Do you believe in monsters?

"Do monsters really exist? Psychologist have a name for something similar to a monster it is a person with anti-social personality disorder. Psychologists consider personality disorders nearly incurable. This would make the psychologist version of a monster incurable. I however doubt the existence of monsters."

Danny Edwin Foster

Danny is a pedophile.

You may know him as Hierophant.

Or you may know him as Dan of Dark Forces.

You may simply know him as a monster.

One of many, who have spent years chatting it up with other monsters, other pedophiles over at GirlChat and sometimes BoyChat.

But one thing is for certain: He has many faces. Take a long hard look at his inner face so that you may recognize him. Remember his face.



Remember his words

"I know at what age children are mature enough to consent to sex. It is at the day of conception. At no time before the day of conception is a child mature enough to give consent to sex.

If a new born gets a hand job by some some retired old person and that new born demonstrates it's happiness with the interaction there is your consent. If however the newborn demonstrates it's discontent there is your rejection and the retired old person should stop."

His dreams

"Little girl dating services where big boys can meet little girls. That would be one definite mark of are emancipation.

Can you imagine this personals? I think they would look something like this.

Hi I am Alice. I am seven years old blond hair blue eyes. I weigh 60 pounds. I enjoy the power puff girls and barbie. I am looking for a man who will snuggle with me, spin me around, and give me baths."

Hi fetish

"Little girls in diapers

Not talking babies here. Talking 4 and up in diapers."

His self-absorption

"Why is it important to know the feelings of the partner before going ahead and doing something that is pleasurable? So the child didn't know. Why should we care?"

His cognitive distortions

"Step on thier toes and they sing.

Both AZ and PJ do us as a group more good than harm."

We're just doing our part Danny. Just doing our part. Glad you like it!

To learn more head over to Wikisposure and read all about Hierophant. The pedophile. The monster.

What's the Hurry?

Look at Christopher Michael Barrios, of Brunswick Georgia. Look at his face. Look at that smile. Imagine him in front of you, six years old, how small he would be. 3 feet 6 inches tall and 60 pounds. Just a little boy playing on a swing set after he got off the school bus. Just a couple hundred feet away from home....

....And right across the street from a convicted sex offender.

His funeral was today.

Now let's walk across the street and see what we find.

Why it's George Edenfield who pleaded guilty in 1997 to molesting two boys, ages 7 and 9. He was sentenced to 10 years on probation.

As part of his 1997 conviction, George Edenfield had to register as a sex offender in Georgia. A Georgia law passed last year prohibits registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school bus stop; the Edenfields lived about 600 feet from the one Christopher waited at. This law has currently been put on hold, pending......

Now let's see what else is across the street. Living with George we have his father.

David Edenfield. David pleaded guilty to incest in 1994.

Wonder if he also molested George when he was a boy? Enter the mother:


Peggy Edenfield. Not a registered sex offender, but she lied during the search for Christopher. She sent investigators off on wild goose chases....away from Christophers body.

But perhaps she wasn't trying to cover up what her son did....or what her husband did for that matter. Maybe she was just trying to cover up for the fact that she watched while both her husband and her son molested the boy....Or the fact that she masturbated while watching?

Perhaps it was both. Nevertheless, all three have been arrested and charged with capital murder. Apparently the prosecutor will be seeking the death penalty....and frankly they all three deserve it, no matter which one actually strangled him to death....after getting their thrills. Or perhaps his death was part of the thrill. Of course, if Jessica's Law had been in effect back in 1997....and George had received the minimum sentence of 25 years, little Christopher would still be alive.

Could anyone argue with that? Well Dissident could. You remember Dissident. The pseudo-pedo philosopher. There was a discussion about Jessica's Law. And of course...as always..Dissident is opposed to any measure that might punish a pedo. He claims that it won't prevent real child molestations it will merely punish those involved in consensual sex with children. Well he claims that child murderers should never be let out of prison in the first place so it doesn't really effect them. But I think he's missing the point. Is it purposeful?

John Couey was arrested for fondling a child. He served his time. He got out. He progressed....he kidnapped and murdered. George Edenfield was convicted of fondling two little boys. He got probation. No jail time. He progressed....he kidnapped and murdered. Are we seeing a pattern here? These are just two examples of why we need ONE STRIKE LAWS.

Just for the record here are some of the pedo-opinions about legislation like Jessica's Law... one that would have prevented John Couey, George Edenfield and even Joseph Duncan from progressing:

Vespucci: "What a travesty of justice"

darth: "It is so sad that love has such a heavy punishment'

Santi: "Sex offenders, especially the ones to offend a minor are to pay forever."

Dissident: "I find it highly insulting that the fears and emotional devastation of a family are used to divert further oppression upon a highly misunderstood minority group"

28: The only way to protect children is to educate them about the differences between child molesters and Pedosexuals....in order to empower children with the comprehensive knowledge they need, in order to make good decisions when confronted with potential exploitation."

Lux: "For every one dangerous-to-children molester, there are a thousand harmless sex offenders"

Hierophant: "These are not anti molester laws....these are anti love laws."

