Derek Logue is a master of it. And apparently it is the ONLY thing he's mastered aside from blame gaming. Now he presumes to lecture "media hounds" on the proper use of the word pedophile and claims there can be no such thing as a "convicted pedophile". Why? Well a couple of reasons, one is that pedophiles CAN control themselves according to Derek Logue, the convicted child molester. Also according to this wacked-out-victim-blaming-piece-of-shit-cockroach one can't be a convicted pedophile because pedophilia is a medical diagnosis.
Pedophilia is also a common word. It has a common meaning which is "sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object". It's in Websters. Look it up.
A part of semantics is also the study of how words evolve. My contention is that words mean what society decides they mean. "Gay" for example. This is really unimportant though because we all know that "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet" and "A pedo by any other name would smell as foul". The name doesn't change what it is.
I recognize that it is important to someone like Derek Logue however because he doesn't want that word associated with himself, despite the fact that he admitted he was attracted to a child. And despite the fact that he molested that child, and then spent years online blaming her and everyone else for his crime while associating with and defending known and admitted pedophiles - he doesn't want anyone to think that about him. He prefers to minimize:
"Very few Registrants are clinically diagnosed with pedophilia"
When we consider the sex offender defender mantra has been that sex offenders are not routinely assessed to determine if they are or are not pedophiles. No registry is going to say "he was a pedophile" and therefore Derek has absolutely no knowledge whatsoever regarding how many offenders are pedophiles and even if he did - that knowledge would be wasted on a fool like Derek.
I generally just shake my head in disbelief at this pathetic and despicable excuse for a man but then he always manages to outdo himself with attempts to lecture people with convoluted statements like this
Stop assuming every registrant is a pedophile and misusing the term. You have done enough damage by misusing and abusing this term.
"You have done enough damage"
Really?
How about this one:
How about a little truth in addressing this issue? Fanning the flames of blind hate and stupidity has not helped matters
Okay, I'll give you a little truth. Derek Logue is nauseating on his best days. He should quit fanning the pain of those who have been devastated by stupid selfish demented pricks like him by saying such profoundly idiotic things. It has not helped matters.
Mary Duval believes no one should be on a public registry. (Except for people who criticize her views of course) She believes the "truly dangerous" offenders should never be released from prison. She says this even though she has listed a "fact" on one of her propaganda brochures that long prison sentences make the community less safe.
I'm not sure which she actually believes - if either - but I'm going to go with the assumption that what she really thinks is that "dangerous sex offenders" should be incarcerated and never released again to the public. This would fit with her statements such as"He should never get out of prison" or "He should just be shot".
So if that's true which sex offenders does she think poses a danger to the community? She defined it:
Repeat Sex Offenders
Those whose victims are strangers
Someone who uses violence
Mary Duval has further defined a repeat sex offender as someone who has been convicted of a sex crime. So according to her statements a man who is caught for the first time and who has multiple victims and was molesting children for years and years and years before being detected would be a first time offender and the "repeat offender" factor wouldn't apply to him and he would therefore not be dangerous.
If he groomed children over a long period of time, if he plied them with gifts and attention then maintained their compliance with the abuse through the use of psychological manipulation, that would also not be a dangerous person since he didn't use a gun or knife or fists to secure their cooperation. A man like that would not be considered dangerous according to Mary Duval.
If the person obtained his victims by dating or marrying a woman with children, or by playing ball with kids in the neighborhood, or volunteering as a Little League coach or being a Boy Scout leader, a Big Brother, a Church volunteer - or Church leader for that matter - that person wouldn't be a perpetrator against strangers and therefore would not be dangerous according to Mary Duval. Someone like Harold Spurling for example.
Mary Duval repeats that we need to start distinguishing between the "violent" and the "non-violent". What would she consider Harold Spurling? He didn't meet any of her criteria.
Harold Spurling who along with his partner molested a three month old baby and multiple children in their community. Some of their victims were abused for years. Harold Spurling who had the baby in his apartment that day because he had volunteered to babysit her. Harold Spurling who was known to play ball with the neighborhood kids. Harold Spurling who had one of the largest collections of child pornography in the history of Connecticut - much of it produced by himself. Harold Spurling who put my pedo-predator-detector into overdrive with his poem:
Little boy, Pull me inside The sweet dream that is you. Let me hold you; Let me breathe you in. You justify my beating heart. With you, the world and its endless troubles Ceases to exist ... Paradise doesn't hold a candle To you. Sweet expression of perfection; Infantile bliss. You run through my veins, My lifeblood.
Harold Spurling does not fit Mary Duval's definition of "truly dangerous".
Harold Spurling was not a repeat offender as Mary Duval defines it. Harold Spurling did not use physical violence to rape children, he groomed them. Harold Spurling did not sexually assault strangers. And like most people who groom and molest children, one day he will get out of prison. I repeat: One day he will get out of prison. Mary Duval wants to insure that Harold Spurling's "right" to live across from that elementary school is protected. Mary Duval wants to insure that Harold Spurling's "right" to loiter around the playground is protected. Mary Duval wants to deny you the right to know that someone like Harold Spurling has moved into your neighborhood or invited you over for tea. What do you think about that?
On the flip-side of all this I wonder what Mary Duval thinks of Donna Kistler? As a Sosen activist Donna's primary argument was that most children are sexually abused by someone they know and .... it's always the parents fault. She says stranger crimes are rare. This was her basic argument for why the registry should be abolished. Take a look:
"The problem is, MOST child sex crimes or child abuse is caused by someone the child knows and trusts such as a family member. It is also mostly due to parental neglect. IF a child is NOT left alone or unattended, such as walking to and from school or the park then they could not and would not be abducted."
--Donna Kistler
We know that most young children do know their abuser in some way but I fail to see how that fits into Donna's philosophy. I found it quite interesting that while Donna was screaming "there's no stranger crimes" as her Pillar Number One she forgot about her own husband.
You see Peter broke into a woman's home in the middle of the night and raped her in her bed. She was a stranger. On two other occasions he broke into the homes of other women and attempted to rape them. They were strangers as well. Peter went to prison for 15 years, but like all violent rapists he got out one day.
Less than one year after his release he was caught trying to lure a 9 year old child into his car outside an elementary school. She was also a stranger.
So what do we have? Peter Kistler, a repeat sex offender, a violent sex offender and someone who had at least four stranger victims that we're aware of. What do you believe Mary Duval thinks of Peter Kistler? I wonder if Mary Duval would tell Donna that she believes Peter is dangerous and should never get out of prison.
A politician once said:
We're after violent sex offenders who rape, commit sexual battery, murder, aggravated murder, kidnapping with a sexual motivation and prey on our children. Those are the kind of offenders we're after.
Ken Lanning replied:
What we have to understand is that the major distinction between the sexual victimization of adults and the sexual victimization of children is one simple word: consent.
With adults in order for it to be a sex crime you have to have lack of consent and violence. You can have sexual criminals, sexual assault of children, without there being any violence.
And because an offender happens to groom and manipulate and seduce a child who cooperates in their victimization, those individuals, in my opinion, can be very dangerous. They are the most persistent and prolific of all known child molesters.
And to simply exclude individuals who happen to groom and seduce adolescent children doesn't make any sense to me.
We first talked about "Hutch" Robert Hochulski here. Now his defense attorney is trying to claim that one reason he should be given a lighter sentence is because he has support from his wife. My goodness I thought, I wonder if he knows what sort of "support" she offers?
Support like coming here to AZU and denying his crimes while calling us every name in the book for harming an "innocent man's reputation" perhaps?
Well of course we weren't trying to "harm an innocent man" and of course he wasn't innocent. He was sentenced yesterday to almost 6 years. He had over 2000 images on his computer but confessed to less than 600 of them. And of course the images included prepubescent children and sadistic acts. That's a "childlover" for you.
But what I found especially interesting was Bob's letter to the judge. Not only was Bob a moderator on a pedophile board, not only did he continue to log into his account AFTER his arrest but he put himself in a position to - as he called it - "mentor" boys for years. That's what filthy pedophiles do. Now he wants to use the fact that he did "good works for boys"? And HEY! not only Bob, but all his family and friends used the same reasons to the court. "Bob is a GOOD man" and "Bob has done so much work for children" and "I was shocked when I heard and I know that he's sorry and would never do it again"
Funny, that's what Joseph Duncan's friends said about him as well.
Duncan wrote:
Someone told me yesterday that I was different than most other sex offenders because I was only 16 when I committed my crime and have never committed any other sex crimes since (or before).
Of course we know NOW that he HAD already committed other sex crimes. Hindsight is funny that way isn't it?
