Showing posts with label Grooming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grooming. Show all posts

Culture of Silence

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Randy English, the new COO of Sosen has decided to make a splash and draw attention to himself.

Since I'm relatively positive that it is virtually impossible for him to actually believe the demented things he's written, I'm left with the opinion that he's saying them with the sole purpose of deflecting attention away from the CEO - Mary Duval and the demented things that she says.

I believe Randy must be jealous of Mary being "at the top". She says she's "at the top". She says we rocketed her "to the top".

I'm not quite sure yet what she's "on the top" OF, but I think Randy must be jealous of it. Why else would he say these things?

Randy English has joined the long historical line of those who have enabled child sexual abuse. From the notorious Catholic Church pedophile cover-up to the Boy Scouts of America: Sosen wants to silence victims of sexual crimes.
"...we also know that it is not healthy for a family who has been devastated by a loss such as this to be cast into the spotlight, rather than having time to deal with the pain and anger in order to recover mentally and emotionally. Their pain and anger begins to rule their lives. It becomes who they are and only they know the true toll it is taking on them."
This is a continuing theme among the radical extremists of Sosen - to point the finger at victims and tell them they aren't doing it right. They aren't recovering correctly or well enough or soon enough or in a way that they deem appropriate. That victims who aren't interested in rationalizing on behalf of an offender are "haters", not "true survivors", not "true victims" or "not moving on".

Instead of focusing endlessly on bashing, blaming, distracting, rationalizing, justifying and harvesting any and all comments that they believe is favorable to "their side" as Kevin Meier refers to it - they should be focusing on identifying what is wrong with THEM and their own movement - what are they doing wrong? What behaviors and attributes do they encourage, foster and nourish within Sosen.....ways of thinking that not only led those offenders to offend in the first place but also which may lead to re-offense if maintained. Distortions which also damage the very points they are trying to make.

The mission statement of Sosen says:
"At SOSEN, we do not condone what former offenders have done. In many cases the harm done by former offenders is horrendous. No one can take that away. However, we feel that with proper treatment the victims can move on with their lives and put the pain and anger behind them. We know that this is the best thing for them as many members of SOSEN are former victims who have reached out for healing and now live normal productive lives."
The truth is, of course, that the only victims associated with Sosen are those who are now offenders themselves or are associated with - and advocating for an offender. Don Sweeney (a sex offender therapist turned activist) who Mary claims is an "expert" told her how amazing it was to him how many offenders went on to marry victims of child sexual abuse. But that's not amazing at all. It is a fact that offenders have a talent for targeting those most vulnerable to their manipulations. They find victims who ARE the most vulnerable and they marry them and begin another co-dependent relationship. The victims who are the strongest of all are those who don't fall prey again to this garbage, who speak up and tell their story without making excuses for their offender, who do support strict management of people who have committed these horrible crimes and in return for their strength and commitment are faced with a daily barrage of victim-bashing, mockery, badgering, and blatant victim-blaming. And yet they carry on. They ARE the "true survivors" to use Mary's term.

Common sense tells us that this issue must be victim-centered. The experts agree. And yet Randy English says this:
"It is time to bring in the experts and remove the decision making process from grieving families and politicians that have a political bias. Though we sympathize with their cause and feel angry that this has happened to their children, they are ill-equipped to make good choices when it comes to managing issues that are exceedingly diverse."
Does Randy believe, that as an offender himself, he is better equipped to make decisions on these issues? Randy, along with all the Sosenites keep referring to "the experts" and yet experts all agree that everything we do regarding the management of sex offenders MUST be victim-centered.

Not sex offender-centered.

Randy English once wrote:
"I would like to thank the ACLU for standing up for the truly weak, the RSO’s"
I was reminded of the infamous statement from Zman:
"Why can't we let the police do their job, and let PJ geeks get real jobs? They could be protecting the country with their hacking skills or something, yet they want to go after defenseless child predators instead of OSAMA, terrorists or other hackers!"
Victims of sexual abuse are "haters" and the offenders who created the victims are the weak and defenseless. That is the attitude of the extremists of Sosen.

When we consider that the mission statement of Sosen says:
"The mission of SOSEN is to educate the public, media, law-enforcement, and legislators regarding the facts, based on current research, of sexual abuse."
Then I am quite sure that Randy English would be interested in fixing some of the errors he has made when quoting "facts".

