Does anybody else know what's going on?Well, that's what we're here for. You know....to set the record straight. To make sure that everybody else knows what's going on.
Let's start HERE
Back on August 2, 2006 the Webmaster of BoyChat revealed his plan. In response to Jessica's Law, Dylan Thomas believes that punishing baby rapers is an act of
"using children as bait in an effort to catch pedophiles"I know it's hard to believe but I assure you that I'm not making this up. Dylan, like all pedophiles, believes that all men are sexually attracted to children, so he devised a plan to HELP pedophiles.
you should be focusing your efforts on the early detection of individuals who are likely to abuse children in the future, not merely avenging children who have already been abused. To this end, I would recommend you investigate a bill to implement the following:That's pretty strange talk coming from a pedophile don't you think? Dylan would know that he would be one of the first to go, of course. But the pedophiles talk about it anyway:Mandatory penile plethysmograph tests for all males upon reaching sexual maturity. Since all reasonable people are opposed to sex with children, the only people who would be oppsed to such a measure, as intrusive as it may be, would be those with something to hide: those people who know they have inappropriate desires and wish to conceal them.In this way, you will be eliminating the sex offenders before they can offend. A measure like that would be truly protecting children instead of just using them as bait.Those are the very people we are trying to catchAny male who is determined to be sexually stimulated by children then can immediately be removed from the population and segregated into rehabilitation camps
French Toast tells Dylan to drop the sarcasm.
Daneel believes that it is a "jaw-droppingly brilliant idea!" He believes that a large percentage of the population is sexually attracted to children and once everyone saw that everyone would be effected by this.....well, we'd change our laws to make baby raping legal.
Dylan replies:
"I'm afraid you misunderstand. There's not a bit of sarcasm in that post"
"Sane California lawmakers should be able to see that my reasoning is flawless"
French Toast continues: "Studies of male attraction to children has already been done. (is it about 23% of college age males admitting attraction to underage?) However, the results are not well known, and but for a few California congressmen having private knowledge, they are not part of the legislative process.
Boychatters can write up storm here, but until such studies and data get into the legislative record formally, nothing will change for the better.
Dylan's logic is more flawless than most, but until what he writes is put into a form digestable and usable in a committee or perhaps the persion in change of analysis of ballot initiatives, it is a talent reaching only a fraction of its possible influence"
Moving along to May 23, 2007, once again Dylan Thomas, Webmaster of BoyChat wants to make a connection with the multiple groups out there who are fighting for the rights of the rapists. He says
The thing is, we are not alone. Besides the boylovers themselves, we've got the girllovers, the childlovers, the furry cublovers, the youth-rights activists (these aren't mutually exclusive categories), the civil-rights activists, parents of boylovers, ex-loved boys, enlightened hippies, not-so-enlightened hippies, box-of-rocks-stupid ex-hippies, pop stars and mentally suggestible in-love-with-a-boylover girls and gay guys who will wave a flag in the hopes of getting laid.He talks of reaching out to Tom Madison of SoClear and Shirley Lowery of SOSEN
whatever support we give should be given eyes wide open. Knowing who we're dealing with and paying attention to how they're dealing with us. Riding along for the events and protests that we genuinely support, but making sure we know that it's a temporary ride and being prepared to jump off the bandwagon at the first wrong turn.But Bill Evans believes there's an alternate answer
I believe it most likely will take the rebel yells and random gunfire to make the sheeple sit up and take notice... those left alive, that is...Returning to Dylan for a moment
When someone is actually willing to work with us in exposing media dishonesty, legislative showboating, organizational strategies based more on job security than actual results, and finally and foremost, to the safety and well-being of children and the right of the child to his own voice, we'll know itYes, yes I believe he would. And yes I believe he found his someone/s
First up we have Shirley Lowery
She tells us
"Even if you don't understand the politics behind this please
put it in as many places as possible"
Dylan said: Since all reasonable people are opposed to sex with children, the only people who would be oppsed to such a measure, as intrusive as it may be, would be those with something to hide
Shirley said: ANYONE WHO REFUSES TO SUBMIT TO THE ACT WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED A RISK LEVEL OF THREE AS THAT CAN ONLY BE AN INDICATION THAT THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE
Dylan says: you should be focusing your efforts on the early detection of individuals who are likely to abuse children in the future, not merely avenging children who have already been abused
Shirley says: We have registration for after…. the fact. It continues to grow at an alarming rate…..after the fact. After the fact is not good enough. After the fact is too late. Prevention deals with before the fact and isn’t that what we want?
Of course let us not forget Jan Kruska, she posts this fake act also. Not only on her own website but on a blog she made hijacking the name of Petra Luna It's just another of her acts of civil disobedience. But, we'll come back to that another day. Instead I'd like to point out that Jan, directly under her posting of Dylan Thomas's plan for baby raping, has posted JD420's version of Dr. Hall's study on arousability. Well she doesn't call him Dr. Hall, she left off his last name, know why? She doesn't know what the study says, you think? She knows what that pedophile website SAYS it says. Does she honestly believe that a legitimate researcher would write something like this in his analysis?
The results of surveys like this smash any theories that pedophiles are but a small minority. Combine this with what we know about internet habits and other factors and you no longer have a minority, like the gay community, you have a huge silent majority. Surveys like this suggest that something like 8 or 9 out of ten men are sexually attracted to young girls as well as women. Shocking? Not really. Women have known that instinctively for years. Women would pay a fortune for the skin, sparkling eyes and body of a 10-year-old. This is not an effort to undermine women - shapely women will always be attractive to men. It is those with slim girl-like figures however, that receive many times more attention.We first wrote about her belief in this here, and she quickly removed that one link to the pedo website.
LOL She missed the other one however. Or the fact that what she's posted is not what is in the report.I just have to ask myself. Did the pedofreaks dupe Jan? Or is Jan just trying to dupe everyone else. You know.....like she does Big Brother?
Interesting that she would choose their Silent Majority article to illustrate the importance of preventing child sexual abuse.
When you see the term No More Victims Act 2007, now you'll know where it came from. I firmly believe we should keep this sort of deception and manipulation in mind every single time one of them opens their mouths.
Exactly who are they representing, these Jan Kruska's and Shirley Lowery's? Is it YOUR children? Or are they taking care of the Dylan Thomas's and the Jan Kruska's and the Shirley Lowery's of the world? My bet is, it's not our kids. After all, according to them "While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life"
