A Damn Thing

God grant me the serenity

to accept the things

I cannot change,

courage

to change the things I can,

and the wisdom

to know the difference.

We think of those powerful words as "belonging" to 12-step programs, but those came after this was written, and these words actually speak to everyone, no matter your beliefs or your troubles. Let's see how they apply to us.

We frequently see activists...those out trying to create change of some sort make some very similar statements.

From the pedophile activists....the now infamous Rob

You will never silence Us. We will fight for our Rights and there is Not a damn thing that you can do about It !

Michael Gregg aka Zman - RSO Activist

The laws don't work. When will people ever realize no matter how tough on crime, all the zero tolerance, all the registries in the world will not prevent a murder from murdering, a thief from stealing, a dealer from dealing, a user from using, a rapist from raping....

Bill Evans

They can't change a damn thing. Paedophilia has existed since the beginning of time and will exist until the end of time. It's part of the mechanism for the survival of the species.

jd420 - self-described "infantfucker"

Their 'power' couldn't stop a damn thing... and an entire generation has grown up in a paederotically-integrated (or actually, baby-boy-assfucking) world.

Derek Logue - RSO Activist

When it comes down to it, these invasive gestapo laws won't stop the rapes, the molestations, and so forth, but only serves to embitter a specific populace which can only serves to further promote this cause

These are completely false statements. Yes there have been pedofreaks as far back as we know of, that doesn't mean we should approve of it and accept it. Nor does it mean that we won't find a cure for it. Lots of research is being done in this area, a lot of new discoveries have been made that at first glance may not appear to be significant, yet I believe they will add up to a cure for this horrible affliction and most likely during our lifetime.

So no, in the first instance we cannot do anything about the fact that pedophiles exist, not us, not you and I. But someone can. In the meantime we can have the courage to confront the issue, the pedophile activism currently underway, the active child predators, we can do something about those things. And we have the wisdom to know the difference between those things as well.

Will there always be crime? Of course there will, that is a given. But we don't sit back and say 'oh well' someone will always do it so it's pointless to make something illegal or to insist on consequences. We can have the courage to change their activism, to make it more honest. We can leave them no out. We can have the courage to stand up for children and do the right thing, we also have the wisdom to know the difference between those things.

So when Dylan Thomas, the Webmaster of BoyChat and the author of the No More Victims Act of 2007 says something like this

The fact of the matter is, we hold all the cards. We (speaking on the broad scale) have sex with their children. And when they arrest us and put us in jail, a zillion more of us are still having sex with their children. And when they get us in therapy and "cure" us and teach us how not to "offend," a zillion more of us still slip through the cracks and still have sex with their children.

And there's not a damn thing they can do about it.

For every pedophile they arrest and put in jail, ten more are fucking their children.

Or when WP says

I've said this a million times, Dylan and I always get slammed for it. No one wants to admit the fact that the idea of the "celibate paedophile" is a kite that jut won't fly because it implies we are sexless or without a sex drive something that isn't real. It also tells the world you're a lying idiot if you actually expect them to buy that horse shit, worse still, schizophrenic if you actually believe it yourself.

Or when Jason says

Masturbation has no known harmful effects on an otherwise healthy child. Even if a child were forcibly masturbated against his/her will, any harm would be minimal and quickly overcome if parents and the law took a sensible attitude toward the "assault"

We can only shake our heads in consternation at the sheer lunacy of these people. It's quite silly of them actually as everyone can clearly see that we CAN do something, we WILL do something and we ARE doing something.

Their responses to our critiques thus far have been anything from complete silence, to the standard pedofreak LAME response

I just LOVE children, why I'd never hurt children

to the pathological

"C" downloads child porn and picks up minors on the net please report this dangerous woman who is also aka Stitches

to the bizarre

Jesus was a pedophile although his actions were not illegal at the time. Laws have changed but it is not likely that God has changed what He considers to be a sin. He got it right the first time.

to the grotesque

Jessica was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder.

to the frustrated

If any anti even comes with in spitting distance of me, they will be dead. They will no longer live. I will fucking kill them. So if they want to stay alive they can leave me alone.

The cognitively distorted

I don't advocate wanton violence. I don't believe in collateral damage. But I'm a firm believer in self-defense, and also a firm believer that the best defense against an irrational enemy is to put him down permanently.