Robert Hochulski wrote:
My family and my work with youth are two of the most important aspects of my life. Unfortunately, my decisions which have led me to the current situation have effectively taken away my ability to work with and mentor to youth. For this and the pain and suffering I have inflicted upon my family I am truly sorry. However, as I progressed in my counseling, I have come to realize that there was a third party that was involved with my bad decisions. They are children who were coerced and forced into a life of abuse and exploitation. These children must be rescued and provided all necessary help in recovering from their situation. I also believe that the parties responsible for this exploitation must be brought to justice and made to pay for their crimes.
I understand that I must suffer the consequences for my actions and decisions. However, I have begun to turn my life back to the path of living within the laws of man and God. I ask that you see who I am beyond the filter of my crime and see me for the person I am.
I see Bob for exactly what he is. A pedophile who drooled over sexually abused children, invaded their privacy and re-victimized them. (there were three victim impact statements made in this case). Child pornography is not a victimless crime. Men like Bob look at it for a reason. - that reason is not because they're bored and have nothing better to do than twiddle their thumbs. No, Bob searched for it with search terms that included things like "boys in loinclothes" and "boylove". He did this from multiple computers and from multiple places - including from his job at the after school program he ran. NOW Bob says he's sorry, not for the children he harmed but for his family. Funny how they always find God when they want to be saved from prison. But if we've learned anything from all the pedophiles who love to blabber off their mouths it is this: pedophiles cannot and will not change. Bob will spend his 5 years and 8 months in prison and return to the loving enabling arms of his wife. When he does: he'll still be a pedophile. Mark your calenders, I have a feeling we'll be seeing Bob again one day.
Jarred Harrell was arrested today for the murder of Somer Thompson.....among other things.
You may recall little Somer was abducted while walking home from school with friends last October. Somer was 7 years old. Her body was found in a landfill a few days later.
On a related note, I argued with Cheryl Griffiths on a news article about it when Cheryl started attacking Somer's mother for appearing on TV to talk about the case. Cheryl - with her typical venomous hatred for victims of sex crimes said it was "over" and Somer was dead and her mother was just trying to get attention and exploit her own dead child. And I wonder, why would Cheryl care if Somer's mother wanted to keep attention on the case.... the perpetrator had not even been caught. Why?
Jarred Harrell was also arrested for possession of child pornography. If he had not been charged with Somer's murder these self-absorbed apologists for baby-rapers would be saying "It was ONLY pictures, it's not like he abducted and killed a child".
We must remember that almost all child molesters are also found to be in possession of child pornography. And in a recent study 85% of those convicted for possession of child pornography also had committed hands-on offenses against children that had gone undetected.
Jerome Miller of Reform Sex Offender Laws Campaign RSOL claims those offenders in that study only said they molested children because they would get special privileges. Interesting that he knows so much about what ALL the men in that study did or didn't do. So I ask you....would you confess to being a filthy child molester if you really weren't? Child molesters are the bottom of the barrel, a scourge, a blight - the most sickening the thing a person can be and something nobody would want to be identified as.
In this particular study 26% of the offenders were known to have molested children at the time of their conviction but during the study they revealed that 85% of them had. Most of them with multiple victims. In fact, as a group they had 75 child victims amongst them - known at the time of their original sentencing for possession of child pornography. After their confessions that number jumped to 1,777. This study was conducted on 155 men by the way. And yet those people who are interested in removing all penalties for possession of child pornography dismiss this study and instead promote the recent one that came out of Switzerland. You know..... the one who used a BoyChat member as his resource for information?
Is Jarred Harrell unusual in some way? Yes, in that he actually killed his victim. No, in that he didn't JUST get caught with child pornography - he progressed before being captured. People who look at images of children being sexually assaulted are not "the real victims of society" the way the Nambla people at RSOL would have you believe. They are people with a sexual interest in children and as Mary Duval always says "That should be a red flag"
We wrote recently about Jim Freeman - the proud pedophile sex offender activist - who was ordered to pay restitution to "Amy" in the sum of $3,263,758. Unfortunately she'll only receive about forty thousand from his retirement fund. He won't be needing it where he'll be spending the rest of his life after all.
Amy is fighting back. She's filed for restitution against at least 20 other people including Remsen McGinnis Benedict, AKA Wolfman and Raymond Highsmith a former Shriners leader. Hopefully more victims will follow in her footsteps to demand true justice and restitution. Amy begins her story: "My uncle started to abuse me when I was only 4 years old."
The Misty series is one of the most popular and readily available kiddie porn videos on the Internet. It's considered a collector's item among pedophiles. Downloading it is a felony. Officials have identified 750 individuals who possess the Misty series, but they believe tens of thousands of copies are out there.
Today, she suffers from severe post-traumatic stress disorder. Victims of child sexual abuse are more resistant to treatment than victims of other types of PTSD.
The next time you see someone refer to child pornography as a "thought crime" stop for a moment and remember Amy and all the children whose experiences echo hers. The next time you hear a dumb duck say that child pornography may "prevent" a pedophile from molesting a child, remember Amy. Take a moment and read her Victim Impact statement. Keep her story in mind when you hear a victim-bashing dumb duck say "victims can get help and go on with their lives but the offenders life is destroyed forever by these laws".
I am horrified by the thought that other children will probably be abused because of my pictures. Will someone show my pictures to other kids, like my uncle did to me, then tell them what to do? Will they see me and think it's okay for them to do the same thing? Will some sick person see my picture and then get the idea to do the same thing to another little girl? These thoughts make me sad and scared.
I am always scared that people can look at me and tell that I am a victim of sex abuse because my abuse is a public fact. I am worried that when my friends are on the internet they are going to come across my pictures and it fills me with shame and embarrassment.
Every day of my life I live in constant fear that someone will see my pictures and recognize me and that I will be humiliated all over again. It hurts me to know someone is looking at them -- at me -- when I was just a little girl being abused for the camera. I did not choose to be there, but now I am there forever in pictures that people are using to do sick things.
I am being exploited and used every day and every night somewhere in the world by someone. How can I ever get over this when the crime that is happening to me will never end? How can I get over this when the shameful abuse I suffered is out there forever and being enjoyed by sick people?
Please think about me and think about my life when you sentence this person to prison. Why should this person, who is continuing my abuse, be free when I am not free?
We previously talked about Jennifer aka Jack Kaiser aka Lyrical Cancer here
I do admit to having some serious issues with this person. First it was his defense of Jizzony and his incessant harassment of me on YouTube that first set me off. Then he stole all the videos of him that I had worked so hard to steal - by claiming copyright to his child luring videos. Ballsy! But mainly it was just about his pedophilia and attempts to gain access to children.
When he was confronted about his pedo-activities he denied being pedo, can you believe that? I've always wondered why they defend their perversions so fiercely in pedo-places and deny it so strongly in others. Especially when we consider that Jack tried desperately to get attention while describing himself as "borderline sociopath" with an "obsession with necro" - frankly I expected a little more gratitude.
When Jack was arrested recently while trying to enroll in a school as a 15 year old boy I couldn't help but be reminded of Neil Havens Rodreick II - a 30 year old convicted sex offender who enrolled in an Arizona school as a 12 year old and was assisted by family members who pretended to be his father, uncle and grandfather.
There are people who are trying to make this into a "transgender" issue due to the fact that Jack was born female. But the truth of the matter is that Jack has been trying to pass himself off as a young boy for years while running pedophile websites and grooming children. Jack didn't pretend to be a kid in order to "get an education" as some have proposed. See these video clips to see Jack in action and I think there won't be any question about why Jack was trying to enroll in school as a child. From Wikisposure:
What makes the pedophile “Jack” particularly sinister and disturbing is his continued persistence to lure underage boys into a world of dangerous Sex Offenders, Child Pornographers and Pedophile activists with the ruse of being “Lyrical Cancer” (a 14 year old boy), despite continued warnings he has received from the police.
We finally get to put the case of Jim Freeman - proud member of the "greatest group of pedos" and executive director of Sohopeful - the largest group of proud sex offender supporters - to rest.
His life sentence we previously spoke about was just the beginning for this great pedophile sex offender leader. Let's see how it breaks down:
Count 1- Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise - Guilty - Sentence: Life in prison
Count 2 - Conspiracy to Advertise the Exchange of Child Pornography, Knowingly Transporting and Shipping Child Pornography in Interstate and Foreign Commerce via the Computer, Possession of Child Pornography Shipped or Transported in Interstate Commerce, Receipt and Attempted Receipt of Child Pornography and Obstruction of Justice
AND
Count 6 - Advertising the Exchange of Child Pornography - Guilty - 600 months
Count 18 - Knowingly Transporting and Shipping Child Pornography in Interstate and Foreign Commerce via the Computer
AND
Count 29 - Receipt and Attempted Receipt of Child Pornography - Guilty - 480 months
Count 40 - Obstruction of Justice - Guilty 240 months
Wow! 20 years just for using encryption!! Interesting that Jim's former partner Tom Madison once had a full encryption tutorial on his website. I wonder what these people have been teaching each other?