Error #1
  • Treatment has been proven to reduce recidivism to 1%

Treatment has not been proven to reduce recidivism AT ALL. Some studies show a reduction, some studies show no reduction. None of them show a reduction to ONE PERCENT

Error #2
  • Pedophilia is the sexual desire for a prepubescent child, and rare among offenders. Less than 1%.

This is an invented statistic pulled from someone's backside. There is no such statistic. There cannot BE such a statistic in existence considering the fact that most sex offenders haven't been "assessed" - according to Mary Duval. One-third of all sex crimes are committed against prepubescent children. While we can all agree that not everyone who molests a child would fit a psychiatric diagnosis of pedophilia, why would anyone believe that only 1% of them were? Randy English has no reference for that statistic, just as Tom Madison and Mary Duval didn't when they repeated it. In fact, the offenders in the infamous DOJ recidivism report they all rely on states quite clearly that 60% of the offenders had victims under the age of 13.

Error #3
  • Re-offense rate averages, for auto theft -78.8%, possession/sale of stolen property -77.4%, burglary -74%, robbery -70.2%, larcenist -74.6%, sex offenders - 3.5%.

That is from the Department of Justice and on it's face that's a true statement regarding what was in the report. What Randy English didn't tell you is that the report ALSO said that 78% of the released sex offenders in that report had ANOTHER previous conviction before the crime they were released for. In other words, they were already recidivists. And 28% of them had 2 or more previous convictions for sex crimes. How do you incorporate the information that at least one-fourth of them had already re-offended with another sex crime before this release - into the recidivism data? How do you use the statistic from the DOJ that only 5% of those offenders re-offended with a new sex crime within 3 years of release when 25% of them already had a history of sexual recidivism? Which leads to the next error Randy has made

Error #4
  • A study from the department of Justice found that about 94.7% of former offenders will not commit ANY other crime.

That study from the Department of Justice found that within 3 years 43% of sex offenders had committed another crime though not necessarily a sex crime. One-fourth of those were for property crimes and one-fourth were for violent crimes. THAT is what the Department of Justice said.

Staying in the closet enabled child sexual abuse to flourish and continue. The most important voice of all in this issue is the voice of those who have been victimized. Victims will no longer be badgered and shamed into silence. It is time for the culture of silence to end.

Necrophilia Obsessed Borderline Sociopath

Wednesday, October 21, 2009


We previously talked about Jennifer aka Jack Kaiser aka Lyrical Cancer here

I do admit to having some serious issues with this person. First it was his defense of Jizzony and his incessant harassment of me on YouTube that first set me off. Then he stole all the videos of him that I had worked so hard to steal - by claiming copyright to his child luring videos. Ballsy! But mainly it was just about his pedophilia and attempts to gain access to children.

When he was confronted about his pedo-activities he denied being pedo, can you believe that? I've always wondered why they defend their perversions so fiercely in pedo-places and deny it so strongly in others. Especially when we consider that Jack tried desperately to get attention while describing himself as "borderline sociopath" with an "obsession with necro" - frankly I expected a little more gratitude.

When Jack was arrested recently while trying to enroll in a school as a 15 year old boy I couldn't help but be reminded of Neil Havens Rodreick II - a 30 year old convicted sex offender who enrolled in an Arizona school as a 12 year old and was assisted by family members who pretended to be his father, uncle and grandfather.

There are people who are trying to make this into a "transgender" issue due to the fact that Jack was born female. But the truth of the matter is that Jack has been trying to pass himself off as a young boy for years while running pedophile websites and grooming children. Jack didn't pretend to be a kid in order to "get an education" as some have proposed. See these video clips to see Jack in action and I think there won't be any question about why Jack was trying to enroll in school as a child. From Wikisposure:
What makes the pedophile “Jack” particularly sinister and disturbing is his continued persistence to lure underage boys into a world of dangerous Sex Offenders, Child Pornographers and Pedophile activists with the ruse of being “Lyrical Cancer” (a 14 year old boy), despite continued warnings he has received from the police.




Watch them squirm, and slowly die

Saturday, June 28, 2008

From Wikisposure:

”Lyrical Cancer” is the screen name of Jennifer “Jack” Jay Kaiser, a 23 year old pedophile originally from Sacramento, California who after taking testosterone to become a man, began posing on pedophile forum boards as a 13 year old boy a year ago.

