Ethel Quayle and Max Taylor are experts in paedophilia. In 2002, they wrote about the dangers presented by paedophiles using the net; it is argued that the net is used by paedophiles in the following harmful ways:
Traffic child pornography
Locate children to molest
Engage in inappropriate sexual communication with children
Communicate with other paedophiles
Pictorial child pornography available on the net can be used as a tool in child molestation.
The authors further highlight the problematic use of the internet by paedophiles:
In allowing paedophiles to communicate so freely with each other, the Internet reinforces the belief that such behaviour is valid and normal activity, and is an expression of ‘love’ for children rather than abuse. It is not clear whether such cognitive distortions exist prior to accessing others on the Internet, but it is clear that they are reinforced by such engagement. Not only does it offer the opportunity to justify paedophile activities, it also allows for a relatively safe environment in which pictures and text can be exchanged. Such material may form part of the paedophile’s collection, and in addition allow for the exchange of information about possible victims.
p. 867
Quayle, E & Taylor, M 2002 ‘Paedophiles, Pornography and the Internet: Assessment Issues’, British Journal of Social Work, no. 32, pp. 863-875.
















17 comments:
Great post OZ this is spot on and mirrors all the diseased pedofreaks that visit this blog all of THEM!!
PEDOPHILE = CHILD MOLESTER
I don't give them the 'honor' of a title, Peds are FREAKS...
It's a perverted SICK mind that could justify the molestation of a child...
"I did it because I love children..."
B.S. They did it because they haven't been STOPPED yet...
They did it because they're too sick or too ugly or too freaky to find an adult that will have anything to do with them so they prey on the most innocent among us...
S&W justice comes to mind, but that's just me talking...
I think that police should deal with this problem.
Good information! This is something that we have to really keep in mind. As much as the Right and Left sides of the political blogoshpere have given us voices (and I think a lot more influence than people think) it also gives pedophiles a platform and a voice.
That is why what we are doing here is so crucial. Their voice cannot be left unchecked. We must continue to discredit them and expose them for what they are!
Not to mention they peddle their wares elsewhere to others in search of like minded people.
About a year, may a year and a half, ago I was in the newsgroup alt.binaries.pictures.animals using software to search all pictures (I was looking for pictures of natural predators for an RPG I was working with) and I accidentally downloaded (and quickly deleted) some of their spam. That means they use it to search for more of their kind even if the not-so-accidentally offend normal people. (You gotta be careful with that automatic download software.)
He's got a point there.
But then, what about all of us who use the internet for none of those things?
PEDOPHILE = CHILD MOLESTER
I assume we have you to thank for the spam on Silent War's blog?
You do this Twilight
Communicate with other paedophiles
You know, you've never answered any of my questions about your comrades. Does their level of cowardice bother you at all?
Truthfully pedophiles aren't automatically child molesters.
But I still think it's unhealthy to have a sexual attraction to children.
Twilight should seek some counseling, before he acts on these desires. A young man shouldn't be throwing his life away.
Truthfully.... yea in the perfect world. And officially by definition. But it still doesn't make pedophilia acceptable behavior, as you said.
So what's your beef if you agree with that?
I'm of the opinion pedophiles should be dealt with accordance to the law, that way they can make less claims about their innocence or rights.
I've been to a few of their sites and seen how they give each other advice about how to manipulate the law. They call themselves Boy/girl lovers instead of pedophiles or child molesters, they claim the minority and yell discrimination when cornered.
I just don't want any of them to get away with a crime because of some bullshit legal loophole so I advise people to know their facts and be careful when dealing with them.
Wow that was quite, uh profound, Klaus.
But you see, here's the interesting part.....we're not breaking any laws. None of us has encouraged anyone to break the law, nor do we intend to.
We have the law on our side, why in the world would we feel a need to break them?
Answer is of course that we wouldn't.
The law is on everyones side, everyone has the ability to follow, manipulate or break it as they want.
I didn't mean to accuse anyone of anything, I've seen a few of sites like these that claim to fight child molesters but advocate a campaign of cyber terrorism against them. So thanks for the reassurance.
Read the Truth or Consequence Post. It'll give you an idea of what we're about...
Who is this Klaus?
What do you stand for?
I am Klaus?
If you mean whose side I am on. Ultimately yours.
I live in a country of laws and will follow them even if they mean advocating protection the more unfavorable members of our society from the more moral members of the society.
That's pretty vague and generalized there Klaus. We of course advocat following the laws as well, but we have no problem stating which side we are all on- immediately- not ultimately.
Hmmmmm, makes us wonder.
I believe that built into any "home incarceration" "probation" "parole" or any other type of release should be an injunction that they are not allowed on the internet. Whether the internet was involved in the crime or not. Goes along with the "not allowed to be in the presence of children". That is if we absolutely have to let them out of incarceration (and no I am not in favor of allowing them to get out).
Post a Comment