The demented

The 'life' of 77Stitches_in_the_cunt. I don't remember where I heard that these females could be healed only with a good, extremely strong kick at the snatch.

And the really, really, really stupid

The reason why AZ and PJ won't post THEIR addresses or show their faces is because they'd have a big-rig through their homes the next day. There are plenty of truckers who'd love to tie those guys on both ends to the DOT bumpers and hit 10th gear. And nobody would ever find them again.

These are all excellent responses. Reactions such as these merely prove they are hysterical nut cases with no clear rebuttal to what we actually said that set them off to begin with. In fact, most times they don't even know or understand what it was we said. They read what they 'think' it says which sometimes leads them to make serious mistakes in their "knee jerk reactions".

When people like this make these outrageous remarks, radical attempts to change society or laws that are absolutely detrimental to children's safety I, for one, will be talking about it. I'll inform everyone I possibly can, I'll shout it from the rooftops if I have to. I WILL be heard, and I'll get others to help spread the message.....far and wide.

And there's not a damn thing they can do about it.

We have a ZERO Recidivism Rate!

Andrew Spedden, Lancaster, PA
April 21, 2007

Arrested in 2003 and convicted in 2005 of "having one of the largest child pornography collections in county history will remain in prison for at least another three months"

Having served only 5 months of his sentence before being released on parole Andy had to attend sex offender counseling. And yet a little over a year later he's back before the court. The judge told him "You represent a very high risk of re-offending"

While in therapy Andy admitted having sex with at least 10 children between the ages of 2 and 15 while on parole, although the crimes went unreported to police. He also told a counselor that he approached children for sex at Lancaster Counter Library and that he viewed pornography on library computers. His therapist also learned that Andy used a computer at the First Presbyterian Church in Lancaster to view pornography and solicit sex using Internet chat rooms. I wonder if he told them he was a member of SOSEN?

Andy said:

Shirley, Thank you for your sharp-edged words; they need to be heard!

I'd like to clarify "paedophilia."

There were a few people who thought it best to designate me as a paedophile and/or a hebophile. However, from a licensed psychologist, who performed an independent psychological evaluation of me, and from the first RSO therapist I worked with, the diagnosis was neither paedophilia nor hebophilia. Given the fact that I was going to adult-stores and using adult-pornography as much as I was using underage-pornography, my problem was sex/love addiction, which is what I'm recovering from.

Shirley Lowery says

"Child porn is a puzzler, Sending people to prison for something they see in their own home seems un-American"

"I don't have a huge issue with child porn unless it is linked to another crime. Most of that stuff is 30 years old or older and kids who were victimized are no longer kids"

"Pedophiles love children and enjoy being around them. The majority of pedophiles never act on their fantasies so they are never exposed"

"We must watch over our children and teach them that a penis is a part of a man s anatomy and the sight of one is not an earth-shattering event"

"Kids do not always tell the truth. They are not the rulers of our nation. Adults must live in this world too. It is time that our kids are taught to co-exist with adults although many find the idea sickening"

"Can I say that I am owner and chairman of SOSEN, a support group that deals with former members all across the US and that new legislation has been introduced which interfers with our program where we have a zero recidivism rate?"

What can you possibly say to this? The woman is clearly deranged, but are all her friends and family also? Why do they not insist she gets the help she so desperately needs? I think that's a question that needs answering. When Shirley Lowery takes up the cause of one of the worst pedophile activists on the internet today why are they following her instructions and posting Dylan's No More Victims Act 2007 all over the place? Are they that distorted?

Personally I'm sick to death of reading this bitch. My jaw has dropped so many times it's now sitting on the floor and I'm in fear of a permanent disconnection from my face. If I ran across too many people like her I believe I'd start advocating for a return to lobotomies and massive shock therapy. Although in this case I doubt it could help her.

I'm going to leave you with some Shirleyisms. Have a barf bag ready.....or a straight jacket on standby just in case you run across her. I'm sure there's probably a reward for this animal somewhere.

You are the only attorney I have. I hope you will teach us how to put this nation in a choke hold.

I don't care how many of these things we must file across the nation of we can afford to do it. We can't afford to fight them but we could cause so much disruption and delay and maybe these issues would get tabled for now. How do we tie up the whole ball of wax?

Just for an example let's look at residency restrictions. Many of the area that have passed them only because nobody has challenged them. Many of these small towns don't have the money to fight to keep them. We don't have $ either but I do beleive that we could file pro se and pay only filing fees that that would cause a panic in poorer areas.

