Quoth the Antis, Nevermore!

The pedophile message board GirlChat takes its domain name (annabelleigh.net) from an Edgar Allan Poe poem, Annabel Lee. They believe he was a pedophile and that the contents of that poem is evidence of such. But if we examine Poe's life and that poem, the assertion falls pathetically flat.

For instance, they'll say

"Poe married his 13 year old cousin Virginia when he was 27. WA LA, he was a pedo!"

The facts of Poe's life contradict the idea that he was a pedophile.

• When he married Virginia, she was NOT a prepubescent child!
  
  
• She suffered from tuberculosis. The evidence suggests that the two did not share a romantic love and never consummated the marriage.
  
  
• At that time, it was not unusual for cousins to marry and the life expectancy was lower therefore it was not uncommon for girls to marry younger than they do today.
  
  
• There is significant evidence of Poe's attraction to adult women.
  
  
• Many scholars conclude that these facts together suggest that Poe suffered from an Oedipus complex (mother fixation) or other condition stemming from childhood which prevented him from having meaningful relationships with women. In this way, it makes perfect sense for Poe to marry someone with whom he could have a platonic relationship.

The reason they chose the poem Annabel Lee is because it contains the line "I was a child and she was a child" and on the surface appears to talk about romantic love. BUT:

• Even if you take this line at its literal meaning, both the people here are children, NOT a child and an adult.
  
  
• The identity of "Annabel Lee" is unknown.
  
  
• Clearly this would not make sense if he was talking about Virginia. Indeed it doesn't make sense related to anyone in Poe's life except his first love Sarah Elmira Royster; they were teenagers when they fell in love but were separated when Poe went to university.
  
  
• Scholars have related this poem to Poe's presumed Oedipus complex and some have suggested he wrote the poem about his mother.
  
  
• Whether you take the poem at its literal or subtle complex meaning, there is nothing to suggest that it in anyway relates to pedophilia.

Close examination of Poe's life reveals no evidence of pedophilia. This is merely a pedophile tactic dreamed up to try to convince you they're ok. Even if Poe was a pedophile, they still wouldn't be ok.

Poe never had a relationship as an adult with a prepubescent child and that is a fact. The only evidence of pedophilia in his life is a series of misrepresentations of the truth.

And the antis demand that pedophiles misrepresent Poe NEVERMORE!

Show your support, copy and paste the code below onto your blog/website:

<a href="http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2008/04/quoth-antis-nevermore.html"><img src="http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/3774/aliceday2008raven11smalrk3.png" width="175" border="0" title="Alice Day - Nevermore" /></a>

A big thank you to Jacey for the amazing graphic!

Happy Alice Day

Repost from April 25, 2007. Help us countdown to Alice Day 2008!

This is tough work we do, isn't it? I think it's time we all took a breather. So kick back and help us as we celebrate the Anti's hijacking of Alice Day.



If you'd like to see more visit HEREand HERE and HERE

Thank you to all the Anti's!

Alice Day Facts

April 25. Alice Day. A day created by heterosexual pedophiles to celebrate the abuse and exploitation of little girls. So named for Alice Liddell who inspired Lewis Carroll's monumental work Alice In Wonderland in 1862. It was a story Carroll created for Alice while rowing her and her sisters in a rowboat.

The innuendo child molesters drew from this: Carroll had to be a pedophile! Alice must've been the object of his desire! She belongs to us! No man could tell a child a story simply to entertain her, NO that's not possible!

Of course, the fact that Carroll photographed Alice only compounds the pedophile delusions.

What they don't want you to know however is the most important part of the Carroll/Liddell story. Here are a few of the highlights:

• Fact: It is a myth that Alice was Carroll's "favorite" photographic model. There is no evidence of this.
• Fact: Carroll often entertained women in his rooms at the University....some were married. This was against every social standard and many would be damaged if this information came to light.
• Fact: Carroll's heirs purposefully promulgated the myth of Carroll as the blundering social misfit who was not comfortable around adults. They could not afford for the truth to come to light so they destroyed the entries in his diary that would've explained Carroll's split with the Liddell family.
• Fact: In the late 1800's in England, adoration of children did not raise eyebrows. Entertaining married women in private quarters and owning a collection of adult porn when you're a Reverend did.
• Fact: There is no evidence that Carroll felt anything stronger than friendship for Alice. Repeat: NO evidence that Carroll was a pedophile in general or that he had feelings for Alice specifically.
• Fact: ALL evidence suggests that Carroll was actually just a normal person and the myth that he was a pedophile is the means the family used to hide the deep, dark family secret.....that Carroll was an adulterer at worst.
• Fact: Carroll took Alice's older brother Harry out on the same rowboat years before Alice. This was not a romantic encounter but something Carroll had been doing to entertain the Liddell family for years before he ever took Alice.

The family hid his secrets hoping to protect his reputation. Unfortunately they unwittingly played into the hands of an even more sinister gang than British aristocracy - pedophiles.

Indeed if all available evidence is considered in context then this day to celebrate the love of Carroll's would more aptly be named Lorina Day for Alice's mother.

Of course fans and scholars alike have recognized that there is no evidence Carroll was a pedophile. But there's always a *certain* kind of person who will just never get it.

The myth that Carroll was a pedophile is only that - a myth. So much so that it even has a name (The Carroll Myth). Google the phrase, examine the evidence and decide for yourself.



Link to this post!
<br /><br /><a href="http://absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/04/alice-day-facts.html"><img src="http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m314/absolutezeroteam/Alice05.png" border="0" title="Alice Day Facts" alt="Alice Day Facts" width="175" /></a><br />

A Profile of Pedophilia Part 3

We previously talked about the Mayo Clinic report on pedophilia Part 1 and Part 2. Continuing on now we'll talk about how pedophiles locate their victims. But first we should probably ask just how widespread is the problem anyway? Pedophiles, after all, are known for their continued insistence that child advocates are hysterical lunatics.

Two Canadian studies found that 32% of women and 15.6% of men had experienced "Unwanted sexual contact" before the age of 17 years.

That's roughly 1 out of 3 females, and 1 out of 6 males. I wouldn't call our reaction hysterical would you? So where and how do they "gain access to children"? Per this report:

Pedophiles often intentionally try to place themselves in a position where they can meet children and have the opportunity to interact with children in an unsupervised way, such as when babysitting, doing volunteer work, doing hobbies, or coaching sports.

Pedophiles usually obtain access to children through means of persuasion, friendship, and behavior designed to gain the trust of the child and parent.

The report goes on to outline the characteristics of children and their families.

Parents of children who had been abused by pedophiles had notable characteristics, such as a lower overall education and a higher rate of absenteeism from home. The mothers of abused children had less education than control group mothers and were more likely to be single parents. The fathers tended to be of lower socioeconomic and educational levels than controls.