But whether Jim learned his techniques from Tom or taught them to Tom, the end for Jim came today - and with a bang. What he did will haunt him for the rest of his life. As it should. I believe we'll be seeing more and more of these good decisions and as more victims receive restitution perhaps even more victims will step up and demand theirs as well.
Senior U.S. District Judge Lacey A. Collier issued a judgment ordering Freeman to pay restitution in the amount of $3,263,758
This restitution judgment is one of the first of its kind in the United States. At the hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney David L. Goldberg presented the testimony of a forensic pediatrician and a psychologist in order to inform the court of the long-lasting trauma that child pornography has upon the victims whose images are taken. Judge Collier noted, "Each and every individual who possesses and downloads these images victimizes these children." Though Freeman had previously been sentenced to life in prison, he has assets from which the restitution judgment can be obtained.
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse, launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys' Offices and the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov.
Gary Anderson or "Gareth" sure does get around. He changed his name legally from Simeon Hope and uses the nicks CapNemo, KidsPower, and luv_lauren99 (among others)
Gary is a pedophile. He likes little girls and he likes little boys too. He says his "age of attraction" is 8 or 9, and 7-12 for boys.
Of course Gary is also a convicted sex offender. A repeat sex offender.
Gary was a teacher working with children when he was convicted in 2000 for distributing child pornography and possession of greater than 51,000 images. After serving only 18 months in prison he joined pedophile groups and returned triumphantly to his previous activities. But, less than two years after his release he was convicted AGAIN for the same thing.
"Yesterday, he was jailed for 18 months and banned from ever working with children or keeping a computer with Internet access. He was also ordered to serve an extended licence, once released, of four-and-a-half years, to be controlled by the probation service and receive treatment."
Did he keep a computer? Or was he using someone elses? Just as soon he got out there he was again posting all over pedophile message boards. BoyChat, GirlChat, BoyMoment and of course he joined Sosen too.
He talked about his treatment program in very mocking terms. Not only did he not need therapy dammit! But he wasn't going to cooperate with it either.
"My strategy is to tell these lovely, caring people what they like to hear. My real thoughts I keep to myself and for here. I want to be regarded as low risk, so that I can lead a more normal life."
"My feeling about this kind of therapy is that it just puts huge powers into the hands of prejudiced, ignorant fools. Instead of someone being given a limited punishment and then allowed to restart their life, we must wait until they say we are ready. That can be years or never."
Sex Offender Treatment is really gonna help this guy isn't it? While he was in prison he wrote letters to John Hodgson aka taf-kat who roams around the net stealing photos of peoples children from their photo albums for masturbation purposes and just another GirlChat pervert multi-convicted child porn freak who kept the twittering pedophiles apprised of their missing in action hero by posting Gary's letters on GirlChat. Gary wrote:
"I am on licence until December 2008 (yes, '08). The judge laid into me at my sentencing, as these morons do, and said that he expected that I will never again be allowed access to the Net. Well..."
Gary claimed the women in his life all knew what he was and what he did:
"I've had two partners who knew all about my attraction to children (mainly 7-12yo). The first was my wife, who gradually became aware over years as I told her more. She was generally accepting, even when she knew I was downloading CP, but left me instantly when I was arrested for that.
Teh second is my current partner. She doesn't like it, but knew about it from the start, as she visited me in prison. She just thinks men are all pervs anyway."
In addition to communicating with pedophile message boards while still in prison Gary has been on those pedo boards and sex offender boards any time he wasn't in prison. In fact, he's still an active member and had his own comments edited by GirlChat when requesting links to "child modeling photos" just a few months ago. But Gary didn't just have child pornography, distribute child pornography and rant and rave about legalizing child pornography (what the sex offender advocacy groups refer to as a "victimless crime") and legalized adult/child sex (no age of consent laws). NO. He wrote stories too. Graphic stories. The kind of stories Ricky's Mom says helps prevent child sexual abuse.
"My intention from the outset was to at least attempt to fuck her, though I knew it wouldn't be easy with a child so young. But it was the day after her seventh birthday and I wanted her to experience it."
"I wondered what her dad would think if he saw us now: his naked seven-year-old daughter sitting by his couch with her vulva reddened and wet with fucking, and her loving partner, a grown man five times her age sat next to her"
I know what you're thinking but that's not graphic. I left the graphic parts out.
Gary wrote:
"It's an excellent article, and a brave stand to take these days. However, it is not a defence of childloving, merely a defence of our legal rights. Commendable, but there is much further to go. I don't just want my legal rights to defend myself, I want my sexuality made legal."
Yes of course. That's what all childhaters want. From BoyChat and GirlChat to the groups who want the same thing but call it something else like Reform Sex Offender Laws Campaign and Sosen. Abolish age of consent laws.... that will solve the problem of child sexual abuse......it would no longer be illegal to groom, manipulate and molest children. And after all, "the government has no right to interfere."
said Your Dishonor Judge Ian Dearden. You may have heard of this folk musician, civil libertarian scumbag who is now a District Judge in Queensland.
Your Dishonor had been an executive member of the Queensland Council for Civil Liberties - an Australian version of the ACLU - for 20 years and the president for 11, but when he was appointed to this position he became a victim and felt abused by "redneck letter writers" who didn't feel it was appropriate for a man who didn't believe in prison to be in a position of administering justice. He replied:
“Why should anybody be abused for advocating freedom?”
Yes, that's what the Judge said. Of course he also said:
"there was certainly a need to regulate human conduct, a need on occasions for jail time and that the only debate was how much regulation and what penalties were required"
Let's look at how he thinks human conduct should be "regulated"
A Queensland father who bashed a man caught molesting his 10-year-old son is facing a prison sentence, while the boy's attacker walks free.
Shane Thomas Davidson was at the child's house at Eagleby in June last year to watch the State of Origin match with the boy's father and a few other people. After the game, Davidson went into the boy's bedroom and began massaging the child's penis under his clothes. When the boy woke up, Davidson asked the boy to show him his penis and offered to do the same. The child refused and went to tell his father what happened. The man then attacked Davidson, dragging him outside, throwing him on to a concrete path where he struck his head and repeatedly kicking him. Davidson later underwent extensive facial surgery in the Princess Alexandra Hospital.
Your Dishonor Judge Ian Dearden said:
"There is no place in our community for a vigilante approach"
Shane Thomas Davidson was spared jail despite pleading guilty to molesting the boy on State Of Origin night last year. Judge Ian Dearden told Beenleigh District Court the sentence was reduced because the young victim's father had wrongly taken action into his own hands and badly beaten Davidson.
In handing down his sentence on Monday, Justice Dearden said adult offenders who committed sex offences against children must serve actual jail time – unless exceptional circumstances were found to exist.
"This is one of those rare and exceptional cases," he said. "When an individual takes the matter of punishment into their own hands, the offence committed by the person may be far, far more serious and, therefore, have far more serious consequences then the original offence."
The boy's father is facing life in prison. And the pedophile himself? He said
he regretted what he had done but didn't think it was something he should go to jail for.
"As far as these sorts of offences go, it's pretty minor."
Your Dishonor agreed with the child molester that what he had done was minor. Your Dishonor didn't feel this child deserved justice. This child who is now without the father who was protecting him......in his own home. But this isn't the first time Your Dishonor has behaved so shamelessly and with such reckless disregard
A Brisbane man Brett Ashley Connor appeared before Judge Dearden charged with with possessing 90 child porn images. The judge sentenced Connor to nine months' jail wholly suspended because of mitigating factors including Connor's co-operation with authorities and the lack of apparent distribution of the images.
Brothers Shammi and Shamal Chand escaped jail in Dearden's court after pleading guilty to savagely bashing an invalid pensioner with a baseball bat. Handing both brothers wholly suspended jail sentences, Judge Dearden said he took into account their own misery following the death of their father, the difficulties Shammi Chand faced supporting his extended family and Shamal Chand's battle with drugs and mental illness.
And for another sexual abuse case, a teacher who also filmed his abuse of a student then threatened to "hurt her" if she told:
A Former north Queensland high school teacher has been jailed after a court overturned his suspended sentence for molesting a female student.
Steven Peter Quick, 29, of Varsity Lakes on the Gold Coast, originally avoided jail when Brisbane District Court Judge Ian Dearden sentenced him to a wholly suspended 18-month jail term and 12-month intensive correction order.
Justice de Jersey found that Judge Dearden didn't take enough notice of the damage done to the victim, that he incorrectly regarded as relevant that she gave “some level of consent”, and that he did not give enough weight to Quick's threats to harm the girl.
The chief justice also found that Quick's remorse was only self-pitying and he lacked true insight into the damage he had done.
There are those paying attention to this type of behavior however. After the most recent ruling this shameful judge thought he'd get away with:
The case has sparked widespread community outrage and child safety campaigner Hetty Johnston described Davidson's sentence as "woefully wrong".