<<<<<< Jack with his Spider Man Underwear

He not only continued to pose as a young boy, we discovered he was grooming an actual minor on the Global-Unity website where he acted as a moderator and one of the owners. 16 year old Allaloneboy was coaxed by “Jack” into undressing on webcam in a chat room full of pedophiles. We contacted police again after this sickening incident. Lyrical Cancer and his lover NZ shut down Global-Unity after this second visit by police and he disappeared from the pedophile activist scene briefly.

He has reappeared in the last few months, very active, and again engaging in conversations with minors on pedophile forums and posting comments on several forum boards in support of pedophiles. Recently he claimed to have moved to Kansas City, Kansas where he lives with two “boylovers”. He also posted comments on a video defending the recent confession of arrested pedophile Jizzony, even claiming he knew two of the victims ages 13 and 15 and that when Jizzony raped them it was “consensual”.

What makes the pedophile “Jack” particularly sinister and disturbing is his continued persistence to lure underage boys into a world of dangerous Sex Offenders, Child Pornographers and Pedophile activists with the ruse of being “Lyrical Cancer” (a 14 year old boy), despite continued warnings he has received from the police.

Beautiful from head to toe

Disappeared; they'll never show

So innocent, they follow me Their little minds just cannot see

Ahead of them lies a surprise The fall-out of my plan devised

I have enough to fill my need It's time to watch their lives recede

One by one I hang them high Watch them squirm, and slowly die

Never have I felt so good And finally, I understood

To achieve eternal happiness I cannot let this lust suppress

My newfound form of beauty; of art Is making a child's soul depart


Visit Wikisposure and read about Jack aka Lyrical Cancer.

Watch this 23 year old pretending to be a child.

"uh dude. I like adults. I'm 14. I'm not into boys younger then me. i prefer them older. But right you won't wanna open your mind to the idea of kids loving and wanting a sexual relationship with adults"

Watch his comments as he defends Jizzony.....after he confessed to molesting 4 boys.

"I know 2 of the boys. the 15 yr old and the 13 yr old. dude. it was consensual. maybe ya should stop making the media think for you stitches. ya know it is possible kids wanna have sex. i'm 14, id have sex with an adult if i wanted to."

If At First You Don't Succeed..........

Sunday, June 15, 2008




Ignatio Vargas
made history when he received the longest sentence in Merced County CA history for the repeat rape of an 8 year old girl which continued for 2 years. Vargas was sentenced to 588 years in prison. The District Attorney said this about the sentence:

"The punishment is proportional to what the people of California said they want for raping a victim. The other thing about getting a really high sentence like this, it guarantees he'll never get out."

Vargas has again made the headlines by attempting suicide by slashing his throat. His attempt proved unsuccessful as prison guards found him and he was rushed to the hospital. He is now described as being in "a stable condition."

Once Vargas has recovered, he will be returned to the prison and placed on suicide watch. But hey, we'd like to remind Vargas of that old saying

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again!

"The most amazing feeling in the world"

Tuesday, February 12, 2008



Meet Graham Christensen

AKA Cangee from GirlChat.

Graham is obsessed with science

And little girls.

Graham is a pedophile.

In fact, Graham has little girl friends.



Graham describes his ideal girl:


9 years old with bright red-orange almost shoulder length hair with bangs down to her eyebrows, skinny, fair skin and wearing cutoff jeans, choker (!!), barefeet, and a T-shirt with JAILBAIT stenciled on the front. Intelligent, talkative and friendly but maybe a little quiet at first meeting her. Physically and verbally affectionate (loves to say "I love you"). And probably the most important, curiosity, empathy and optimism.

*sigh* I'd be set for life....if only she would stay 9
Graham says he first realized he was a pedophile when he was 14 years old but thought that made him a bad person until he discovered GirlChat and discovered that his deviant desires were perfectly normal! So normal in fact that he says:


When you really get to know the right little girl it's the most amazing feeling in the world. It's not just about her body, you love everything about her. The way she smiles and giggles at all the silly things you say warms your heart and makes your whole day worthwhile living, no matter what else has happened

Graham also replies to the question "do you ever think that it is wrong?" With this:


Nope. Attraction is a feeling, not an action. Feelings are never wrong or right, only actions can be reasonably judged as being one or the other. And my attraction has never led me to take any action that was what I consider wrong.

