Who are these men?

What do the following men have in common?

• Lindsay Ashford
• Tom O'Carroll
• Charles Rust-Tierny
• John Murray Melanson
• Damien Cole

Along with all the visitors we get here at this blog who arrive here under the most sickening of search terms.

• 10 year old boys pedo pictures
• cp innocent youth porn
• pedofilia photos kids
• pedofilia videos
• pedo vaginal penetration 3 year old
• child molesting pics
• pedofilia pics
• boylove videos
• pedofilia free video
• little pedo child pics
  
• young boys raped by pedophiles pics

Hey, I don't make this stuff up folks. Those are from just the last few hours and doesn't take into account all the pedo boy, pedo girl, pedo chat, pedo blog, pedophile, pedosexual pedo pedo pedo pedo until I could just GAG. But what do they have in common with the above and with these guys who have made these statements....

Drifter:

"I would definitely have sex with any little girl I had a chance with, but would not rape one. I guess there really are those that want to admire but would never touch. Thats not me man, I will touch and touch and touch!!!!"

Taf-Kat:

"piled high, were the many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine"

Camper:

"Hmmm....I generally find boys start 'turning my eye' at about age five"

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

Olive freak:

"Having discovered a community of people who understand you, share those same likes and dislikes, and managed to live life without rape or molesting"

Viamund:

"The internet is a tool that is meant to be used for all manner of things. Personally I use it for research, activism, gaming and certainly online dating. I date boys aged 14 - 18 and I have met all my lovers over the past 6 years exclusively through internet dating sites"

Daniel:

"I am sexually attracted to children, but I am not a pedophile"

What can you say about men like this? Men like Daniel who wrote a complete guide to debate for pedophiles....taking them step by step through the process of proving that pedophiles are normal and child prostitution and child pornography should not only be tolerated and accepted but legalized! What can you possibly say? I can just imagine him trying to publish it.... Perhaps he could call it Pedo-Logic for Dummies?

What can you say about Camper who not only attempted to deceive society in general but actually pulled it off with the pedophile community. What can you say when the co-owner of BoyChat...the largest message board for boylover pedophiles is running from law enforcement for not only child pornography but the rape of a 5 year old boy? John Murray Melanson. Remember that name, you'll be hearing it again.

What can you say about Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU...with a history of attempting to legalize child pornography and allow access to it in public libraries, was anyone actually surprised? Were they surprised to hear that it wasn't lovely images of 'child models' but videos of young girls bound while being raped with screams coming from their mouths?

What can you possibly say about Tom O'Caroll that hasn't already been said? Repeated prison sentences for his deviant acts, his history with NAMBLA and horrendous writings in support of child molestation.

Lindsay Ashford, the sneaking cowardly webhost who distorts scientific studies by mixing the statistics to fit his agenda. Who maintains a website all pink and sugary to 'educate young girls' . Lindsay, of which I have seen scores of pedophiles say they were confused, they were looking for information and then they found Lindsay and all of a sudden they knew there was nothing wrong with them.........they had come home! Lindsay who lies about child pornography. Lindsay who lies about statistics. Lindsay who lies to his pedo pals, and to society. Lindsay who runs and hides from country to country.........all for his sexual desire of young girls. He denies any wrong-doing, but he can't very well say otherwise, can he?

What can you say about Damien Cole aka Rookieeee of the decimated Pedologues. Oh, well I think ILGO said it best when he whined about Rookiee losing his pedo terrorism hierarchy on the internet. "Many times I found myself disagreeing....but just as many times more I've nodded my head enthusiastically and said to myself 'Yes, that's exactly how it is!'"

Well, yes we see that Olive. That's part of the reason why Rookieeeee was dangerous, he encouraged, he reinforced and he helped you all maintain your cognitive distortions. If you listen to his pedologues, you also know that practically every guest he ever had either went on to a pedophile related criminal conviction or else they already had one under their belt. They were just one of the many who joined in when the pedo heads began to nod in unison. You should know, you were one of them....even as you claimed to NOT sexually offend against children ALL BECAUSE OF A MESSAGE BOARD! Oh Dear! You need a message board to keep you from raping babies Olive freak? Is that what your prior conviction was for? Oh, never mind, you took the plea.

And what do you say about Seamus? The GirlChat resident of how-to-hide-child-porn without giving your mother a stroke infamy...

"Now, a stranger just might stumble across the correct 75-character password which has been encryped by BestCrypt with a 448-bit algorithm, but not easily. Word on the street is that he will need every computer on Earth tied together, for longer than the age of the universe, to crack it."

What have you got to hide Seamus?

"BestCrypt has a system wherein you can hide a container within a container; nobody but you knows if there is a hidden container.

Create a container and fill it with borderline stuff: girls who have just turned legal age, for example.
Hide your sensitive files in another container which is hidden inside of that one.

If the authorities ask for a password, give them the password to the innocuous container; there is no way for them to know if that is all there is.

I've been in and out of the UK frequently since that law was enacted; no problems"

Well. Well.
What could we say about Jason? You know Jason Masters the 'fiction' writer? We could say he likes girls....and little boys too. We could say he believes he's a girl trapped in a man's body. We could say he has bondage fantasies about tying up toddlers, or talk about his legal problems.