Descartes tells us the secret to finding boys if you're a pedophile. He's a little worried about violating the "unwritten BL code" but feels that it's not fair to other pedophiles not to know how to find victims. The key, he says, is not to go after the most attractive, the most well-adjusted, the happiest boys. No, the pedo must lower his standards and be willing to take boys less attractive, poorer and with physical and/or emotional handicaps. THEN he can get all the boys he wants. The Mayo Reports says:

The pedophiles stated they would choose vulnerable individuals (eg, children living in ia divorced home, emotionally needy or unhappy children) and/or children who were receptive to their advances, even if that child did not meet the pedophile's usual physical pattern of attraction

Bill Evans says:

Whatever made you think it was otherwise? How many times have you seen posters here talk about having y/fs from happy, loving homes? Those boys don't need to turn to someone outside the family for support. I have had a couple of y/fs from those sort of homes, but we never had the kind of close friendship I usually develop with kids from dysfunctional familes.

The kids from good homes are just along for the fun, but kids from dysfunctional homes, or no home, want a whole lot more...

Boys don't want to be with Bill Evans or other pedophiles simply because it's "Normal and natural and something that they NEED and want" No according to Bill, the only boys who would be interested in being with a pedohead are those who are disadvantaged and needy in some way. He said it himself!!

Thunderchild says:

I've been working with boys since not long after I got out of prison. I've had some failures, but I've had many more successes.

There's no gaurded secret to spending time with boys.

I've been convicted more than once for BL stuff and even today I spent some time with a boy under the AOC

Meeting boys is easy

Vespucci:

Buy a basketball and shoot hoops every day at the local poor people park

been there done that:

In most cases the parents are too busy trying to make ends meet to devote time to their kids. The politically incorrect terms for some of these families is "white trash"

UKBoy:

I've found that if you get a really fancy car....and live in a family neighborhood, then boys will eventually come when they see you washing or fiddling with it. Nothing attracts a boy more than hanging out with a man doing mans stuff

Silvrspun: Just crawls through little boys windows and takes what he wants.

Cheshir Cat:

...I lurk around schools. Most of the LGs I know, I met through one of the following ways:
*Schoolmates of my daughter
*Friends' daughters and young cousins/sisters
*Roleplayers
*Friends of the above categories.

Principia Mathematica

I am regularly stared at by LGs and occasionally jump on the webcam and hook up with kids....... What's most important is to be, and act, more like a member of their peer group than just another adult

Enigma:

My heart aches. I feel weak. I want, so badly.....How can I not be obsessed? Nothing else is important in life. Little girls are my heroin, and I am an addict

While these guys are making these statements above, they are claiming no relationship with child molesters. Whenever a pedophile is arrested they rush to his defense saying things like: "How sad that one is persecuted for a consensual act of love" Or, in a particularly bad case such as Jessica Lunsford their arguments quickly switch to "He's not even a pedophile! No! He's a child molester!" As if there were a difference.

And how would you explain THIS:
Wayne Bleyle a respiratory therapist working at a long term care facility for seriously ill children....convicted of molesting brain-damaged, comatose boys and girls, taking cell-phone photos of himself in the act and posting them on the internet. When his home computers were seized tens of thousands of graphic images of children, some engaged in sex acts with adult males were discovered. When Bleyle was asked how many children he had molested he stated calmly "How many snowflakes are out there?" Bleyle stated that he selected children based on their inability to speak because if they couldn't talk, they couldn't tell anybody they had been attacked. Included in his victims were a 2 year old girl and a boy who was still in diapers. He received 45 years in prison based upon a plea agreement.

Bleyle is a pedophile.

And how do we explain only one month later the arrest of Christopher Alan Irvin for the exact same thing......at the exact same hospital?

An ICU nurse Irvin confessed to the molestation of a patient....a comatose 4 year old girl......twice. His home computers containing hundreds of child porn images including videos and his hand-written journals with entries like:

"I want to lay down at night & feel love & the presence of a (loved, comforted) little girl...."

"This is killing me. The little girl downstairs is playing and I want to go play with her, ahhhh!!!"

"Oh God, I've strayed"

"I easily and often fall in love with young children"

"I suffer because I crave this and try to satisfy it"

He received 14 years in prison under a plea agreement.

Irvin is a pedophile.

In these instances here we have two men both abusing brain injured children incapable of saying yes or NO. Incapable of asking for help. They were trapped within their little damaged bodies in their little beds....at the mercy of monsters and like all predatory creatures these men took what they wanted.

It should come as no surprise to us that BoyChatters have previously discussed this very thing. Babylove asked the question:

"Would it be okay to have consensual sex with a mentally handicapped person? A mentally handicapped person may have the intellectual capacity of a 3 yr old"

floating point:

If it is consensual, why not?

SilVered:

The only reason it is now dangerous is because of the hysteria. As Hyacinth and other boylovers have expressed from their very, very past experiences when sex was not as guarded, it was a much simpler decision with no consequences......I don't believe in any AOC, I believe in BOUNDARIES

foo:

While this may come as a surprise to you, not much intellect is required for sex.

Silent Sufferer:

What does IQ have to do with having sex?

JD420:

We own the globe

SG:

Nobody here condones rape, and those of us who would engage in sexual behavior with children despite the possible legal ramifications would certainly want to obtain a higher level of consent than just a lack of complaint.

dannywyatt:

Let nature work naturally; that's why children are able to reproduce.

And let us not forget 28:

Erotic encounters, involving no penetration, should be at worst minor annoyances.

Last but certainly not least we should consider MrDOB:

We are victims too.....We come from all walks of life, races, religions, ages, socio-economic brackets and what-have-you. And, in many cases, can go through our whole life without ever harming a child.

Or Lindsay Ashford who believes it's perfectly acceptable to inflict sexual contact upon a 6 month old....who he believes can consent to sexual activity with a 30, 40, 50 yr old man? I suppose Lindsay would approve of Bleyle and Irvin's behavior. After all those assaulted children weren't really harmed were they? Compared to the pleasure it brought to the pervert? How about the child porn sting last fall. Horrible images, children bound and raped. Children so young they had pacifiers in their mouths. "d" says:

So, instead of saying "ohmygawdtheyareabusinginfants thebastards!" the police and news should be saying "thank goodness these kids won't remember what happened."

What all of this means is that these men are all the same. Pedophiles are child molesters. Child molesters are pedophiles. They all think the same way, they operate the same way, and they talk the same way. They are animals, rabid and out of control. Children are mere objects to them. Lindsay said :

the pictures are meant to show that we GLs see girls as objects of beauty, not merely as sexual objects

Like I said, children are mere objects to pedophiles. When Lindsay was asked what attracted him to little girls he said:

There's just this way that they walk, all carefree and all that. And the way that they smell, and their bodies are ever so .... ripe.....

Pedophiles try to explain all of this away with their rationalizations, justifications and lies. Apparently in their distorted thinking these things make sense to them. If not for the fact that they harm children, one could almost feel sorry for them. They are, after all, quite pathetic subhuman creatures. The problem however is that that they are EVIL pathetic creatures and therefore beneath contempt. Their excuses and attempts to always misplace blame is hard for us to understand and comprehend. After all, we force kids to eat properly.....so what do we know?

