Steven M. Dominguez admitted he had 2,515 images of child pornography on his computer, including sex acts between young children and between young children and adults.
He and federal law enforcement authorities agreed in a court filing that the images came from the Internet where they were “exchanged . . . by individuals interested in child pornography.”
“Did you do these things?,” U.S. District Judge Robert Blackburn asked Dominguez.
“Yes, your honor,” he responded.
Dominguez and the prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Habib Nasrullah, agreed in a plea bargain that the judge should sentence Dominguez to 87 months in prison. The range in sentencing guidelines is between 78 and 97 months in prison.
Federal customs agents, who specialize nationwide in child pornography investigations, built the case against him through a task force that included Pueblo County sheriff's officers.
Agents received a tip about Dominguez's pornography activities from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. The center had been contacted by a Web site on which members store and share photos.
Isn't that interesting? Lindsay Ashford might want to disagree with this story, considering that he has THIS to say:
Careful quantification contradicts statements like those of Casa Alianza that there are "24,000 web sites currently devoted to child pornography on the internet," as well as claims by Customs Agent MacMartin that he had personally seen more than 100,000 pictures and video segments , all obtained on line, of children being sexually exploited. It also contradicts police reports that 80,000 child pornography images are traded on line every week. These are lies!
Their exagerrated statistics and lies about the extent of child pornography on the internet has been the trojan horse to suspend privacy rights and the freedom of speech for everyone.
Sexually sick moral crusaders and totalitarian authorities have defined children's bodies as obscene. They aren't! At least until filtered through their own pathological psychosexuality. They do an immense amount of harm to the healthy sexual development of children, who now must deal with their bodies-defined-as-obscene, not to mention the widespread fear of non-sexual but pleasurable touching generated by the hysteria they have created.
Less than an average of ten new series per year have been circulated on the internet since 1984. Only 14 of these series include children engaged in sexual intercourse, 32 in non-penetrative genital contact and 39 in fellatio. Most of these series include genital display only.
It is estimated that $100,000, 000 per year are spent by police forces and moral crusaders to combat this practically non-existent child pornography industry. On an annual basis that is approximately $10,000,000 per victim and $75,000,000 per act of sexual intercourse.
And then we have his pal Taf-Kat, John Hodgson, from GirlChat. Poor Taf-Kat has had his share of problems, lost his wife for one thing when he was arrested for possession of child pornography. It was such a horrible experience for him, he's even made an online diary, and swears he'll never use child porn again. Filling his diary with the story of what happened and Lollicon images. Oh well some folks never learn:
He brought up some of the hc pictures up on the screen. It was very odd seeing those pictures, with three other men in the room. They were my private pictures, they were never meant to be seen by anyone who didn't want to see them. It seemed like a violation of my sexuality.
I haven't harmed anyone in my life and if I go to jail the only people who will suffer will be Penny and my children. And he claims he is working for child protection!
The interview went on for several hours. He is a vindictive person with a wild imagination and I don't know how he sleeps at night.
In the corner is a pile of boxes and books. I recognise my scrap-books filled with cut'n'paste pictures of little girls, modified by me to give the impression that the little minxes were "getting it on", oh how I'd love to have one more session with those books. I had turned their pages so often, week after week, year after year. Every page was burned in my memory, they were almost works of art, the skill I had developed with scissors and Pritt, I was a fucking genius!
Next to them, piled high, were the many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine. Like the books, I was so familiar with every single image, they had been sorted and re-sorted, into age order, into filename order, all the series sorted, my favourite folder, my pigtails folder, my blow-job folder...if there was a different way to sort them, I had done it.
The police were misleading in their estimate of how many pictures there were on the disks, sure, there were 70,000+ images, but many of them were duplicates, and many were legal, maybe there was 15,000+ that were hc or featured nudity.
Oh right, Lindsay. There's no child pornography out there. It's all a great big lie drummed up by mean old bad parents who don't want your nasty hands on their little girls. I guess we should've asked you first if we had wanted the truth, eh?
Labels: Child Pornography, John Hodgson, lindsay ashford, Taf-kat
9 Old Comments:
USA Today reports that United States and Canada have broken up a child pornography ring that involved the live molestation of children: "Children, including a baby, were sexually molested while others in a private Internet chat room watched, U.S. and Canadian law enforcement officers said Wednesday in announcing the bust of an international child pornography ring. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales called the trading of graphic images and transmitting of live sexual molestation the "worst imaginable form of child pornography."
