Will he sing?

Harold Spurling aka Aztram who was charged with more than 60 sex-related crimes, including 15 counts of first-degree sexual assault has been offered a plea deal!

Jeffrey Brisson aka The Night Raven charged with more than 140 sex-related charges, including 38 counts of first-degree sexual assault was not!

Together the two were charged with assaulting at least 11 children, ages 3 months to 14 years old and possessing the equivalent of 42 80-gigabyte computers filled with child pornography.....including their own homemade videos of themselves having sex with children - over the course of years and years and years.

I wonder what the terms of Harold's deal were? They haven't been released yet. He has until January 28 to decide. Now personally I believe the only choice he should be allowed is between methods of execution. But I'm not the one offering a deal so HEY, at the very least I'll just bet he's asked to sing a song, don't you?

I just wonder how much information he's got. I just wonder how many people could go down over this. I just wonder how much information was stored in those computers of theirs.

Pedophiles don't exactly have childrens interests at heart. Otherwise I would imagine someone who just loved children would be grateful to Wikisposure. However, it's just business as usual. They'll post the news article on BoyChat, but won't allow them to say that Harold Spurling was one of their most respected pedo-members Aztram. Perhaps some of them are worried about the secrets he can tell. If so they'll surely not say it, instead we just hear the usual mumbo-jumbo distorted crap -- most of it sounds like it could have come right out of Sosen. Or a certain little podcast or two.

Zlurker, visiting from GirlChat. Who does this remind you of? The belief that the government has no right to tell parents they can't give permission for their children to have sex?

But, again, infants and toddlers are incapable of giving consent.

Though I am not very interested in infants, I dispute that. It is true for some "activities", but not for all "activities". I would also add that for some "activities", the parent's consent on behalf of the infant or toddler should be enough.

Toothless Bill Evans

the vast majority of cops are lying, bullying cunts who have no hesitation in "creating" their own evidence if they want to "get" someone.

The Dadbeater

They have no evidence against Spurling other than the statement of a 14 year old boy.

The raid was incited by extremist vigilantes who have a history of entrapment, deceit and potential fraud. The question is not whether the alleged acts are ethical. The question is whether they ever occurred.

Icarus

We all have our private lives, but I hope this guy "Spurling" had the sense not to show his face on those videos if it was indeed him... I'm sure he's a really good guy.

slvrspun

I remember reading previously about this very suspiciously organised case and recall that an anonymous informant was mentioned, which could very well turn out to be bogus and could fatally damage the prosecution case against them. That would be very interesting indeed.

mrb

The law is not on your side in the United States, and it takes millions of dollars to even try to make it apply fairly to you.

Whatever. Fuck the U.S.A.

As an aside, I just had the most boy-filled week I can ever remember having in all my life this past week. This, after the filth told me I'd never be near a child again for the rest of my life after I was busted. HAHA. Last laugh is on me. Some of them were naked too. hehehe :)

As 2008 winds down I'd like to offer a huge HT to Wikisposure for their role in helping to get these two men off the streets and away from children. Let's have a little reminder here of how this all started over on the old boyloveblog. Pedophiles intentionally antagonizing and drawing attention to themselves. What did he think was going to happen? I'm sure Dylan Thomas, Jim Finn, Aztram et al are very grateful too. So for old times sake and all.......Be careful what you wish for guys.

“I think this hysteria regarding childhood sexuality rests firmly
on a general fear and hatred of sex itself.
Otherwise, why would people think sex isn't for children?”

.........Harold Spurling

That Happy Place

There's a filthy pedophile going by the nickname Zlurker. He's one of the worst of the worst. He's an abusive husband and father.........and he's addicted to pictures of little girls. He fantasizes about having sex with little girls. He can't stop talking about his desire for little girls.