And yesterday Attorney-General Cameron Dick called for a transcript of the judge's sentencing remarks to determine whether the state should appeal. He has 28 days from the June 15 date of sentencing to lodge an appeal.
Meanwhile, the Liberal National Party's deputy leader Lawrence Springborg said the case highlighted the need for Queensland's sentencing laws to be overhauled "to reflect community standards".
Your Dishonor Judge Ian Dearden says
"There is no place in our community for a vigilante approach"
Society says "There is no place in our community for child molesters or their enabling judges"
The Dishonorable Judge Dearden - the folk musician feels a close affinity to these lyrics
Justice is a constant struggle I’m struggling on We are all struggling on.
But I don't believe he even knows what justice is. He once titled a speech "From Little Things, Big Things Grow" - I don't think it should be a struggle for him to know how the "little decisions" he makes today feed those who use and abuse children for sexual gratification. This Judge is a part of that cycle of abuse.
Please let your voice be heard and speak loudly about this horrendous injustice and demand that he be removed from a position which he has and continues to abuse in his personal mission of freedom for criminals. Demand he be removed. Demand justice for this boy.
Please write or phone the Beenleigh District Court at this address and in demanding justice let it be known that there is no place in any community for those who sexually abuse children or enable those who do.
Courthouse.beenleigh@justice.qld.gov.au
Cnr Kent and James Street PO Box 383, Beenleigh 4207 Beenleigh Qld 4207
The critics of vigilantism say that the enforcement of laws is the job of the police and other government agencies. However, vigilantes are born when proper authorities fail to protect and serve, and government agencies became bloated and bureaucratic. So my advice to cities, counties, states, and federal authorities is; if you don't want vigilantes - do your friggin' jobs.
Emovocals faces up to life in prison after he was arrested and charged Wednesday on accusations of molesting a 10-year-old boy whose Grand Isle County family said they hired him over the Internet as a nanny.
Is anyone really surprised? Another member of GirlChat and BoyChat preying on children, putting himself in a position to be in close contact with children, pretending to just "love children why he'd never hurt children" as the typical filthy pedophile always does.
aka Donald Shepherd aka Emovocals, JonnyXO, Philosophy and Kyva when we discovered this pedophile advertising to be a nanny online in 2007 Searching for a Nanny? Read This
"Steve Lampert, CEO of eNannySource.com, said company records list no one with the suspect’s given name, but they do contain two aliases Vermont police say Shepherd used.
An account under one alias, Parker Wilder, was closed in August 2008 after a family complained about him; a listing for a Donald Shepherd, the name law enforcement says the boy used in referring to his nanny, had been shut down in December 2006, also following a complaint"
So this is to be expected:
Shepherd admitted the inappropriate activity included touching, oral sex and the taking of explicit photographs. According to police, Shepherd said he initially felt like a father figure for the boy but later the "dynamic changed and turned into, you know, I see him as a lover."
Shepherd had nothing to say as he left the Grand Isle Courthouse charged with a list of sex crimes, including aggravated sexual assault on a child. Investigators say that Shepherd will likely face child porn charges. That part of the investigation is just beginning but it's expected to be huge, with thousands of images found on Shepherd's electronic equipment, including photos of the victim in this case.
Shepherd told law enforcement he had had worked with children in California, Florida, Michigan, and at summer camps for boys in Texas and New York. He had also been approved to be a substitute teacher in Grand Isle County. Police are concerned that there could be other victims out there.
People who think that pedophiles chatting amongst each other in online pedo groups are "just chatting and gaining support" from each other need to think twice. That isn't what they are doing at all. They are trying to gain validation so they don't have to face what they really are. They're feeding each others demented desires for children which DOES encourage them to act out.
They say they're exercising free speech, but the Anti's say they are endangering children by messing with the distorted minds of fellow pedophiles, feeding them "girl moments" and "boy moments" and glorifying child sexual abuse.
They are participating in hate speech.
Their targets: children.
"People are being jailed just for being attracted to children. Isn't that what you tell me when I would give out information about myself on this board? Hell, now I am on some ass hole's blog. My pictures and all. That is what happens though when you stand up for something you believe in. I risk the chance everyday of being found out and investgated. How do you think that makes me feel?
I am not asking you to look past the things I have done, or except my lies. I am only asking you to stop your madness. I am harmless. I can promise you that. I just need people to talk to. I hope that some of this will sink in, but I doubt it."
Greenfly first became a member of GirlChat while searching the internet for child pornography back in 2002. He says he's sexually attracted to prepubescent girls and also little boys, occasionally women but never men.
His real name of course is Aubrey Eugene Davis. Aubrey says he first became aware that he was a pedophile when he was a teenager but that he'd been "playing" with little girls since he was 9 or 10. He called it tickling games or wrestling games and believes that he's a pedophile now because of molesting so many children when he was young.
Now as an adult he makes sure to put himself in close contact with children. He says he's worked with the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts and volunteers at summer camps. I wonder if parents would be trusting their child around Aubrey if they knew some of the things he's said. Such as:
i hope you guys are having a good start to your summer. mine has started very nicely. i'm working at a summer camp for a couple of weeks. we had 5-7 yr olds last week and 8-11 yr olds this week.
Man it's been guite awesome. some hotties last week and this. so, i'm kinda like a fat kid in a candy store ("bone-apetit":)) LOL).
Or how about this one:
How about this? Setting on a couch with a yg, leaning over and kissing on her, by leaning over your weight forces her to lay on her side, this position allows you to be in position to mount her. It would be a side mount.
Or this:
cunnilingus and gently stroking of a yg's labia majora and minora is very pleasing to them.
And:
legally speaking if you touch a girls "secret place" whether you have concent or not wont matter. I don't think a defense of "well she said i could" would wash with a judge or jury. i guess you could try and let the rest of us know the outcome.
don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to be a hypocrite, i've touched girls before with their permission. you just have to be careful. kids talk. adults misunderstand. you end up in hot-water.
Or:
just remember females have 3 orifices. you can ah "utilize" 2 of them and maintain your virginity but have fun all the while. :)
Over and over Aubrey started discussions where he was obviously seeking validation for his affliction. He says he's a pedophile. He says he doesn't have sex with children while admitting that he's touched them. He says he doesn't understand how you can be a pedophile if there's no sex involved.
how can you be a pedophile and not want to have sex with a minor? that's like saying homosexuality doesn't advocate sex with the same sex. if you are a pedophile, if you love minors than you are one, then you at least think about having sex with minors
i respect your opinion. but i can not understand how child love, a.k.a. pedophilia, can be legitamite if there's no sex at all.
He made it clear he didn't want a "romantic relationship", that for him it was all about sex.
i don't understand, maybe i'm stupid, how adult men can fall in love with a 12, or so, year old. I have a very attract 13 year old cousin. i love her as a cousin, but when i think of intimate situations, it's all lust. I would never disrespect her, but i could never LOVE her whether she was my cousin of not.
after reading some of the messages over the last few days, i'm woundering if this site should be call girllust garden. if we couldn't have orgasms we wouldn't be interested at all. so is it love that you felling or lust?
And then after awhile he reached a conclusion that's rather rare for a pedophile to do. He himself wanted sex with children but he recognized all those other pedophiles for what they really were
if i had a daughter, there's no way i'd leave her alone with a girllover whether i new him or not. most child predators are fimilar with the kids they target. so, i don't see how knowing a girllover helps with a since of security.
I hope anyone who has children in contact with this man are warned. He certainly doesn't need to be watching children at summer camps and he's even been stalking his own relatives children. I find this very disturbing:
i have an interest in the way people, especially younger adults and kids, die. Unnatural deaths primarily. I find the data interesting, and sometimes amusing.
Personally, I don't find that amusing at all.
Visit Wikisposure and learn more about this dangerous pedophile Aubrey Eugene Davis
Demosthenes AKA Jacob Detring was once one of the loudest, most aggressive and radical voices at GirlChat...until he started making enemies from his own "brothers and sisters"- as he referred to them.
I admit it's rather nice to tick off the names of some of those on my personal top ten list of filthy pedophiles. It makes me happy. It makes me smile. But I'll smile even bigger when the other 7 are revealed. Can you guess who they are? MY list may not match your list. I guess we all have different reasons, eh?
Jacob was so easy to despise. From his history of making scathing flames directed at his own, to the scathing flames directed at us, to his support for giving drugs to little girls to prevent them from going through puberty, to his frequent puffed-up diatribes, support for child pornography and calls for Revolution - Demosthenes was impossible to ignore.
Who could forget this?
"Shame? I am very proud of who and what I am."
"I make no excuses or apologies, nor do I hold back."
"Most of my life, the one thing that I always seemed to have going for me when nothing else did was my linguistic ability, my ability to dance and play with written (and sometimes spoken) word. Being my, to me, singularly most outstanding gift, I worked and honed it until it could also be my most potent weapon."