It's like when you feed a child vegetables at a young age, that child might not be able to consent to vegetables until 3 or 4 when they say "I don't like vegetables" but you still feed it to them as babies. It doesn't create psychological trauma in their future when you fed them vegetables at that age. Sex is something I think a child needs to experience and learn about as they progressively grow to maturity

Who are these men?

What do the following men have in common?

• Lindsay Ashford
• Tom O'Carroll
• Charles Rust-Tierny
• John Murray Melanson
• Damien Cole

Along with all the visitors we get here at this blog who arrive here under the most sickening of search terms.

• 10 year old boys pedo pictures
• cp innocent youth porn
• pedofilia photos kids
• pedofilia videos
• pedo vaginal penetration 3 year old
• child molesting pics
• pedofilia pics
• boylove videos
• pedofilia free video
• little pedo child pics
  
• young boys raped by pedophiles pics

Hey, I don't make this stuff up folks. Those are from just the last few hours and doesn't take into account all the pedo boy, pedo girl, pedo chat, pedo blog, pedophile, pedosexual pedo pedo pedo pedo until I could just GAG. But what do they have in common with the above and with these guys who have made these statements....

Drifter:

"I would definitely have sex with any little girl I had a chance with, but would not rape one. I guess there really are those that want to admire but would never touch. Thats not me man, I will touch and touch and touch!!!!"

Taf-Kat:

"piled high, were the many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine"

Camper:

"Hmmm....I generally find boys start 'turning my eye' at about age five"

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

Olive freak:

"Having discovered a community of people who understand you, share those same likes and dislikes, and managed to live life without rape or molesting"

Viamund:

"The internet is a tool that is meant to be used for all manner of things. Personally I use it for research, activism, gaming and certainly online dating. I date boys aged 14 - 18 and I have met all my lovers over the past 6 years exclusively through internet dating sites"

Daniel:

"I am sexually attracted to children, but I am not a pedophile"

What can you say about men like this? Men like Daniel who wrote a complete guide to debate for pedophiles....taking them step by step through the process of proving that pedophiles are normal and child prostitution and child pornography should not only be tolerated and accepted but legalized! What can you possibly say? I can just imagine him trying to publish it.... Perhaps he could call it Pedo-Logic for Dummies?

What can you say about Camper who not only attempted to deceive society in general but actually pulled it off with the pedophile community. What can you say when the co-owner of BoyChat...the largest message board for boylover pedophiles is running from law enforcement for not only child pornography but the rape of a 5 year old boy? John Murray Melanson. Remember that name, you'll be hearing it again.

What can you say about Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU...with a history of attempting to legalize child pornography and allow access to it in public libraries, was anyone actually surprised? Were they surprised to hear that it wasn't lovely images of 'child models' but videos of young girls bound while being raped with screams coming from their mouths?

What can you possibly say about Tom O'Caroll that hasn't already been said? Repeated prison sentences for his deviant acts, his history with NAMBLA and horrendous writings in support of child molestation.

Lindsay Ashford, the sneaking cowardly webhost who distorts scientific studies by mixing the statistics to fit his agenda. Who maintains a website all pink and sugary to 'educate young girls' . Lindsay, of which I have seen scores of pedophiles say they were confused, they were looking for information and then they found Lindsay and all of a sudden they knew there was nothing wrong with them.........they had come home! Lindsay who lies about child pornography. Lindsay who lies about statistics. Lindsay who lies to his pedo pals, and to society. Lindsay who runs and hides from country to country.........all for his sexual desire of young girls. He denies any wrong-doing, but he can't very well say otherwise, can he?

What can you say about Damien Cole aka Rookieeee of the decimated Pedologues. Oh, well I think ILGO said it best when he whined about Rookiee losing his pedo terrorism hierarchy on the internet. "Many times I found myself disagreeing....but just as many times more I've nodded my head enthusiastically and said to myself 'Yes, that's exactly how it is!'"

Well, yes we see that Olive. That's part of the reason why Rookieeeee was dangerous, he encouraged, he reinforced and he helped you all maintain your cognitive distortions. If you listen to his pedologues, you also know that practically every guest he ever had either went on to a pedophile related criminal conviction or else they already had one under their belt. They were just one of the many who joined in when the pedo heads began to nod in unison. You should know, you were one of them....even as you claimed to NOT sexually offend against children ALL BECAUSE OF A MESSAGE BOARD! Oh Dear! You need a message board to keep you from raping babies Olive freak? Is that what your prior conviction was for? Oh, never mind, you took the plea.

And what do you say about Seamus? The GirlChat resident of how-to-hide-child-porn without giving your mother a stroke infamy...

"Now, a stranger just might stumble across the correct 75-character password which has been encryped by BestCrypt with a 448-bit algorithm, but not easily. Word on the street is that he will need every computer on Earth tied together, for longer than the age of the universe, to crack it."

What have you got to hide Seamus?

"BestCrypt has a system wherein you can hide a container within a container; nobody but you knows if there is a hidden container.

Create a container and fill it with borderline stuff: girls who have just turned legal age, for example.
Hide your sensitive files in another container which is hidden inside of that one.

If the authorities ask for a password, give them the password to the innocuous container; there is no way for them to know if that is all there is.

I've been in and out of the UK frequently since that law was enacted; no problems"

Well. Well.
What could we say about Jason? You know Jason Masters the 'fiction' writer? We could say he likes girls....and little boys too. We could say he believes he's a girl trapped in a man's body. We could say he has bondage fantasies about tying up toddlers, or talk about his legal problems.

We could mention that it was reported in Relapse prevention with Sex Offenders

"the longer sexual fantasies are maintained and elaborated on, the greater the chance that the behavior will be acted out in real life"

"the more individuals engage in fantasy, the more motivating and more detailed the rehearsal may become, and the more able the individuals are to convince themselves to act out the behaviour in real life"

But I think we all already understand that.

We could talk about Infinity and his Child Porn problem. But then, they all have a bit of a problem with Kiddie Porn of one sort or another, don't they? We could talk about Dylan Thomas and his pro-child prostitution and child porn stand, or Robert Vann Smith aka Ghostwriters Mexican bust when he thought he'd just pass over the border and play with a boy or two for the weekend, or how about Lux? or Princesplaff? or Jeffrey W. Russell aka Jeffrey Gold and Matthew Fox of Sure Quality Radio sitting in custody awaiting trial for...oh what was it now? Sexual offenses against children? Distributing obscene material to a minor? What if we talked about Paul Edward Vose aka Slvrspun and the boy he terrorized....or his detailed instructions for hiding child porn? Or how about Bill Evans and his exploitation of an indigenous population of people....all for his sexual desires.

We could talk about their pedo distortions and how they claim they would never no never harm a child. "It was consensual!" Or another favorite they use "That child was only harmed because society told him he was!" We could go on and on and on and on but there's one question that begs to be answered.