My main LG fantasies though are 'D', 'E' and 'G'. I really like 'G' when it involves removing her diaper first

When your AOA dips into the nepi range, changing diapers is not such a miserable chore as it might otherwise seem

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

I regularly fantasize about the daughters of my neighbors, friends, cousins and co-workers. If I had nieces in my AOA I am sure I would fantasize about them as well

Knowing how and when to make eye contact with the parents accompanying the LG is a skill at which I have become quite proficient

We could mention that it was reported in Relapse prevention with Sex Offenders

"the longer sexual fantasies are maintained and elaborated on, the greater the chance that the behavior will be acted out in real life"

"the more individuals engage in fantasy, the more motivating and more detailed the rehearsal may become, and the more able the individuals are to convince themselves to act out the behaviour in real life"

Zlurker is quite concerned about AZ sharing the search terms that child porn seekers who visit us use. It apparently worries him a lot. That's how filthy pedophiles are, they worry about the wrong things. Instead of worrying about what we're doing over here at Absolute Zero United, he should be worrying about how he can best get the help he so desperately needs.....before it's too late.

Who are these men? These men who search for:

• pedo 8yo fuck porn
• lolita pedo porn galleries
• dark evil kiddie pedo sex videos
• pre teen, video, rape,
• young girl hard pedo rape videos
• preteen bestiality
• cp pedo piss fuck child
• pedo masturbate baby
• toddler girl fuck pedo
• prepube girl pics
• bondage pedo
• masturbation child hurt pain
• pedo torture
• penetrate pedo child
• sucked off by preteen girl
• kids nude diapers rape incest pedo top forced cp bondage

Tony Guerra a 21 year old employee at Disney World has plead guilty to multiple child pornography charges. Tony was searching for "hardcore videos involving babies". The seizure of his computer led to:

Robert Leslie Metz a 54 year old man who was trading cp with Tony. In fact, during just one chat session in which they discussed having sex with 1 and 2 year old children, they traded over 1,000 images. Robert was in possession of over 20,000 child porn images, including infants, toddlers, many of which were of a sadistic nature in which children were tied and bound. One image in particular was of Metz molesting his own infant daughter. Robert also confessed to molesting his other two daughters when they were 6 and 8 years old. He told authorities that he looked at these images as a way he could "go to a happy place"

Computer examination determined that from Aug. 6 to Sept. 29, Metz distributed 16,537 images of child pornography to people in the United States, England, Amsterdam and Germany

Robert is facing a 40 year federal sentence under his plea agreement.

Andrew Neston 21 years old was also trading child porn with Tony Guerra. He was in possession of more than 6,500 images of child porn, including pictures of bondage and sadomasochism involving girls ages 7 to 14. He was recently sentenced to 20 years in federal prison under a plea agreement.

Those are just a few of who these men are. Scumbags, perverts, pedophiles and absolutely without a doubt child predators. And while I've been accused of being "angry" I can't help but wonder who could know about these things and NOT be angry? What my accusers obviously don't understand is that my anger is cold and calculating. It is directed at those who prey on children, and defend, promote and enable those who do. If you are one of those people I only have one suggestion:

"REMEMBER WINSTON SMITH!"

Zlurker: Destroyer of his own family

I am greatly concerned for the children who live with Zlurker!

We have read many posts on girlchat in which Zlurker advocates sex and sex play with children. He lectures on seducing parents in order to molest children and encourages other pedophiles to do as he does. For example the following quote:

I think you are a little pessimistic. But, so much depends on your individual situation. Your age, your AoA, the "impression" you make on the parents of the girls in your AoA.

Years ago I too avoided interacting with little girls, mostly because I was in denial of having that attraction. Having fully embraced the little girls in my life, I now know there is no going back. My friendships, interaction, and play time with girls are some of the most important and cherished aspects of my life.

zlurker

Zlurkers words are dangerous and illegal.
He is advocating sex with children ....unashamed.

Re: Of course

Posted by zlurker on Saturday, August 11 2007 at 05:39:54am
In reply to posted by tyciol on Friday, August 10 2007 at 01:22:52pm

---

Parents give consent on behalf of their children all the time. How about a situation where parents and their child jointly consent to the child engaging in developmentally appropriate (based on the child's physical development and size) sex play?

zlurker

How much more does he have to say to admit to molesting his own children?