Turtle: "New laws won't stop scumbags from raping children. They will just ruin more men and womens lives and continue to tear families apart."

LGsinmyheart: "I would chop my feet off, bracelet included (speaking of tracking device), give the bracelet away as a present to a little girl....just to prove a point"

Well, you made your point LGsinmyheart. You sure did. Nothing will stop you will it? Not as long as you have your freedom anyway.

Thank You ~ From AZ

Absolute Zero would like to thank everyone who worked on getting GL Meister, aka Zlurker of Glorious Girls removed from Blogger.

To various bloggers such as ACME and all the individuals who worked on this, good people who put value on children's lives and safety we can and will continue to make a difference.

Absolute Zero applauds your efforts. Keep up the good fight!

UPDATE: ZLURKER RESPONDS

They have already failed...

Posted by zlurker on Thursday, January 25 2007 at 08:29:58am
In reply to The more we are silenced the louder we are. posted by Hierophant on Thursday, January 25 2007 at 01:22:00am

---

...because I have committed to establishing two new online, pro-pedo, identities before the end of the March to replace the one they worked so hard to eliminate. We can set them up much faster than they can get rid of them, or even find them, as I have no intention of linking them back to my former blog or to my zlurker identity.

The antis are the primary reason may pedos took to blogging in the first place. But that is typical of antis and oppressive governments — they actually create the very problems that supposedly concern them so much.

zlurker

Absolute Zero says to this loser: If we can't find you, no one else can either. That's all we asked for to begin with. If you are keeping your blog private you cannot commit pedo terrorism i.e. pedo activism. We got what we wanted. So, exactly who is the loser?

Incessant PedoBabble

Incessant PedoBabble sometimes does our work for us. Let's think about that a moment while we consider the internet baby-lusting activist Nihil Aeturnius.

Lots of anti bloggers are sitting upright and paying attention to Nihil. AZ has written about him recently, as have Anti-Paedo. He deserves attention. Nihil is dangerous to children. He's just about as stupid as that idiotic coward Winston. The difference is that Nihil is more articulate. The difference is that Winston's yellow streak sent him hiding into the sidelines, whereas Nihil is too stupid to know when to be afraid. The difference is that Winston had nothing to say, he was best at pecking, harassing, and repeating useless scientific studies that didn't support what he was trying to support, whereas Nihil, who also misinterprets data, unfortunately has new ideas and he's not afraid to use them.

It's well known that Nihil is hostile towards parents. His beliefs can best be summed up this way:

"All parents are bad because they either neglect or control their children."

Nihil in his infinite wisdom, believes that not only does HE know what's in the best interest of children, but he will provide it for them in defiance of the parents wishes.

Looks like I'll have to start a Notable Nihil series. but for today I offer you his responses to a discussion on GirlChat regarding "openness within families & communities." Kea, who started the discussion, had this to say:

"as far as i am concerned, caregivers wishes are to be respected. this goes for everything. if they don't want her eating blue & yellow icecream, i won't buy it. i would break this rule if a child were in an abusive home situation & i wanted to help her, but thats all"

That sounds to me like Kea trying to pull the pedos back down to earth a bit. What does PedoBabbler Nihil have to say?

many if not most parents (In America, in modern society) fall into the following four categories

- Moronic
- Apathetic
- Controlling/Abusive
- Insane/Neurotic

With that in mind, if the girl I was seeing had parents who fell into those categories, I wouldn't give a shit what they thought

He rationalizes this position with this statement:

"There are many who want the best for their children, no matter what it is, and there are some who...don't. I support the former. I oppose the latter."

Nihil feels that he DOES know best. Nihil feels he has the right and the obligation to do as HE feels best with YOUR children. With that in mind, let's see what the other pedofreaks have to say.

Kea, who started the discussion says:

nihil_aeturnius, i wld feel uncomfortable maintaining the level of hostility you do here towards the families of children you love. i can't see how its going to help your cause.

Gryphon:

I would very much want you to give a shit about my thoughts on the matter; my daughter, my responsibility, not yours.

Dissident:

"These are common ways that parents go against the interests of their kids and try to exert control over them. I would indeed care what you thought, but I would NOT honor any attempts you might make to force your daughter into becoming the type of person YOU wanted her to become"

"I would tell them (parents) to go to hell"

Hierophant:

What the parents don't know won't hurt them,,,,

Eeyore:

Guardians are not always right. It's up to you to decide what's right and what's illogical

I would never just bow to a parent's wishes on anything they wanted for their child, especially when it's not what the child wants. I use my own sense of reason and morality based on the freedoms I think children deserve to have.

These statements were made by pedophiles. These statements were made by people who want you to accept them and entrust your children to them. These statements were made by people who want you to think of them as good people who are good for children. These statements were made by people who want society to give them legal access to your childrens bodies. These statements were made by selfish pedofreaks whose motivating drive in life is their own sexual pleasure. These statements were made by delusional people who will say anything to get in your kids pants. When someone like BB makes a comment like this:

"Nobody - and I mean absolutely nobody loves children more than a Child Lover."