What do these men have in common with the Lindsay Ashfords and the Rust-Tierney's of this world. Why, it's very simple.

They are all real men!

These men and others like them loudly and boldly proclaim that they are pedophiles. They inflict themselves upon society, upon our children! They demand to be accepted! They make all kinds of foolish demands actually, but one thing is for sure, they are out there with one purpose in mind......sexual gratification through the use of children.

So if you ever have cause to doubt, just remember that they LIE as a matter of course. They have reason to. Who are these men?

They are child predators and they are real. They are not just words on a computer screen, a nickname or a sigpic. They are child predators, whether they call themselves a Girl Lover, a Boy Lover, a Child Lover, a Pedophile, Pedosexual or MAA. These things they do are happening everyday and we need everyone working together, united, to deny them that ability There can be Absolute Zero Tolerance for those who prey on children and use them for selfish, sexual motives.

HT to Jacey for the awesome graphics!

Let's Help Norbert Get to Prison

The new Anti game I suppose you could call it.


It's not very challenging though I must say....because all we have to do is sit back and watch him destroy himself.

Norbert is trying to make a political statement apparently and considering that he and Lindsay are in cahoots it comes as no surprise.

Two radical pedoheads together is gonna be some nasty business. They are puffing each other up and we all know that nothing good can possibly come of that.


Norbert made a video game you see, the Pedo Quest but before he did he asked all the little nodding pedoheads at GirlChat for ideas on stereotypical pedophilia related objects. He got some interesting answers, but his own were the most noticeable. KY Jelly for example. Amazingly enough the guy went through with it.

Yes Norbert is trying very very hard to draw attention to himself. And I do believe it's working. I have a sneaky suspicion though that the consequences aren't going to be what Norbert anticipated.



Take a look at Norbert's game. And let's see what we know about Norbert, eh?



We know he's young



We know he got kicked out of University.



We know he has radical politics.....PNVD..... Party for Neighbourly Love, Freedom, and Diversity.


Some of his goals include:

• Lower Age of Consent to 12 and eventually abolish AOC altogether



• Legalize private use of child pornography



• Allow non-violent pornography to be screened on daytime television



• Eliminate marriage in the law



• Permit public nudity anywhere in the country

We know what he fantasizes about:

Raping little girls



And now we know what he's been watching:

"You realize how absurd it is to even have to explain the benefits of greater sexual freedom for children, when you see a child - when you see child pornography of consensual sexual contacts. You know sex can be a source of joy for children when you see a boy enjoying being sucked off or the expression on the face of a girl who is cumming while being licked out. This, of course, is one of the reasons why anti-pedophiles want all child pornography to be illegal"

Interesting here to note that not only is child pornography illegal in the Netherlands but it is also illegal to incite child sexual abuse. Also of interest is the fact that what a person fantasizes about is a greater predicter of what they will do than what they say they will do. Dr. Abel

And according to Relapse prevention with Sex Offenders

"the longer sexual fantasies are maintained and elaborated on, the greater the chance that the behavior will be acted out in real life"

"the more individuals engage in fantasy, the more motivating and more detailed the rehearsal may become, and the more able the individuals are to convince themselves to act out the behaviour in real life"

Dr. Seto said:

people are likely to choose the kind of pornography that corresponds to their sexual interests

Ken Lanning said:

P 52 Pedophiles almost always collect child pornography and/or erotica

30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child

NCMEC said:

Forty percent (40%) of those estimated arrestees were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation.

Crimes Against Children Research Center said

Approximately 1 in 5 arrested CP possessors (21%) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape, and torture

Most of all let us not forget this

Ken Lanning:

Most preferential child molesters spend their entire lives attempting to convince themselves and others that they are not perverts.

Dr. Gene Abel:

Pedophilia is the most significant cause of child molestation.

But we all already know these things don't we? And we know what they're out there doing on the internet, don't we? We know what they look for, don't we? I wonder if Norbert is one of them......One of the men out looking for:

• molesting pics
• 
  
• childrens fuck sex child rape underage

naked preteen boys blogspot

a website with pictures of naked kids

little minor girls fucked by daddy's

preteen girls fucking older men for their first experiance

illegal child rape pics

how to molest little girls

This one is rather interesting, as he's been here at least 8 times with similar search terms. Yeah, I'd say this guy won't be giving up until he's forced to. He just hasn't yet learned that we don't have what he's looking for. That's persistence. That's a pedophile. That's a child predator. That's what Norbert would have people believe is normal.

HT to Jacey for graphics!

If it walks like a duck......

Hey, remember that crazy Aussie Pedohead we saw on video a few months ago? You know, the one that reminded us so much of Nigel? Well, he just lost an appeal BOO HOO.

His name is Geoffrey Leonard and he's 73. In 1990 he was convicted of sexual assault against two brothers, then 12 and 16 years old for which he served 3 years in prison.

In 2006 he was before the court again charged with possession of 400 child pornography images. He pled guilty.

Then he appealed. Now his appeal application has been dismissed due to the fact that Geoffrey, being the brilliant pedohead that he is....posted an edited version of the statements made by those two boys he molested so many years ago on his website.

Geoff lost his appeal because of it.......and now BoyChat is so very nice to share that site that cost him his appeal.....with others by linking to a mirror site of it. (The actual site is long gone) I recommend you not bother. It's huge and it's nothing more than pedobabble and just as incoherent as Nigel Oldfield, Jd420 and danyfreak. It's actually painful to read so I'll save you the trouble and show you a bit of it here. This is just a small list of Geoffrey-isms:

• The poor kid who reaches 16 and who is innocent faces a life where he will never truly lose that innocence. He will never be truly sexually aware. he will never possess real sexual skill and his sexual relationships will always be difficult. The age of 16 is far too late to start learning about sex.


• If we give kids bread and honey in kindergarten, they will love the stuff from then on......What I am advocating is that, starting in kindergarten, kids should be taught how to masturbate.


• The thing is to catch the kids before their ideas become fixed


• I would go so far as to say that I strongly suspect that most people in our society are child sexual offenders, and that all but the unfortunate few have been sexually abused.


• People in authority do not like sex.


• We are a minority group that behaves sexually in the way that we do because we have no other choice.


• I firmly believe that kids should be taught to have sex from caring and skilled older partners.


• Christianity has attempted to abolish sex


• The ability to have good sex does not come out of the clear blue sky. It has to be learned.


• Sex is complicated.

Geoffrey obviously has issues. Look at a portion of a letter he wrote to one of the boys:

What we did is considered to be the ultimate act of intimacy. God has joined us in an act which at the time seemed a little clumsy & painful but in retrospect was like entering the gates of heaven

And as if that's not enough he posted the boys statements to police about what Geoff did to them. He edited it first of course then left this comment

In addition there were a few charges relating to his 12 year old brother, one instance of oral sex and a couple of instances of masturbation. Hardly monstrous acts. And the whole thing is hardly the crime of the century.

