Jeffrey Brisson "You're a Hero!"

Who is The Night Raven?

Jeffrey Brisson
AKA
Edward Buzzard
AKA
The Night Raven
AKA
tnraven

Pervert, pedofreak, pedophile, baby raper and fully supported by GirlChat, BoyChat and all the nodding pedoheads.

I waited a bit to see what their reaction would be, even though I already knew. It is obvious, none of the pedophile community will denounce his actions. They would rather pretend it didn't happen and bury their heads in the sand as though by doing so they can keep attention away from themselves. In actuality it draws more attention to them. Their lack of response, while expected, is very telling of the mindset and the activities that are routine amongst that group of SCUMBAGS that is BoyChat. They are not outraged that someone would sexually assault a baby. They don't love children. They see children as sexual objects and they convince themselves and each other that children want to be molested.

Just as the sadistic Nigel Oldfield showed up here trying to minimize and justify Jeffrey and Harold Spurling's actions - and just as "d" once defended men charged with possession of child pornography featuring infants. "d" said

So, instead of saying "ohmygawdtheyareabusinginfants thebastards!" the police and news should be saying "thank goodness these kids won't remember what happened."

Read Jeffrey Brisson's wikisposure article. Read the news. See how he and Aztram made video's of him sexually assaulting a 3 month old baby.

"When they looked on the desktop, there was an icon that they believed depicted child pornography," Pearson said. "Upon further examination of that video clip, they determined that Mr. Brisson had sexually assaulted that 3-month-old, that infant that was on scene."

Remember some quick facts about Jeffrey,

The Night Raven is not especially choosy when it comes to boys or girls - he likes them both. His age of attraction is 2 - 6 for boys, and 3 - 8 for girls.

"If you have ever have had the honor to seen a Raven up close and observe it's behavior, you will understand what I say. They are reserved yet outspoken, Cautious yet adventurous, and righteous yet vicious. Just as I am. Anyone who knows me IRL can attest to that. They can be kind gentle creatures, or they can be your worst enemy. Just as I can be."

Jeffrey and Aztram designed a variation of the pedophile symbol for those who prefer little boys. Jeffrey said

"The main idea behind this variation of the BLogo is that it distinguishes itself by appearing like a young boys scrawl, giving it an enhanced "little boy" flavor. It's rounded, soft shape and lack of hard corners and steep angles, is symbolic of the little boys we love."

Remember the community Jeffrey belonged to. Remember what WP once said on BoyChat:

"I've said this a million times, Dylan. And I always get slammed for it. No one wants to admit the fact that the idea of the "celibate paedophile" is a kite that just won't fly because it implies we are sexless or without a sex drive, something that isn't real. It also tells the world you're a lying idiot if you actually expect them to buy that horse shit, worse still, schizophrenic if you actually believe it yourself."

And remember most of all the words of their leader. Dylan Thomas, the webmaster of BoyChat:

Some years ago, another good friend of mine IMed me and said, "Dylan, I'm in trouble. I got caught with a boy. I'm probably going to go to prison." I think I took him completely by surprise when my response was, "Good for you."

He asked, "You aren't mad?" I said that I was to some degree pissed about the things he and the boy would both have to go through as they were ground up by the system, but the fact that he had sex with a boy? "Are you kidding? You got some!

As far as I'm concerned, if you go to prison for something involving a boy (or a photo of a boy, or a movie of a boy, or whatever), you're not a "fallen boylover." You are a hero boylover. You did it. You've been there, you've done that.

When you see a young teenager, a kid - not a pedophile - so obviously taken in by these baby raping activists. The one's they get to spread their agenda for them, to repeat their lies "Pedophiles love children. Pedophiles would never hurt children" Point them to Harold and Jeffrey for fine examples of what pedophiles really are.

UPDATE

Jeffrey Brisson and Harold Spurling were back in court yesterday. Check out the news and watch for them to be back in court on May 20

Newly released arrest and search warrants served on two city men accused of sexually assaulting a 3-month-old baby reveal they were likely using local children to make pornographic movies and one man admitted the duo preferred molesting children under the age of 9.