"Violence and force can spurn people to a desired action, but words can make those same people to take the ideal behind that action into their heart and make it their own. As has been said many times throughout history, words are power.. and I very much enjoy being powerful."
Of course he also said this:
"modelling pictures are legal, and "feeling up" your LGF may not be but if it is desired and accepted by her then there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. We all know this, whether we dance around the "brake no law" stance or not"
And:
"We are all that stands between children and a world where innocence of any kind can not exist. Yes, innocence can thrive when we are involved with a child, even when that involvement becomes sexual. We are children's last hope, and they are our salvation"
And:
"You want to know how I overcame some of those obstacles that are dominating your psyche? I did it by letting sanity go and basking in the radiance of madness. Sanity is an illusion."
Jacob Detring believed that children needed to be taught about sex - by having sex with adults, otherwise they would become dysfunctional adolescents, then dysfunctional adults. Like him.
He thought people would believe him when he said:
"My only goal in all of this is to create the system that allows children to flourish and meet their potential. I don't care about getting anything for myself. I'm for the complete sexual liberation of youth, as well, but I don't have any personal gain in mind with it."
After he had said this:
"Trust me.. you don't get away with it and people don't find it cute. The mother of a girlfriend that I did have like that at that age threatened to call the police on me if I didn't stay away from her daughter"
He wanted to be a leader:
"They have agendas, but their battle plan is one of histrionics and fear. Our battle plan would have to be such that they didn't see the effects of it until it were too late for them to do anything about it.
They want someone to label as the leader? I'll take the honor. I'm arrogant enough to enjoy the thought of my name being the one that they curse when the day comes that they realize that they lost their war before it was started. They are so foolish that they don't even take into consideration that in our numbers are some of the most intelligent people in the world.
One does what one must. I have existed in obscurity and shadow my entire life, but I've always known what it would come to if anything were to change. Do I want to be the leader? Desire has little to do with it, as I don't pray for that sort of responsibility. The issue is what one is willing to do. A leader is required for a movement to exist, as such, I will do what I must. I have spent my life existing but not living, and if my life is the required payment for the the world to change, then so be it. Death is something that I have never been afraid of.. living has.
As I have said before, the win against them must be sudden and it must be decisive. We can not fight to merely win the first battle, we must make the first battle the only one by winning so completely that there no chance of the next one."
Jacob abandoned the war and scurried away before attending the first battle. Outwitted I suppose you could say. Or perhaps he just found himself under a boot. Yes, it really was just that simple after all.
"In the end, there is something that I feel for the antis stronger than hate. The strongest feeling that I hold toward those people is pity.
I pity them because they are varelse, and they will never be able to understand the joy that we feel. They will never be able to love children as we do......But that pity will not save them from me when the time comes for me to stand and take the inevitable war to them.
They war against us now and stand basking in their small victories, but they can not conceive of the day approaching when their time will be over and the world will no longer have a place for them. Their hypocritical and disgusting cry is "protect the children", ours will be simply "For the Children!".
"Protect children" is a disgusting cry? Only someone whose sole motivation is sexual pleasure at the expense of an innocent child could say such a thing. "For the children" is pedospeak for "I'm molesting kids for their own good"
But, thanks to Wikisposure's boot perhaps we've now heard the last of Jacob's nauseating pontificating pomposity. When all is said and done he's really no more than what he said he was ..... Jacob Detring is "Pedo by Design"
Well, he uses lots of names actually. Most of them are too nasty to repeat.
He's a pedophile who likes little boys 8 to 12 years old.
He's a pedophile who followed a little boy to another state when his family moved.
He's a pedophile who delivers pizza and keeps an eye out for any little boys who may be there.
He's a pedophile who once said:
For over two years now, I have been downloading KP and storing it on disks. I had been considering quitting again for a while. I knew I had to soon. The living in fear, the paranoia, the guilt and the shame were just not worth it anymore. I figured last week I was going to quit. This weekend I went through and separated all of the legal pictures from the pornographic ones. I resolved to myself that I was going to get rid of the porn but I was not sure when.
Then, the "operation candyman" story broke and that gave me the added motivation, (fear), I needed to get rid of the porn. I broke all of the disks and threw them away. I canceled my subscription to uncensorednews.com and easynews.com. Then, last night, just to be safe, I reformatted my HD. I am going to stay clean of it this time. I have to. I can't go back to downloading.
But he also said this:
He was seven and a half. He was so tiny and I'm usually not attracted to children as small as he was at the time but he was just so god damned much cuter than most other children. He was sitting in my lap and was kind of cuddling against me. I had my arms around him, holding him. He was so warm and soft. I could have held him forever. That moment only lasted a few minutes but in those few minutes my heart had welled up with that warm, fuzzy feeling until it was just about to burst. I remember just looking down at him and thinking, "Shit, I'm falling in love with this little kid. I didn't think it would happen this early." Ever since then I've been head-over-heels for him.
Now considering that I've never before mentioned his name, I'm having a hard time trying to figure out why he's got it in for me so badly. Well, me and Static that is.
So I'll just say this to The Dark Prince:
* YOU ARE OUT OF CONTROL * GET OUT OF MY FACE * SEEK HELP
Before it's too late.
"It's times like this that I want to look skyward and yell, "Why god? Why have you cursed me with being a pedophile??? Just what the hell did I do to deserve this"?
I know that I am a sick piece of shit and I know that the pain I feel is mostly all my fault. However, if I had no little boys in my life I would feel pain at their absence, so I can't really win can I?
Just part of being a sick piece of shit, I guess."
"As the recently crowned Princess of the Night, Alia is intrigued by beauty found within the macabre, and intends to show a generation of gothlings just how intensely exquisite the darkness within the soul can be."
What's the first thing people think when they see her I wonder.
Take that thought, whatever it might be and add the fact that she's a pedophile and attracted to prepubescent little girls. And sometimes boys. Never adults.
Add to that her interest in necrophilia. The interest she says she tries to keep suppressed.
Ready? Now add the fact that unlike the other pedophiles she doesn't even try to disguise herself as a "girl lover" - No she says it straight out -
"i'm not even sure if i can truly consider myself to be a girllover--after all, most of my fantasies are purely physical and include hurting little girls. there is no way that can be considered girllove."
Does this concern you?
When Alia was in college she confessed her desires to a friend. This friend reported Alia and she was forced to undergo a psychiatric evaluation. Alia's parents told her not to "tell too much" and shortly Alia returned to GirlChat to say she had been deemed "not dangerous to children" but admitted that they don't really know the full extent of her deranged views.
I'd like to consider for a moment what WE - we meaning people who don't want to have sex with children - we who don't want to make children scream - would do, what would we say to someone like this? Someone who wasn't a stranger but a long-time member of the group? What if they said this to you
"Sometimes when i'm walking and i see someone boy or girl who i think is beautiful the first thing that comes through my mind is how erotic it would be to hurt them....."
So? What would you say? What would you do? Let's look at what GirlChat members said to her. She's been there for EIGHT years, I'd be guessing that her desire isn't going away anytime soon wouldn't you? This is how the "Girl lovers" aka child haters responded when Alia said:
What am I? Where should I go? Help me!
I don’t know how to transfer my desire to strangle into a desire to cuddle
T3hl33tg33k:
You can talk to me
I think we might have similar feelings
Minstrel:
I strongly advise against 'professional help' as being completely useless for any problems you might have. If you tell a shrink you're attracted to girls, you're already doomed, even without mentioning violent fantasies. I don't see the point in throwing your life away
So, where should you go? I suggest Girl Chat Chat.
Dissident:
fantasies are just a way to let off steam for your inner frustrations. However, I don't think it's particularly healthy to NEVER think about cuddling and gentle imagery and to ALWAYS think about abusive behavior in your fantasies. A healthy dosage of both is better than just one type of fantasizing exclusively, IMO
You seem like a pleasant enough person, Poison
BB:
What I would guess is that you've never actually been able to have a close relationship with a LG. If you did, I strongly suspect that you would find the comfort you're seeking in the warm, soft, comforting arms of a LG. If you had the opportunity to really be with a girl, you would find that violence is the furthest thing from your mind.
T3hl33tg33k:
Wait a minute, you have a vagina! Rape away, then! People will be thanking you for it.
Blue Heaven:
Accept the problem and let it go, but don't encourage it, and don't deny it. Just let it be. If you're a good person otherwise, then hold true to that.
Razor1911:
i refuse to blame sex offenders that actually kidnap a child and do something about it
Whatever happens is the pedophobes' fault.
For example, the person that technically did it should receive one year in prison while the pedophobic therapists and their accomplices in society should be slowly beaten to death. They are child killers, pulling the strings from a good distance while we erreneously focus, with a perspective that is far too small, on the single person that has his strings pulled.
