Little White Faces

My organization has done so much on the national level to shift the focus to the truly dangerous. An organization that you don't think too highly of. What's the deal?

- Jim Freeman
Executive Director SoHopeful

Remember this guy? The one with the little white face? In case you've forgotten that's Jim Freeman, former executive director of SoHopeful. He's the guy who claimed he wasn't a pedophile. He's the guy who claimed he was low risk. He's the guy who claimed he didn't pose any danger -- after all he was the perfect example of "non-dangerous" sex offender wasn't he?

When Jim tumbled down the mountainside earning himself multiple life sentences it went virtually ignored by Sosen. Well, except for their attempts to hide their association with him. And of course Cheryl Griffiths subsequent attempt to cover-up her cover-up attempt.

Sosen never stopped to consider that there could possibly be another Jim Freeman hiding in their forums pretending to only care about "No More Victims" while having children sexually assaulted and filmed to order and on demand. Little children. Toddlers. Infants.

"How could we have missed this?" or "Was there anything we missed?" or "How can we prevent this from occurring again?" were not questions they asked as they scurried about pretending they weren't involved with him. Perhaps they paid him no attention because he had a little white face?

To imply Sosen must be racists and not care about his crimes because he had a little white face and that's the reason they ignored the possibility of other Jim Freemans hiding among them and implementing changes which may help prevent them from harboring another recidivist sex offender sounds pretty offensive to me. But that must be why, mustn't it? What else could it possibly be! Certainly they wouldn't miss an opportunity to "prevent and educate" would they? Which idea is more offensive? That they really blame the victims rather than the offender, that they rationalize on behalf of the offender, that they fail to recognize the serious crimes that have been committed and the possibility of them being repeated and instead try to insult those who have been victimized because they really deep down hate victims - OR- the idea that they treat victims this way because they're racists? Which is it? Does it have to be either/or? Can it be both? Could it be something else altogether? Something perhaps deeply rooted in blame-gaming philosophy? Try to think like a Sosenite for a moment and figure this out because Sosen has sunk to an all time low - even for their standards as Richard Schalich attempts a new technique. According to Richard, people who try to make the world a little safer for children are no longer simply "the haters" they are now racists too. And he has proof.......

Megan's Law, the Jacob Wetterling Act, the Adam Walsh Act and Jessica's law were all named in honor of children who were white.

A child named Lunsford or Kanka or Walsh with a little white face attached to it will attract more voters and PAC money. You probably will not see a "Christopher’s" law. His last name is Barrios. He has a brown face and looks too much like the dirty illegal’s the politicians and their pundits love to rant about.

And

it is obvious these laws are rooted in racism and discrimination

Wow! Not only do they compare their struggle to escape the consequences of their own actions to the historically widespread mistreatment of other minority groups - those minority groups who weren't labeled because they had harmed someone else but merely because they were born with it. Richard Schalich has taken it to a whole new level.

Richard doesn't understand that these laws were enacted due to the hard work of the families of those abducted and murdered children. It was due to their determination to do something to help other children, to turn their never-ending loss and pain into triumph and to assure that their own child had not died in vain.

There wasn't a new law proposed in honor of Christopher Barrios because he was Black/Hispanic, but rather because his family didn't lobby for one. The case of Christopher Barrios wasn't hidden and "not talked about" because he was Black/Hispanic - it did in fact receive widespread attention. Google "Christopher Barrios" and your results will be in excess of a half million. It faded from the forefront however, because his family allowed it to. They could have stayed in the spotlight and kept the case on everyone's lips if they had chosen to. The media would have flocked to them. Why is Richard Schalich trying to put the focus on something else which had nothing to do with this case? David Edenfield received the death penalty. He said that killing Christopher "felt good". George was a registered sex offender and is being evaluated for competency. Peggy won't face the death penalty in exchange for testifying against her husband and son. In case Richard Schalich has forgotten, these baby-raping killers - the Edenfield's all had little white faces.
Parents of murdered children are actually encouraged by law enforcement to do such things - to focus their energy - to volunteer - to lobby - to keep busy doing something to help with their grieving process. But of course Richard Schalich wouldn't be aware of that. Like the other Sosenites he's too busy trying to find someone else to blame.

But perhaps we should look at some other faces.




How about Jesse Timmendequas it looks to me as though he has a little white face. He had already re-offended multiple times before he raped and murdered little Megan Kanka in 1994. In 1979 he had sexually assaulted a 5 year old girl for which justice meant a suspended sentence. In 1981 he sexually assaulted a 7 year old girl. He got 6 years for that one. A therapist stated that she thought he would re-offend one day. Of course, no one expected he would go that far.




What have we here? Another little white face it appears. John Couey's sex crimes went back over 20 years before he abducted, raped and murdered Jessica Lunsford then buried her alive. Of course, he'd never exhibited such horrific violence before, he wasn't considered especially dangerous. Who could have predicted what he'd go on to do? Even experts now agree that it's practically impossible to accurately predict who will or will not re-offend. Which reminds me........




This is Michael Jacques, a twice-convicted sex offender, in fact a violent rapist - who was allowed off probation early because Richard Kearney of the Department of Corrections called him a rehabilitation success. In fact Richard told the court "When I make comments about successes in sex offender treatment, I have three names of which Michael Jacques is one." Of course the court didn't know that Jacques also had other convictions........a sexual assault he'd managed to have expunged from his record. And of course Richard Kearney didn't know that at the time he told the court these things - Michael Jacques was molesting a little girl and had been since she was nine years old and continued to for the next 5 years. And of course they didn't know that he would go on to rape and kill his own niece. He had groomed everyone it appears, not only his family members but the DOC as well. He was a model sex offender alright. He also had a little white face.


This is Jon Savarino Schillaci aka Dylan Thomas. An unremorseful pedophile - in fact an activist for pedophiles and one time webmaster of BoyChat. Jon served 10 years in prison for the sexual assault of two boys - twins - when he was a teenager. While in prison he earned two Master's degrees. He spoke several languages fluently, was an accomplished pianist and disturbingly articulate - for a filthy pedophile. After capturing the attention of a woman who was taken by his poetry that was printed in a prison publication he managed to convince her that he was reformed, regretted his mistakes and wanted to make a new life. She agreed to help him. She allowed him to move in with her family, he registered as a sex offender, enrolled in a doctoral program at a nearby university and gave her 5 year old son piano lessons. He also downloaded child pornography and repaid her kindness and willingness to give him a chance by molesting her son. He had a little white face.

Shall I continue? Here is John Gardner. A registered sex offender in fact a child rapist who was considered low risk to re-offend. He's confessed to raping and murdering 17 year old Chelsea King and 14 year old Amber Dubois and attempting to rape a woman. He has a little white face.

This is Joseph Duncan. His first recorded sex crime occurred when he was 15 years old. In that incident he raped a 9-year-old boy at gunpoint. He was sentenced as a juvenile and sent to Dyslin's Boys' ranch in Tacoma, where he told a therapist that he had bound and sexually assaulted six boys. He also told the therapist that he estimated that he had raped 13 younger boys by the time he was 16. He went on to murder an entire family, kidnapping 9 year old Dylan and 8 year old Shasta Groene. He tortured Dylan, raped him - made Shasta watch, and of course raped her too. No one anticipated his actions. He had a little white face as well.