During questioning, Spurling told officers the two molested children and he preferred having sex with boys ages 4 to 9 while Brisson preferred male and female infants and toddlers, according to one of the warrants.

The warrant indicates that Brisson and Spurling repeatedly committed sexual acts with a Middletown victim that began nine years ago when the boy was 5. The boy told police he thought he had been videotaped while performing sexual acts, police said.

Police started investigating Brisson and Spurling Jan. 4 after a city middle-school staff member received an anonymous flier providing information that the two were using the Internet to engage in “pedophile activities.” Officers were able to confirm that the flier wasn’t a hoax by determining that one of the addresses listed on the sheet was that of a 14-year-old boy now living in Middletown.

Visit WIKISPOSURE for the rest of the story

AZTRAM and THE NIGHTRAVEN

Happy Alice Day

Repost from April 25, 2007. Help us countdown to Alice Day 2008!

This is tough work we do, isn't it? I think it's time we all took a breather. So kick back and help us as we celebrate the Anti's hijacking of Alice Day.



If you'd like to see more visit HEREand HERE and HERE

Thank you to all the Anti's!

Battery Acid or Liquid Latex?

What is THAT you might ask.

Well, let me tell you.

That my friends, is your common variety SCUMBAG.

His name is Daniel Czajkowski, and he just got busted in a porn sting in Florida, along with 20 other men in Polk County.

"19 suspects are in custody. 2 others are still on the loose. The suspects are all men, ages 17-64."

Operation Defender, an undercover investigation which started in October of 2007 involved computer downloads and swapping of images over the internet. Over 100,000 images and 500 videos were recovered. The children have yet to be identified.

I was astounded to find that immediately the registered sex offender activists and pedophile apologists moved in to leave comments on the news stories, instructing people of how ignorant they were and on many instances leaving comments that "most child pornography was created by teenagers spreading images of themselves on MySpace". They are saying this on an article describing what these men were in possession of.

Images of children as young as 1 month old

The average age of the child victims appeared to be between 7 and 9

Videos of minors in sex acts with other children, adults and animals

Investigators also discovered these men were in possession of a power point tutorial depicting how to sexually molest children between the ages of birth and 8 years old.

The four-minute video outlined, by age group, instruments that could be used to sexually molest children. It also provided information, with photos to demonstrate techniques, on how to hide the signs of sexual abuse from a spouse or from the mother of a child.

The video closed with the message: "There are many other options. So have fun and be creative."

Dubbed the "poster child" of Operation Defender,
Joseph Allen was in possession of over 80,000 images and videos.

"Absolutely Addicted" his keyboard was covered with cigarette ashes and he kept a gallon jug under his desk so that he wouldn't have to take time away from his perverted endeavors to urinate.

"He made it so he didn't have to get up from his computer," authorities said.

Is there anything you can think of that makes THIS pervert any different than any other pervert?






Up next we have Mitchell Parker.

Unlike some of the others this guy said he didn't do it.

But concludes

"I am disgusted. I wish I was in a battery acid pool right now."

Why, Mitchell? I thought you didn't do it?






Derek Fraser, a 17 year old high school student said:

"I did it. But it was a mistake"

And Eric Curtis tried to blame it on his stepson.

Sheriff Judd Grady said: "These men are absolutely disgusting. They are deviants. I have never seen anything as repulsive as our detectives and prosecutors are dealing with today."

HERE we talked about people such as that. One of them, the incessant pain-in-the-ass harassing pedophile nobody Nigel Oldfield, who once wrote this regarding his own experiences with child porn addiction

• I had an unclean house
• I have been obsessed
• I had no sexual inhibitions whatsoever
• I am not going to attempt to frighten the reader into abstinence
• I hardly cared at all during the episode about these immense consequences, such was the power of the combination of contributing factors and the intensity
• I started to create the most offensive series of photo-realistic fabrications I could imagine
• I would describe it as though Evil was sat with me for a few weeks
• The biggest mistake I will ever make in my life, but I don't regret it

We've talked multiple times about the types of things these guys look for. The search terms that they use. And of course how stupid they are. Not a day goes by that I don't have a pervert come in search of something, only to come back 15 minutes later with the term changed a little. When he still doesn't find it he comes back again with a different term. Did he not realize that he kept clicking on us? I can imagine him thinking "Where's the porn dammit?! It's got to be here somewhere! Where have they hidden the child porn!!" Finally in frustration he clicks the child pornography tag, and amazingly enough sometimes the guy will STILL come back. That's an example of need-driven behavior. THAT is someone society needs to be protected from, because he WILL NOT STOP. He will never stop. Not until we take his options away from him.