Three years in prison and Geoffrey still has no insight into his own behavior does he? He still has no recognition of the boundaries that exist between people or the realization that....well that he has issues. But it reminded me so much of

28's statement:

Erotic encounters, involving no penetration, should be at worst minor annoyances.

and Demosthenes who thought it acceptable to give drugs to a child to prevent them from going through puberty.....for his own sexual gratification.

Or Abraxas who was oblivious to the psychological discomfort a child experienced when forced to urinate in front of her classmates.

Or Vespucci who cops a feel of a sleeping 12 year old boy

Or Lindsay Ashford who believes 6 month old babies can consent to sex and is attracted to little girls because they are ripe

Or Olive Fweak who thinks message boards keep him from raping children.

Or Jack McClellan who took pictures of little girls and posted them on a pedophile website telling fellow perverts where to find them

Or Zlurker who said

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

Or Nigel Leigh Oldfield who said

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email)

We all view Geoffrey Leonard as a total lunatic I'm sure. Watching him in the video it's hard to believe he hadn't already been committed somewhere isn't it? But are his beliefs any different than all of these other pedo activists that we've had the misfortune of crossing paths with? I'll let you decide and why don't you compare your findings with those of Febri-Chan

with a little editting and dash of commentary to guide the viewers' perception, they take everything out of context and twist every single thing he said to make it sound like the guy is as "batshit" as every should think.......Anyway, the guy didn't seem crazy or evil to me because I know in my gut that he was probably goaded into acting that way by some vulture of a reporter who was patiently and antagonistically waiting for the guy to snap.

Indeed.

You talking to me?

Nigel Leigh Oldfield, the convicted child pornographer, long ago banned from AZ for trolling behaviors and psychopathic harassment tries to prove once again how utterly deluded he really is. Once upon a time on the blog of nothingness Nigel accused me of being Rez. Now I admit I took that as a compliment but when he proceeded to claim I was every member of AZ I was stunned. Until of course I realized that his accusations were just a mere symptom of his many mental disorders.

Reminiscent of danyfreak who believes I'm Rez, Violet, Llort, Jacey, Beachbitch and Daydreamer....Nigel now believes me to be Blackribbonday as well. And while it is flattering of course for one to think me capable of pulling off such a feat, I must admit that I couldn't care less what he believes, and I hope it doesn't disturb any of you guys either.

You see pedofreaks don't recognize children as separate people from themselves, they view them as objects there for the taking. And just as Nigel sees children in this light, he also sees the Anti's as one entity. Cognitive distortion at it's finest.

So let us use this opportunity to have a bit of fun. I'm going to show you what true sockpuppetry looks like. With none other than the self-proclaimed king of pedovores himself..... Lindsay Ashford.

Here we have Lindsay posting as Neptune on GirlChat.









And here we have Lindsay posting as Bereshith replying to Lindsay posting as Neptune.







To continue their discussion amongst themselves, here we have Lindsay posting as Neptune replying to Lindsay posting as Bereshith.








And to round things out nicely, here we have Lindsay posting as Neptune claiming he should have spoke as Lindsay while replying to Lindsay who's posting as AP.

Do we all understand sockpuppetry now? Everyone please point at Lindsay and laugh. Just ignore Nigel, he's not worth your effort.

Cruisin' for a Bruisin'

That's Jack McClellan I'm talking about. I think he has some sort of death wish. He lost his Seattle girl perving website for awhile. His parents gave him an ultimatum....."Open another website like that and you'll get out" Well......how could he pass that up?

Living on disability, with his parents, bringing them into the news and I'm sure making their life a living hell. Why would anyone think this was a man of character and integrity? Oh, he left Washington and headed to L.A. he says to take attention from his parents.......I suppose he's too ashamed to tell the real reason. Wouldn't you be?

So here he is a man who is dependent on somebody for money, and to somebody else for a roof over his head, and never mind the fact that he's practically spitting in his own family's face, yeah never mind that....but he also spits in the face of his pedo-brothers. He's defiant, he's outrageous, and he's out of control.

He says he's homeless, sleeping in his car. Oh BOO HOO. You can afford a website telling people where to find little girls to perv over can't you? Yep, he's going to be the new Lindsay Ashford alright. Obnoxious, arrogant, hated by 99.999% of the population and now begging for hand outs so he can keep his wheels a'movin. Hunting..........now he's in L.A. He can't work but he sure can drive all over the place attending children's events and photographing girls for ulterior motives. What did you say that disability was again, Jack? Hmmm?

Now while begging for scraps from the pedoheads he also lets them know he'll be on the Rick Roberts show in the morning.....again. I'm interested to know what they think about Jack continuously putting them in the spotlight.

Infinity:

You're asking for trouble jack.......I guarantee you Jack that nothing but bad comes out of this. Keep in mind you are representing this entire community now

Spike:

I don't get it, what possible good could this do you, us, and the greater GL movement?

Jack:

I'm hoping some GLs will try calling in (their number is 1-800-760-KFMB) -- so that the interview isn't just me versus Rick & the antis

Joey Bishop:

While I admire the bravery of those who would risk calling in with a pro-pedo opinion, I would once again remind them of the consequences, especially if they have dependants who rely on them(like Kevin Brown).

Student:

Right from the start, try to focus on the bigotry/discrimination/thought-crime angle. It's going to be hard to get that in, so the sooner you start trying, the better..........

He's going to try to focus on the idea that 'you and people like you want to have sex with the little kiddies.' Avoid that. When he goes there, the audience stops thinking and starts blindly hating. Please try to spend some time on the discrimination/bigotry/thought-crime angle.

Trucker:

BTW I think the Rick Roberts show is just a cover-up for his own repressed pedophilia, so you should call him on that. In fact, I suggest you be more aggressive and tell him he is spreading hate and fear with his attacks on pedophiles, and thus making himself to be an eventual suspect

We love ya man. Pedos unite.

Mojoe:

The community needs people to out themselves in a positive way (As you seem to do), so the world can see how normal we all are!

Arch:

Your goal is survival

Abraxas rears his head:

Hold your own, pal

I think Abraxas doesn't know when to hush uppa his mouth. See here he gives Jack some tips on who to call regarding shelter. But then Abraxas knows a lot about poverty and how to get by. Why, once upon a time he even had a plan for a young boy to support his entire family and all he had to do.....

"There are lots of families out there struggling to survive financially. Many of these are families with boys

So let's say a boy in a struggling family offers his services five times a day. 5 Head Jobs x $20.00 each = $100 per day. Say he takes Sundays off, that's still 6 Days a Week x $100.00 = $600.00 per week. That's a cool $31,200.00 per year. Any family could use that. Even better for families with more than one boy.

1. The sex is safe. Getting a head job has almost zero risk.
2. The sex is financially lucrative.
3. The sex is pleasurable.
4. The boy is sexually satisfied, no danger of his getting his girlfriend pregnant.

There is no down side.