Zlurker has told his wife that he is a pedophile, and even with children in the home she has not left him. I am concerned for her safety, and for their children's safety. If she cannot protect herself from him, she certainly cannot protect her children!

If it walks like a duck......

Hey, remember that crazy Aussie Pedohead we saw on video a few months ago? You know, the one that reminded us so much of Nigel? Well, he just lost an appeal BOO HOO.

His name is Geoffrey Leonard and he's 73. In 1990 he was convicted of sexual assault against two brothers, then 12 and 16 years old for which he served 3 years in prison.

In 2006 he was before the court again charged with possession of 400 child pornography images. He pled guilty.

Then he appealed. Now his appeal application has been dismissed due to the fact that Geoffrey, being the brilliant pedohead that he is....posted an edited version of the statements made by those two boys he molested so many years ago on his website.

Geoff lost his appeal because of it.......and now BoyChat is so very nice to share that site that cost him his appeal.....with others by linking to a mirror site of it. (The actual site is long gone) I recommend you not bother. It's huge and it's nothing more than pedobabble and just as incoherent as Nigel Oldfield, Jd420 and danyfreak. It's actually painful to read so I'll save you the trouble and show you a bit of it here. This is just a small list of Geoffrey-isms:

• The poor kid who reaches 16 and who is innocent faces a life where he will never truly lose that innocence. He will never be truly sexually aware. he will never possess real sexual skill and his sexual relationships will always be difficult. The age of 16 is far too late to start learning about sex.


• If we give kids bread and honey in kindergarten, they will love the stuff from then on......What I am advocating is that, starting in kindergarten, kids should be taught how to masturbate.


• The thing is to catch the kids before their ideas become fixed


• I would go so far as to say that I strongly suspect that most people in our society are child sexual offenders, and that all but the unfortunate few have been sexually abused.


• People in authority do not like sex.


• We are a minority group that behaves sexually in the way that we do because we have no other choice.


• I firmly believe that kids should be taught to have sex from caring and skilled older partners.


• Christianity has attempted to abolish sex


• The ability to have good sex does not come out of the clear blue sky. It has to be learned.


• Sex is complicated.

Geoffrey obviously has issues. Look at a portion of a letter he wrote to one of the boys:

What we did is considered to be the ultimate act of intimacy. God has joined us in an act which at the time seemed a little clumsy & painful but in retrospect was like entering the gates of heaven

And as if that's not enough he posted the boys statements to police about what Geoff did to them. He edited it first of course then left this comment

In addition there were a few charges relating to his 12 year old brother, one instance of oral sex and a couple of instances of masturbation. Hardly monstrous acts. And the whole thing is hardly the crime of the century.

Three years in prison and Geoffrey still has no insight into his own behavior does he? He still has no recognition of the boundaries that exist between people or the realization that....well that he has issues. But it reminded me so much of

28's statement:

Erotic encounters, involving no penetration, should be at worst minor annoyances.

and Demosthenes who thought it acceptable to give drugs to a child to prevent them from going through puberty.....for his own sexual gratification.

Or Abraxas who was oblivious to the psychological discomfort a child experienced when forced to urinate in front of her classmates.

Or Vespucci who cops a feel of a sleeping 12 year old boy

Or Lindsay Ashford who believes 6 month old babies can consent to sex and is attracted to little girls because they are ripe

Or Olive Fweak who thinks message boards keep him from raping children.

Or Jack McClellan who took pictures of little girls and posted them on a pedophile website telling fellow perverts where to find them

Or Zlurker who said

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

Or Nigel Leigh Oldfield who said

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email)

We all view Geoffrey Leonard as a total lunatic I'm sure. Watching him in the video it's hard to believe he hadn't already been committed somewhere isn't it? But are his beliefs any different than all of these other pedo activists that we've had the misfortune of crossing paths with? I'll let you decide and why don't you compare your findings with those of Febri-Chan

with a little editting and dash of commentary to guide the viewers' perception, they take everything out of context and twist every single thing he said to make it sound like the guy is as "batshit" as every should think.......Anyway, the guy didn't seem crazy or evil to me because I know in my gut that he was probably goaded into acting that way by some vulture of a reporter who was patiently and antagonistically waiting for the guy to snap.