Here's some new terms:

• pedo 5yo vaginal penetration
• picture little girl masturbating
• little girls get rape video
• dogs fucking lolita underage preteen underground
• helping child masturbate
• 5yo raped and fuck
• bondage pedo pics
• boys raped by men porn
• child pornography" infant pacifier vagina"
• how to find pedo pics
• how to beat phallometric testing
• is it normal to fantasize about little girls?
• pedo fuck hard child porn
• pedo pain young girl hurt pain torture
• watch free brutal porn rape molestation online now
• how do I hide my child porn?
  

Does that sound to you like fun-loving teenagers sharing images of themselves with their friends? It sure doesn't to me. (Or any other rational person I would imagine) No, what it sounds like to me is the very things of interest to these men busted due to Operation Defender. It sounds just the like men busted due to Operation Achilles. One of those being Jim Freeman, a registered sex offender, sex offender defender, baby raper apologist, activist for baby raper rights and himself directly responsible for the sexual abuse of an untold number of children.

As I previously said here: When the pedophile community attempt to ridicule what you are doing, when they scoff and when they rant, sometimes when they try to charm you...... remember who and what they are. Remember their motives for saying these things, and remember above all the results from the N-JOV Study

more than half of child pornography possession cases began with reports from individuals to law enforcement

So just keep on keeping on and do your part, however big or small that may be. All efforts lead to successes such as this one.

Pedophiles!

Pedophile! Is there an uglier word in the English language that you know of? Pedophile! There is nothing worse you could call someone than a pedophile. Once someone is known as a pedophile all other possible insults go out the window. I think of them as slugs. Those slithery, slimy disgusting creatures. The only living thing on earth that serves no known purpose is a slug.....and a pedophile.

Pedophiles try to legitimize their perversion by calling themselves child lovers. Boy lovers or girl lovers for those 'exclusively' attracted. Some prefer the term minor attracted adult. MAA. They don't particularly like the term baby raper. They prefer intergenerational sex, as though softening the sound of it will improve their reputations.

We need to never, ever use those words. They are pedophiles! They are child molesters, baby rapers, soul thieves, manipulators, liars, pedovores and pedofreaks. They are freakopaths, creepazoids, monsters, predators and destroyers of children. Pedophiles are many many things, but there's one thing they're not and that's child lovers.

There was a case not long ago that got my attention. A man caught emailing a video. The video was of a young girl being sodomized. She was screaming. My first thought was of that poor child and what she went through. My next thought was that it had been captured on video. And it was being shared. Traded, emailed, spread around like a funny joke that people share. Why? Because there are men who get their sexual thrills by looking at it. They LIKE it. Nigel Leigh Oldfield aka WM Critest, he likes it. He would defend anyones right to look at it. And he does.

The cruel, senseless nature of perverts like Nigel Oldfield isn't deserving of euphemisms. There's no sugar coating what happened to the children pictured in the photos, he enjoyed. There's no sugar coating for the children which have to live with what happened to them for the rest of their lives. No matter what name pedophiles want to give themselves, here at Absolute Zero they will always be regarded as Child Molesters, Baby Rapers and Perverts.

The special agent visit

Nigel nigel nigel ... when will you learn? Your the criminal here. Don't try to push me around.
I am not a 15 yr old girl anymore.




A special thanks goes out to Stitches and Jacey for their help!

Those Pesky Armies!

Dylan Thomas, webmaster of BoyChat, calls Shirley Lowery

"the feisty woman who has been writing so vehemently about the excesses of sex offender legislation? She's gotten some cheers on our board; she's someone we can call an ally, isn't she?"

But what Dylan and the blame gamers don't seem to understand is that there's a difference between feisty and psychotic. But that's another story.

Today we're going to talk about how to get the most from free email services, acts of civil disobedience, building armies and disguising yourself for 20 bucks or less.

First we have Shirley who told her SOSEN people

"We know that the liklihood [sic] of an SO being tracked down and murdered is very small"

and encourages them to think "outside the box....think unpredictable" for ways to get what they want. And sure enough they do. rainbows4evr2002 comes up with a plan to make it seem as though they are concerned for the safety of the sex offenders family.....

"I think a twist on this would be horrendous to deal with, but is different from the normal paranoid idiots thought. And it would be a place to start"

Ah, those good ol' brainstorming sessions. You just never know what will pop up next. Why just take a look at this one:

shirleyceo wrote: To: nationalsosen@yahoogroups.com
From: "shirleyceo"
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 23:26:04 -0000
Subject: [nationalsosen] Re: ...........................We are going to build an army........................

Please work with me, people. I need every member to have a minimum of 5 email identities. When those are established come back and join with all of them. Keep using your regular identity for posting and set the remaining 4, 40 or 400 on no e-mail. On the sign-in page just put the word "duplicate" so we will know. We don't have a lot of clout so we will build some. We can build as much as we want and we will use it to win battles. 2007 is going to be a different kind of year.

This is the first step in a bigger plan where each of us will have many voices. Public forums are not the place to lay out the details of a game plan. We have learned from professionals that there are benefits to padding a registry. It inflates a problem to gigantic proportions. Why not inflate the opposition to useless laws?

Shirley/ceo/
sosen

Next on the email campaign we have none other than Jan Kruska. How can she possibly top that you might wonder

If you're State (like Arizona or New Jersey) is trying to pass legislation where you need to register all of your present and future online identifiers THAT YOU may USE (OR NOT :-), bring them BOX FULLS and or E-MAIL THEM DAILY with several new ones. iF E-MAILING THEM BE SURE TO DO SO IN PDF FORMAT SO THAT THE INFO CANNOT BE COPIED AND PASTED. THIS WILL FORCE AUTHORITIES TO HAND ENTER EACH ENTRY. Make up as many as you can, it doesn't matter whether you will ever use them or not, The point is inundate the heck out of them so that they realize the ridiculousness, futility, and colossal waste of resources of such ill thought out legislation.

That's how. Even Jan herself admits that there are some pretty dangerous people out there. Even Jan herself admits that children need to be protected from them. But in Jan's twisted, selfish little bimbohead those children don't matter. They aren't as important as Jan's wishes. She advocates wasting taxpayer dollars, overburdening the system and outright preventing it from being effective against anyone, even those that she herself admits are dangerous. It makes me wonder just what it is she's up to besides being an anti-child activist.

Last year she created a MySpace account listing her age as 16. No one can do that for you. No, you have to confirm the account FROM the email you registered. Perhaps like her best friend 45 year old Rhonda Lee. She's made her a MySpace too. Only Rhonda claims to be a 16 year old male. See?Before you ask, that's not just any Rhonda Lee, that's Rhonda4Hope, RhondaLee60, Rhonda6513, the Rhonda Lee sex offender activist, SOSEN Legal Director and Moderator of SOSEN Arizona.

And what have we here? So far it seems they've built an army where there was none, they've created havoc, undermined the system, and ripped off taxpayers. What more could there possibly be? How far would someone go? I'm especially curious considering that MySpace thing. From Jan Kruska's website

One of Big Brothers growing technology is facial recognition.

Readers are urged to do more research on this growing evasive [sic] system of technology and it's uses. Basically a camera, like the one that takes your photograph at the motor vehicle department (usually provided by Viisage) when you get your driver's license or security cameras placed at various locations. The photo is then run through a software program that takes very precise measurements of your facial features, down to micrometers.

There is a very simple, easy to use and cost effective way to combat and confuse this system. Check out theatrical liquid latex. Available online and of course, on ebay.com . Applying a small amount to your nose forehead and chin for example should do the trick. Blends well and comes off easily. It is even available in different colors such as black if you really want to get serious about changing your image. >>>Average cost is between $5-$20 USD

And just in time for Halloween too!

"I am on the registry and have been for almost 15 years and I have never missed a Halloween yet. I do it for my kids so that they can maintain some sort of normalcy in this crazy world and I will continue to do so, being civilly disobedient whenever possible"

Meet Latex Jan AKA Nigel Kruska

Graphics Courtesy Jacey

They're holding out for a Hero

"Experts have often wondered what proportion of men who download explicit sexual images of children also molest them. A new government study of convicted Internet offenders suggests that the number may be startlingly high: 85 percent of the offenders said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors, from inappropriate touching to rape."

Traffic in online child pornography has exploded in recent years, and the new study, some experts say, should be made public as soon as possible, to identify men who claim to be “just looking at pictures” but could, in fact, be predators.

Let's look at a few of these men.

First up we have actor Chris Langham

Sentenced to a mere 10 months in prison for downloading child pornography.

"Once the 43 days he has spent in jail since his conviction are taken into account, the actor will serve just over three and a half months."

Outrageous? You bet it is.

What was Chris looking at?

"One video found at his home featured a girl of eight who was being abused by her father and has since been rescued by police.

She had been subjected to what is known as 'level 5 abuse' - the most extreme level and which can include sadism and bestiality.

In the film she was bound, naked and blindfolded, and tied to a ceiling."

Next we have Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the the Virginia ACLU, youth sports coach and an advocate for unrestricted use of the Internet in public libraries was sentenced to seven years in federal prison for sadistic child pornography.

Charles Rust-Tierney, 51, pleaded guilty in June to downloading hundreds of pornographic images of children as young as 4. Authorities said Rust-Tierney used a computer in his 11-year-old son's bedroom to view the files, which included a six-minute video that depicted sexual torture of children, set to a song by the rock band Nine Inch Nails

And what have we here?

David Arthur Joy

A pedophile who campaigned for sex with children as young as four to be legal, now sentenced to an indeterminate jail term after he pleaded guilty to 11 counts of making or possessing indecent images of children.

David, a member of the notorious Pedophile Information Exchange or P.I.E. "also had a string of previous convictions for child sex offenses dating back to the 1970s and 1980s, including the attempted rape of a young girl and indecent assault."

Now, before you get all excited, no albertRoss wasn't busted in this raid. It's just that...well, his house looks just like David's.

"As part of coordinated raids on the remaining leading members of PIE, officers from Scotland Yard's Paedophile Unit swooped on recluse Joy's one-bedroom flat.

The property was so untidy that officers had to climb around rotting piles of newspapers, rubbish and clutter to find what they were looking for, the court heard.

They eventually unearthed some 1,129 indecent images involving children as young as one in innocent-looking files by his bed, between the pages of books, in magazines and on two home computers.

Several were in the very worst "level 5" category, which includes sadism"

And now meet David's friends

61-year-old Thomas Victor O'Carroll, an out of work journalist and 67-year-old Michael John De Clare Studdert , a retired Anglican minister, were arrested in January 2006 after the Met's Paedophile Unit conducted a series of co-ordinated searches and arrests.

O'Carroll is a high-profile activist who has campaigned to legitimise certain aspects of paedophilia and was the chairman of the now defunct Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) in the UK. He has latterly been a member of the International Paedophile Child Emancipation forum (IPCE).

During the arrest phase of the operation, a search of Studdert's extensive country home, and some 17 acres of grounds, uncovered two highly sophisticated hidden compartments within his bathroom One was hidden behind a false wall by the bath and the other was hidden in the eves of the house and accessed by a secret door opposite the toilet. The 'hides' contained a massive hoard of indecent images of children, believed to be his lifetime's collection, with images from the 1950's to modern day in a variety of formats.

The formats included videos, photographic slides, cine films, photographs, magazines and photographic negatives. In terms of formats it was the widest ranging personal collection of abusive material known to the Metropolitan Police Service ever attributed to one person.

Well what was the harm in that? They were only lookin' weren't they? That shouldn't be a crime should it? Why just last year after 125 men were arrested for possession of child pornography including infants so young they had pacifiers in their mouths *d* of boychat had this to say

So, instead of saying "ohmygawdtheyareabusinginfants thebastards!" the police and news should be saying "thank goodness these kids won't remember what happened."

Let's not forget that. Let's not forget how much the filthy pedophiles just love children. And while we're remembering that, let's also remember BoyChat's very own fallen heroes Camper and Jim Finn aka Jimf3. And let's also remember GirlChat's Infinity, Lux, Taf-Kat and Nigel Oldfield all guilty of exploiting children through the use of child pornography. Sweet little pics? Child-like images? Oh no. See, Taf-Kat had

many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine.

And Nigel had

bestiality, heterosexual sex, cross-dressing, masturbation, torture, all ages of children

Maybe some of that had to do with Nigel being an

"exhibitionist cross dressing bisexual"

I don't know, he brags about it, and he's not even remotely sorry for it. Perhaps he simply can't decide which word is a noun and which is a verb.



He had this to say about it

• I had an unclean house
• I have been obsessed
• I had no sexual inhibitions whatsoever
• I am not going to attempt to frighten the reader into abstinence
• I hardly cared at all during the episode about these immense consequences, such was the power of the combination of contributing factors and the intensity
• I started to create the most offensive series of photo-realistic fabrications I could imagine
• I would describe it as though Evil was sat with me for a few weeks
• The biggest mistake I will ever make in my life, but I don't regret it

He doesn't regret it? Well, why would he? He doesn't believe he's done anything to regret. No, you see he's only sorry he got caught. Which sounds verrrrry familiar now that you mention it....could it be the Webmaster of Boychat perhaps?

"So let's say, for the sake of argument, that he really did have child pornography...The question is, "So what?" So, Jim got to see something that we all wish we could see.

So then... maybe Jim got to see it. Should I "cluck, cluck" and say, "Oh, how could you, Jim, you've let us all down?" No. What I would say if I knew Jim got a glimpse would be, "Way to go, boy." I'd give him a thumbs-up and, if I got a chance, I'd ask for a description.

You broke the law... but you didn't do anything I don't wish I could do, too. I won't... but damn, I wish I could

Some years ago, another good friend of mine IMed me and said, "Dylan, I'm in trouble. I got caught with a boy. I'm probably going to go to prison." I think I took him completely by surprise when my response was, "Good for you."

He asked, "You aren't mad?" I said that I was to some degree pissed about the things he and the boy would both have to go through as they were ground up by the system, but the fact that he had sex with a boy? "Are you kidding? You got some!

I've got to protect my own security--don't ask me to hold on to your CD collection while you're in jail, and for the love of Timmy, if you know you're doing something illegal, don't fucking tell me about it

As far as I'm concerned, if you go to prison for something involving a boy (or a photo of a boy, or a movie of a boy, or whatever), you're not a "fallen boylover." You are a hero boylover. You did it. You've been there, you've done that

When you outlaw who we are, we don't have any choice except to be a bunch of outlaws. Gimme me a break: let me write the laws for a while. I'll make heterosexual behavior illegal, and then we'll see how long everyone else can stay out of jail. Our boylove criminals aren't something to be ashamed of; they're something to be proud of!

Some people say that Dylan Thomas's influence is limited. They say that the vomit he spews forth on a regular basis would only influence pedoheads, and they're all deluded anyway. It's easy for Dylan to puff them up with baby raping pride. They'd do it anyway with or without him.

And while that in itself may be true, there are other borderline psychotics out there. Other unstable people. People who WANT so much to Believe that they latch on to this vomit spewing, ugly, pock marked little weasel of a man. They latch on....and they hang on for dear life. Sometimes they even spread his agenda around in seemingly unlikely places. But, that's another story.

Graphics courtesy of Jacey

If it walks like a duck......

Hey, remember that crazy Aussie Pedohead we saw on video a few months ago? You know, the one that reminded us so much of Nigel? Well, he just lost an appeal BOO HOO.