This is just an idea"


Like I said, some people don't know when to stop talking. They won't control themselves and they won't control their own community. So ya know, they shouldn't complain when someone else has to do it for them. Although Abraxas does dream of living in an underdeveloped country, and Lindsay is running for his life......perhaps that's the type of advice you guys should be giving him instead?

"How to live on the run out of a suitcase begging for dollars from message boards"

Now that would be interesting to watch.

Can you just imagine what society would be like if men like these......with ideas like these ran the world?

Jack's Back

We talked about pedophile Jack McClellan and his pedophile website recently HERE and HERE

Jack has his site back up and running, and guess what folks? He's right back to perving on kiddies. Hanging out at local events, taking pictures of other peoples children.....without their knowledge or permission. Ask Sabrina...this is one upset mother. Who can blame her? She has a message for Jack

"Stop, or else!"

Jack, just like Lindsay Ashford claims he's just exercising his first amendment rights. He sees nothing wrong with the contempt he's showing society. He's going to push, push, push the issue. It matters not to him that Sabrina doesn't want her daughter on a stinking pedophile's website. To Sabrina I say You Go Girl and to Jack I say There's more than one way to skin a cat Jack.

You and your cohorts show absolutely no common decency or respect for society in general. Why the hell do you think we should show you any?

Now State Senator Val Stevens is drafting legislation to be introduced in the next session to make this website illegal in Washington....and hopefully to be expanded later to the Federal level. Who knows, before this is over we might get this sort of thing going in far off places, say places like oh maybe Canada or how about the Netherlands? It's amazing what you can accomplish with a little elbow grease and a lot of determination.

Jack McClellan doesn't deserve respect. Lindsay Ashford doesn't deserve respect. These scornful men are manipulative child predators. And we don't take that lightly. Not at all. We've been huffing and puffing so far, but now a harsh wind has begun to blow. Listen guys, can you hear it? It sounds to me like the Anti's are coming.

This is going to take time, and they may win little skirmishes along the way, but in the end we will win the war. And that war will be decisive. Monitor yourselves, control yourselves, understand what is acceptable behavior.....because if you don't, someone will surely do it for you. This is our children's safety that's at stake, and we don't compromise when it comes to that. So, keep watching. Are you watching, Jack?

A Profile of Pedophilia Part 2

To continue on with our discussion of the article published by the Mayo Clinic Dr. Seto classifies pedophiles according to whether or not child pornography and/or a computer was used to engage the child in sexual activity.

1. Stalkers - who try to gain physical access to children
2. Cruisers - who use the internet for direct sexual pleasure without physical contact (chat rooms)
3. Masturbators - who use the internet for passive gratification (child pornography)
4. Networkers or Swappers - who communicate with other pedophiles and trade information, pornography, and children
5. Combination of the previous 4 types

According to Ken Lanning

30% to 80% of individuals who viewed child pornography and 76% of individuals who were arrested for Internet child pornography had molested a child

According to NCMEC

Forty percent (40%) of those estimated arrestees were “dual offenders,” who sexually victimized children and possessed child pornography, with both crimes discovered in the same investigation. An additional 15% were dual offenders who attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators who posed online as minors.

According to the Crimes Against Children Research Center

We found 40% of the cases involving CP possession in the N-JOV Study involved dual offenses of CP possession and child sexual victimization detected in the course of the same investigation. All of these offenders had identified child victims. An additional 15% both possessed CP and attempted to sexually victimize children by soliciting undercover investigators posing online as minors. When these cases of attempted child sexual victimization are counted, 55% of the CP possessors were dual offenders

Here are some other quick stats:

• 39% of arrested offenders who met victims online possessed child pornography
• 43% of offenders who solicited undercover investigators posing onine as minors possessed child pornography
• 27% of dual offenders had shown or given child pornography to identified victims
• Approximately 1 in 5 arrested CP possessors (21%) had images depicting sexual violence to children such as bondage, rape, and torture.
• Most had images of prepubescent children (83%) and images graphically depicting sexual penetration (80%)
• One in six investigations beginning with allegations or investigations of CP possession discovered dual offenders.
• 39% of arrested offenders who met victims online and 43% of offenders who solicited undercover investigators were dual offenders
• Almost all arrested CP possessors (96%) were convicted or plead guilty, and 59% were incarcerated.

And should you wonder what motivates these possessors of child pornography, Taylor & Quayle has this to say:

• Sexually interested in prepubescent children (pedophiles) or young adolescents (hebephiles), who use child-pornography images for sexual fantasy and gratification
• Sexually “indiscriminant,” meaning they are constantly looking for new and different sexual stimuli
• Sexually curious, downloading a few images to satisfy that curiosity
• Interested in profiting financially by selling images or setting up web sites requiring payment for access

Dr Seto said:

people are likely to choose the kind of pornography that corresponds to their sexual interests, so relatively few nonpedophilic men would choose illegal child pornography given the abundance of legal pornography that depicts adults.

What were the images?

• 83% had images of children between the ages of 6 and 12
• 39% had images of 3 to 5 year old children
• 19% had images of toddlers or infants younger than 3
• 92% had images of minors focusing on genitals or showing explicit sexual activity
• 80% had pictures showing the sexual penetration of a child, including oral sex
• 21% had child pornography depicting violence such as bondage, rape, or torture. Most of these involved images of children who were gagged, bound, blindfolded, or otherwise enduring sadistic sex

What happened to these men? Does anyone think it's easy to get out of something like this? Well I believe that they get a slap on the wrist compared to what they should get, but they don't get off that easy. It does indeed effect their lives and in some cases you might say it destroys them. Their reputation, their marriages, their jobs even. Basically they lose the respect of anyone who has known them. Who could respect someone who does such a thing? How many get away with it completely? Look at the following chart


Returning to Ken Lanning 's Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis whom the pedophiles misquote on almost a daily basis and whose work is quoted extensively in the Mayo article I'd like to share some random quotes of his that ties in nicely with this discussion

P 30 Need-driven behavior leads to bewildering mistakes

P 43 Pedophiles are skilled at manipulating children

P 52 Pedophiles almost always collect child pornography and/or erotica

P 69 Collecting this material may help them satisfy, deal with, or reinforce their compulsive persistent sexual fantasies…..Collecting may also fulfill needs for validation. …It is almost as though each hour spent on the internet and each communication and image is evidence of the value and legitimacy of their behavior.

P 70 Although their brains may tell them not to send child pornography or reveal details of past or planned criminal acts to someone they met online, their need for validation often compels them to do so. They believe what they need to believe

P 81 Pedophiles are more likely to use trickery, bribery or seduction to take their photographs of children. …..Many pedophiles even collect photographs of children who are complete strangers to them….