Indeed.

But, is he armed?

Well Dylan Thomas says that's a rhetorical question. But, no it's much more than that isn't it? That was a threat and it was an attempt to puff up his pedo brothers with the delusion that not only should they strike out at Antis but they should strike preemptively. He gives the scenario of a black man harassed for the color of his skin. In one scenario this man is armed yet in another he's not. The question being, when he feels threatened should he strike out in case they DO try to hurt him. Notice the question is not IF he's attacked but rather to make sure that he's not. He tries to compare the prejudices and injustices committed against a race of people with the hatred and scorn people feel for him and his kind, those who prey on children. And he ends it in typical Dylan fashion.......

And now a final question, entirely rhetorical. Am I armed?

Interestingly enough, just yesterday the Pedophile known as '28' normally seen on GirlChat showed up at BC to commiserate over the decimation of their beloved child sexual abuse holiday and the unveiling of the Sex Offender Wiki maintained by Perverted Justice. Ooooh they were all in a tizz over that one. So 28 who has a habit of saying stuff like:

I am trying to hone in on a strategy that stands a chance of advancing both the rights of children and eventually our own.

We must not stress or insist that we should have a right to be involved with them(children)......not yet anyway

Classic grooming behavior. They apparently think that because it works on children it will work on everyone. That was 4 years ago when he said those things, and now in 2007 he says:

They (Antis) never take the time to meet and greet real Child Lovers with an open mind, preferring instead to name and shame them without even knowing who they are. This ignorance based hatred is neither rational, nor socially responsible.

Antis hate the stereotypical pedophile; the Chester the Molester caricature.

Oh! He must mean someone like oh maybe Zlurker! Yeah, GLMeister who hangs out at playgrounds using his own children for bait.

28 goes on to liken the situation he finds pedophiles in to groups like women, blacks, Jews. It's sad that someone could be so deluded, except when you remember that he is choosing this. He chooses to self-identify. He chooses to commune with pedoheads. He chooses to pedo-philosophize. Is it any wonder then that he can't comprehend the difference in say a black man who couldn't claim to be a white man and go about his business. Or a white woman who couldn't claim to be a man, or a European Jew who couldn't do anything. Men like this who use and abuse the suffering of others demean these people and make others shake their heads at their desperation.

No, 28, you can walk amongst us unidentified.....until you act out or open your mouth and demand something that we will not give you. Not ever. I find it interesting that we talk about this today when just recently Dylan Thomas made this point:

I don't think one can name any element of Nazi extermination of the Jews that is not already present in our current situation.

Dylan compares the gold stars to electronic identifiers, our prisons to concentration camps etc etc blah blah blah. I can only wonder what he thinks when he sees images of what happened to Jews during the Holocaust. How DARE he or any of these other perverts compare themselves to what those people endured..... To have their entire lives stripped away, their children ripped from their arms and sent to death or killed in front of them, to be starved, raped, beaten, operated on without anesthesia, to be forced to walk around nude, stripped even of their hair and for no other reason than the fact that they were Jewish. How the hell do you live with yourself Dylan Thomas, 28, Curtis and every single one of you low life scumbags. To even make such a comparison proves beyond any doubt what monsters you are. You aren't worthy to have a voice, you aren't worthy to speak and you certainly aren't worthy to be heard. You are all child predators. And every last one of you are dangerous individuals who threaten children not only in your daily lives but with the fact that you proliferate this pedo nonsense to impressionable young men.

And so Dylan.......with your head full of your own martyr complex for no other reason than your desire to rape boys, you should know....as if you didn't.......that we heard you loud and clear. We heard you when you said:

If they want a war, we'll give them one. They may have numerical superiority, but we're invisible. We'll be sitting in on their strategy sessions while they're still trying to figure out who the hell we are.