We know exactly what BB is referring to. And when he states:

"I'd like to see a "normal" man give up all sexual contact with women in order to protect women from any damage that could result"

We can only shake our heads when all the little pedo heads start to nod.

Pedofreaks Speak - for Rookieeee

Now Rookieeeee, I have tons of examples I could point out to you, but I thought I'd give you a fresh illustration of the thought distortion that goes on in your community. They/you? are too entrenched in this way of thinking. It's all around you if you'll only open your eyes and see it.

It starts with a news story that captures the eyes of the activist pedovores:

Youth gang rape reported in Milwaukee

MILWAUKEE - It began with a crush, police said, and turned into one of the most shocking crimes in Milwaukee's long, violent summer: an 11-year-old girl was sexually assaulted by as many as 20 boys while a 16-year-old girl she was romantically interested in watched and coached her.

The 16-year-old and a 15-year-old boy have been charged in juvenile court in the alleged attack, which authorities said took place Monday in a house on the city's north side. The teenage girl's 40-year-old uncle might also be charged, authorities said.

The 11-year-old girl told police she was interested in the teenage girl, who looked and dressed like a boy, authorities said in court records. She and two friends went to the teen's house, where the child performed oral sex on three teenage boys, the court records said.

The teenage girl's 40-year-old uncle admitted he also had sex with the 11-year-old and told police that his niece was coaching the child, the records said.

The 11-year-old told police she then went to the basement, where there were about 15 males and "began to choose who she wanted to perform oral sex on," the records said.

The teenage girl told police that the 11-year-old had told her she wanted to perform oral sex on the boys in the house, according to court records. The 16-year-old denied encouraging her.

The teenage girl and the 15-year-old boy were charged with being a party to sexual assault. Torbenson said he will probably seek to have them tried as adults

Now I just wonder what the reaction could possibly be to this story. A story of a young girl, most likely very troubled to begin with, taken advantage of by these guys? What do you think, Rookieeeee, what do you think their reactions would be? Well I'm here to tell you.

d said

Legally, it's gang-rape. In actually, the 11 year old may have not only consented but actively chosen who to have sex with and what to do.

Baldur said

the reporters are trying to incite more mob violence against boys and men who might appreciate such 11 year old girls

the-wolf said

why is this story surprising? An 11 year old can get to be just as jealous of her older lover as anyone else. Is it because supposedly in the girls own words she chose to engage in sex acts and with whom she would have them with? But remember an 11 year old is supposed to be asexual and not have any knowledge of this sort. Like the guy said she was only a baby! Well atleast now some people are waking up to the reality of the situation

kea said

one needs merely to be 'coached' into being the victim of an assault, rather than, say, threatened or forced

hierophant asks

She just wanted to help? What was she to get in return for all those blow jobs?

turtle replies

maybe she was just having fun? or maybe she was seeking the 16yr old girls approval? we are obviously not getting the whole story. they left out the parts that might undo their "victim" story

turtle can't stop he has more to say

if she really did suck 15 boys,that should send them a loud message,but i doubt they will figure it out. the 40yr old will prolly end up being the scapegoat just because they dont want to believe that minors would do this on their own.

Demosthenes says

A full tummy?

BB replies

More protein than a steak dinner!

Moon Dreamer says

didn't you know that 11-year-olds aren't old enough to make decisions? They're too dumb! I really think most adults need to take a long hard look at themselves and realize usually they're the ones incapable of decision

Hierophant says

There appears to be a coordinated effert to mold the public.

AH! So now we get to the heart of the matter! Nevermind that anyone would question a girl that age walking into a room full of, oh say, 20 strangers and giving blow job after blow job...... and NOT question her emotional stability.

Ok, nevermind that Let's focus instead on hierophant's accusation of a coordinated effort to mold the public .... do you really want to talk about that? Because we could if you wanted to.

We could talk about the mission statement that's currently being developed by the pedovore community.

We could talk about the attempts to deceive the public from within that mission statement.....as in.....'NO don't ask for abolishment of age of consent laws first, that will have to come later after we've convinced them to accept us'

Is that what he's talking about, I wonder?

Or maybe he's talking about their little propoganda project of the day, hmmm, maybe that's it. You know the one where they print out little business size cards and leave them around in public places. The ones they call Visual Propoganda Oh the ones they say something like THIS:

FEAR NOT THE ONES WHO LOVE

Most people who are attracted to children are interested in
knowing, understanding, respecting, and valuing children,
rather than simply trying to have sex with a child. This is
sometimes referred to as “love”.

FEAR NOT THE ONES WHO LOVE

and the flip side

WHO ARE THE TRUE ABUSERS?

Most sexual crimes against children are
committed by those who are NOT
exclusively attracted to children.

WHO ARE THE TRUE ABUSERS?

Now I don't know about you guys, but I happen to know those little fact cards are flat out lies. And no, you little pedofreaks I am not speaking from emotion but from intelligence and reasoning. What are you speaking from? What are they speaking from, Rookieeeee?