BB:
Yes, the Antis are responsible for creating the monsters that they hate, but those monsters still have free will.
I will concede, however, that if all the Antis died, there be virtually no crimes against children anymore.
LGSoul:
As long as you seperate fantasy from reality and maintain your self-control you should have no problem. Or maybe if you feel its best just stay away from little girls. Or (if you live in the USA) you could masturbate to violent lolicon. To sexually relieve yourself.
THAT is the truth about GirlChat. Their entire existence is nothing more than denial, rationalizations and LIES. They lie to society, they lie to the Anti's, they lie to each other and they lie to themselves. They HAVE to, the truth might make them scream.
Knowing how they fed into the disturbed and demented mind of Alia Jacobson, I wonder what they would say if she did what Melissa Huckaby did? I don't think that is too far-fetched of a question to ask, especially when they've been wondering if Melissa could possibly be a member of one of their pedo-sites. Hopefully we'll never have to discover that answer considering they won't discuss their own members who commit crimes and go to prison for life. However, we CAN see what they had to say about the woman accused of sexually assaulting and murdering Sandra Cantu.
Trucker refers to Melissa Huckaby:
I feel more pity for her than sweet little Sandra; at least Sandra's in LG heaven while the rest of the world has to fight through this hellish life.
I hope the antis are damn skippy over the atmosphere they created. If there was more understanding than hating maybe Sandra would still be alive.
Iron Marxist:
If she was a member of the MAA community then she has even less of an excuse for doing what she did because that would mean that she felt love for little girls. Maybe she was constantly told all her life that she was an evil monster who was destined to hurt kids and she finally broke under the pressure.
But when any one of us allows society to break us and does something stupid and savagely cruel, not only does an innocent child and her family suffer but so does the entire MAA community. I just hope that when Sandra's Law is passed we don't end up losing forums like GC, because these forums help to prevent any of us from acting out in negative ways.
MimzyBorogrove:
You really want to know who killed Sandra Cantu? I'll tell you. It was you, I, and everyone else who has ever turned an unseeing eye or an uncaring heart to another's plight (or our own, for that matter.) Anyone who has taken profit from another's suffering, whether direct or not. Those among us who watch the darkness descending, who cry out for the dying of the light, yet, can't seem to break out of our molds enough to say "Enough is enough." We did it. We killed that little girl, as surely as if we had been standing there. And only by taking responsibility for all of this, can we ever hope to change ANY of it.
Trucker:
I don't care if I get heat for this but I can't stand how the U.S. just coddles and overprotects children just to keep them "innocent."
So a suspect in Sandra Cantu's murder has been caught. Notice how quickly the police got someone, not because a person was murdered, but because a "sweet, innocent little girl" was murdered. Is the concept of innocence worth the price of depriving possibly innocent people of freedom and riling paranoia?
Are children so helpless and ignorant that they must be given special attention whenever one gets killed every two years?
Until this bogus "innocence" stigma is done away with and children are seen as equals with adults, we will never be one unified people.
That's the brand of distorted crap Alia has heard for eight years. Alia, a woman fighting urges to "kill and rape and maim" receiving responses that
it's just OCD
it's normal to think that way
she's really a nice person
hold true to herself
find violent lolicon to further feed the fantasies
find a little girl to love
But if she does act out and hurts a child........then it's the fault of people who don't want her to molest their children.
So I ask you - if it were legal for adults to have sex with children, what do you think Alia Loren Jacobson would do?
"....I guess i have always sympathized too much with people who commit horrendous crimes because every so often i myself have to sit down and solemnly swear to myself that i will never murder anyone."
We talked about Jim Freeman here and about pedophile denial of child pornography here. We also talked about Judith Levine using pedophiles for references.....one in particular - Lawrence Stanley - who not only claimed there was no child porn but was actively producing it himself. Aw well she must not have done her homework.
We've talked about Jim Freeman's RSO activism as the Executive Director of SoHopeful. We talked about his involvement in the "most sophisticated child pornography operation in recent memory" and which included "one of the largest digital seizures in the history of the FBI"
We felt sure the RSO advocacy groups would seize the opportunity to take stock, educate their members and clean house.
We watched and we listened.
We waited patiently. It never happened. Instead they attempted to cover it up, not only to the outside world but to their very own members as well. Perhaps they just didn't want their members to find out how that silly little "legal defense fund" yahoo group helped identify Jim in the first place. Or perhaps as we've previously seen "no more victims" is NOT their primary goal after all. For instance this is something they would never talk about:
"Experts have often wondered what proportion of men who download explicit sexual images of children also molest them. A new government study of convicted Internet offenders suggests that the number may be startlingly high: 85 percent of the offenders said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors, from inappropriate touching to rape."
Jill Levenson responded:
“It’s crucial to understand the sexual history of all these offenders, because sometimes the crime they were arrested for is the tip of the iceberg, and does not reflect their real patterns and interests”
This report having already been accepted for publication was withdrawn due to the concerns of certain people. People like Dr. Fred Berlin who claimed it may cause a backlash and intrude on a child molesters "individual liberty". Obviously he's not interested in the truth. No it looks to me like he's into coddling. It looks to me like someone should have been paying more attention to all those sex offenders who reoffended while they were in his treatment program. Or maybe all those priests he released that went right back to molesting children. He's Michael Melsheimer's mentor. And Freddie's mentor was good old Dr. John Money famous for trying to turn a boy into a girl with devastating consequences and who said in an interview in Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual...then I would not call it pathological in any way
Paidika? Who in the world would want anything to do with that? Well, here's a few who have:
Laurence A. Stanley - Thc Hysteria Over Child Pornography and Paedophilia
Dr. Fritz Bernard - The Dutch Paedophile Emancipation Movement
Peter Lambourn Wilson - Islamic Boy-love
Dr. Rudiger Lautmann - Sexual Desire for Children
Edward Brongersma - In Defense of Boy Love
Theo Sandfort - The World is Bursting with Adults,so I'm always Glad to See a Little Girl
The usual and oft-quoted crowd:
Hubert Kennedy
Ralph Underwager
Pat Califia
And the RSO favorite Hollida Wakefield:
You don't have good sex education in the schools, just these ridiculous prevention programs.
Couples are making their own pornographic movies. The comparison is on the one hand people running around making their own pornographic movies but on the other hand reacting hysterically to child sexuality issues
Given this schizophrenia and these hysterical attitudes about childhood sexuality, it's going to be difficult for paedophiles to appear more positive, to start saying they're not exploiters of children, that they love children, the sexual part included, even if it's a minor part
But what does that have to do with Jim Freeman? This is one time I'm going to let you figure it out for yourselves. I have a feeling only a few won't be able to.
From a conversation before Jim's fall:
Jim:
Being a pedophile does NOT mean the person has acted out. The "average adult", on the other hand, is sexually active. Thus they have "acted out", and will strive to do so again and again. So I STILL believe that a pedophile has more self-control than the average adult.
Response:
Whether a pedophile has 1 or 100 victims he is still out of control.
Jim:
Pedophiles with victims are not pedophiles. They're child molesters. What of the pedophiles who have not acted out?
Response:
I think we can both agree that any grooming is inappropriate and clearly out of control, no?
Jim:
Inappropriate, yes. Out of control, no. A person who is out of control can't at the same time have the patience of Job. You can fall tumbling down the mountainside, or you can slowly and methodically walk down, picking and choosing your path. The end result is the same, but you were out of control on one and in control on the other. You can't calmly, slowly and methodically tumble down the side of a mountain.
The following men in Jim's "greatest groups of pedos" - who didn't passively take a tumble have been sentenced. Half the men took plea deals and - got sweet deals - considering what they did. The one's who didn't, well take a look. Jim's sentencing is coming up in a couple of weeks by the way. Mark your calender - I understand he's going to be getting a sentencing enhancement under the Adam Walsh Act. I wonder if that means Life + 10 years? Betcha he's sweating bullets about now. Of course, if he had served his time and learned his lesson and just wanted to move on and wasn't dangerous and he wasn't a pedophile..............