And we heard you today when you said:

When I "draw attention" to the possibility of pedophiles using deadly force, I am not "crossing the line into the unacceptable." I'm performing a public service...... Let's make sure this is clear: pedophiles will use deadly force.......Sooner or later, someone will kill some cops, vigilantes or kids.

Yes lots of eyes are on you. But you are a stinking, filthy pedophile. And stinking, filthy pedophiles don't realize how utterly devoid of rational thinking they really are. That's why they keep saying such stupid things. Ken Lanning said:

Need-driven behavior leads to bewildering mistakes.

But then he also said:

Men sexually attracted to young adolescent boys are the most persistent and prolific child molesters known to the criminal justice system.

Kevin Brown has the best idea. Which is rather surprising after the Rick Roberts fiasco and the fact that the poor boy doesn't know the difference between the cavalry and Calvary. Take a look at his sigpic. Nevertheless today he says:

I support creation of an autonomous settlement in Africa -- Rwanda, Congo, or Mozambique -- taking up arms to defend ourselves, and building an economy that can pay for peace with the regional military power. Whether that is a rational alternative to the violence and discrimination we face in the west is difficult to answer. What value does one place on their freedom?

I don't know Kev. It'll be interesting to see how you like living in a third world country though. Yes, indeed. You know.......one of those advanced and enlightened places that the west should emulate? Yeah, one of those. I fully support deporting your sorry ass though. I'll help raise the money if you'll go. Yes! finally an idea to unite the Anti's and the Pedoheads! You pick a place Kevin! Isolate yourselves somewhere far far away from civilization, and we....those who choose to be civilized we will pay your way. Every last one of you. I DARE you.

Violet has a good idea, I suggest you check out her blog. Her new invention would win her a Nobel Peace Prize. And it all has to do with the pedo stench. Because you can smell them you know. Here's an example. Men who find AZ while looking for other stuff. Stuff they aren't meant to be looking for. Are they pedophiles? Oh yeah, of course they are. And like Camper of BC once said:

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

Some of these guys are more determined than others, they return again and again. There's thousands of these search terms and we get them everyday. Everyday I tell you! I'll show you a few.

• gagged raped cuties
• illegal child rape pics
• old men fucking preteen girls
• 10yo naked children
• child porn naked boy
• free pictures illegal pedo 10yo porn
• preteen virgins fucked
• child kids fucking porn
• pedophilia girl rape pictures
• boys raped by men
• pretty little girl pedo rape
• fucking young girls who are only 8
• underage incest pre-teen paedo lolita sex
• very hard pedo porn kids fuck pics
• men kissing and raping little girls for sexual gratification
  

And the awards go to:

• stupidest of the day: Am I safe after totally deleting traces of child porn
• most frustrated: minor preteen child pedo just give me the fucking porn
• most horrific: 5yo enjoys gentle pedo fuck from very big dick, child sex
  

I smell them. The filthy, stinking pedophiles. Filthy, filthy pedophiles. They're breathing our air. They're stinking up our world. They're preying on our children.

Dropping Like Flies

Live Journal one of the original blogging sites has been simply infested with pedophiles and pedo-activists. We wrote about it a couple of times HERE and HERE

Some people wonder what AZ and the other ANTI blogs do besides writing about pedofreaks on our blogs. One thing we do is monitor these blogger sites like Live Journal. We watch these perverts invading spaces that kids hang out. We watch them spouting off pedo-crap, puffing each other up with pedo-pride and above all LYING. We work to rid the internet of these dangerous places. Sometimes they go down fast and easy, other times it takes a bit of creativity. But, like I always say "there's more than one way to skin a cat"

Take a look at some recent fallen Live Journals, several communities as well. Live Journal finally snapped to attention and decided to be responsible. Yeah, pedo blogs are dropping like flies over on Live Journal.

