has served as an advisor to various international governments and as an expert witness in many court cases. Further to this, she is the author of multiple journal articles and four books including Kinsey, Sex and Fraud and Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences. Dr Reisman has kindly agreed to speak with us today about Kinsey and paedophilia.




On your website, you refer to the "world according to Kinsey", can you explain the conditions of that world and whether they affect us today?

Alfred C Kinsey was the recognized "father of the sexual revolution" the creator of the return of "free love" for what had slowly become a fairly civilized society. In 1948 as he and his followers sold his "philosophy" of sex, intimacy and love worldwide, they reshaped our world. Even Margaret Mead, hardly a puritan, knew that Kinsey's phony "numbers" would wreck havoc with society. He could not distinguish between a woman "and a sheep," she noted.

Kinsey was himself a fanatic sexual psychopath, a bi/homosexual pornographically addicted adulterous sadomasochistic male with obvious proclivities for young boys, a man who solicited and directed the sexual torture of up to 2,035 infants and children as young as two months of age. Ask yourselves, in this era of Congressman-child molesters, what kind of justice can women and children expect from our elected officials and from those they appoint? Academicians, law enforcement, elected and pastoral officials will choose people likely to do as their “leaders” expect. Kinsey chose only disordered people to be near him, to do his research. That is normal. Elliot Ness wouldn't surround himself with Mafia men and Mafia men certainly wouldn't have an honest man nearby. That means the disease spreads—hire or appoint only those you know you can blackmail or control.

When adults are permitted to be narcissistic and self indulgent they naturally are abusive of those weaker than they. Kinsey was, on the evidence, the most important "philosopher" of the 20th and even the 21st Centuries. His philosophy of life was not original, not new, but very old. He revived the selfish gene philosophy, even largely repudiated by Darwin himself, and he and his patrons and followers have engrained their neo-pagan philosophy into all of Western society—not a small accomplishment for a lone sexual psychopath. We now have Kinsey’s philosophy operative everywhere we turn, from the kinds of media we view to the sodomies and promiscuity that is force fed to children in schools, the mass media, even some church venues, as well as the laws -- enforced or not. It's a Kinsey world.

You've spoken about the "international academic pedophile movement" you observed in 1977. Do you feel this group has gained momentum and what are the implications of such movement? Do you see any parallels between the Kinsey reports and the Rind et al study?

You know, I cannot address this question or that of the current Congressional expose without facing the fact that leadership in the effort to legalize child abuse comes largely from the male homosexual movement. At the 1977 conference it was largely male homosexual power—pederasty-- that was in evidence calling for child access. Just as Kinsey “normalized” adult access to boys so too did the Rind authors, the lead two of whom also were showcased in Paidika, The Journal of Paedophilia, a Dutch based publication, that has been advocating for an end to age of consent and "man-boy love" as their mission statement.

Male heterosexual abuse of women and girls skyrockets within any environment that demeans and degrades women. Of course, as pornography increased so too does heterosexual addiction to this erototoxin. Erototoxins are therefore causal in the increase of sex and non sex crimes against women and girls, wives, girlfriends, ones children, ones students, etc. (Depending on the data you use we can suggest well over a 1000% increase in sex crimes post 1948). So yes, it is only logical that Rind et al cite to Kinsey and all of his followers as "experts" in their bogus report.

Considering the direction of the paedophile movement in the 21st century, what do you consider the most compelling finding you made about Kinsey?

The most compelling finding is probably how dependent the entire "field" of human sexuality is upon Kinsey and his reputation. I admit to being surprised that I found no real support at all in the academic world for these obvious, well documented findings. Despite evidence, smoking guns galore, the Kinsey Institute continues unhindered, financed by state, federal and private foundation money. Now the merger of Big Pharmacology, Big Pornography, Big Sexology and Big Media is a multi billion dollar corporate merger. The money made of sexual dysfunction, depression, disease, abortion, and all of the fallout from that in STD vaccines mandated for children, etc., makes Big Tobacco look like a nursery school party.