His name is Geoffrey Leonard and he's 73. In 1990 he was convicted of sexual assault against two brothers, then 12 and 16 years old for which he served 3 years in prison.

In 2006 he was before the court again charged with possession of 400 child pornography images. He pled guilty.

Then he appealed. Now his appeal application has been dismissed due to the fact that Geoffrey, being the brilliant pedohead that he is....posted an edited version of the statements made by those two boys he molested so many years ago on his website.

Geoff lost his appeal because of it.......and now BoyChat is so very nice to share that site that cost him his appeal.....with others by linking to a mirror site of it. (The actual site is long gone) I recommend you not bother. It's huge and it's nothing more than pedobabble and just as incoherent as Nigel Oldfield, Jd420 and danyfreak. It's actually painful to read so I'll save you the trouble and show you a bit of it here. This is just a small list of Geoffrey-isms:

• The poor kid who reaches 16 and who is innocent faces a life where he will never truly lose that innocence. He will never be truly sexually aware. he will never possess real sexual skill and his sexual relationships will always be difficult. The age of 16 is far too late to start learning about sex.


• If we give kids bread and honey in kindergarten, they will love the stuff from then on......What I am advocating is that, starting in kindergarten, kids should be taught how to masturbate.


• The thing is to catch the kids before their ideas become fixed


• I would go so far as to say that I strongly suspect that most people in our society are child sexual offenders, and that all but the unfortunate few have been sexually abused.


• People in authority do not like sex.


• We are a minority group that behaves sexually in the way that we do because we have no other choice.


• I firmly believe that kids should be taught to have sex from caring and skilled older partners.


• Christianity has attempted to abolish sex


• The ability to have good sex does not come out of the clear blue sky. It has to be learned.


• Sex is complicated.

Geoffrey obviously has issues. Look at a portion of a letter he wrote to one of the boys:

What we did is considered to be the ultimate act of intimacy. God has joined us in an act which at the time seemed a little clumsy & painful but in retrospect was like entering the gates of heaven

And as if that's not enough he posted the boys statements to police about what Geoff did to them. He edited it first of course then left this comment

In addition there were a few charges relating to his 12 year old brother, one instance of oral sex and a couple of instances of masturbation. Hardly monstrous acts. And the whole thing is hardly the crime of the century.

Three years in prison and Geoffrey still has no insight into his own behavior does he? He still has no recognition of the boundaries that exist between people or the realization that....well that he has issues. But it reminded me so much of

28's statement:

Erotic encounters, involving no penetration, should be at worst minor annoyances.

and Demosthenes who thought it acceptable to give drugs to a child to prevent them from going through puberty.....for his own sexual gratification.

Or Abraxas who was oblivious to the psychological discomfort a child experienced when forced to urinate in front of her classmates.

Or Vespucci who cops a feel of a sleeping 12 year old boy

Or Lindsay Ashford who believes 6 month old babies can consent to sex and is attracted to little girls because they are ripe

Or Olive Fweak who thinks message boards keep him from raping children.

Or Jack McClellan who took pictures of little girls and posted them on a pedophile website telling fellow perverts where to find them

Or Zlurker who said

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

Or Nigel Leigh Oldfield who said

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email)

We all view Geoffrey Leonard as a total lunatic I'm sure. Watching him in the video it's hard to believe he hadn't already been committed somewhere isn't it? But are his beliefs any different than all of these other pedo activists that we've had the misfortune of crossing paths with? I'll let you decide and why don't you compare your findings with those of Febri-Chan

with a little editting and dash of commentary to guide the viewers' perception, they take everything out of context and twist every single thing he said to make it sound like the guy is as "batshit" as every should think.......Anyway, the guy didn't seem crazy or evil to me because I know in my gut that he was probably goaded into acting that way by some vulture of a reporter who was patiently and antagonistically waiting for the guy to snap.

Indeed.

You talking to me?

Nigel Leigh Oldfield, the convicted child pornographer, long ago banned from AZ for trolling behaviors and psychopathic harassment tries to prove once again how utterly deluded he really is. Once upon a time on the blog of nothingness Nigel accused me of being Rez. Now I admit I took that as a compliment but when he proceeded to claim I was every member of AZ I was stunned. Until of course I realized that his accusations were just a mere symptom of his many mental disorders.