"Twenty-seven people from nine U.S. states and Canada, Australia and Britain have been charged with possession, receipt, distribution and manufacture of child pornography.Thirteen have been indicted in the USA and 14 abroad. All have been arrested except one, who is now considered a fugitive."
"Gonzales said seven children were victims. Among them, according to an indictment, is an infant allegedly molested in April by Brian Annoreno, a suburban Chicago man who went by the nickname "Acidburn" and transmitted images live via the Internet."
Of course that was reported on March 16, 2006. Guess they hadn't heard what Lindsay said yet.
By 
Stitches77, at
Wed Jul 26, 05:09:00 PM PDT
It's all lies! It's all just a big, hateful conspiracy!
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
By jarhead john, at
Wed Jul 26, 08:32:00 PM PDT
ROFL It must be a 'vast anti-ped conspiracy'
Well, the more they blabber the more trouble it gets them in. You'd think they would've already figured that out. Oh sorry, forgot about the mentality we're dealing with. Surely though one of them will figure it out eventually, and SHUT UP.
By Stitches77, at
Wed Jul 26, 09:09:00 PM PDT
The "moral crusaders" who want to protect children are sick and perverts who want to treat them as sexual playthings are normal. They really live in an upside-down world.
By shoprat, at
Thu Jul 27, 12:39:00 AM PDT
The guys proclaiming to the world that child pornography is not a true problem are the same ones writing diaries such as this.
Anyone else notice what Ashford's doing here?
Poor paedophiles clearly can't work it out.
By Daydreamer of Oz, at
Thu Jul 27, 02:21:00 AM PDT
Anyone else notice what Ashford's doing here?
No they don't notice Daydreamer. Is that a surprise? They worship Lindsay because he came out of the toybox. They don't realize all the ways that he's used and taken advantage of them. The lies that he's told them, the damage he's done to their movement.
By Stitches77, at
Thu Jul 27, 07:35:00 AM PDT
Stitches77--
the damage he's done to their movement.
Ah, right...quite like the damage a certain member of AZU who is no longer a member has done to your organization...
..That terrible damage Lindsay Ashford has done to the world, yes by ::gasp:: telling Paedophiles simply because they have an attraction they don't have to act upon it. Surely this is a crime above all else and everyone should string Lindsay from the highest tree...
I must say these days I've come to regard AZU as little more than a humor site... All you do is rip off the words of others --especially news articles-- and crow about all the work you've done. ROTFLMAO, you should talk about the self-inflicted damage you've done to one's own cause?? Pot, Kettle, Black?
You had an opportunity to rise above the lies that gave this blog birth when JD420 told you about the Care Act and you chose not to take it. You had a chance to better the lives of children every where by making your own donations to StC, and you declined to take it. You have in short shown yourselves to the world to be nothing more than the latest hate group seeking an outlet to thrust your hatred upon. And while it may be funny to watch you spin your wheels in the air it's still quite sickening to see your kind continues to exist of the misery of others and that's sad.
--I*Love*Green*Olives (crossposting this at GC for posterity)
By I*Love*Green*Olives, at
Fri Jul 28, 05:47:00 PM PDT
Yo green freak. You had an opportunity to rise above the lies that gave this blog birth
The lies? Oh my. Ok, whatever you say olive psychopath. *wink*
telling Paedophiles simply because they have an attraction they don't have to act upon it.
Oh is that all Lindsay said? Or is that all you're capable of reading? I know LOTS of stuff Lindsay said. And most of it has to do with the wonders of touching little girls and ways that you can get age of consent laws abolished. Oh Lindsay has said lots of things. We know all about it.
And since you find us to be so humorous, why don't you go do some more of your psychotic math deductions.
By Stitches77, at
Fri Jul 28, 08:21:00 PM PDT
Olive,
You're growing more pathetic by the moment. If you're attempting to feign intelligence, this really isn't the way to do it.
You know what we allow you to know. You wouldn't have the slightest idea what work we do OR what donations we make. Because we're not in it for a publicity stunt. We don't have to try to win people over into thinking we're acceptable human beings.
Now go back to your nothing blog and try to figure out what we're going to do next. We've got lots of surprises in store for you.
<< Home