Inform
Expose
Silence

And to all you nodding pedoheads responding on WFI with statements like:

Its a free world! If a person do not want to view those contents they do not have to go into the site. Just because you guys do not like it does not mean the whole world doesn't. please respect other people's interest and choices

and

I suppose it's a lot easier to crusade around having fanfiction groups deleted off LJ than it is to contribute time and effort to groups that are trying to change laws and actually...you know. Protect children.

and

Freedom of speech should always trump over zealous fanaticism like this site's.

and

You do realize that by deleting their LJs and letting them know they're watched, the REAL criminals are only going to be more careful next time.

and

Words on a page don't hurt people. People hurt people. And you, my friends, are hurting people by taking away their freedom to write the fiction they please

and

As much as I have deep problems with pedophilia, I have even deeper problems with people who trample freedom of speech as easily as you do. Do you ever give the consequences of your actions any thought?

Every single one of you are indeed pedophiles. Nasty, filthy, stinking pedophiles. You all preface your statements with "I'm not a pedophile myself BUT"

The truth of the matter is that the only person who would value free speech more than the safety of a child is a person who WA LA endangers children. You're all clueless and every single one of these statements prove it.

So, like I said to ZLurker once upon a time..........keep watching.

Are you watching?

Thank You ~ From AZ

Absolute Zero would like to thank everyone who worked on getting GL Meister, aka Zlurker of Glorious Girls removed from Blogger.

To various bloggers such as ACME and all the individuals who worked on this, good people who put value on children's lives and safety we can and will continue to make a difference.

Absolute Zero applauds your efforts. Keep up the good fight!

UPDATE: ZLURKER RESPONDS

They have already failed...

Posted by zlurker on Thursday, January 25 2007 at 08:29:58am
In reply to The more we are silenced the louder we are. posted by Hierophant on Thursday, January 25 2007 at 01:22:00am

---

...because I have committed to establishing two new online, pro-pedo, identities before the end of the March to replace the one they worked so hard to eliminate. We can set them up much faster than they can get rid of them, or even find them, as I have no intention of linking them back to my former blog or to my zlurker identity.

The antis are the primary reason may pedos took to blogging in the first place. But that is typical of antis and oppressive governments — they actually create the very problems that supposedly concern them so much.

zlurker

Absolute Zero says to this loser: If we can't find you, no one else can either. That's all we asked for to begin with. If you are keeping your blog private you cannot commit pedo terrorism i.e. pedo activism. We got what we wanted. So, exactly who is the loser?

GL Meister ~ The Lurker

GL Meister runs the pedo blog Glorious Girls, and posts on GirlChat as Zlurker. He's a pedophile attracted to little girls. He's told different stories about his age of attraction AOA, but currently it's 2-14 years old. GL started his blog with the hope of luring in non-pedos to influence them with false information, but of course it attracts nothing but pedos. His plan failed. The one thing that is notable about Glorious Girls however is his consistent use of little girl 'modeling photos'. Gl is a kidder perver. He feels no guilt about doing this, I'd venture to say he feels no guilt about anything. Zlurker is totally self-absorbed.

Just a little background info on Zeeeelurker. According to him, he's in his late 30's, living in Western New York. He's married and has a young son and daughter. From here on his story becomes blurry, from his age when he lost his virginity and the age of children he's attracted to, to the fact that he first started masturbating to images of adult women at 10 or 11 according to which version you read. You just don't know which parts are true and which are lies. There's only one thing for sure. GL is a liar. So it only stands to reason that if he lies about insignificant things --wouldn't he also lie about what he did with his little "pedolicious crush" when he watched her change out of her swimsuit, or when he took her out on a "date?" Or how about when he changed his daughter's diaper and thought to himself "if they only knew"

GL came out of the toybox this year to his wife. Why? Why would he do that? Well, for one thing Lindsay told him to. But more importantly GL believes that coming out is the "ultimate form of activism." He also knew, so he says, before he did it that she wouldn't leave him. How could he know such a thing? I'm assuming she's an emotionally battered woman, just judging from the things he's written. And so GL just sticks it to her a little more. What possible benefit was it? He needed to feel accepted by someone. He needed to force his perversion on someone, without regards to their feelings. He needed validation. GL is self absorbed. He even plans to tell his Mother. He's not worried about her rejecting him though because if she doesn't accept what he tells her with love and support then he'll reject her! What a guy.

GL says he loves children. Yet his own children aren't enough to fulfill him. He doesn't love them in that way. His own kids are objects he uses to put him into contact with other young children....at church, soccer games, parks and playgrounds. He calls these GoM's. Girl ogling Moments. Each time he spends the day at the playground he rushes to GirlChat to brag. Not about the wonderful time he had with his child, but about each and every flash of panties he saw. "A day I had not been looking forward to turned into one of the best days I have had in many weeks."

Gl Meister, husband, father of 2, adult porn addict one day "accidentally" sees some child porn online. "I've never felt that way before!" The effect of seeing that little girl nude had such a profound effect on Zlurker that he set out to test the depths of his depravity. On Usenet groups he collects "child modeling" pics mostly of girls in "age appropriate underwear". "I probably have 300+ images alone just from Adie's Vogue Bambini collection". Girls mostly 3-10 years old. He particularly enjoys the images of Sandra, but states that he feels the images of her in thongs with legs spread wide are disrespectful.

"I stay away from the government run child porn sites"

Oh well! That's different then. He's told us enough that we know. He doesn't have to say it. Who's willing to bet how much child porn he's got? I'll give you 20 to 1.

Let us continue our look at GL's fixation as he proceeds down that path from regular ol' family man to porn addict and self-actualized pedophile. Just how far will he go? How far will he push the limits and boundaries that society places upon him? Personally I have no doubt. We are currently watching his descent as it evolves. And since it has been determined that a man's fantasies are a much greater indicator of future actions than what they say, I think it would be very interesting to know what this man fantasizes about, don't you?

I only fantasize about consensual/mutually-desired sexual interaction, but were it not for the fact that even the thought of an LG being frightened or hurt makes me go limp my choice would be D. (occasionally fantasize about making a child participate in sexual activity against her wishes)

Zeeeelurker loves polls. When faced with lots of choices on the next fantasy poll he gets more specific. the choices were: A-fully clothed, B-underwear, C-nude, D-watching her masturbate, E-consensual sexual touching, F-getting/giving a consensual hand job, G-getting/giving oral sex, H-consensual anal/vaginal penetration, I-consensually breaking the cherry

With any girl in my AOA 2-14 I fantasize about 'A' through 'G'

With young teens he fantasizes about 'H' and 'I'

My main LG fantasies though are 'D', 'E' and 'G'. I really like 'G' when it involves removing her diaper first

What else is there to say about Zeeeelurker you may ask. I'll just leave you with some random remarks of his and let you figure him out for yourself. When you're through reading these comments from this obsessed, fixated pedophile please help us rid the blogosphere of this pedocrap. Go HERE and flag his blog. Then go HERE and click the TOS violation regarding the posting of images of little girls for the sole purpose of sexually arousing other pedophiles.

"losing her virginity" implies that something valuable has been lost. Whereas I see something valuable being gained.

When your AOA dips into the nepi range, changing diapers is not such a miserable chore as it might otherwise seem

I would like to see a new tradition where girls - around their sixth birthday or so - are given a nice set of dildos/vibrators that they can "grow into"

I wish I could act on my urges with a mutually consenting LG

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

I regularly fantasize about the daughters of my neighbors, friends, cousins and co-workers. If I had nieces in my AOA I am sure I would fantasize about them as well

I just saw an absolutely gorgeous two year old today still in diapers and using a pacifier. My heart was thumping

The day I discovered Puella was one of the most important days of my life

I fantasize about little girls almost every day

Knowing how and when to make eye contact with the parents accompanying the LG is a skill at which I have become quite proficient

You owe yourself something after what you've been through. I suggest you go hang out at the playground - just do not look suspicious while you're there

I would not recommend bothering with a therapist. I do not see what a therapist is going to do for someone that the internet cannot do

Parents are afraid of their children seeing them have sex for a number of reasons. The parents shame of their own sexuality, embarrassment of their own bodies, and fear that their three year old daughter would ask if she could play too.....

Update: SUCCESS