Reminiscent of danyfreak who believes I'm Rez, Violet, Llort, Jacey, Beachbitch and Daydreamer....Nigel now believes me to be Blackribbonday as well. And while it is flattering of course for one to think me capable of pulling off such a feat, I must admit that I couldn't care less what he believes, and I hope it doesn't disturb any of you guys either.

You see pedofreaks don't recognize children as separate people from themselves, they view them as objects there for the taking. And just as Nigel sees children in this light, he also sees the Anti's as one entity. Cognitive distortion at it's finest.

So let us use this opportunity to have a bit of fun. I'm going to show you what true sockpuppetry looks like. With none other than the self-proclaimed king of pedovores himself..... Lindsay Ashford.

Here we have Lindsay posting as Neptune on GirlChat.









And here we have Lindsay posting as Bereshith replying to Lindsay posting as Neptune.







To continue their discussion amongst themselves, here we have Lindsay posting as Neptune replying to Lindsay posting as Bereshith.








And to round things out nicely, here we have Lindsay posting as Neptune claiming he should have spoke as Lindsay while replying to Lindsay who's posting as AP.

Do we all understand sockpuppetry now? Everyone please point at Lindsay and laugh. Just ignore Nigel, he's not worth your effort.

Cause for concern?

In a recent discussion over on the absolute nothing blog, a couple of comments made by the poster WM, otherwise known as Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield really made me think about the kind of people we are dealing with here.

I have taken thousands of images of minors, throughout my life, and have never masturbated over one of them. However, once again, I reserve the right to do so, if I ever wished.

He reserves the right to take pictures of peoples children without consent, and then use them for masturbation if he wishes to, and he sees nothing wrong in that? The second comment is a real corker, not only does he flout his contempt for the legal system he mocks those he would abuse if he chose to, and he still says he's not a sociopath.

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email).

I will leave you with a final comment from him, bearing in mind this man feels he is unjustly labelled by me as a sociopathic paedophile, judge for yourself.

I have served my time. The job is done. Unless, of course, you mean ‘rehabilitation’, in the sense of being subservient to an unjust and ill-informed system? That is not my style, never was, never will be.

PCC agrees, he's a 'pervert'.

Disgraced teacher Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield took offence at an article in the sun calling him a 'paedo' and a 'pervert', and took the matter up with the press complaints commission. After all he claims he'd simply downloaded the 11,000 indecent images of children for research purposes, to explore his own sexuality. He continues to deny he is a paedophile or a pervert, despite his conviction for possession of the aforementioned 11,000 images, and his continued activity within the pro-paedo community via the site www.critest.com

The following are excerpts from the PCC ruling on the case Oldfield V The Sun (comments in italics mine) : (Ref : 061568)

'The commission noted the complainant had raised concerns that the article was innacurate when it stated that he was a 'pervert' and a 'paedo'...'

(Although when posting here on AZ under the alias WM he's freely admitted to being a 'pervert' he's also quite happy to answer to the term 'wanker'.)

'The commission addressed first the complainant's concerns about the terms - 'paedo' and 'pervert' - used to describe him by the newspaper. Clause 1 (Accuracy) states that the press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information. In this instance, given the nature of the complainants conviction for making indecent images of children, the commission was satisfied that readers would not have been misled by the terms used to describe him by the newspaper.'

(Oh dear it seems they agree that in light of the evidence it's quite acceptable to call him a 'pervert' and a 'paedo', well if the cap fits and all that, might be best if he gets used to wearing it! The PCC goes on to detail further codes and clauses examined when deciding the case and then concludes with the following:)

'Finally the commission did not consider that there were any issues to pursue under Clause 4 (Harassment) and Clause 12 (Discrimination) of the code.'

So there you have it, I daresay he feels this isn't the end of the matter etc etc. At the end of the day, if you get caught with 11,000 indecent images of children on your pc, what level of denial/delusion would prompt you to expect anyone to believe you were not a 'pervert' or a 'paedo'?