From David Alway aka Lindsay Ashford who spreads propaganda that child pornography doesn't exist to his pedo brothers: Nigel (convicted of greater than 11,000 CP images), Taf-Kat (convicted of greater than 70,000 images), to Infinity moderator of GirlChat (a picture of a six yr old giving a blow-job and a subscription to a little girl nudie site) and justified it like this:

What was I thinking? Apparently I wasn't thinking, that is what an addict does, they do not think about what they are doing or any consequences, they just need the "fix". I liked looking at those pics and I made a mistake

I SURVIVED the NIGHTMARE that is prison, and I got out, got a kick-ass job, have tons of lg's in my life

All these guys lead right back to Lindsay and men like Dylan Thomas of BoyChat who promote child porn and child prostitution.

I got off the Mayo article a bit here with this discussion of child pornography which was only a small part of the article as it covers the entire pedophile topic. CP is a big issue. It's HUGE. Regardless of what Lindsay Ashford or even the lowly Jackson would tell you.....We've talked about this before. About the Lindsay's of the world who love children so much that they want to legalize the exploitation of children for the sexual gratification of dirty old men. We asked Who are these men? and Is this a game? We talked about John Melanson aka Camper who said:

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

And now we'll talk about Stitches who says "I know what they're looking for" I certainly don't need a nodding pedo head - ILGO style to tell me it isn't so. We'll get back to Part 3 with the Mayo article soon but for now here's some random search terms from the last few hours:

• diaper child models
• panties children kids fucking
• kindergarten pedo rape
  
• share pics boylover
• preteens pedo porn
• pics vids mommy's boyfriend jacking off on little daughter
• pedo sex with 5yo girls
• pedo girls nude -teen -video
• web.archive boylove gallery
• watch illegal underground child porn of preteen girls
• young girls fucking
• mexican pedo pics
• exploit porn child free pictures girls
• kids pedo pics
• child models panties
• child porn video pedo rape
• 10yo boys naked and hard after sex

And my favorite:

• can someone go to jail for viewing child porn in their past?
• safe payment hard cp pedo
• how to pass the abel assessment
  
  

I'll leave you with this thought: When the pedophile community attempt to ridicule what you are doing, when they scoff and when they rant, sometimes when they try to charm you...... remember who and what they are. Remember their motives for saying these things, and remember above all the results from the N-JOV Study

more than half of child pornography possession cases began with reports from individuals to law enforcement

A Profile of Pedophilia Part 1

Nigel sure does like this article published by the Mayo Clinic. I can't figure out for the life of me why though. Maybe he just doesn't understand it? Or maybe he just obsessively collects anything that has the word pedophile in it as though it were some sort of trophy. On the other hand, maybe his pathological need for attention leads him to do those things. In any event, here it is.

Released in April of this year and co-authored by Drs. Ryan and Richard Hall, A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues is in response to the increased public awareness of pedophilia and to educate physicians regarding the issue.

So, what's in it exactly? Nothing that could help Nigel. Nothing that could help any of them actually. Let's look at some of the highlights which interestingly enough reflect our position on the issues here at AZ.

It includes the types of sexual acts pedophiles may engage in with children listed by types of paraphilias...exhibitionism etc.

Generally, pedophiles do not use force to have children engage in these activities but instead rely on various forms of psychic manipulation and desensitization (eg, progression from innocuous touching to inappropriate touching, showing pornography to children)

A US Department of Justice manual for law enforcement officers identifies 5 common psychological defense patterns in pedophiles:

1. denial "Is it wrong to give a child a hug?"
   
2. minimization "It only happened once"
   
3. justification "I am a boy lover, not a child molester"
   
4. fabrication "the activites were research"
   
5. attack "character attacks on the child, police etc"
   

Sound familiar?
The article continues with diagnostic criteria for pedophilia and gives this information from a study by Gene Abel

40% of child molesters, who were later diagnosed as having pedophilia, had molested a child by the time they were 15 years old. An estimated 88% of child molesters and 95% of molestations (one person, multiple acts) are committed by individuals who now or in the future will also meet criteria for pedophilia. Pedophilic child molesters on average commit 10 times more sexual acts against children than nonpedophilic child molesters.

It then talks about categories of pedophiles, exclusive or nonexclusive and homosexual, heterosexual or bisexual.

Heterosexual pedophiles, in self-report studies, have on average abused 5.2 children and committed an average of 34 sexual acts vs homosexual pedophiles who have on average abused 10.7 children and committed an average of 52 acts. Bisexual offenders have on average abused 27.3 children and committed more than 120 acts. A study by Abel et al of 377 nonincarcerated, non–incest-related pedophiles, whose legal situations had been resolved and who were surveyed using an anonymous self-report questionnaire, found that heterosexual pedophiles on average reported abusing 19.8 children and committing 23.2 acts, whereas homosexual pedophiles had abused 150.2 children and committed 281.7 acts.

These studies confirm law enforcement reports about the serial nature of the crime, the large number of children abused by each pedophile, and the underreporting of assaults. Studies that used self-reports and polygraphs show that pedophiles currently in treatment under report their current interest in children and past behaviors

Wonder why they would under report? Is this article saying that's typical behavior for a pedophile to...what....lie?

Then it goes on to discuss incest:

Federal data show that 27% of all sexual offenders assaulted family members. The study by Abel and Harlow found that 68% of “child molesters” had molested a family member; 30% had molested a stepchild, a foster child, or an adopted child; 19% had molested 1 or more of their biologic children; 18% had molested a niece or nephew; and 5% had molested a grandchild

Let's look at that a moment, as one of the favorite "statistics" that pedophiles love to toss around is that 90% of all child molestations are not committed by pedophiles. They got that information from an unethical journalist, but claim it came from an expert in the field. David Alway aka Lindsay Ashford is the one who started that deceitful propaganda, while all the little pedo heads nodded in unison as it spread like wild fire through their community. Having witnessed Ashford repeat that statistic with my own eyes, and having seen the media fail to follow up with that, you have to wonder why. Why do they allow that statement to stand? Because they don't know....it doesn't sound right, no but not having devoted their life to the issue well no, they haven't read the literature.....It's not pleasant reading that's for sure. They know it doesn't sound right but they have a creepy little pedophile sitting in front of them spouting off statements as FACT and the result is that the statement ends up hanging there in mid air. This is what they want.

Can't you just see Lindsay now? Digging, digging deep down into the bowels of the internet to find one sentence......NOT backed up by what the author actually said I might add and suddenly it's EVERYWHERE! Pedophiles are all aware of this statement. Lindsay even edited Wikipedia and added it there. Just goes to show you that something doesn't have to be true to make it into a Wiki entry. Yet only a handful can tell you where it came from and not a single one of them will be honest with you and tell you that it isn't true after the deception was uncovered HERE

The other little trick they try to pull (and unfortunately it worked on pedophiles) is to try to claim that the difference between a situational versus preferential means something different than what it really means. These were two terms coined by Ken Lanning to aid LEA in understanding how to investigate CSA cases. There's a very interesting post regarding the pedophiles misinterpretation of this Lanning report located HERE

Concerning the above they routinely fail to understand when they make the statement that most abuse is committed by family members, is that number 1 that's a false statement, number 2 just because someone is committing incest does not mean that they are not a pedophile. The studies they link to showing the numbers of abuse do not address the question of whether or not the perpetrator is a pedophile. And in fact Ken Lanning stated in his report that this was one of the biggest mistakes law enforcement make when investigating a case involving incest when they assume that there are no other victims but one.