Considering that he doesn't think sexually abusing children is wrong, I don't have much faith in that statement personally. Especially considering the ages of children he desires:


If you're asking what the youngest age is that I'm typically attracted to, it usually drops off below 4. Although there was this one really cute sweetheart of a 3 year old I thought had the sexiest little legs and feet, along with her pretty face

I couldn't help but think about Harold Spurling and Jeffrey Brisson when Graham answered the question about whether or not anyone in his real life knew about his pedophilia


The only person who knows in real life is my roommate,
who is also a GLer.

Red flags are going off here. I wonder if the parents of those little girls he's involved with know about Graham and how they would feel about the time he spends with their daughters if they knew?


I've never had a lgf that was this affectionate! When we watch a movie she'll cuddle up on the couch with me under a blanket and pull my arm around her. I think I'm falling in love.

Please visit Graham's wikisposure page, learn more about him, please let your voice be heard by letting someone know of any children you're aware of who may be in contact with him.


Graphics Courtesy of Jacey

What's Love Got To Do With It?

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Have you ever watched a boy try and eat a lobster for the first time?

So begins the story of Vespucci, a frequent pedofreak poster on BoyChat. He tells about his young (12 year old) friend trying to handle the lobster, how he assisted him and how it made him feel.
the way he dipped the meat in the butter and brought it to his mouth was completely unpostable.
And naturally some of his other pals have to get in on the pervchat jonasBark says
Lots of tail pluckin' and head suckin'
These outrageous comments made by obvious imbiciles intrigued me. What else might Vespucci say?

He talks a lot about wanting a foster child.
I was walking and talking with S when I mentioned I was bored in my life and was considering getting a foster child. He looked at my with his most serious boy look and informed me that I really should and told me what a great idea it was. He even later recommended I get a 10yo boy
I think the poor kid is trying to save himself, makes sense especially since Vespucci has talked about the boy being jealous when he was around other boys. But then he reassures us that he probably never will apply because
it gets taxing being that responsible for that long. At least as a AF only there is no real responsibility.

To be honest I will probably never go through with all of the paper work to be a foster parent. It is probably easier to marry a single mother and off her
(THAT WAS A JOKE) He proclaims.
And the anatomical deadspace quips back with
Isn't that what foster kids are for...To spicen up life when your bored, and to discard when you have something else better to do?
Then he comes up with a way to perv on kids without having to do anything He says: I feel so guilty! I know how many of you like to look at state sex offender registries looking at all of the pictures and seeing if you know anyone well today I did something slightly different. Appearently my state has an adoption web site were you can view pictures and biographies of adoptable children.
Yes Vespucci is really mouthy. When his pals have trouble finding jobs he advises them that most places don't do background checks and the best bet is to "Flat out lie!"

He tells us about sniffing his friends underwear to see what it's like. He didn't like it and ended up calling his pedopals who do "PERVERTS!"

He tells us about a time he exposed himself to a young boy in the men's room while at the movies to see "CARS".

He tells us about hanging out at the swimming pool and spying a striking 8 year old boy.
there were no pesky lifegaurds and the pool was nearly empty
Tomorrow I think I will bring some toys with me when I go to swim laps. Riding his bike he can't carry any with him and a football or a tennis ball will work wonders.

BTW, I am not going to go on about his lithe tight wet body that glistened in the sun as he climbed out of the side of the pool nor will I mention the way he fit his swimsuit ever so perfectly because, as we know, that would violate the rules.
In another post he tells us about being unemployed and living in a low-rent apartment complex witih "a great abundance of single mothers and unfathered boys. I took an immediate liking to 1 in particular". Unfortunately it didn't last long, as Vespucci says
Although she never confronted me she accussed me of doing things to C
To defend himself he accuses the Mom of things he deems to be unsatisfactory, such as
an alcoholic who likes to sleep around with black men with records
Over time the woman became jealous of the time I spent with C and his younger brother.
And even turtle (you will remember him from GirlChat) gets in on this one, he says:
if someone is overprotective of their kids i always choose to assume that its either because something sexual is going on or its because the parents are into illegal activities.
OH! Is that what it is?
it tears me up when i see the slow damage done by parents like this. a kid starts out early in life as a sweet funloving kid,with no clue how fucked up the situation is.
but kids grow and learn. as they get a little older,you can see fear and a question in their eyes. this is usually when they reach out for attention by being clingy or acting out. as they get a little older,they smile and laugh even less. you can now see the beginnings of anger and despair. they can still be saved at this point,but it usually doesnt happen. they are beginning to figure out that noone cares,and they are virtually on their own. a little more time goes by and they are almost completely changed. very little is left of that once beautiful child,so full of love and wonder. they have given up. they are broken. they are cynical. their seldom laughter is evil and full of contempt for others. they become cruel at this point,and often violent. by 12 or 14,they have become their parents,or worse.