We could mention that it was reported in Relapse prevention with Sex Offenders

"the longer sexual fantasies are maintained and elaborated on, the greater the chance that the behavior will be acted out in real life"

"the more individuals engage in fantasy, the more motivating and more detailed the rehearsal may become, and the more able the individuals are to convince themselves to act out the behaviour in real life"

But I think we all already understand that.

We could talk about Infinity and his Child Porn problem. But then, they all have a bit of a problem with Kiddie Porn of one sort or another, don't they? We could talk about Dylan Thomas and his pro-child prostitution and child porn stand, or Robert Vann Smith aka Ghostwriters Mexican bust when he thought he'd just pass over the border and play with a boy or two for the weekend, or how about Lux? or Princesplaff? or Jeffrey W. Russell aka Jeffrey Gold and Matthew Fox of Sure Quality Radio sitting in custody awaiting trial for...oh what was it now? Sexual offenses against children? Distributing obscene material to a minor? What if we talked about Paul Edward Vose aka Slvrspun and the boy he terrorized....or his detailed instructions for hiding child porn? Or how about Bill Evans and his exploitation of an indigenous population of people....all for his sexual desires.

We could talk about their pedo distortions and how they claim they would never no never harm a child. "It was consensual!" Or another favorite they use "That child was only harmed because society told him he was!" We could go on and on and on and on but there's one question that begs to be answered.

What do these men have in common with the Lindsay Ashfords and the Rust-Tierney's of this world. Why, it's very simple.

They are all real men!

These men and others like them loudly and boldly proclaim that they are pedophiles. They inflict themselves upon society, upon our children! They demand to be accepted! They make all kinds of foolish demands actually, but one thing is for sure, they are out there with one purpose in mind......sexual gratification through the use of children.

So if you ever have cause to doubt, just remember that they LIE as a matter of course. They have reason to. Who are these men?

They are child predators and they are real. They are not just words on a computer screen, a nickname or a sigpic. They are child predators, whether they call themselves a Girl Lover, a Boy Lover, a Child Lover, a Pedophile, Pedosexual or MAA. These things they do are happening everyday and we need everyone working together, united, to deny them that ability There can be Absolute Zero Tolerance for those who prey on children and use them for selfish, sexual motives.

HT to Jacey for the awesome graphics!

PING: Seamus & taf-kat

Since you're so curious Seamus about your appearance on AZ, I'll fill you in. You see, your pedo pal Greenfly came to be on AZ while out searching for.....something and he landed right HERE on this post.

We were just having a little heart-to-heart, you know a CHAT and we asked the question who are these men?

You, Seamus, were one of the ones that we asked about. We talked about you downloading child pornography and your methods for hiding it.

Of course we didn't talk about I*Love*Green*Olives wanting to know your secrets but we can save the olive fweak for another day, eh?

Now LGsinmyheart says that he's read you and he's read AZ and he'll

"blindly vouch for both Seamus and Taf-kat in this case . Sorry but Taf-kat and Seamus are just WAY more dignified and trustworthy than Absolute Intolerance can ever dream of being... "

Oh well, I guess the little freak just doesn't appreciate us. But Dissident sure tucked tail. Yeah that radical pervert is now telling the GirlChatters to watch their mouths and stop talking sleazy and disrespectfully toward little girls. Funny in a way isn't it? And of course LGsinmyheart tells Seamus not to even read us:

1) Absolute Intolerance is well known to be a heavily bugged site. I'd rather drink Mumbai's sewage water than visit them.

2) Absolute Intolerance is also well known for its heavy (and quite immediate) censorship. I'd rather shout "Long live Israel" in the middle of Rafah than speak to them.

3) As a quite logical consequence of these two previous factors, Absolute Intolerance is also known to engage in harassment for sport. I'd rather date Britney than be harassed by them.

Believe me, nothing you have said and no way they might have twisted it is worth your time, security or liver.

Oh well, perhaps he's right. Perhaps you should stay away from us when we talk about you....and when we don't. In fact perhaps you shouldn't even utter our name 'cos see, there are rumors you know.........about what happens to those who do.

Why just ask taf-kat, we talked about him too....more than once. About his conviction for child pornography....how much it cost him in terms of loss in his life.


I suppose what I'm wondering is why I'm not to be believed when I directly quote taf-kat? Why would LGsinmyheart prefer to believe the confession coming straight from taffy's mouth? Why would I be taking taffy's words out of context when I quoted him saying:

"Next to them, piled high, were the many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine. Like the books, I was so familiar with every single image, they had been sorted and re-sorted, into age order, into filename order, all the series sorted, my favourite folder, my pigtails folder, my blow-job folder...if there was a different way to sort them, I had done it."

Or why I would be wrong if I said taf-kat hadn't learned his lesson? When back in June he was starting again. What purpose does a grown man without a little girl to raise have for a children's fashion catalog?

See, his addiction, like all addictions is progressive. Today he may be on eBay bidding on a child's fashion book, tomorrow he'll be out trying to score some hard core child pornography. Next thing you know he'll be walking away in handcuffs and hopefully before he starts in on little Suzie next door.