I don't know if 10 people could file 1 small claims suite with each of those individuals asking for the max allowed in that particular court or if everyone would
have to spend the $50 to ask for the maximum of $5000.

During the 60 days or so, between the time it is filed and the time of the hearing,some really creative thinking may be taking place. A loss for you means $50. A loss for them could cost $5000 for each person filing. In either case you have cost them time, money and worry

ask that it be turned into a class action and delay the hell out of it for a very long time? We can't afford to fight court battles but maybe we can afford to get states tied up in legal red tape

So many teen disappearances are internet related and the responsibility lies with parents

The way to get pedophiles out of chatrooms is to remove teens who are searching the net for sex

We have underage kids surfing the net for sex. Why aren't we seeing how many of them we can catch and jerk out of these chat rooms? Picking up some trash along the highway might teach them something about personal responsibility

The problem starts with whom we label as a sex offender. A single, non-violent incident can be a mistake, a misjudgment or a set of circumstances. There is no pattern of behavior and no life is forever altered. It would be wise to save that label for a second offense

If the public wants solutions the very best tool available is the sex offender. Who can better provide answers? It takes very little time to determine that a sex offense is a symptom and it is the symptom that gets punished.

A fifty-cent plastic whistle around a kid's neck would work wonders. Teaching them that 3 short blasts is a distress call could save lives. Getting kids off the Internet and providing all kids with a whistle are simple things that any parent can do. I guarantee that it would do far more toward prevention than anything that the government has provided us with. There are many commonsense solutions. Getting society to listen is a whole different story

Jessica (Lunsford) was not tortured and her death comes across more as an assisted suicide than a murder. It looks as if she stepped into the bags of her own accord, squatted down and waited for death.

Flawless Reasoning ~ No More Victims Act 2007

Once upon a time, I*Love*Green*Olives, ILGO, in his typical melodramatic voice asked a question

Does anybody else know what's going on?

Well, that's what we're here for. You know....to set the record straight. To make sure that everybody else knows what's going on.

Let's start HERE

Back on August 2, 2006 the Webmaster of BoyChat revealed his plan. In response to Jessica's Law, Dylan Thomas believes that punishing baby rapers is an act of

"using children as bait in an effort to catch pedophiles"

I know it's hard to believe but I assure you that I'm not making this up. Dylan, like all pedophiles, believes that all men are sexually attracted to children, so he devised a plan to HELP pedophiles.

you should be focusing your efforts on the early detection of individuals who are likely to abuse children in the future, not merely avenging children who have already been abused. To this end, I would recommend you investigate a bill to implement the following:

Mandatory penile plethysmograph tests for all males upon reaching sexual maturity. Since all reasonable people are opposed to sex with children, the only people who would be oppsed to such a measure, as intrusive as it may be, would be those with something to hide: those people who know they have inappropriate desires and wish to conceal them.

Those are the very people we are trying to catch

Any male who is determined to be sexually stimulated by children then can immediately be removed from the population and segregated into rehabilitation camps

In this way, you will be eliminating the sex offenders before they can offend. A measure like that would be truly protecting children instead of just using them as bait.

That's pretty strange talk coming from a pedophile don't you think? Dylan would know that he would be one of the first to go, of course. But the pedophiles talk about it anyway:

French Toast tells Dylan to drop the sarcasm.

Daneel believes that it is a "jaw-droppingly brilliant idea!" He believes that a large percentage of the population is sexually attracted to children and once everyone saw that everyone would be effected by this.....well, we'd change our laws to make baby raping legal.

Dylan replies:

"I'm afraid you misunderstand. There's not a bit of sarcasm in that post"

"Sane California lawmakers should be able to see that my reasoning is flawless"

French Toast continues: "Studies of male attraction to children has already been done. (is it about 23% of college age males admitting attraction to underage?) However, the results are not well known, and but for a few California congressmen having private knowledge, they are not part of the legislative process.

Boychatters can write up storm here, but until such studies and data get into the legislative record formally, nothing will change for the better.

Dylan's logic is more flawless than most, but until what he writes is put into a form digestable and usable in a committee or perhaps the persion in change of analysis of ballot initiatives, it is a talent reaching only a fraction of its possible influence"

Moving along to May 23, 2007, once again Dylan Thomas, Webmaster of BoyChat wants to make a connection with the multiple groups out there who are fighting for the rights of the rapists. He says

The thing is, we are not alone. Besides the boylovers themselves, we've got the girllovers, the childlovers, the furry cublovers, the youth-rights activists (these aren't mutually exclusive categories), the civil-rights activists, parents of boylovers, ex-loved boys, enlightened hippies, not-so-enlightened hippies, box-of-rocks-stupid ex-hippies, pop stars and mentally suggestible in-love-with-a-boylover girls and gay guys who will wave a flag in the hopes of getting laid.

He talks of reaching out to Tom Madison of SoClear and Shirley Lowery of SOSEN

whatever support we give should be given eyes wide open. Knowing who we're dealing with and paying attention to how they're dealing with us. Riding along for the events and protests that we genuinely support, but making sure we know that it's a temporary ride and being prepared to jump off the bandwagon at the first wrong turn.

But Bill Evans believes there's an alternate answer

I believe it most likely will take the rebel yells and random gunfire to make the sheeple sit up and take notice... those left alive, that is...

Returning to Dylan for a moment

When someone is actually willing to work with us in exposing media dishonesty, legislative showboating, organizational strategies based more on job security than actual results, and finally and foremost, to the safety and well-being of children and the right of the child to his own voice, we'll know it

Yes, yes I believe he would. And yes I believe he found his someone/s

First up we have Shirley Lowery



She tells us

"Even if you don't understand the politics behind this please
put it in as many places as possible"

And of course she does. First up American Chronicle, like Dylan so helpfully pointed out will publish anyone that can put two words together. So here we have Shirley Lowery promoting Dylan's plan with a twist. Instead of rehabilitation camps, Shirley merely wants people put on registry lists after taking a plethysmograhic test.

Dylan said: Since all reasonable people are opposed to sex with children, the only people who would be oppsed to such a measure, as intrusive as it may be, would be those with something to hide

Shirley said: ANYONE WHO REFUSES TO SUBMIT TO THE ACT WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED A RISK LEVEL OF THREE AS THAT CAN ONLY BE AN INDICATION THAT THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE

Dylan says: you should be focusing your efforts on the early detection of individuals who are likely to abuse children in the future, not merely avenging children who have already been abused

Shirley says: We have registration for after…. the fact. It continues to grow at an alarming rate…..after the fact. After the fact is not good enough. After the fact is too late. Prevention deals with before the fact and isn’t that what we want?

Of course let us not forget Jan Kruska, she posts this fake act also. Not only on her own website but on a blog she made hijacking the name of Petra Luna It's just another of her acts of civil disobedience. But, we'll come back to that another day. Instead I'd like to point out that Jan, directly under her posting of Dylan Thomas's plan for baby raping, has posted JD420's version of Dr. Hall's study on arousability. Well she doesn't call him Dr. Hall, she left off his last name, know why? She doesn't know what the study says, you think? She knows what that pedophile website SAYS it says. Does she honestly believe that a legitimate researcher would write something like this in his analysis?

The results of surveys like this smash any theories that pedophiles are but a small minority. Combine this with what we know about internet habits and other factors and you no longer have a minority, like the gay community, you have a huge silent majority. Surveys like this suggest that something like 8 or 9 out of ten men are sexually attracted to young girls as well as women. Shocking? Not really. Women have known that instinctively for years. Women would pay a fortune for the skin, sparkling eyes and body of a 10-year-old. This is not an effort to undermine women - shapely women will always be attractive to men. It is those with slim girl-like figures however, that receive many times more attention.

We first wrote about her belief in this here, and she quickly removed that one link to the pedo website. LOL She missed the other one however. Or the fact that what she's posted is not what is in the report.

I just have to ask myself. Did the pedofreaks dupe Jan? Or is Jan just trying to dupe everyone else. You know.....like she does Big Brother?

Interesting that she would choose their Silent Majority article to illustrate the importance of preventing child sexual abuse.

When you see the term No More Victims Act 2007, now you'll know where it came from. I firmly believe we should keep this sort of deception and manipulation in mind every single time one of them opens their mouths.

Exactly who are they representing, these Jan Kruska's and Shirley Lowery's? Is it YOUR children? Or are they taking care of the Dylan Thomas's and the Jan Kruska's and the Shirley Lowery's of the world? My bet is, it's not our kids. After all, according to them "While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life"