I Didn't Know Whether to Laugh or Cry

After recently discovering
that the pedophile community is using (among other things) an editorial written for an alternative news source as a justification for tolerance.

And having exposed an obvious pedophile apologist who believes Michael Jackson should be excused by society because he didn't commit violence against his victims and paid them millions of dollars.....(though not of free choice)

I sarcastically made this remark

The next thing you know the pedovores will be editing Wiki's and using Ms. Amiel as a reference.

Ah, but little did I know. They're already using Ms. Amiel! Why, it's even in the pedo library!

Example in point, Tom O'Carroll, a long time pedophile activist and repeat sex offender, member of NAMBLA and pervert extraordinaire, quoted and linked to Barbara Amiel, a journalist, in defense of his position that

True concern for children would prefer to see some children participating willingly in pornography under monitorable conditions than to have others brutally exploited because of their status as runaways or mere chattels of their parents.

Then he has an editorial by Ms. Amiel. After reading what she had to say about Michael Jackson it should come as no surprise
.

Child pornography is produced because some people have a need to look at it. This need and its satisfaction will not be extinguished by Patten's prohibitions any more than homosexuality or the craving for the high has ever been extinguished by legislation. Human desires are largely indifferent to fines, although any instinct can be curbed by sufficiently draconian measures.

One is revolted at the idea of children posing for pornographic pictures, but while the use to which the pictures may be put in someone's mind is abhorrent, I can't really see that simply photographing a child exploits him.

In the end, I suppose, I dislike all legislation like this proposed new amendment to the Criminal Justice Act., because it is legislation against an essentially victimless crime. The living child exists only in the paedophile's mind.

Victimless Crime???

I'm simply at a loss for words. While I've been researching reputable studies and peer reviewed academics, the pedophile community is quoting criminals and journalists.

Lanning said on p.69

Many preferential sex offenders collect academic and scientific books and articles on the nature of their paraphilic preferences in an effort to understand and justify their own behavior. For the same reason pedophiles often collect and distribute articles and manuals written by pedophiles in which they attempt to justify and rationalize their behavior……..

I guess that says it all.

A Prime Example

Here's a prime example of one of the main goals of the pedovore movement. To increase tolerance for their perversions and to be accepted into mainstream society as 'just one of the guys'. Reporting on Michael Jackson, journalist Barbara Amiel gives us a look at what pedophile apologia looks like:

Genius doesn't justify evil, never has, but in the face of his brilliance, shouldn't society show just a little more tolerance of Jackson's peculiarity? What, after all, does one do with an idiosyncratic person of many sexual quirks including a taste for young boys whose own gender, judging by his appearanace, gestures and conversation is at best ambiguous? Jackson sits right on the border that separates maleness and femaleness, blackness and whiteness, grown-up and child, and possibly sanity and insanity.

Perhaps Ms. Amiel believes we should just ignore it. Leave Michael on his NeverLand ranch to never grow up and continue his grooming process over multiple children and spouting off stupidities like "Why can't we just share a bed?" But she has more to say on the topic:

Is there really any doubt that he had children in his bed for his pleasure? And what was the damage to them? Child molestation of any sort is not a desirable thing, and I can't think of any culture that has viewed it so, or even viewed it as a neutral sexual orientation. But in the absence of violence, fear and physical coercion, in the total absence of penetration, what actual harm has he done? These children have received millions for their moments in his bed. Before they were told it was a crime, they couldn't wait to get back to Neverland.

Maybe Ms. Amiel should educate herself on the grooming process and the psychological effects on the child. Or maybe she should tell all the children who have been sexually exploited that if it wasn't violent they have nothing to complain about. Or perhaps if they could be paid off that would make it just fine and dandy. Perhaps the simplest solution is for her to pull her head up out of the sand and see things for what they are. You don't have to be a genius to know that the statement In the absence of violence, what actual harm has been done? is merely an attempt to justify. A most extreme cognitive distortion, from the outside looking in. Or maybe there's some latent tendencies there.......

The next thing you know the pedovores will be editing Wiki's and using Ms. Amiel as a reference.

Why can't you share your bed?

Why can't you share your bed? The most loving thing to do is to share your bed with someone. It's very charming. It's very sweet. It's what the whole world should do.
- Michael Jackson

Yeah, Michael. My kids can sleep over anytime. I trust you.

With all the lame attempts by the paedos to try to debate their disease, to make us understand, to try to persuade us, I decided to look to the world's biggest paedo of them all. Surely, if the King of Pop (gag, cough, gag) thinks such a thing is innocent, it must be. Afterall, he loves the children. He loves them so much, he even shares his bed with them. It's all about the love, people. Can't you feel the love?

Excuse me. I'll be back after I am done vomiting.