Here's a little white face for you. Thomas J. Leggs, a registered sex offender charged with the murder of Sarah Foxwell - his girlfriends niece. He's facing the death penalty.

I could go on like this all day. Instead, why don't you go here and see a wall of little white faces staring back at you. Little white repeat sex offender faces. It must be racism and discrimination! It simply must be, the lack of someone else to blame might be too hard for some people to bear.

Sex offenders vary widely in their risk to re-offend. Estimates suggest that 40%-45% of untreated sexual offenders will sexually re-offend in their lifetime. These rates are considerably lower than rates of re-offense for other types of violent offenders.

ATSA

How Snitching Can Improve Your Life

Look at Dylan Thomas as he's led from the plane a year and a half ago. Dirty, filthy and disgusting. He'd been begging in the streets of Mexico for food to survive, bringing it back to his apartment to eat like an animal amongst all the rotting food and debris pedos are known for.

But now, it's all paid off and he can live a comfortable life made easier knowing he's helped to catch his fellow pedo brothers.

Perhaps he was just lonely in jail and hoped they'd be joining him and he'd have someone to listen to him pontificate for the next 20 to 50 years about how much he just loved little boys and of course would never hurt them.

See this story:

And watch the video of Dylan Thomas - the shifty-eyed Webmaster of BoyChat being led into the courtroom where the victim's mother says

"He has shown himself cold, calculating, self-centered, deceitful, and very willing to use the innocent and naive to serve his personal ends."

"After spending nine years on the FBI's most wanted list, a New Hampshire man pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a 5-year-old boy in Deerfield, N.H.

Police said Jon Schillaci fled when the investigation into the assault started and was on the run until they caught up with him in June 2008. Schillaci was arrested in Mexico after spending nearly a decade on the run.

Schillaci was sentenced to 20 to 50 years in prison after pleading guilty to one count of felonious sexual assault and 23 counts of possession of child pornography.

The investigation began October 1999 when a 5-year-old told his parents that Schillaci had improperly touched him. Police later found child pornography on his computer.

Schillaci had been invited to Deerfield by the boy's parents after his release from prison in Texas, where he was convicted of sexually assaulting two 11-year-old boys. While in prison, Schillaci exchanged letters with the Deerfield family, who wanted to give him a second chance.

In a letter read in court by the prosecutor, the boy's mother said that everyone deserves a second chance, but Schillaci spit on the chance they gave him.

But why a plea agreement? Why not just take it to trial and get the biggest sentence possible? A couple of reasons:

Prosecutors said one reason they agreed to the plea agreement was to spare the boy, now 15, from testifying. Schillaci also cooperated with federal authorities, and officials said that led to more than one child being rescued from an abusive situation.

And Dylan? Well, that big talking, fat-mouthed, filthy pedophile doesn't have to beg for food anymore. I guess he's quite comfy now. He's starting to look like Ghostwriter as a matter of fact. 'Cept he won't be going to Mexico anytime soon.



If I were the BoyChatters, I'd be afraid. I'd be very afraid.

The Legacy of BoyChat

“I think this hysteria regarding childhood sexuality rests firmly
on a general fear and hatred of sex itself.
Otherwise, why would people think sex isn't for children?”

.........Harold Spurling

5-Year-Old Interviewed In Sex Abuse Case

Police said a 5-year-old victim who was allegedly sexually abused by two New Britain men told them he would go to the men’s apartment and watch movies on the computer of children having sex with adults.

The two men -- Jeffrey Brisson and Harold Spurling -- were arrested earlier in the year after police spent 10 months reviewing computer evidence confiscated from their apartment. The men have been charged with sexually assaulting children ranging in age from 3 months old to teenagers.

The 5-year-old alleged victim said Brisson and Spurling would also make him look at pictures of naked children between 5 and 8 years old. He also told police the two men would perform sexual acts with one another in front of him.

Another piece of evidence the court has is a letter listing quotes from Brisson and Spurling, including one that says, “I love 5-year-old boys and am very attracted to them.”

According to the warrant, investigators began to look into the pair when an official at the Pulaski Middle School in New Britain received a warning about pedophiles in the community.

Police said they learned that Brisson and Spurling were allegedly "using the Internet to promote their pedophile lifestyle" during the seven years they lived together in a Washington Street apartment.

Investigators said a search of the men's apartment turned up the equivalent of 42 80-gigabyte computers filled with child pornography -- enough they said to fill nearly 103,000 paperback books with illegal material.

Brisson and Spurling have been in custody since January. Together, their bonds total more than $5 million

-----------------------------------

Visit Wikisposure to learn more about The Night Raven and Aztram, as well as the conviction of their fellow BoyChatter Jim Finn, sentenced to 97 months for child pornography and don't forget the ever popular Wiki-win Dylan Thomas

Four for Four, I kinda think BoyChat is coming out on the raw end of this deal.

Perhaps they'll start thinking twice before saying things like Aztram said:

"My drug *IS* boys. Sniffing a boy's silken hair makes me higher than any calibre of cocaine; the touch of his skin bringing me a euphoria millions of times beyond that which the finest hashish can invoke; kissing his lips making me lose myself totally ... death of the ego, annihilation of self ... at one with sweet, sweet quintessence of that youth the eternity of that youth the happiness the love the oneness fuck drugs they fail where boys fulfill ..."

Cheers from the Deeeep South! :)

http://boychat.org/messages/1142613.htm

Well they've already deleted it. Leave it to a bunch of filthy pedophile boy rapers to try and hide the truth. Fortunately..........we saw it first.

What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been!

Posted by silly1 on 2008-October-11 00:22:08, Saturday

---

First of all, no, melf, you don't get to out me this time. I'm doing it myself. So while I'm sure you are chuckling and rubbing your hands together because you know the IP I prf'd from was from a KNOWN ANTI, you don't get to sit on that info and think you're some kind of know it all. :)

I wrote my last letter to Dylan a few days ago. It is a good feeling to finally close this chapter. Because, you see, doing what we did with this nick wasn't easy. We had to listen to all of Dylan's bullshit on the radio, and I had to pretend I liked him. As a matter of fact, he thought I was his biggest fan. His best friend.

Isn't that what you guys do? Pretend you're a kid's best buddy, only you have another agenda? Turnabout is fair play, and sometimes it's pretty fun.

The day we found out Dylan was finally arrested, after months of monitoring his every move, was one of the most hilarious days in history. Not only had we managed to help the FBI nail a Top Ten Wanted, but we also got to listen in, if you will, on pedophiles freaking the fuck out about it. Oh yes, I have an actual audio recording of that! :)

So, the next time you see a pedo saying Peej had nothing to do with this, you will want to take a short trip back in time and remember exactly how this went down.

And, of course, all the others who were identified were just icing on the Dylan Thomas cake. IRC logs, months of them, of you stupid fuckers typing away about your lives, your "YF"s, your illnesses, your financial problems. What a bunch of moochers and wrecked individuals you are. But your misery is enjoyable to some people, as I'm sure you know.

For example, did you know that Dylan is allergic to penicillin? And that his dick had big pus-y sores on it because of that, when he was having his tooth problems? We. laughed. so. hard.

Did you know that Skylark is trying to fake that he has autism by substituting the word "me" for "I" in his sentences? And that Bill pays for his cigarettes, but makes him make his OWN wine? And that Dacarus is a pathetic piece of shit who's grooming even more kids, even after he was found out about by his community?

There are many, many things we've discovered this year. But the biggest laugh of all is when Dylan wrote to me and said that Peej had nothing to do with his arrest. What a huge laugh we all had at that one line in his letter, handwritten just to me. :) And how funny it was that the rest of this garbage "community" felt that that was some sort of confirmation. He wrote that letter to me, which I passed along to Bill. Starting to see the picture now?


Oh, I sure hope you guys fight about security now. We love to see that happen. After all, I WAS staff at BTR. -waves at toothless ugly ass Bill-
You know, the safe and secure BTR you're always being invited to. Yeah, that one.

Ahh, finally, an end to this persona. It feels good to be free. Unlike Dylan. lol. He gets to spend the rest of his life thinking about how he trusted me, loved me, begged me to never forget him. He asked me, get this, he asked me to make a memorial website for him. Not just any old memorial website, but the website of all websites, the one that would make him a LEGEND. Yes, there he is, sitting in jail for molesting a child, thinking that somehow he could become a legend.

He and many of your other friends get to stare at blank walls for years and years, knowing that their very narcissism is what got them busted. All of your idiotic "security measures" will not keep you safe from jail. You're too fucking stupid.

There will be a full write-up about this soon, so keep your eye out for it. Xavier is so good at those things, and it will be extremely amusing.

Cheers from the Deeeep South! :)

Wikisposure Identified Jon Savarino Schillaci

Here's the face that the FBI chose to make the poster boy for its efforts to crack down on child molesters

Back in 1989, Schillaci was a 17-year-old sometime-transvestite who haunted Montrose and was just getting into a world that would land him among the FBI's Ten Most Wanted Fugitives.

After serving ten years in prison for molesting two 11 year old boys, recording it, then trying to sell it, he groomed a family into trusting him, that he was reformed, that he wanted another chance at life. They took him in and in less than two months he had molested their 5 year old son multiple times. Dylan Thomas, the webmaster of BoyChat.

By accident, the Wikisposure Project came across Jon Schillaci aka Dylan Thomas hiding in Mexico

It wasn't federal agents or police, but an Internet watchdog group that apparently uncovered the vital link in catching a convicted pedophile who was hiding in Mexico, but got his start in Houston.

Authorities were looking for Jon Schillaci, who was on the FBI's list of the 10 most-wanted fugitives, but a break came when the Wikisposure Project discovered his identity and Internet-connection address while researching a mysterious Webmaster for a site catering to pedophiles.

"We go after the leaders, we go after everybody," said Xavier Von Erck, director of operations for the project.

Wikisposure, which is not affiliated with the Wikipedia online encyclopedia, builds databases on pedophile activists.

The group accidentally came across Schillaci as it sought to uncover the identity of someone using the name Dylan Thomas to operate a pedophile Web site and radio show.

"When we started out, we had no intention of catching an FBI Top Ten Most Wanted guy," Erck said, noting Dylan Thomas seemed too brazen, arrogant and careless to be in hiding.

He said he could hardly believe no one knew Dylan Thomas and Schillaci were the same person.

And what about the boys he originally went to prison for? What do they think about this? Dylan wrote many times about it. I wonder if their story matches his..........

Jon Savarino Schillaci's victims here included twin brothers who were sexually assaulted, videotaped, humiliated and threatened.

"I think about it every day, and I won't lie about it, he took advantage of 11-year-old boys," said one of the men, now a father. "I'd tell him to his face: Jon, you are wrong for what you did. I hope you burn in hell."

Nah, I didn't think so.

Visit Wikisposure for the full story of Dylan Thomas, the webmaster who went into that good night. In an orange jumpsuit no less.

The Renaissance Man

NAMBLA Activist "Will Robinson" has insinuated that Jon Schillaci aka Dylan Thomas was a Renaissance Man.

"Maybe the spirit of Leonardo
was in our midst"

Is BoyChat -- with their leader now fallen -- going to idolize him? Make him bigger than life? The God of perversions?

Of course some of them will, others will merely defend him and/or mourn the loss to their community. While others - still feeling the sting of his sometimes vicious words themselves - are turning on him. Some because they viewed him as a "grandiose-megalomaniac" and still others because they fear for their own safety and the possible repercussions to the pedophile community in general. Let's look of some of the reactions.

Nickless:
I see no contradiction whatsoever between having genius and being without conscience. Why is that so hard to imagine? One can be born a sociopath, or one can become a sociopath by having empathy strangled out of your soul.

DT's story and predicament just reaffirms my belief that humans, including extraordinarily talented ones, cannot escape their own programming and predispositions. We are what we are.

Bill Evans:
What they don't realise is that the more they attack us, the more vigorously we will fight back. They may win a few battles, but we will win the war.

Santi:
Dylan, as smart as he is, as so close to the renaisance ideal of the cultivated man he is, seems to be closer to a psychopath than any of us

yoyoboy:
That was pretty fucking cold......I mean what Dylan did to that family. The strength and faith they put into that man to allow him into their home and to give him a second chance to start over. How could he betray them like that? Yeah, a real fucking Da Vinci!

Bill Evans:
I don't know just what degree, if any, of sexual contact was involved in the charges he is now due to answer, but I seriously doubt it involved anything more than some genital rubbing, or that the boy objected. More likely he told his mother about it in the hopes she and his father would do likewise.

Yes, we are fighting a war, but it's not a war to be fought with guns and the like. This war's battlefield is the press and the hearts and minds of thinking people. Lucid and erudite people are precisely what we need to win this war, as we eventually must.

Just like the New Hampshire family who believed him when he said he was reformed? Is THAT the sort of "thinking people" you want to convince? That couple who were so touched by his words, that they gave him the opportunity of a lifetime....for a convicted pedophile anyway. He could continue his education, he could live in comfort...all he had to do was have respect for other people. So while some of you freaks over at BoyChat are saying......well, he'd been in prison for ten years! Well, uh, that's exactly the point! He didn't learn anything from it did he? Let this serve as an example for all future "thinking people", when a pedophile tries to manipulate you, deceive you, groom you and convince you they're reformed........Remember Dylan Thomas!

So, no, you aren't fighting a war with the hearts and minds of 'thinking' people. You see Bill Evans, we're ALL thinking people. And just like Dylan Thomas......you are not special. You don't have some profound knowledge about children or the ways of the world that makes you unique and the rest of the world 'ignorant' 'bigoted' 'unenlightened' or any other word you choose to use. You Bill Evans aren't special. But just like your fallen hero you think you are. And that is where you've made your first mistake.

Alive:
I have seen him say things to people who turn to this board looking for help and in a state of emotional crisis only to face his unsympathetic and conceited "holier than thou" face.

Dylan Thomas is a sociopath who is genuinely incapable of giving a fuck about ANYBODY but himself. He can rot in fucking hell for all I care.

Lupie:
Perhaps he was enough of a smooth talker to gain the respect of posters like yourself. I could see through him, but I really didn't give a shit. People like him dig their own graves, and I don't find it sad that he was caught.

Tangie:
So with all due respect for his erudition and skill at doing the webmaster's job, I can't say that I've been impressed by what I've heard of his real life.....the impression I've had for quite a long time now is that he's someone best known at a long arm's length.

Santi:
This is the second time we have as Webmaster somebody with a dangerous reality and pervasive mental problems. We had a murderer once, and we just had this grandiose-megalomaniac recently. The next Webmaster needs to be bullet proof. The damage this arrest will do to the public image of "the cause" is way deeper than Santi's rants

Bill Evans:
Whoever puts their hand up to take over from him needs to be aware that they are painting a very large and bright target on their back. If he has been publicly outed, all the more so.

Santi:
Identifying with Dylan will not help us, man.....What we need is to find, in our kind, somebody that can be emulated. He doesn't need to be a saint and not a peace promoter. He needs to love and understood war.

I suppose you'll have to have a new Webmaster won't you? Let us for a moment remember what Damien Cole once said:

I've had people on the show who have criminal backgrounds. Big fucking deal. I know they're good people and could give a shit about what the state claims is criminal. Yes, they've had sex with minors and/or were accused of solicitation. They've done time for it. They're on their corresponding Sex Offender Registries. They're LIVING the life that we fear. They're a living testiment to what we as a community are attempting to steer away from. They have lived the life they wanted, suffered for it, and are now here to preach out. Why on earth would we want to bar them from doing so?

There ain't no way we can (or should) wash our hands of "these people". These people are ourselves.

Indeed. Let's see what The Renaissance Man would recommend.

If you cannot take responsibility for the results your actions bring about in your own community, then you certainly have no business taking responsibility for encouraging "public accountability" for people outside that community.

The fundamental difference between us is this: I do take responsibility for my influence on this community and you dismiss the potential of that influence as invalid and irrelevant. I'll make you a deal. I won't be upset if one day you get to come back to me and say, "I told you so."

On Remorse

As far as responsibility... well, I feel responsibility for the things which are properly my responsibility. I don't take responsibility for the actions of others; that's a level of hubris I don't possess. As arrogant as I am, I'm not near arrogant enough to believe that I'm the only one whose decisions matter. As far as remorse, absolutely not. Let the Crossroads trolls take clear and precise notes here:
I am utterly without remorse.

On being a criminal

The fact is, it doesn't matter a bit if our spokespeople are squeaky clean. since we don't want our spokesmen being arrested for things they will do, better that those bonafides come from something that he's already done, and already paid the price for.

So I wouldn't support a "no convicts" clause on any activist organization's charter for the simple reasons that my own analysis indicates that first, it would not be an effective tactic in any event, and second, that it would be an unjust act of discrimation within our own community.

On adoration

I gave up on the popularity game a long time ago. I've already proven to my own satisfaction that I can be universally adored if I want to. I've been there and done that. The price is too high. What people primarily love is themselves, and so to be loved, I must become more like them. I won't. I will be me, and I'm loved by the people that matter to me; everyone else is noise

On Being Special

We build our own little walls not to keep us in, but rather, to keep those fears of our own horribleness out. I suppose if you build a cage high enough, you can convince yourself it’s a pedastle.

I live my life, as I see fit. If my decisions are to the liking of the codifying crowd, more power to ’em. If not, tough. I’m an individual, and so are all the boys I love, and we’ll deal with each other on those terms

And so once again, I’m special because I have boys in my life. And once again, I resist being special

On supporting criminals

As far as I'm concerned, if you go to prison for something involving a boy (or a photo of a boy, or a movie of a boy, or whatever), you're not a "fallen boylover." You are a hero boylover. You did it. You've been there, you've done that

On Doom

These words--"I'm not doing anything illegal"--are portents of doom. When I hear a boylover say it, I almost immediately begin to make plans for his eventual disappearance. This wins my award for the Number One Deadliest Boylover Belief. Let's just say that if you think you're safe because you're not breaking the law, you are absolutely, completely, unequivocally the worst kind of wrong

On Destiny

Destiny? I had my destiny. I had my whole life wrapped up
in my destiny. My reason for existing. But, I suppose,
it wasn't mine. I blew it. And it's over.

"Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light."

You know, he never did say what to do once the light was gone

On Escape

I left everything. My house, my job, my furniture, my friends, my bank account... everything. No forwarding address. No one knows where I am. Once I left, there was no way for anyone to trace me. I have ceased to exist. Maybe I didn't die, but I am no more.

Visit WIKISPOSURE for more details about Jon Savarino Schillaci

A Damn Thing

God grant me the serenity

to accept the things

I cannot change,

courage

to change the things I can,

and the wisdom

to know the difference.

We think of those powerful words as "belonging" to 12-step programs, but those came after this was written, and these words actually speak to everyone, no matter your beliefs or your troubles. Let's see how they apply to us.

We frequently see activists...those out trying to create change of some sort make some very similar statements.

From the pedophile activists....the now infamous Rob

You will never silence Us. We will fight for our Rights and there is Not a damn thing that you can do about It !

Michael Gregg aka Zman - RSO Activist

The laws don't work. When will people ever realize no matter how tough on crime, all the zero tolerance, all the registries in the world will not prevent a murder from murdering, a thief from stealing, a dealer from dealing, a user from using, a rapist from raping....

Bill Evans

They can't change a damn thing. Paedophilia has existed since the beginning of time and will exist until the end of time. It's part of the mechanism for the survival of the species.

jd420 - self-described "infantfucker"

Their 'power' couldn't stop a damn thing... and an entire generation has grown up in a paederotically-integrated (or actually, baby-boy-assfucking) world.

Derek Logue - RSO Activist

When it comes down to it, these invasive gestapo laws won't stop the rapes, the molestations, and so forth, but only serves to embitter a specific populace which can only serves to further promote this cause

These are completely false statements. Yes there have been pedofreaks as far back as we know of, that doesn't mean we should approve of it and accept it. Nor does it mean that we won't find a cure for it. Lots of research is being done in this area, a lot of new discoveries have been made that at first glance may not appear to be significant, yet I believe they will add up to a cure for this horrible affliction and most likely during our lifetime.

So no, in the first instance we cannot do anything about the fact that pedophiles exist, not us, not you and I. But someone can. In the meantime we can have the courage to confront the issue, the pedophile activism currently underway, the active child predators, we can do something about those things. And we have the wisdom to know the difference between those things as well.

Will there always be crime? Of course there will, that is a given. But we don't sit back and say 'oh well' someone will always do it so it's pointless to make something illegal or to insist on consequences. We can have the courage to change their activism, to make it more honest. We can leave them no out. We can have the courage to stand up for children and do the right thing, we also have the wisdom to know the difference between those things.

So when Dylan Thomas, the Webmaster of BoyChat and the author of the No More Victims Act of 2007 says something like this

The fact of the matter is, we hold all the cards. We (speaking on the broad scale) have sex with their children. And when they arrest us and put us in jail, a zillion more of us are still having sex with their children. And when they get us in therapy and "cure" us and teach us how not to "offend," a zillion more of us still slip through the cracks and still have sex with their children.

And there's not a damn thing they can do about it.

For every pedophile they arrest and put in jail, ten more are fucking their children.

Or when WP says

I've said this a million times, Dylan and I always get slammed for it. No one wants to admit the fact that the idea of the "celibate paedophile" is a kite that jut won't fly because it implies we are sexless or without a sex drive something that isn't real. It also tells the world you're a lying idiot if you actually expect them to buy that horse shit, worse still, schizophrenic if you actually believe it yourself.

Or when Jason says

Masturbation has no known harmful effects on an otherwise healthy child. Even if a child were forcibly masturbated against his/her will, any harm would be minimal and quickly overcome if parents and the law took a sensible attitude toward the "assault"

We can only shake our heads in consternation at the sheer lunacy of these people. It's quite silly of them actually as everyone can clearly see that we CAN do something, we WILL do something and we ARE doing something.

Their responses to our critiques thus far have been anything from complete silence, to the standard pedofreak LAME response

I just LOVE children, why I'd never hurt children

to the pathological

"C" downloads child porn and picks up minors on the net please report this dangerous woman who is also aka Stitches

to the bizarre

Jesus was a pedophile although his actions were not illegal at the time. Laws have changed but it is not likely that God has changed what He considers to be a sin. He got it right the first time.

to the grotesque

Jessica was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder.

to the frustrated

If any anti even comes with in spitting distance of me, they will be dead. They will no longer live. I will fucking kill them. So if they want to stay alive they can leave me alone.

The cognitively distorted

I don't advocate wanton violence. I don't believe in collateral damage. But I'm a firm believer in self-defense, and also a firm believer that the best defense against an irrational enemy is to put him down permanently.

The demented

The 'life' of 77Stitches_in_the_cunt. I don't remember where I heard that these females could be healed only with a good, extremely strong kick at the snatch.

And the really, really, really stupid

The reason why AZ and PJ won't post THEIR addresses or show their faces is because they'd have a big-rig through their homes the next day. There are plenty of truckers who'd love to tie those guys on both ends to the DOT bumpers and hit 10th gear. And nobody would ever find them again.

These are all excellent responses. Reactions such as these merely prove they are hysterical nut cases with no clear rebuttal to what we actually said that set them off to begin with. In fact, most times they don't even know or understand what it was we said. They read what they 'think' it says which sometimes leads them to make serious mistakes in their "knee jerk reactions".

When people like this make these outrageous remarks, radical attempts to change society or laws that are absolutely detrimental to children's safety I, for one, will be talking about it. I'll inform everyone I possibly can, I'll shout it from the rooftops if I have to. I WILL be heard, and I'll get others to help spread the message.....far and wide.

And there's not a damn thing they can do about it.

Jeffrey Brisson "You're a Hero!"

Who is The Night Raven?

Jeffrey Brisson
AKA
Edward Buzzard
AKA
The Night Raven
AKA
tnraven

Pervert, pedofreak, pedophile, baby raper and fully supported by GirlChat, BoyChat and all the nodding pedoheads.

I waited a bit to see what their reaction would be, even though I already knew. It is obvious, none of the pedophile community will denounce his actions. They would rather pretend it didn't happen and bury their heads in the sand as though by doing so they can keep attention away from themselves. In actuality it draws more attention to them. Their lack of response, while expected, is very telling of the mindset and the activities that are routine amongst that group of SCUMBAGS that is BoyChat. They are not outraged that someone would sexually assault a baby. They don't love children. They see children as sexual objects and they convince themselves and each other that children want to be molested.

Just as the sadistic Nigel Oldfield showed up here trying to minimize and justify Jeffrey and Harold Spurling's actions - and just as "d" once defended men charged with possession of child pornography featuring infants. "d" said

So, instead of saying "ohmygawdtheyareabusinginfants thebastards!" the police and news should be saying "thank goodness these kids won't remember what happened."

Read Jeffrey Brisson's wikisposure article. Read the news. See how he and Aztram made video's of him sexually assaulting a 3 month old baby.

"When they looked on the desktop, there was an icon that they believed depicted child pornography," Pearson said. "Upon further examination of that video clip, they determined that Mr. Brisson had sexually assaulted that 3-month-old, that infant that was on scene."

Remember some quick facts about Jeffrey,

The Night Raven is not especially choosy when it comes to boys or girls - he likes them both. His age of attraction is 2 - 6 for boys, and 3 - 8 for girls.

"If you have ever have had the honor to seen a Raven up close and observe it's behavior, you will understand what I say. They are reserved yet outspoken, Cautious yet adventurous, and righteous yet vicious. Just as I am. Anyone who knows me IRL can attest to that. They can be kind gentle creatures, or they can be your worst enemy. Just as I can be."

Jeffrey and Aztram designed a variation of the pedophile symbol for those who prefer little boys. Jeffrey said

"The main idea behind this variation of the BLogo is that it distinguishes itself by appearing like a young boys scrawl, giving it an enhanced "little boy" flavor. It's rounded, soft shape and lack of hard corners and steep angles, is symbolic of the little boys we love."

Remember the community Jeffrey belonged to. Remember what WP once said on BoyChat:

"I've said this a million times, Dylan. And I always get slammed for it. No one wants to admit the fact that the idea of the "celibate paedophile" is a kite that just won't fly because it implies we are sexless or without a sex drive, something that isn't real. It also tells the world you're a lying idiot if you actually expect them to buy that horse shit, worse still, schizophrenic if you actually believe it yourself."

And remember most of all the words of their leader. Dylan Thomas, the webmaster of BoyChat:

Some years ago, another good friend of mine IMed me and said, "Dylan, I'm in trouble. I got caught with a boy. I'm probably going to go to prison." I think I took him completely by surprise when my response was, "Good for you."

He asked, "You aren't mad?" I said that I was to some degree pissed about the things he and the boy would both have to go through as they were ground up by the system, but the fact that he had sex with a boy? "Are you kidding? You got some!

As far as I'm concerned, if you go to prison for something involving a boy (or a photo of a boy, or a movie of a boy, or whatever), you're not a "fallen boylover." You are a hero boylover. You did it. You've been there, you've done that.

When you see a young teenager, a kid - not a pedophile - so obviously taken in by these baby raping activists. The one's they get to spread their agenda for them, to repeat their lies "Pedophiles love children. Pedophiles would never hurt children" Point them to Harold and Jeffrey for fine examples of what pedophiles really are.

UPDATE

Jeffrey Brisson and Harold Spurling were back in court yesterday. Check out the news and watch for them to be back in court on May 20

Newly released arrest and search warrants served on two city men accused of sexually assaulting a 3-month-old baby reveal they were likely using local children to make pornographic movies and one man admitted the duo preferred molesting children under the age of 9.

During questioning, Spurling told officers the two molested children and he preferred having sex with boys ages 4 to 9 while Brisson preferred male and female infants and toddlers, according to one of the warrants.

The warrant indicates that Brisson and Spurling repeatedly committed sexual acts with a Middletown victim that began nine years ago when the boy was 5. The boy told police he thought he had been videotaped while performing sexual acts, police said.

Police started investigating Brisson and Spurling Jan. 4 after a city middle-school staff member received an anonymous flier providing information that the two were using the Internet to engage in “pedophile activities.” Officers were able to confirm that the flier wasn’t a hoax by determining that one of the addresses listed on the sheet was that of a 14-year-old boy now living in Middletown.

Visit WIKISPOSURE for the rest of the story

AZTRAM and THE NIGHTRAVEN

No more Pedos Act of 2008

We wrote about Allan Doerner aka "Hangtwenty", a 75 year old Karaoke singer from West Palm Beach, Florida and long time member of BoyChat HERE

We just didn't realize the story would be such a hit with the pedohead community. I found their reaction rather interesting.