So the cover–up, the "circle the wagons" mentality was perhaps the most significant “scientific” finding of all. Kuhn wrote about the “bandwagon” effect and that isn’t even the half of it. “Science” disappears when authorities think their reputations will be harmed as "experts." This has been THE major SCIENTIFIC finding. Kinsey's fraud, without question the most significant and influential scientific frauds in our century is untouchable! Just as Mead, Freud, Rodgers and Maslow and others were discredited, just as the evidence has discredited the entire sexual revolution, their academic fields, text books, grants, papers and professors soldier on, professing it never happened.

The Yorkshire Television documentary, Kinsey's Paedophiles even located a German Nazi who contributed his on going rapes to Kinsey but our media won't play the British documentary. The cowardice of the so called scientific community is palpable. Tragic indeed.

Thank you Dr Reisman for taking the time to speak with us.

Further details of Dr Reisman's life and work can be found here.

*Photograph used with express written permission from Dr Reisman.

Twilight 's Brains Fell Out

Twilight said:

I said looking at child pornography is a social taboo, and that that shouldn't be the reason it's illegal.

It should be illegal to try and lessen the amount of CP being made.

I'm thinking that perhaps that was a Freudian slip. I hope.

I agree with the anti-CP laws as long as they're being enacted for the right reasons

Child pornography shouldn't be illegal just because people think it's wrong for adults to view or own, as that would imply that it's being banned on puritanical reasons

While I would have expected such a statement from the militant psychopathic Demosthenes, the nauseating Lindsay, the wishy-washy Todd, the completely-without-a-shred-of-empathy Turtle, the deranged Danny Wyatt, the immature BlueRibbon, the academic-wanna-be Jillium, the I'm-at-war-no-I'm-not-yes-I-am Silent War, the psychotic mathematician olive freak, the I'm-a-writer-who-can't-spell Crake, the everyone-stop-molesting-children-and-collecting-childporn-so maybe we can fake some people off Rookieeeeee, the liar BB, the forgettable JD420, the please-stop-ruining-child-abusers-lives Pedo-Ken, or even the inarticulate, trouble-making dimwitted Debatecrime, but I NEVER expected it from you TWI.

Bignewsday answered you best when he said:

Child porn should be illegal because it exploits and harms children. For this reason, anyone knowingly producing, possessing, or viewing child porn is breaking the law and should be locked up. Whether someone is paying for it should have no bearing on whether or not a crime has been committed.

I'd like to just ask you some questions, why do you think it's wrong to kill? Or do you? Could it be social taboo? Who decides? Who decides what's right or wrong? Who decides how best to have an order to society. Do you believe there should be any laws at all? As a law will necessarily step on someone's toes, maybe there should be none. Maybe we should all live lawlessly and every man (or child) for himself. Perhaps you believe psychopaths should just run rampant. Perhaps you believe that the right of the pervert to inflict himself upon the innocence of our youth and forever change their lives is more important than for children to have the right to not be exploited. Hmmm I do indeed wonder about you.

I personally think you're a victim of the Kinsey era..... the "anything goes and it's ok that we restrained babies and molested them for hours on end because we have a biased reason to do so" mentality.

Or it could simply be that you aren't the same Twilight I met a few months ago. I believe you are heavily influenced by the pedovore community. In one breath you say you agree with something here on AZ and the next you say something so asinine it

Takes Your Breath Away

I told you yesterday to give it a couple of days to think on it, but your youthful impatience got the best of you and you spouted off this nonsense here. You either go put on your thinking cap and think reeeeeaaaaaaaal hard and tell me what's wrong with this picture I'm getting of you. If you can't do that---Don't you DARE come back here and speak one more word, or you will be deleted on sight forever and ever amen.

And by the way, where's your cohort Jillium? His cat got his prolific tongue maybe? Or maybe he's hunched over his computer searching desparately for journal abstracts. Tell him I'm waiting for him.