PLEAD GUILTY
Stepan Bondarenko aka "Bumhead" 38, of Philadelphia, Pa. - 20 years
Erik Wayerski, 46, "Lerch" of Round Rock, Texas - 30 years
Raymond Roy, 54, "Nimo" of San Juan Capistrano, Calif. - 30 years
Ruble Keys, 55, "Crazy Horse" of Medford, Ore. - 17 years
John Mosman, 46, "Pickleman" of Waterbury, Conn. - 13 years
Warren Weber, 56, "Muad'Dib" of Boise, Idaho - 15 years
Michael Berger, 33,"Box of Rocks" of Mechanicsville, Va. - 15 years
Went to Trial:
Daniel Castleman aka "Chingachgook" 43, of Lubbock, Texas - LIFE
Gary Lakey, 54, "Eggplant" of Anderson, Ind - LIFE
Marvin Lambert, 33, "Methuselah" of Indianapolis, Ind. - LIFE
Neville McGarity, 40, "Wraith" of Medina, Texas - LIFE
Ronald White, 59, "RoadKill" of Burlington, N.C - LIFE
Not yet sentenced:
Warren Mumpower, 63, "Lizzard" of Spokane, Wash - GUILTY
James Freeman, 47, "Mystikal" of Santa Rosa Beach - GUILTY
Of these men Neville McGarity committed sexual assault of a child in 2003, Warren Mumpower had more than one sex crime conviction dating back to the early 1980's. And of course we already know about Jim Freeman, the registered sex offender and sex offender advocate who once told the Valigator:
My organization has done so much on the national level to shift the focus to the truly dangerous. An organization that you don't think too highly of. What's the deal?
Much hope and attention has been placed on Terrence J. White a registered sex offender who is suing the Attorney General of Georgia along with every District Attorney in the state.
He believes that the new law requiring him to register his internet identifiers is unconstitutional.
We believe he is a perfect example of why the law was created in the first place.
He stated in his lawsuit that he'd had one sex offense conviction. He signed it under "penalty of perjury".
He stated elsewhere that he had two convictions. Both of which he minimized off-handedly
Convicted in 1989 of one count of "Enticing a Child for Indecent Purposes" (Simply saying the wrong words to an underage person).
Convicted in 1990 of two counts of "Sending and Receiving Child Pornography through the U.S. Mail" (a "victimless" crime).
In fact Terrence says that he was "a victim of my own desires" and has written extensively regarding his belief that society will eventually have to accept men having sex with boys.
The time needs to come, when (as I've said elsewhere) pederasty will be perceived by the mainstream as an aid or enhancement toward developing and encouraging 'masculinity'
Not only is society wrong to make it illegal but he even uses religion to try and justify it
Jesus refused--by all the evidence--to condemn pederasty (or 'boy-love')
Jesus apparently never was worried about any of these other matters that we mere childish humans keep on making such a horrified fuss about.
He makes his mission clear:
I believe I know what sort of reaction my work will arouse in most Americans. And it is truly my declaration of permanent WAR against them and any sort of fearful, dogmatic, closed-mindedness. My work is an attempt to provoke exactly where fundamentalist Americans most fear and loathe being challenged.
Another of the precise aims of my body of work has been just this: to attempt to "reattune individuals to a forgotten [or neglected] archetype," specifically, that of the "beautiful boy," androgyne, or PUER AETERNUS.
He believes himself to be on some lofty plain of existence far above the comprehension of this mere mediocre society that he mocks and jeers at.
I am so FAR above their poor abilities to fathom or comprehend! Yet, how incredibly lonely it is, up here on this towering peak on which I sit, staring down below at the far-removed world. How cold, how silent, how icily destitute it is up here!
He's predatory and flagrantly wrote about trying to convince someone to have sex with him when it was clear they were heterosexual
The human mind that has been lulled to sleep by conformity and majority opinions, must, my boy, MUST be literally SHOCKED BACK INTO A STATE OF WAKEFULNESS. It is the only way (for most people).
How is this shock back into mental wakefulness best accomplished?
Allowing oneself to freely experience sexuality--especially forms of sexuality which go against the usual rules of society; and two, deliberately allowing oneself to experience things which repulse or frighten oneself.
Also you have--and this is extreme--necrophagia, the eating of dead bodies. ... In certain American Indian cultures of the Southwest, one of the initiations to the clown category ... involves actually eating dog shit. The most repulsive has to be accepted as also Brahman [i.e., as a part of 'God']."
In other words, the 'Divine' exists everywhere--even in a piece of dog shit (however repulsive or blasphemous an idea that may be to most people). But it is not necessary for you or I to actually EAT it, or even to partake of dead bodies, in order to realize that fact; nor is it neccessary for us to do this in order to free our minds, either. Other means exist--such as (as mentioned above) "nudism, sexual freedom, group sexuality, adultery, ... incest ..." And HOMOSEXUALITY.
Are you repulsed by the idea of having sex with another man? Then this is a pathway that is excellent for helping to free your mind from society's 'shackles' of mental conformity.
Wow pretty deep crap you got there Terrence. We'll leave you with some of his magnificent poetry. You know, the kind that's so far above our ability to fathom or comprehend.
A glimpse of boyish hips will please
The man, whose thick, enlarging pole
Frightens the boy, who surely sees
What fate awaits his virgin hole.
T.J. White
21 December, 2006
You can find Terrence these days over at Reform Sex Offender Laws Campaign. These people stick together like glue you know. Yep, they've got his back and are raising money for his lawsuit.
"What war? Well the war inside of every human being of course. It sounds so cliche, doesn’t it? Like no one has heard that phrase before."
So speaks William Adamson aka Crysta aka Crysta-Shard a former member of the defunct Butterfly Kisses, long time member of BoyChat and a prolific blogger.
William is a registered sex offender who likes little boys and little girls too. In fact it appears he'll try anything including disguising himself as a female pedophile and threatening to crash gay rights parades and force them to advocate for child molesters. He's obsessed with the topic of incest and claims to have started having "consensual" sex at the age of 7.
"First of all. I am a woman. Second, I am a pedophile i like boys and girls ages 7-16. Third, i have been with with both boys and girls as YFs and in some other ways. And finally fourth: listen up my phallis attatched friends, this is your wake up call.
I also want the BL community to just stop BSing themselves, and perhaps the world. Lets just face it folks, we want to fuck minors! YEAH! I said it, we want to have sexual intercourse with boys and girls, some as young as 4 yrs old! Yet i constantly read these posts on Boychat and other pedo-groups where we talk about the "beauty of boys", or of "our/my "love" for boys. This is a form of denial to me."
William may be a chronic liar but there's one thing he's consistent about and that's his desire to have sex with children, to abolish age of consent laws and to find him a husband so he can be a good wife to one man and they can reproduce and both have sex with their children.
I’ll say this much, I’d rather fuck my kid then have anyone else do it. Because i feel i would take my child’s feelings and needs into account
William doesn't like being a registered sex offender, he doesn't like the fact that his neighbors and other family members can find out about him even while posting continuously about his lust for small children in his life, including family members, the friends of family members and the family members of friends.
I've never molested, raped or even forced myself on a child. I've never even had to seduce a child. To tell the truth, all i had to do was ask. =P I'm not bragging, and i sure as hell ain't going into details.
Visit Wikisposure to learn more about this extremely dangerous pedophile
William C. Adamson II aka Crysta
Its just like one of the other posters said, "live like you wish to." You want a YF, go get one. You wanna fuck little boys then go find some. Stop moping around here looking for a way out. If you're old and can't get it up anymore then live with it.
Michael Melsheimer aka Lek is a sex offender and a pedophile activist member of BoyChat. He runs the website B4U-Act along with his pedophile activist BoyChat friend Richard Kramer. At one point Jon Schillaci aka Dylan Thomas acted as Michael's webmaster. Richard Kramer runs the website MHAMic ("Male Homosexual Attraction to Minors Information Center") which is an attempt to "educate" people that child sexual abuse isn't harmful. B4U-Act has partnered up with Reformsexoffenderlaws.org
Some of you have probably heard of the "Call to Safeguard our Children and our Liberties," a 1999 effort in Boston to fight against the demonization of sex offenders and the curtailment of civil liberties for people accused of sex crimes. The original group included some important peace activists, journalists, and academics.
On July 10, 2007 Paul Shannon had his article published on CounterPunch - An Urgent Call to Support the Well-being of Children and the Rights of Us All
In 1999, a group of us in Boston -- prominent political activists, civil libertarians, and workers in the mental health and legal systems, as well as teachers and others who work with children -- tried to draw public attention to this threat with a "Call to Safeguard our Children and Our Liberties."
The lives of many thousands of people have been unfairly ruined. And we have created a despised under-class labeled "sex offenders". All of these developments are justified under the high-sounding rhetoric of "protecting our children from sexual predators" despite the fact that most registered sex offenders have never committed sexual offenses against minors.
In 1999, a group of us in Boston.........
On August 13, 2007 Paul Shannon was interviewed by Daniel Tsang (we spoke of Here)
Last year, the brutal rape and murder of a young boy in Cambridge triggered a wave of indignation which targeted all 'pedophiles.' Supporters of the death penalty in Massachusetts used this case and almost prevailed. There were calls in public meetings to "find and kill all the pedophiles." Cardinal Bernard Law was quoted a saying, "This is the closest thing I've seen to a lynch mob since my days in Mississippi."
December 13, 2002
Cardinal Bernard Law was forced to resign in shame after it was revealed that he had covered up for child molesting priests and in fact had enabled their continued abuse of children by simply shuffling them from parish to parish for decades. Paul Shanley and John Geoghan are two of the priests who molested kids while the Church and Cardinal Law simply looked away.