Allan showed up on BoyChat over the weekend to claim

"I have been attacked viciously and maliciously on Absolute Zero's blog"

Seemingly oblivious to his Wikisposure page.

Allan says:

"It is quite difficult to sue these kinds of slanderous statements because you have to 'prove' they are false, something that is near impossible to do"

Yes indeed. Especially difficult to prove they're libelous when we can prove they're true. I was wondering if he thought his quotes we shared of him confessing to molesting children were what he considered libel or was it the statements about his eccentricity? Guess we'll never know. Allan has announced his departure from BoyChat.

"I shall not bow down to this assault! I shall continue doing and being who I am! Writing letters to other tenants in my apartment building has not altered anything!

I hope I can stand as a beacon of light to all of you, young as well as old, that life can go on as is, and when shit is flung at you, you just take a shower and you continue on!"

Now let's look at how the rest of the pedoheads reacted

Nickless

"I hope that if the opportunity ever presents itself, I will be able to avenge your pain by inflicting the greatest horror on those who target innocent boylovers like you and me"

Xanadu

"If any anti even comes with in spitting distance of me, they will be dead. They will no longer live. I will fucking kill them. So if they want to stay alive they can leave me alone.

That's not a threat. It's a promise."

Rahiim

"When push comes to shove, when its me and/or mine or one of them? They're suddenly gonna get a very acute case of lead poisoning."

Bill Evans

"The antis are like rabid dogs.
There is only one way to stop them spreading the infection."

Santi

"Their nature is cowardice, and they are completely worthless in any sense. Not even something slightly positive can be yield from these pests. They were born to be terminated."

Santi

"Actually sometimes I think of a MAA with, lets say, cancer, AIDS or anything similar, waiting patiently for the "To Catch a Predator" lures, and going to the decoy's house packed with ammo or, even better, extremely powerful explosives, killing everybody there.

That would give the precise message our current status needs. And, hopefully, it will trigger thousands of copycat incidents.

Killing your enemies is great, but permanently maiming them is astonishing, as you know that their suffering will last up to the moment they decide to end their pain with suicide, something that maggot they call god forbids them."

Dylan

"I don't advocate wanton violence. I don't believe in collateral damage. But I'm a firm believer in self-defense, and also a firm believer that the best defense against an irrational enemy is to put him down permanently."

What do you know? I finally agree with Dylan on something. He's irrational. He's the enemy. He needs to be put down permanently. Let's propose some new legislation based on that! We could call it the "No more Pedos Act of 2008"

Hangtwenty

"I do not know what the future holds for me. Perhaps there will be some problems. Perhaps someone will physically attack me. After all, I am out late at night, every night. But, I now carry a lethal, and legal, weapon! Actually, three weapons!

Steel darts! I play darts alot, so if I ever get attacked in some parking lot, I shall use those darts to my advantage. I shall carry them in my hand!"

No worries Allan.

I have my handy-dandy Anti-Shield,

guaranteed impervious to pedo-darts.

And remember this:

The only violence that has been threatened has been by pedophiles. We operate within the law.

Those Pesky Armies!

Dylan Thomas, webmaster of BoyChat, calls Shirley Lowery

"the feisty woman who has been writing so vehemently about the excesses of sex offender legislation? She's gotten some cheers on our board; she's someone we can call an ally, isn't she?"

But what Dylan and the blame gamers don't seem to understand is that there's a difference between feisty and psychotic. But that's another story.

Today we're going to talk about how to get the most from free email services, acts of civil disobedience, building armies and disguising yourself for 20 bucks or less.

First we have Shirley who told her SOSEN people

"We know that the liklihood [sic] of an SO being tracked down and murdered is very small"

and encourages them to think "outside the box....think unpredictable" for ways to get what they want. And sure enough they do. rainbows4evr2002 comes up with a plan to make it seem as though they are concerned for the safety of the sex offenders family.....

"I think a twist on this would be horrendous to deal with, but is different from the normal paranoid idiots thought. And it would be a place to start"

Ah, those good ol' brainstorming sessions. You just never know what will pop up next. Why just take a look at this one:

shirleyceo wrote: To: nationalsosen@yahoogroups.com
From: "shirleyceo"
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:26:04 -0000
Subject: [nationalsosen] Re: ...........................We are going to build an army........................

Please work with me, people. I need every member to have a minimum of 5 email identities. When those are established come back and join with all of them. Keep using your regular identity for posting and set the remaining 4, 40 or 400 on no e-mail. On the sign-in page just put the word "duplicate" so we will know. We don't have a lot of clout so we will build some. We can build as much as we want and we will use it to win battles. 2007 is going to be a different kind of year.

This is the first step in a bigger plan where each of us will have many voices. Public forums are not the place to lay out the details of a game plan. We have learned from professionals that there are benefits to padding a registry. It inflates a problem to gigantic proportions. Why not inflate the opposition to useless laws?

Shirley/ceo/
sosen

Next on the email campaign we have none other than Jan Kruska. How can she possibly top that you might wonder

If you're State (like Arizona or New Jersey) is trying to pass legislation where you need to register all of your present and future online identifiers THAT YOU may USE (OR NOT :-), bring them BOX FULLS and or E-MAIL THEM DAILY with several new ones. iF E-MAILING THEM BE SURE TO DO SO IN PDF FORMAT SO THAT THE INFO CANNOT BE COPIED AND PASTED. THIS WILL FORCE AUTHORITIES TO HAND ENTER EACH ENTRY. Make up as many as you can, it doesn't matter whether you will ever use them or not, The point is inundate the heck out of them so that they realize the ridiculousness, futility, and colossal waste of resources of such ill thought out legislation.

That's how. Even Jan herself admits that there are some pretty dangerous people out there. Even Jan herself admits that children need to be protected from them. But in Jan's twisted, selfish little bimbohead those children don't matter. They aren't as important as Jan's wishes. She advocates wasting taxpayer dollars, overburdening the system and outright preventing it from being effective against anyone, even those that she herself admits are dangerous. It makes me wonder just what it is she's up to besides being an anti-child activist.

Last year she created a MySpace account listing her age as 16. No one can do that for you. No, you have to confirm the account FROM the email you registered. Perhaps like her best friend 45 year old Rhonda Lee. She's made her a MySpace too. Only Rhonda claims to be a 16 year old male. See?Before you ask, that's not just any Rhonda Lee, that's Rhonda4Hope, RhondaLee60, Rhonda6513, the Rhonda Lee sex offender activist, SOSEN Legal Director and Moderator of SOSEN Arizona.

And what have we here? So far it seems they've built an army where there was none, they've created havoc, undermined the system, and ripped off taxpayers. What more could there possibly be? How far would someone go? I'm especially curious considering that MySpace thing. From Jan Kruska's website

One of Big Brothers growing technology is facial recognition.

Readers are urged to do more research on this growing evasive [sic] system of technology and it's uses. Basically a camera, like the one that takes your photograph at the motor vehicle department (usually provided by Viisage) when you get your driver's license or security cameras placed at various locations. The photo is then run through a software program that takes very precise measurements of your facial features, down to micrometers.

There is a very simple, easy to use and cost effective way to combat and confuse this system. Check out theatrical liquid latex. Available online and of course, on ebay.com . Applying a small amount to your nose forehead and chin for example should do the trick. Blends well and comes off easily. It is even available in different colors such as black if you really want to get serious about changing your image. >>>Average cost is between $5-$20 USD

And just in time for Halloween too!

"I am on the registry and have been for almost 15 years and I have never missed a Halloween yet. I do it for my kids so that they can maintain some sort of normalcy in this crazy world and I will continue to do so, being civilly disobedient whenever possible"

Meet Latex Jan AKA Nigel Kruska

Graphics Courtesy Jacey

Flawless Reasoning ~ No More Victims Act 2007

Once upon a time, I*Love*Green*Olives, ILGO, in his typical melodramatic voice asked a question

Does anybody else know what's going on?

Well, that's what we're here for. You know....to set the record straight. To make sure that everybody else knows what's going on.

Let's start HERE

Back on August 2, 2006 the Webmaster of BoyChat revealed his plan. In response to Jessica's Law, Dylan Thomas believes that punishing baby rapers is an act of

"using children as bait in an effort to catch pedophiles"

I know it's hard to believe but I assure you that I'm not making this up. Dylan, like all pedophiles, believes that all men are sexually attracted to children, so he devised a plan to HELP pedophiles.

you should be focusing your efforts on the early detection of individuals who are likely to abuse children in the future, not merely avenging children who have already been abused. To this end, I would recommend you investigate a bill to implement the following:

Mandatory penile plethysmograph tests for all males upon reaching sexual maturity. Since all reasonable people are opposed to sex with children, the only people who would be oppsed to such a measure, as intrusive as it may be, would be those with something to hide: those people who know they have inappropriate desires and wish to conceal them.

Those are the very people we are trying to catch

Any male who is determined to be sexually stimulated by children then can immediately be removed from the population and segregated into rehabilitation camps

In this way, you will be eliminating the sex offenders before they can offend. A measure like that would be truly protecting children instead of just using them as bait.

That's pretty strange talk coming from a pedophile don't you think? Dylan would know that he would be one of the first to go, of course. But the pedophiles talk about it anyway:

French Toast tells Dylan to drop the sarcasm.

Daneel believes that it is a "jaw-droppingly brilliant idea!" He believes that a large percentage of the population is sexually attracted to children and once everyone saw that everyone would be effected by this.....well, we'd change our laws to make baby raping legal.

Dylan replies:

"I'm afraid you misunderstand. There's not a bit of sarcasm in that post"

"Sane California lawmakers should be able to see that my reasoning is flawless"

French Toast continues: "Studies of male attraction to children has already been done. (is it about 23% of college age males admitting attraction to underage?) However, the results are not well known, and but for a few California congressmen having private knowledge, they are not part of the legislative process.

Boychatters can write up storm here, but until such studies and data get into the legislative record formally, nothing will change for the better.

Dylan's logic is more flawless than most, but until what he writes is put into a form digestable and usable in a committee or perhaps the persion in change of analysis of ballot initiatives, it is a talent reaching only a fraction of its possible influence"

Moving along to May 23, 2007, once again Dylan Thomas, Webmaster of BoyChat wants to make a connection with the multiple groups out there who are fighting for the rights of the rapists. He says

The thing is, we are not alone. Besides the boylovers themselves, we've got the girllovers, the childlovers, the furry cublovers, the youth-rights activists (these aren't mutually exclusive categories), the civil-rights activists, parents of boylovers, ex-loved boys, enlightened hippies, not-so-enlightened hippies, box-of-rocks-stupid ex-hippies, pop stars and mentally suggestible in-love-with-a-boylover girls and gay guys who will wave a flag in the hopes of getting laid.

He talks of reaching out to Tom Madison of SoClear and Shirley Lowery of SOSEN

whatever support we give should be given eyes wide open. Knowing who we're dealing with and paying attention to how they're dealing with us. Riding along for the events and protests that we genuinely support, but making sure we know that it's a temporary ride and being prepared to jump off the bandwagon at the first wrong turn.

But Bill Evans believes there's an alternate answer

I believe it most likely will take the rebel yells and random gunfire to make the sheeple sit up and take notice... those left alive, that is...

Returning to Dylan for a moment

When someone is actually willing to work with us in exposing media dishonesty, legislative showboating, organizational strategies based more on job security than actual results, and finally and foremost, to the safety and well-being of children and the right of the child to his own voice, we'll know it

Yes, yes I believe he would. And yes I believe he found his someone/s

First up we have Shirley Lowery



She tells us

"Even if you don't understand the politics behind this please
put it in as many places as possible"

And of course she does. First up American Chronicle, like Dylan so helpfully pointed out will publish anyone that can put two words together. So here we have Shirley Lowery promoting Dylan's plan with a twist. Instead of rehabilitation camps, Shirley merely wants people put on registry lists after taking a plethysmograhic test.

Dylan said: Since all reasonable people are opposed to sex with children, the only people who would be oppsed to such a measure, as intrusive as it may be, would be those with something to hide

Shirley said: ANYONE WHO REFUSES TO SUBMIT TO THE ACT WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED A RISK LEVEL OF THREE AS THAT CAN ONLY BE AN INDICATION THAT THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE

Dylan says: you should be focusing your efforts on the early detection of individuals who are likely to abuse children in the future, not merely avenging children who have already been abused

Shirley says: We have registration for after…. the fact. It continues to grow at an alarming rate…..after the fact. After the fact is not good enough. After the fact is too late. Prevention deals with before the fact and isn’t that what we want?

Of course let us not forget Jan Kruska, she posts this fake act also. Not only on her own website but on a blog she made hijacking the name of Petra Luna It's just another of her acts of civil disobedience. But, we'll come back to that another day. Instead I'd like to point out that Jan, directly under her posting of Dylan Thomas's plan for baby raping, has posted JD420's version of Dr. Hall's study on arousability. Well she doesn't call him Dr. Hall, she left off his last name, know why? She doesn't know what the study says, you think? She knows what that pedophile website SAYS it says. Does she honestly believe that a legitimate researcher would write something like this in his analysis?

The results of surveys like this smash any theories that pedophiles are but a small minority. Combine this with what we know about internet habits and other factors and you no longer have a minority, like the gay community, you have a huge silent majority. Surveys like this suggest that something like 8 or 9 out of ten men are sexually attracted to young girls as well as women. Shocking? Not really. Women have known that instinctively for years. Women would pay a fortune for the skin, sparkling eyes and body of a 10-year-old. This is not an effort to undermine women - shapely women will always be attractive to men. It is those with slim girl-like figures however, that receive many times more attention.

We first wrote about her belief in this here, and she quickly removed that one link to the pedo website. LOL She missed the other one however. Or the fact that what she's posted is not what is in the report.

I just have to ask myself. Did the pedofreaks dupe Jan? Or is Jan just trying to dupe everyone else. You know.....like she does Big Brother?

Interesting that she would choose their Silent Majority article to illustrate the importance of preventing child sexual abuse.

When you see the term No More Victims Act 2007, now you'll know where it came from. I firmly believe we should keep this sort of deception and manipulation in mind every single time one of them opens their mouths.

Exactly who are they representing, these Jan Kruska's and Shirley Lowery's? Is it YOUR children? Or are they taking care of the Dylan Thomas's and the Jan Kruska's and the Shirley Lowery's of the world? My bet is, it's not our kids. After all, according to them "While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life"

They're holding out for a Hero

"Experts have often wondered what proportion of men who download explicit sexual images of children also molest them. A new government study of convicted Internet offenders suggests that the number may be startlingly high: 85 percent of the offenders said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors, from inappropriate touching to rape."