I'll have to come back to this Mayo article later as there is simply too much to fit into one post. I do think you will find it valuable reading though should you care to take the time with it. It includes heavy referencing of the work of Dr. Gene Abel who conducted one of the largest, most comprehensive studies to date and was subsequently labeled a crackpot by none other than the dad-beating boy-luster BlueRibbon. It also references the expert Ken Lanning who was libeled and defamed by a child predator known as Lindsay Ashford....The result being? Now the entire pedo community believes the great Lindsay lie.

This is just one more example of the dangers of pedo congregation, and I'll leave you with a perfect example. We talked about an Australian report HERE, we explained how pedophiles had misinterpreted that report........there is no doubt about it. And yet HERE we have JD420 stubbornly continuing to make the same pedo-lie to new people. Pedo activism....purposefully deceiving....proliferation of lies with a sinister ulterior motive---gaining sexual access to children.

JohnDoe420 is the very epitome of why. Why places like AZ exist...... and just as importantly why we will not stop.

Ken Lanning said:

Most preferential child molesters spend their entire lives attempting to convince themselves and others that they are not perverts.

Gene Abel said:

Pedophilia is the most significant cause of child molestation.

Lindsay Slipped ~ Oops

Is anyone here aware of the new effort against Lindsay Ashford? Petra Luna is calling for search engines to de-list Lindsay. (Hey Lindsay, here's a clue.....they can). Petra went on KTRH Newsradio and was interviewed by Scott Braddock concerning this effort. You can listen to it HERE

Scott also interviewed Lindsay. You can listen to it at the same location....if you can stomach it. It was mostly just more of the same old nauseating drivel that emanates from the words and writings of this sick twisted sissy-man. But there were a few things from the interview that I wanted to make note of. Let's start here:

Scott: Do you think that children who have any type of sex with adults grow up to be well adjusted?

Lindsay: I think that some do.

Scott: Do you know of any?

Lindsay: I know of people who had sexual encounters when they were elementary school age children.

Scott: And you think they're alright?

Lindsay: I think they're fine.

Let's stop there and first look at his one-time partner Todd Nickerson. Todd was molested as a small boy, I believe it was a fondling episode. To this day he can't come to terms with it. "Did the man care for me?" He still asks himself. Well, Todd, I'm sorry to say, that no, no the man did not care for you. He merely groped you, that's what perverts do. When you go on one of your rants, when you're confused and tormented by it.......you are asking the wrong people for advice when you go to GirlChat for answers. They are perverts! What do you expect? Perhaps you should try writing a survivor letter to your abuser instead.

As for Lindsay, he failed to tell Scott Braddock that he himself was molested by his babysitter when he was 4 years old. He failed to tell Scott about how he never told anyone, how it tormented him and he thought of it as a trauma, how screwed up it made him when he was going through puberty. He failed to tell Scott about his multiple suicide attempts and his bipolar disorder. His multiple hospitalizations in mental institutions and how he is still not alright to this very day. Yeah he left off that part. But, moving on....

Scott: So there should be no laws regarding people who for example do what most people consider to be molestation of children?

Lindsay: I think that there should be laws against any form of sexual contact which are obtained by force, coercion,manipulation or deception.

What? Lindsay agrees! There should be no deception! Then what do you call all that rubbish on your website, Lindsay? All those twisted and skewed academic articles? The twisting of Ken Lanning for example, and gosh darn even the DOJ report, you've screwed that up too! How do you explain the ethics behind manipulation of facts for the purpose of deceiving people, which is in turn to create some sort of change of opinion about you and yours?

How do you explain your actions? That's not honesty.....so why would you feel people should take what you say seriously and believe you when you say that you wouldn't harm a child under any circumstances when your entire website is a purposeful misrepresentation? Why should they believe you when you say that a child who was abused wasn't really abused? Or when you say your website is not hosted in the Evil Empire then try to claim free speech protection under the American Constitution? Why should they trust you to be a fine, up-standing man when you post what you know to be a form letter from StC....which they rescinded...and you leave it there when they request it be removed and your sole purpose is to deceive people into believing that StC endorses you?

Why should they feel anything other than repugnance when they see you mock society....or children who were abused, or murdered? You are a walking, talking, breathing LIE, Lindsay Ashford. You are dishonest, unethical, calculating, malicious, and unconscionable. But there's more:

Lindsay: I think that so long as there is consent and respect that children should be allowed to....

Scott: Do you think that a 5 year old grasps what's going on well enough to be able to consent to sexual activity?

Lindsay: A 5 year old understands friendship. A 5 year old understands affection.

Scott: So can a 2 year old?

Lindsay: A 2 year old understands pleasure.

Scott: So they can consent to sex?

Lindsay: They can consent to pleasurable activity

Scott: Can a 6 month old do that?

Lindsay: I'm sure that 6 months old also have nerve endings and understanding and an understanding of what is pleasurable to them, yes

Scott: So a 6 month old can consent to sex

Lindsay: A 6 month old can consent to activity that it finds pleasurable

Scott: And so you don't understand why you get death threats?

There you have it. A condensed version, but if you can bear it go listen to the entire thing. Let's see what the girl chatters had to say about their hero

Hayaku: She should get the hell of the internet. The last frontier of free speech, and a very exciting one, and a bunch of mentally ill christofascist bitches with nothing better to do than make stupid petitions and complaints try and spoil it all.

albertross: lindsay - you hit every ball home - i could almost believe your interviewer was feeding you lines from a script - he was classic, and you walked him smack into every wall on the court. well played, sir - absolutely impeccable.

Was he listening to the same interview I was??

Elminster: You're my fucking hero, dude! You have balls the size of Jupiter!

Student: Aside from being articulate, you have a delightful accent, man.

LOL, read more about that here.

"The Brits are really surprised when I say I'm
American, because my accent is really good, so
I'd say that I'm the second American who can pull it off."

For the record, he's from San Francisco and if you listen carefully you'll hear him slip sometimes when he's talking. Some things you can only fake for so long, in fact he did it in this interview.

Student: That 6-month-old baby he threw at you was uncalled for. I suppose he was just trying to trip you up and test you for consistency, but it certainly drove down the amount of rational thought going on in his listening audience, which was already pretty low. Lindsay, you have Balls of Titanium

Hierophant: I was almost in tears luaghing at the Texas radio host.

Trucker: TOOT TOOT!!! (NT)

Hayaku: More nutjobs that make no sense fighting us. Makes us look like the smart ones.

SUNDAYS AND CYBELE: cant wait for judgement day and the 2nd coming. BURN ANTI'S BURN!

Febri-chan: God bless puellula and Mr. Ashford until and beyond the end of the world!

Norbert: Who made a better case?

LOL I believe that was a rhetorical question.