yet this is better than a loving embrace from a sick pedophile,right? i hate society...
Sounded like the effects of child sex abuse to me, hmmmm.
But then, ah the camping trip. Vespucci asks:
How to convince a boy he wants to go camping? Really, Im asking. I have taken S(12) camping before and he loved it yet he adamantly refuses to go again
Some of the suggestions he receives are
  • Buy him a camera
  • take him rock climbing
  • sweeten the pot with archery
  • or shooting, fishing, or hunting
  • Remove the thing that keeps him from wanting to go
Then we have a piece of advice from lookin who tells Vespucci
Well...I remember your story about the last camping trip. Maybe you ought to read your own post to see why he might not want to be out in the woods with you again, hmm?
But of all Vespucci's stories the one that stuck with me the most was his car wreck he had with S the 12 year old. Yeah, it really shook Vespucci up pretty bad. You might say his life flashed before his eyes. And in so doing he had an epiphany....
At times I am S's dad and he is my son. We don't mention it but that is the relationship. And then at other times we are just best friends and we treat each other as age peers. Really I am in new territory here.
I have never loved a boy before
only lusted after ones
I could not have.
So there you have it. The story of Vespucci. The boylover who had never loved a boy before.

Facts According to Jay Part 2

Monday, August 21, 2006

Jay Baskins, see HERE, and HERE, tells us about this little thing called A FACTOID, which he defines as:

A statement of presumed fact that people believe to be true because they hear it repeated over and over

FACTOID #2
The "pedophile" is a violent man who forces himself on children.
Jay states that the ACTUAL fact is:
Baurmann in the largest study of child abuse every carried out discovered that in 80% of all cases of reported illegal sexual contacts "the perpetrator had exhibited something other than threatening or violent behavior."
Well, here we go again. First up, this study, while it may have been one of the largest ever done at that time concerned SPECIFIC aspects of child abuse. Secondly it was done in 1983. Third..... I do not doubt at all that just about any study done would show that the majority of child sexual abuse was non-violent. In fact I wouldn't question it at all.
It's called GROOMING.

A Prime Example

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Here's a prime example of one of the main goals of the pedovore movement. To increase tolerance for their perversions and to be accepted into mainstream society as 'just one of the guys'. Reporting on Michael Jackson, journalist Barbara Amiel gives us a look at what pedophile apologia looks like:

Genius doesn't justify evil, never has, but in the face of his brilliance, shouldn't society show just a little more tolerance of Jackson's peculiarity? What, after all, does one do with an idiosyncratic person of many sexual quirks including a taste for young boys whose own gender, judging by his appearanace, gestures and conversation is at best ambiguous? Jackson sits right on the border that separates maleness and femaleness, blackness and whiteness, grown-up and child, and possibly sanity and insanity.


Perhaps Ms. Amiel believes we should just ignore it. Leave Michael on his NeverLand ranch to never grow up and continue his grooming process over multiple children and spouting off stupidities like "Why can't we just share a bed?" But she has more to say on the topic:

Is there really any doubt that he had children in his bed for his pleasure? And what was the damage to them? Child molestation of any sort is not a desirable thing, and I can't think of any culture that has viewed it so, or even viewed it as a neutral sexual orientation. But in the absence of violence, fear and physical coercion, in the total absence of penetration, what actual harm has he done? These children have received millions for their moments in his bed. Before they were told it was a crime, they couldn't wait to get back to Neverland.



Maybe Ms. Amiel should educate herself on the grooming process and the psychological effects on the child. Or maybe she should tell all the children who have been sexually exploited that if it wasn't violent they have nothing to complain about. Or perhaps if they could be paid off that would make it just fine and dandy. Perhaps the simplest solution is for her to pull her head up out of the sand and see things for what they are. You don't have to be a genius to know that the statement In the absence of violence, what actual harm has been done? is merely an attempt to justify. A most extreme cognitive distortion, from the outside looking in. Or maybe there's some latent tendencies there.......

The next thing you know the pedovores will be editing Wiki's and using Ms. Amiel as a reference.