Traffic in online child pornography has exploded in recent years, and the new study, some experts say, should be made public as soon as possible, to identify men who claim to be “just looking at pictures” but could, in fact, be predators.

Let's look at a few of these men.

First up we have actor Chris Langham

Sentenced to a mere 10 months in prison for downloading child pornography.

"Once the 43 days he has spent in jail since his conviction are taken into account, the actor will serve just over three and a half months."

Outrageous? You bet it is.

What was Chris looking at?

"One video found at his home featured a girl of eight who was being abused by her father and has since been rescued by police.

She had been subjected to what is known as 'level 5 abuse' - the most extreme level and which can include sadism and bestiality.

In the film she was bound, naked and blindfolded, and tied to a ceiling."

Next we have Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the the Virginia ACLU, youth sports coach and an advocate for unrestricted use of the Internet in public libraries was sentenced to seven years in federal prison for sadistic child pornography.

Charles Rust-Tierney, 51, pleaded guilty in June to downloading hundreds of pornographic images of children as young as 4. Authorities said Rust-Tierney used a computer in his 11-year-old son's bedroom to view the files, which included a six-minute video that depicted sexual torture of children, set to a song by the rock band Nine Inch Nails

And what have we here?

David Arthur Joy

A pedophile who campaigned for sex with children as young as four to be legal, now sentenced to an indeterminate jail term after he pleaded guilty to 11 counts of making or possessing indecent images of children.

David, a member of the notorious Pedophile Information Exchange or P.I.E. "also had a string of previous convictions for child sex offenses dating back to the 1970s and 1980s, including the attempted rape of a young girl and indecent assault."

Now, before you get all excited, no albertRoss wasn't busted in this raid. It's just that...well, his house looks just like David's.

"As part of coordinated raids on the remaining leading members of PIE, officers from Scotland Yard's Paedophile Unit swooped on recluse Joy's one-bedroom flat.

The property was so untidy that officers had to climb around rotting piles of newspapers, rubbish and clutter to find what they were looking for, the court heard.

They eventually unearthed some 1,129 indecent images involving children as young as one in innocent-looking files by his bed, between the pages of books, in magazines and on two home computers.

Several were in the very worst "level 5" category, which includes sadism"

And now meet David's friends

61-year-old Thomas Victor O'Carroll, an out of work journalist and 67-year-old Michael John De Clare Studdert , a retired Anglican minister, were arrested in January 2006 after the Met's Paedophile Unit conducted a series of co-ordinated searches and arrests.

O'Carroll is a high-profile activist who has campaigned to legitimise certain aspects of paedophilia and was the chairman of the now defunct Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) in the UK. He has latterly been a member of the International Paedophile Child Emancipation forum (IPCE).

During the arrest phase of the operation, a search of Studdert's extensive country home, and some 17 acres of grounds, uncovered two highly sophisticated hidden compartments within his bathroom One was hidden behind a false wall by the bath and the other was hidden in the eves of the house and accessed by a secret door opposite the toilet. The 'hides' contained a massive hoard of indecent images of children, believed to be his lifetime's collection, with images from the 1950's to modern day in a variety of formats.

The formats included videos, photographic slides, cine films, photographs, magazines and photographic negatives. In terms of formats it was the widest ranging personal collection of abusive material known to the Metropolitan Police Service ever attributed to one person.

Well what was the harm in that? They were only lookin' weren't they? That shouldn't be a crime should it? Why just last year after 125 men were arrested for possession of child pornography including infants so young they had pacifiers in their mouths *d* of boychat had this to say

So, instead of saying "ohmygawdtheyareabusinginfants thebastards!" the police and news should be saying "thank goodness these kids won't remember what happened."

Let's not forget that. Let's not forget how much the filthy pedophiles just love children. And while we're remembering that, let's also remember BoyChat's very own fallen heroes Camper and Jim Finn aka Jimf3. And let's also remember GirlChat's Infinity, Lux, Taf-Kat and Nigel Oldfield all guilty of exploiting children through the use of child pornography. Sweet little pics? Child-like images? Oh no. See, Taf-Kat had

many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine.

And Nigel had

bestiality, heterosexual sex, cross-dressing, masturbation, torture, all ages of children

Maybe some of that had to do with Nigel being an

"exhibitionist cross dressing bisexual"

I don't know, he brags about it, and he's not even remotely sorry for it. Perhaps he simply can't decide which word is a noun and which is a verb.



He had this to say about it

• I had an unclean house
• I have been obsessed
• I had no sexual inhibitions whatsoever
• I am not going to attempt to frighten the reader into abstinence
• I hardly cared at all during the episode about these immense consequences, such was the power of the combination of contributing factors and the intensity
• I started to create the most offensive series of photo-realistic fabrications I could imagine
• I would describe it as though Evil was sat with me for a few weeks
• The biggest mistake I will ever make in my life, but I don't regret it

He doesn't regret it? Well, why would he? He doesn't believe he's done anything to regret. No, you see he's only sorry he got caught. Which sounds verrrrry familiar now that you mention it....could it be the Webmaster of Boychat perhaps?

"So let's say, for the sake of argument, that he really did have child pornography...The question is, "So what?" So, Jim got to see something that we all wish we could see.

So then... maybe Jim got to see it. Should I "cluck, cluck" and say, "Oh, how could you, Jim, you've let us all down?" No. What I would say if I knew Jim got a glimpse would be, "Way to go, boy." I'd give him a thumbs-up and, if I got a chance, I'd ask for a description.

You broke the law... but you didn't do anything I don't wish I could do, too. I won't... but damn, I wish I could

Some years ago, another good friend of mine IMed me and said, "Dylan, I'm in trouble. I got caught with a boy. I'm probably going to go to prison." I think I took him completely by surprise when my response was, "Good for you."

He asked, "You aren't mad?" I said that I was to some degree pissed about the things he and the boy would both have to go through as they were ground up by the system, but the fact that he had sex with a boy? "Are you kidding? You got some!

I've got to protect my own security--don't ask me to hold on to your CD collection while you're in jail, and for the love of Timmy, if you know you're doing something illegal, don't fucking tell me about it

As far as I'm concerned, if you go to prison for something involving a boy (or a photo of a boy, or a movie of a boy, or whatever), you're not a "fallen boylover." You are a hero boylover. You did it. You've been there, you've done that

When you outlaw who we are, we don't have any choice except to be a bunch of outlaws. Gimme me a break: let me write the laws for a while. I'll make heterosexual behavior illegal, and then we'll see how long everyone else can stay out of jail. Our boylove criminals aren't something to be ashamed of; they're something to be proud of!

Some people say that Dylan Thomas's influence is limited. They say that the vomit he spews forth on a regular basis would only influence pedoheads, and they're all deluded anyway. It's easy for Dylan to puff them up with baby raping pride. They'd do it anyway with or without him.

And while that in itself may be true, there are other borderline psychotics out there. Other unstable people. People who WANT so much to Believe that they latch on to this vomit spewing, ugly, pock marked little weasel of a man. They latch on....and they hang on for dear life. Sometimes they even spread his agenda around in seemingly unlikely places. But, that's another story.

Graphics courtesy of Jacey