June 29, 1998
A discussion group of about twenty people formed, hosted unofficially by a non-governmental organization. Participants included women who are incest and sex abuse survivors, boy-lovers, anti-censorship and civil liberties activists, feminists, gay and lesbian people, health-care workers, church activists, peace and social justice activists, academics, and those who work with prisoners.
We have met regularly for six months, sometimes almost as a kind of group therapy or consciousness-raising session, dealing with deep and justified angers and emotions. We continue to hold a wide range of views about children's sexuality and certainly about intergenerational sex.
Sincerely: Dr. Richard Pillard, Cathy Hoffman, Paul Shannon, Chris Tilly and others....
A discussion group of about twenty people formed, hosted unofficially by a non-governmental organization. Participants included women who are incest and sex abuse survivors, NAMBLA members, anti-censorship and civil liberties activists, feminists, gay and lesbian people, health-care workers, church activists, peace and social justice activists, academics, and those who work with prisoners.
We have met regularly for six months, sometimes almost as a kind of group therapy or consciousness-raising session, dealing with deep and justified angers and emotions. We continue to hold a wide range of views about children's sexuality and certainly about intergenerational sex
SIGNED: Dr. Richard Pillard, psychiatrist; Paul Shannon, educator; Cathy Hoffman, peace activist; Chris Tilly, economics professor; Marie Kennedy, community planning professor; Eric Entemann, mathematics professor; Tom Reeves, social science professor; Bob Chatelle, writer & anti-censorship activist; Jim D'Entremont, playwright and anti-censorship activist; Ann Kotell, health worker; Carol Thomas, social justice and religious activist; French Wall and Bill Andriette, gay writers and editors; Nancy Ryan, feminist activist; Dianne McLaughlin, community & criminal justice activist; Reebee Garofalo, popular culture professor; John Miller, economics professor; Molly Mead, urban social planning professor; John MacDougall, sociology professor; Laurie Dougherty, social science researcher & editor; and others...
June 1998:
The real challenge is to support and expand programs for children and youth which develop caring, loving, thoughtful, whole human beings. Among these are day care, after-school care, sex positive sex education, and better training and pay for those who work with children.
The aim of all these programs should be to empower young people to learn to make their own decisions about their lives. Children and youth need to view themselves not as potential victims, but as part of a community which supports and nurtures them, encouraging them to speak up and act responsibly on their own beliefs.
July 10, 2007
* Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty.
* Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights
July 10, 2007
Focusing on "saving" children from sexual molestation by strangers distracts us from far more serious forms of violence against children and young people. Most child abuse has nothing to do with sex. It is important to speak out against sexual harm, which has often remained hidden and denied within families and communities. However, non-sexual violence against children is at least as pervasive as sexual violence.
Sexual abuse has long remained hidden and denied within families and communities and churches. Define "far more serious abuse"? No one can define someone elses victimization for them. No one should imply that "While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life. Most children do not die or become permanently disfigured as a result" as some people have. For any event we can usually find something somewhere that is worse. To deny the significance of abuse and attempt to minimize the effects on the victim by pointing elsewhere is wrong. It is always wrong.
"Focusing on "saving" children from sexual molestation by strangers distracts us". Focusing on denial and rationalization and minimization and helping child molesters get away with it, seems to be distracting some people from doing anything for anybody except feeding into the cognitive distortions of people who don't feel what they do is wrong nor should they be punished or restricted. The vast majority of sexual abuse is committed by someone known to the victim. This can be anyone from a family member to a teacher or a Boy Scout leader or a Little League coach, a neighbor or a priest.
Perhaps the key to this panic about sex offenders is that they are often assumed to have raped children. That is, "sex offender" is often equated with a violent "pedophile." The term pedophile itself has become a stereotype of a person who violently rapes young children. In fact, the vast majority of persons attracted to children are not violent
The vast majority of pedophiles are rarely physically violent. The destruction is far deeper and longer lasting than physical wounds. It's one of the things that sets sexual abuse apart from other crimes. The fact that they aren't usually violent is how they continue to fly under the radar, through manipulation and grooming of their victims and the victims family but also those in authority who cover up for them.
The offender is a priest. He is friendly, reassuring, comforting, respectful, respectable, professional, knowledgeable, compassionate, caring – a good man. He is in a position of trust, leadership, authority. He targets one or two or 20 victims – male or female, pre or post pubescent or adult. He cultivates the target, preparing her or him: he invites confidences, offers friendship, creates or joins social opportunities. He offers camping trips, dinners, picnics, family visits. When he feels trusted enough he commits the abuses, assaults, violations. He gains silence through smooth talk, explanations, persuasion, threats, promises of harm. He continues the abuse until the victim is no longer accessible or until exposure is threatened or imminent.
His bishop hears of the abuse – in a letter, in whispers, in person, clearly, emphatically, repeatedly. The bishop ignores it. He knows a scandal will erupt if the abuse is revealed. He blames the victim, is in denial, treats it as an aberration, believes treatment is the answer, is blinded by his friendship with the offender, is an offender himself.
The bishop leaves the priest right where he is. Or he moves the priest to a new parish, church, hospital, school, nursing home. And warns no one.
Weeks, months, years later – continuously – the same priest abuses again. And a victim speaks up, asks for help, tells his story. The priest is surprised and wounded that anyone would suspect or accuse him. The bishop says, "He said he never did that." "He promised not to do it again." "He got treatment." The latest victims are stunned to learn that the priest had a known history of abuse and was allowed to harm them. The previous victims are stunned to learn that the priest was given more opportunities to victimize. Weren’t they promised he would be removed from his priestly duties?
Then comes doubt, denial, recrimination, victim blaming. All heads swivel toward the victim. And the questions begin: Why believe his story? Her story? Their stories? After all, the victim was pre-pubescent at the time and has an unreliable memory. The victim was post-pubescent and probably wanted, enjoyed, sought out, provoked the abuse. The victim is male; this must be a homosexual encounter. The victim is female; she seduced him, she wanted it. The victims must want money; they make up these stories to get a piece of the pie. And always: Why did she wait? Why didn’t he tell when it happened? Why now? The victim knows the subtext: "You are a liar. Priests tell the truth."
Diocese after diocese writes check after check for settlements, church spokespeople say the victim was seductive, compliant, unreliable, negligent, complicit, greedy, a liar. Lest we forget: the wrongdoers pay to buy silence or to comply with court orders – not to acknowledge, compensate, apologize or make whole.
And the beat goes on. The institution makes gestures toward new policy, new procedures, new personnel. The victims become exhausted, and finally are silent, in agony over the public dissection of their private torment. After following the story for days, weeks, months, the media loses interest and moves on to something new. All is still. And in that silence, rape and sexual abuse continues.
Anywhere people seek help, sanctuary, direction, advice – anywhere someone with authority, status or resources is in a position to guide, direct, or aid – that is a place of vulnerability and access. That is a place where the young, aged, female, disabled, incarcerated, infirm, disenfranchised are targeted by a predator. And the predator who is lauded, promoted, hidden and protected by the institution he represents is the most dangerous among us. He can prey with impunity.
Because we do not believe victims, because we do not believe such a nice man could have done that, because we do not sustain long-term interest in the story, we turn away, tune out, move on. We do not demand exposure and accountability; we do not stop the sexual abuse and rape of women and children.
We have cooperated, collaborated and compromised with those in positions of power. We have waited, patiently and furiously for change. We have reached across chasms of doubt, mutual suspicion, anger and angst to create allies in every institution in this country. We have tolerated continued abuse and continuous denial of its prevalence and impact.
We have cajoled, pleaded, persuaded, argued and worked tirelessly to move every institution toward an understanding of rape. What it is. How it harms the victim. How it harms all of us. We are tired of being patient. We are tired of ignorance. We are tired of denial. We are tired of excuses and lip service. We are tired of defense of the indefensible. We are tired of stonewalling, victim-blaming, confidentiality agreements that protect institutions and silence victims. We are tired of institutions protecting themselves instead of the people they are there to serve. We are even tired of apologies.
We want action. Meaningful action. Action to end sexual violence.
How to safeguard children? Reformsexoffenderlaws.org calls for abolishing every single law imaginable and then somehow believe they can disguise that as "safeguarding children". They call for the abolition of age of consent laws and just like the pedophile activists groups they try to disguise it in "liberation of children". What they are calling for is the very things that helped to create the decades-long sexual abuse of children within the Catholic Church. We have to move forward not back in time. Hysteria and panic did not create this problem. People who have no respect for children created it.
A community of individuals pledged to fight paedophiles on the web. We are committed to the safety and emotional well-being of all children. This site will serve as a resource for those committed to our fight wherever you may be in the world.