Of course if you guys don't like us exposing the truth about you, you can always tell it to the media.

kissbyalice:

I'm sick and tired of all the great injustice. Why dont we start a demonstration? Why dont we start giving more TV interviews? Why not protest? Why not give PJ twofold what they've given us? I want change and I want it now!

Yeah, well that's always an option. But if I were you I'd ask Kevin Brown what happened when he tried that. lol, yeah why don't you ask him?

Nowhere To Run

Story HERE U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) introduced this bill, I believe we all need to support it.

"This legislation would reduce the sexual exploitation of our children, and punish those who cause them physical and emotional harm through sex crimes."

PDF located here.

This bill would increase the reporting standards for child pornography and obscenity against children. In other words....no more graphic, written descriptions of having sex with babies on Live Journal. Anyone hosting a website, a blog, a message board etc, would be required to report someone for posting such.

Millions of commercial Web sites and personal blogs would be required to report illegal images or videos posted by their users or pay fines of up to $300,000, if a new proposal in the U.S. Senate came into law.

After child pornography or some forms of "obscenity" are found and reported, the Web site must retain any "information relating to the facts or circumstances" of the incident for at least six months. Webmasters would be immune from civil and criminal liability if they followed the specified procedures exactly.

In addition to the provisions relating to child pornography, the bill also would ensure that sex offenders will register information relevant to their online activities on sex offender registries. Specifically, it would require sex offenders to register their email addresses, as well as their instant messaging and chat room handles and any other online identifiers they use. If a sex offender failed to do so, he could be prosecuted, convicted, and thrown into jail for up to 10 years. The bill would also make the use of the Internet in the commission of a crime of child exploitation an aggravating factor that would add 10 years to the offender’s sentence.

WOWZA! This bill, if passed will have massive, far-reaching effects on the online pedofreak community! No longer can blogger say "It's not our business what people write, or images bloggers use. " NO, no, Blogger themselves will be held responsible if they don't follow a specific set of rules. Pedo message boards won't be able to simply DELETE a risque comment, no they will have to save the information AND report it themselves. Does that strike anyone as...well, quite funny? It does me. Actually I got rather tickled about it. Wonder what the pedofreaks have to say about it. First let's look at what a pedo-apologist has to say....

"This constitutionally dubious proposal is being made apparently mostly based on fear or political considerations rather than on the facts," said EFF's Bankston. Studies by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children show the online sexual solicitation of minors has dropped in the past five years, despite the growth of social-networking services, he said.

That was from Kevin Bankston an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and former ACLU attorney). He's used a typical pedo-trick. Partial fact stated in such a way that it gives the reader a false impression. Here are the facts from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children 2006 Youth Internet Safety Survey (in comparison to the 2001 survey)

A smaller proportion of youth Internet users received sexual solicitations. In YISS-1, 19% received such solicitations, and in YISS-2, 13% received such solicitations. Plus a smaller proportion of youth Internet users were visiting chatrooms and communicating online with people they did not know in person. These findings suggest youth Internet users may be more aware of the risky nature of online encounters with such people.

The Internet remains a source of disturbing and offensive solicitations for many youth.

Even though a smaller proportion of youth Internet users received sexual solicitations, the proportion with the most serious incidents, aggressive and distressing solicitations, did not decline.

The extent of unwanted exposure to sexual material among youth is extraordinarily high and grew between the times YISS-1 and YISS-2 were conducted. Approximately one third of youth Internet users (34%) had an unwanted exposure to sexual material in the past year, an increase from 25% in YISS-1 that occurred despite increases in the number of families using filtering, blocking, or monitoring software

Now, let's take a look at the pedo-chatters. I don't think we'll find any surprises here.

The Walker: many sex offenders these days are only on the sex offenders registry because they were found guilty of possessing child pornography...Nor is there any compelling evidence that I am aware of that looking at sexual oriented pictures of children inevitably leads to the sexual molestation of children. It is my personal opinion that simply viewing images does not in any meaningful way imply one is an actual sex offender of the sort that needs constant surveilance.....I definitely don't feel that because someone looks at CP pictures but is not actively involved on the production end of the business they should be regarded as a sex offender.

Joey Bishop: How many kids in Southeast Asia did John McCain drop bombs on in an unjust and unneccesary war? IMHO, shooting kids with semen is far more morally just than shooting them with bullets.

Heartfallen: The truth is, soldiers don't kill blindly... they murder knowingly.

Spherious: The more forbidden it becomes the more desired it becomes.

Albert Ross: mccain is burning bridges here, trying to shut down the last remaining socially responsible interfaces.

the consequence will be anarchy.

Seamus: I lost the little bit of respect that I had for him after reading this; he is simply pandering to people's fears that something might happen to their kids. This is as cynical and exploitative as it gets.

Turtle: this is not really a strike at predators. it is a thinly veiled attack on all child lovers,whether they have been convicted for breaking the laws or not. its simple biggotry. they aim to ban us all from the net,which is insane considering most of us dont seek minors online...

Let your voice be heard, write your Senator today and let him know how you feel about this. And why.

SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION