Well, he uses lots of names actually. Most of them are too nasty to repeat.
He's a pedophile who likes little boys 8 to 12 years old.
He's a pedophile who followed a little boy to another state when his family moved.
He's a pedophile who delivers pizza and keeps an eye out for any little boys who may be there.
He's a pedophile who once said:
For over two years now, I have been downloading KP and storing it on disks. I had been considering quitting again for a while. I knew I had to soon. The living in fear, the paranoia, the guilt and the shame were just not worth it anymore. I figured last week I was going to quit. This weekend I went through and separated all of the legal pictures from the pornographic ones. I resolved to myself that I was going to get rid of the porn but I was not sure when.
Then, the "operation candyman" story broke and that gave me the added motivation, (fear), I needed to get rid of the porn. I broke all of the disks and threw them away. I canceled my subscription to uncensorednews.com and easynews.com. Then, last night, just to be safe, I reformatted my HD. I am going to stay clean of it this time. I have to. I can't go back to downloading.
But he also said this:
He was seven and a half. He was so tiny and I'm usually not attracted to children as small as he was at the time but he was just so god damned much cuter than most other children. He was sitting in my lap and was kind of cuddling against me. I had my arms around him, holding him. He was so warm and soft. I could have held him forever. That moment only lasted a few minutes but in those few minutes my heart had welled up with that warm, fuzzy feeling until it was just about to burst. I remember just looking down at him and thinking, "Shit, I'm falling in love with this little kid. I didn't think it would happen this early." Ever since then I've been head-over-heels for him.
Now considering that I've never before mentioned his name, I'm having a hard time trying to figure out why he's got it in for me so badly. Well, me and Static that is.
So I'll just say this to The Dark Prince:
* YOU ARE OUT OF CONTROL * GET OUT OF MY FACE * SEEK HELP
Before it's too late.
"It's times like this that I want to look skyward and yell, "Why god? Why have you cursed me with being a pedophile??? Just what the hell did I do to deserve this"?
I know that I am a sick piece of shit and I know that the pain I feel is mostly all my fault. However, if I had no little boys in my life I would feel pain at their absence, so I can't really win can I?
Just part of being a sick piece of shit, I guess."
Jim Freeman was sentenced to life in prison today. Jim was the former executive director of the largest sex offender advocacy group on the web.
Jim Freeman once said:
"All I can say is that they are worth the download. My thanks to you and all the others that together make this the greatest group of pedos ever to gather in one place."
All the members of SoHopeful looked up to Jim. They loved his propaganda.
He indoctrinated them into the use of pedospeak and pedo rhetoric......and they didn't even realize it. Isn't that cool?
Who was watching out for the members of his activist group to protect them from this "great pedo"? Who was keeping an eye on Jim? In January he was found guilty of
participating in an illegal organization that used Internet newsgroups - large file-sharing networks where text, software, pictures and videos can be traded and shared - to traffic in illegal images and videos depicting prepubescent children, including toddlers, engaged in various sexual and sadistic acts
Today he was sentenced to life in prison for his role in an international child pornography ring. I wonder if he had been teaching the members of SoHopeful what the new brand of sex offender activist teaches them? That child pornography is A) a victimless crime and B) produced by the government. I bet he was.
In all, more than 400,000 pictures, video files and other images showing children engaged in sexual behavior were produced, advertised, traded and distributed globally in the online pornography ring, according to U.S. and international authorities. The sting, which started in Australia, also netted accused pornographers in England, Canada and Germany.
Some victims were as young as 5 years old. Others were preyed upon for innocent characteristics such as wearing their hair in pigtails
More than 40 children have been rescued
James Freeman of Santa Rosa Beach, Fla., was sentenced to life in prison today. We applaud that decision.
The network traded images depicting the violent sexual abuse of children globally, including having children sexually abused live and on demand for the benefit of its members
"As the recently crowned Princess of the Night, Alia is intrigued by beauty found within the macabre, and intends to show a generation of gothlings just how intensely exquisite the darkness within the soul can be."
What's the first thing people think when they see her I wonder.
Take that thought, whatever it might be and add the fact that she's a pedophile and attracted to prepubescent little girls. And sometimes boys. Never adults.
Add to that her interest in necrophilia. The interest she says she tries to keep suppressed.
Ready? Now add the fact that unlike the other pedophiles she doesn't even try to disguise herself as a "girl lover" - No she says it straight out -
"i'm not even sure if i can truly consider myself to be a girllover--after all, most of my fantasies are purely physical and include hurting little girls. there is no way that can be considered girllove."
Does this concern you?
When Alia was in college she confessed her desires to a friend. This friend reported Alia and she was forced to undergo a psychiatric evaluation. Alia's parents told her not to "tell too much" and shortly Alia returned to GirlChat to say she had been deemed "not dangerous to children" but admitted that they don't really know the full extent of her deranged views.
I'd like to consider for a moment what WE - we meaning people who don't want to have sex with children - we who don't want to make children scream - would do, what would we say to someone like this? Someone who wasn't a stranger but a long-time member of the group? What if they said this to you
"Sometimes when i'm walking and i see someone boy or girl who i think is beautiful the first thing that comes through my mind is how erotic it would be to hurt them....."
So? What would you say? What would you do? Let's look at what GirlChat members said to her. She's been there for EIGHT years, I'd be guessing that her desire isn't going away anytime soon wouldn't you? This is how the "Girl lovers" aka child haters responded when Alia said:
What am I? Where should I go? Help me!
I don’t know how to transfer my desire to strangle into a desire to cuddle
T3hl33tg33k:
You can talk to me
I think we might have similar feelings
Minstrel:
I strongly advise against 'professional help' as being completely useless for any problems you might have. If you tell a shrink you're attracted to girls, you're already doomed, even without mentioning violent fantasies. I don't see the point in throwing your life away
So, where should you go? I suggest Girl Chat Chat.
Dissident:
fantasies are just a way to let off steam for your inner frustrations. However, I don't think it's particularly healthy to NEVER think about cuddling and gentle imagery and to ALWAYS think about abusive behavior in your fantasies. A healthy dosage of both is better than just one type of fantasizing exclusively, IMO
You seem like a pleasant enough person, Poison
BB:
What I would guess is that you've never actually been able to have a close relationship with a LG. If you did, I strongly suspect that you would find the comfort you're seeking in the warm, soft, comforting arms of a LG. If you had the opportunity to really be with a girl, you would find that violence is the furthest thing from your mind.
T3hl33tg33k:
Wait a minute, you have a vagina! Rape away, then! People will be thanking you for it.
Blue Heaven:
Accept the problem and let it go, but don't encourage it, and don't deny it. Just let it be. If you're a good person otherwise, then hold true to that.
Razor1911:
i refuse to blame sex offenders that actually kidnap a child and do something about it
Whatever happens is the pedophobes' fault.
For example, the person that technically did it should receive one year in prison while the pedophobic therapists and their accomplices in society should be slowly beaten to death. They are child killers, pulling the strings from a good distance while we erreneously focus, with a perspective that is far too small, on the single person that has his strings pulled.
BB:
Yes, the Antis are responsible for creating the monsters that they hate, but those monsters still have free will.
I will concede, however, that if all the Antis died, there be virtually no crimes against children anymore.
LGSoul:
As long as you seperate fantasy from reality and maintain your self-control you should have no problem. Or maybe if you feel its best just stay away from little girls. Or (if you live in the USA) you could masturbate to violent lolicon. To sexually relieve yourself.
THAT is the truth about GirlChat. Their entire existence is nothing more than denial, rationalizations and LIES. They lie to society, they lie to the Anti's, they lie to each other and they lie to themselves. They HAVE to, the truth might make them scream.
Knowing how they fed into the disturbed and demented mind of Alia Jacobson, I wonder what they would say if she did what Melissa Huckaby did? I don't think that is too far-fetched of a question to ask, especially when they've been wondering if Melissa could possibly be a member of one of their pedo-sites. Hopefully we'll never have to discover that answer considering they won't discuss their own members who commit crimes and go to prison for life. However, we CAN see what they had to say about the woman accused of sexually assaulting and murdering Sandra Cantu.
Trucker refers to Melissa Huckaby:
I feel more pity for her than sweet little Sandra; at least Sandra's in LG heaven while the rest of the world has to fight through this hellish life.
I hope the antis are damn skippy over the atmosphere they created. If there was more understanding than hating maybe Sandra would still be alive.
Iron Marxist:
If she was a member of the MAA community then she has even less of an excuse for doing what she did because that would mean that she felt love for little girls. Maybe she was constantly told all her life that she was an evil monster who was destined to hurt kids and she finally broke under the pressure.
But when any one of us allows society to break us and does something stupid and savagely cruel, not only does an innocent child and her family suffer but so does the entire MAA community. I just hope that when Sandra's Law is passed we don't end up losing forums like GC, because these forums help to prevent any of us from acting out in negative ways.
MimzyBorogrove:
You really want to know who killed Sandra Cantu? I'll tell you. It was you, I, and everyone else who has ever turned an unseeing eye or an uncaring heart to another's plight (or our own, for that matter.) Anyone who has taken profit from another's suffering, whether direct or not. Those among us who watch the darkness descending, who cry out for the dying of the light, yet, can't seem to break out of our molds enough to say "Enough is enough." We did it. We killed that little girl, as surely as if we had been standing there. And only by taking responsibility for all of this, can we ever hope to change ANY of it.
Trucker:
I don't care if I get heat for this but I can't stand how the U.S. just coddles and overprotects children just to keep them "innocent."
So a suspect in Sandra Cantu's murder has been caught. Notice how quickly the police got someone, not because a person was murdered, but because a "sweet, innocent little girl" was murdered. Is the concept of innocence worth the price of depriving possibly innocent people of freedom and riling paranoia?
Are children so helpless and ignorant that they must be given special attention whenever one gets killed every two years?
Until this bogus "innocence" stigma is done away with and children are seen as equals with adults, we will never be one unified people.
That's the brand of distorted crap Alia has heard for eight years. Alia, a woman fighting urges to "kill and rape and maim" receiving responses that
it's just OCD
it's normal to think that way
she's really a nice person
hold true to herself
find violent lolicon to further feed the fantasies
find a little girl to love
But if she does act out and hurts a child........then it's the fault of people who don't want her to molest their children.
So I ask you - if it were legal for adults to have sex with children, what do you think Alia Loren Jacobson would do?
"....I guess i have always sympathized too much with people who commit horrendous crimes because every so often i myself have to sit down and solemnly swear to myself that i will never murder anyone."
We have been very impressed with some of the work done on Wikisposure in the past but they've truly outdone themselves this time. They've taken the Alice Day occasion to expose some very depraved pedophiles. No longer will this be known as Alice Day. From now on, it will be known as Wikisposure Day!
Please preview the new additions below and click the links to read the full Wikis.
Around that time i started amassing a huge collection of illegal porn, which i deleted completey the day before i turned 18 - just to be that much more carefull..
I dont share your "ewwwww" feelings about my parents knowing.. Of course im big on incest
Elminster Trueheart aka Keith Cronin of Pennsylvania
There was a girl who was three years old, and she loved me with all of her heart. I couldn't help but love her back. She loved cuddling, kissing and snuggling. I can't count the times I lost myself in her love and we would kiss passionately. I loved her so much it hurt. I never knew what that meant before then, but I do now.
My desire for lg's has been as strong as super glue since I was like 5 or something, sometimes it goes away and I can actually look at a lg for a short period of time and just admire her beauty without the nearly unbearable desire to do something unhealthy. I love my wife more than anything and I love being intimate with her but the thirst, this godamned hunger is never satisfied and that demon inside me wants me to say FUCK IT and do something crazy.
Now over 60, been comforted by a 12 year old, so heavenly, so divine that I never regret that she was gone, happy instead that I had her love for a awhile. Dont cry over spilled milk.
That's why I'm staying with.. ...the 10 and under crowd for my own in-home modelling shots, they haven't been indoctrinated in "decent, virtuous, and moral" like a 14 year old tends to be. ^_~
all of my fantasies... ...are violent, and include rape, torture, killing, etc. And in all of my fantasies i am male (well, i guess that facillitates the rape thing.) Oddly enough, in some of my fantasies (in which i am not actually involved) there are two children, one raping and mutilating the other.
...I was convicted of "illegal use of a minor in nudity oriented material or performance." I did time, was on parole for a while, and have to register as a sex offender.... ...they sometimes lump various things together as they did in the law I was convicted under....
Let's assume bondage and sodomy consists of lightly tying the child down, possibly drugging him a little so he doesn't struggle, and inserting thin objects (say, a pen or something thinner) into his anus. While I cannot endorse restraining an infant or inserting objects into his anus without a valid reason (e.g. protect child from harm or take a temperature if he has a fever), it's not "the worst possible scenario" when it comes to child abuse
If sex could enter into it without any threat of prison, i.e. if whe world were more relaxed about love and sexuality, then I would love to make sweet love to a young girl, tickling her and making her laugh, feeling her warm, soft skin against mine, but all I can do is dream. Sucks, doesn't it?
Where I live there are alot of street kids, you find them outside mosques begging or cleaning cars' windows at stop light and so on... my idea basically is to be nice to one of those once, and increase it gradually to achieve some.. ahem... desirable outcomes. Let's examine this in details assuming the GEORGOUS girl I just saw today outside the mosque... she was about 6-7, had the cutest face ever with a veil covering hair, and was selling tissues I think
if you were on death row and instead to a last meal, or got a last sexual explicit act that you could perform on anyone you like at any age. Who would you pick, how old and what would the act be? You can have only one pick, but perform more than one act. I would go with my 13 yr old 1st cousin once removed, which i still believe is my 2nd cousin, but that's for another post, I would first perform oral sex on her and finish with a traditional Missionary style, me on top.
I can tell I am in the right place ,I love little girls ,no kiding,they love me back ,the little they are the more they love me .I teach six & seven year olds at church I am in haven when I am with my class ,I am in hell when not with them.I love to see games at school VB ...,i LOVE to see play's at church & school,do we see A trind here If there are little girls somplace look around I am there
When I was fired from my daycare job, I was taken away from someone very special to me. It nearly devastated me, but it crushed her, and there was nothing I could do about it.
We talked about Jim Freeman here and about pedophile denial of child pornography here. We also talked about Judith Levine using pedophiles for references.....one in particular - Lawrence Stanley - who not only claimed there was no child porn but was actively producing it himself. Aw well she must not have done her homework.
We've talked about Jim Freeman's RSO activism as the Executive Director of SoHopeful. We talked about his involvement in the "most sophisticated child pornography operation in recent memory" and which included "one of the largest digital seizures in the history of the FBI"
We felt sure the RSO advocacy groups would seize the opportunity to take stock, educate their members and clean house.
We watched and we listened.
We waited patiently. It never happened. Instead they attempted to cover it up, not only to the outside world but to their very own members as well. Perhaps they just didn't want their members to find out how that silly little "legal defense fund" yahoo group helped identify Jim in the first place. Or perhaps as we've previously seen "no more victims" is NOT their primary goal after all. For instance this is something they would never talk about:
"Experts have often wondered what proportion of men who download explicit sexual images of children also molest them. A new government study of convicted Internet offenders suggests that the number may be startlingly high: 85 percent of the offenders said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors, from inappropriate touching to rape."
Jill Levenson responded:
“It’s crucial to understand the sexual history of all these offenders, because sometimes the crime they were arrested for is the tip of the iceberg, and does not reflect their real patterns and interests”
This report having already been accepted for publication was withdrawn due to the concerns of certain people. People like Dr. Fred Berlin who claimed it may cause a backlash and intrude on a child molesters "individual liberty". Obviously he's not interested in the truth. No it looks to me like he's into coddling. It looks to me like someone should have been paying more attention to all those sex offenders who reoffended while they were in his treatment program. Or maybe all those priests he released that went right back to molesting children. He's Michael Melsheimer's mentor. And Freddie's mentor was good old Dr. John Money famous for trying to turn a boy into a girl with devastating consequences and who said in an interview in Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual...then I would not call it pathological in any way
Paidika? Who in the world would want anything to do with that? Well, here's a few who have:
Laurence A. Stanley - Thc Hysteria Over Child Pornography and Paedophilia
Dr. Fritz Bernard - The Dutch Paedophile Emancipation Movement
Peter Lambourn Wilson - Islamic Boy-love
Dr. Rudiger Lautmann - Sexual Desire for Children
Edward Brongersma - In Defense of Boy Love
Theo Sandfort - The World is Bursting with Adults,so I'm always Glad to See a Little Girl
The usual and oft-quoted crowd:
Hubert Kennedy
Ralph Underwager
Pat Califia
And the RSO favorite Hollida Wakefield:
You don't have good sex education in the schools, just these ridiculous prevention programs.
Couples are making their own pornographic movies. The comparison is on the one hand people running around making their own pornographic movies but on the other hand reacting hysterically to child sexuality issues
Given this schizophrenia and these hysterical attitudes about childhood sexuality, it's going to be difficult for paedophiles to appear more positive, to start saying they're not exploiters of children, that they love children, the sexual part included, even if it's a minor part
But what does that have to do with Jim Freeman? This is one time I'm going to let you figure it out for yourselves. I have a feeling only a few won't be able to.
From a conversation before Jim's fall:
Jim:
Being a pedophile does NOT mean the person has acted out. The "average adult", on the other hand, is sexually active. Thus they have "acted out", and will strive to do so again and again. So I STILL believe that a pedophile has more self-control than the average adult.
Response:
Whether a pedophile has 1 or 100 victims he is still out of control.
Jim:
Pedophiles with victims are not pedophiles. They're child molesters. What of the pedophiles who have not acted out?
Response:
I think we can both agree that any grooming is inappropriate and clearly out of control, no?
Jim:
Inappropriate, yes. Out of control, no. A person who is out of control can't at the same time have the patience of Job. You can fall tumbling down the mountainside, or you can slowly and methodically walk down, picking and choosing your path. The end result is the same, but you were out of control on one and in control on the other. You can't calmly, slowly and methodically tumble down the side of a mountain.
The following men in Jim's "greatest groups of pedos" - who didn't passively take a tumble have been sentenced. Half the men took plea deals and - got sweet deals - considering what they did. The one's who didn't, well take a look. Jim's sentencing is coming up in a couple of weeks by the way. Mark your calender - I understand he's going to be getting a sentencing enhancement under the Adam Walsh Act. I wonder if that means Life + 10 years? Betcha he's sweating bullets about now. Of course, if he had served his time and learned his lesson and just wanted to move on and wasn't dangerous and he wasn't a pedophile..............
PLEAD GUILTY
Stepan Bondarenko aka "Bumhead" 38, of Philadelphia, Pa. - 20 years
Erik Wayerski, 46, "Lerch" of Round Rock, Texas - 30 years
Raymond Roy, 54, "Nimo" of San Juan Capistrano, Calif. - 30 years
Ruble Keys, 55, "Crazy Horse" of Medford, Ore. - 17 years
John Mosman, 46, "Pickleman" of Waterbury, Conn. - 13 years
Warren Weber, 56, "Muad'Dib" of Boise, Idaho - 15 years
Michael Berger, 33,"Box of Rocks" of Mechanicsville, Va. - 15 years
Went to Trial:
Daniel Castleman aka "Chingachgook" 43, of Lubbock, Texas - LIFE
Gary Lakey, 54, "Eggplant" of Anderson, Ind - LIFE
Marvin Lambert, 33, "Methuselah" of Indianapolis, Ind. - LIFE
Neville McGarity, 40, "Wraith" of Medina, Texas - LIFE
Ronald White, 59, "RoadKill" of Burlington, N.C - LIFE
Not yet sentenced:
Warren Mumpower, 63, "Lizzard" of Spokane, Wash - GUILTY
James Freeman, 47, "Mystikal" of Santa Rosa Beach - GUILTY
Of these men Neville McGarity committed sexual assault of a child in 2003, Warren Mumpower had more than one sex crime conviction dating back to the early 1980's. And of course we already know about Jim Freeman, the registered sex offender and sex offender advocate who once told the Valigator:
My organization has done so much on the national level to shift the focus to the truly dangerous. An organization that you don't think too highly of. What's the deal?
Much hope and attention has been placed on Terrence J. White a registered sex offender who is suing the Attorney General of Georgia along with every District Attorney in the state.
He believes that the new law requiring him to register his internet identifiers is unconstitutional.
We believe he is a perfect example of why the law was created in the first place.
He stated in his lawsuit that he'd had one sex offense conviction. He signed it under "penalty of perjury".
He stated elsewhere that he had two convictions. Both of which he minimized off-handedly
Convicted in 1989 of one count of "Enticing a Child for Indecent Purposes" (Simply saying the wrong words to an underage person).
Convicted in 1990 of two counts of "Sending and Receiving Child Pornography through the U.S. Mail" (a "victimless" crime).
In fact Terrence says that he was "a victim of my own desires" and has written extensively regarding his belief that society will eventually have to accept men having sex with boys.
The time needs to come, when (as I've said elsewhere) pederasty will be perceived by the mainstream as an aid or enhancement toward developing and encouraging 'masculinity'
Not only is society wrong to make it illegal but he even uses religion to try and justify it
Jesus refused--by all the evidence--to condemn pederasty (or 'boy-love')
Jesus apparently never was worried about any of these other matters that we mere childish humans keep on making such a horrified fuss about.
He makes his mission clear:
I believe I know what sort of reaction my work will arouse in most Americans. And it is truly my declaration of permanent WAR against them and any sort of fearful, dogmatic, closed-mindedness. My work is an attempt to provoke exactly where fundamentalist Americans most fear and loathe being challenged.
Another of the precise aims of my body of work has been just this: to attempt to "reattune individuals to a forgotten [or neglected] archetype," specifically, that of the "beautiful boy," androgyne, or PUER AETERNUS.
He believes himself to be on some lofty plain of existence far above the comprehension of this mere mediocre society that he mocks and jeers at.
I am so FAR above their poor abilities to fathom or comprehend! Yet, how incredibly lonely it is, up here on this towering peak on which I sit, staring down below at the far-removed world. How cold, how silent, how icily destitute it is up here!
He's predatory and flagrantly wrote about trying to convince someone to have sex with him when it was clear they were heterosexual
The human mind that has been lulled to sleep by conformity and majority opinions, must, my boy, MUST be literally SHOCKED BACK INTO A STATE OF WAKEFULNESS. It is the only way (for most people).
How is this shock back into mental wakefulness best accomplished?
Allowing oneself to freely experience sexuality--especially forms of sexuality which go against the usual rules of society; and two, deliberately allowing oneself to experience things which repulse or frighten oneself.
Also you have--and this is extreme--necrophagia, the eating of dead bodies. ... In certain American Indian cultures of the Southwest, one of the initiations to the clown category ... involves actually eating dog shit. The most repulsive has to be accepted as also Brahman [i.e., as a part of 'God']."
In other words, the 'Divine' exists everywhere--even in a piece of dog shit (however repulsive or blasphemous an idea that may be to most people). But it is not necessary for you or I to actually EAT it, or even to partake of dead bodies, in order to realize that fact; nor is it neccessary for us to do this in order to free our minds, either. Other means exist--such as (as mentioned above) "nudism, sexual freedom, group sexuality, adultery, ... incest ..." And HOMOSEXUALITY.
Are you repulsed by the idea of having sex with another man? Then this is a pathway that is excellent for helping to free your mind from society's 'shackles' of mental conformity.
Wow pretty deep crap you got there Terrence. We'll leave you with some of his magnificent poetry. You know, the kind that's so far above our ability to fathom or comprehend.
A glimpse of boyish hips will please
The man, whose thick, enlarging pole
Frightens the boy, who surely sees
What fate awaits his virgin hole.
T.J. White
21 December, 2006
You can find Terrence these days over at Reform Sex Offender Laws Campaign. These people stick together like glue you know. Yep, they've got his back and are raising money for his lawsuit.
"This was not good before, and by forcing a woman to live there is asking for problems. Is the state going to be blamed if she is raped by someone? I doubt it, but they are the HEARTLESS BASTARDS that are doing this. WHERE ARE THE HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS? Hell, do they even exist anymore? So what's next? Are you going to also be sending child sex offenders to live under the bridge as well?"
I was under the impression from reading that article that she was offered a place to stay and didn't have to go under the bridge. She's a sex offender who TWICE failed to follow registration laws and now refuses to go anywhere else to stay because it doesn't "suit her". While I don't particularly care to have sex offenders living under a bridge I can't help but wonder why Zman would be worried that she would be raped living with all those other sex offenders but he can't grasp why parents would be concerned about them living next door to their children.
Maybe it's his "thinking disorder" that's at fault. He claims sex offenders are judged guilty before being tried and you can't believe the media because they lie. He also claims:
HEARSAY ALONE IS LITERALLY NAILING THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE TO THE WALL
And:
Well, that is the problem, the media has force fed you lies, so has the media, John Walsh (who is an admitted sex addict), Mark Lunsford (who had child porn on his machine when Jessica went missing, and his son has since been busted for molesting a child, but walked free), and politicians. The sheeple believe anything that is force fed to them, even if it's a lie.
And:
Shut the hell up Mark! You were out of the house at some skanks house that night instead of taking care of Jessica like a REAL father would do. I wish someone one look into the child porn you had on your machine, and put you in prison where you belong
And:
Maybe they should read this article, which shows CHILD PORN was on Mark Lunsfords machine when Jessica went missing. It seems everyone is trying to bury that, but, I won't let it be buried.
And:
We need to stop letting rage filled idiots like John Walsh, Mark Lunsford or Marc Klass make laws. People not thinking clearly created idiotic laws, that has been proven by history.
Seemingly oblivious to the fact that none of those men MADE laws. They didn't sign them into effect, they didn't vote them into effect, they didn't enact any laws. They merely lobbied for their beliefs. The same way this idiot with a big mouth does.
John Couey constantly asked for help! Did he ever receive it? No, why not? If you would've got him treatment a long time ago when he asked for it, Jessica would still be here.
Seemingly obvious to the fact that Mark Lunsford didn't even know John Couey before he abducted, raped and buried his daughter alive.
This man is another John Walsh who is, IMO, exploiting his daughters death for fame and money. He was nothing before all this occurred. It's about torturing as many people as possible, when you need to accept some blame as well for leaving your daughter at home that night while you went out to a bar/girl friends home, AND LEFT THE DOORS UNLOCKED!!!
Seemingly oblivious to the fact that Jessica was not left alone and it is not uncommon for a single man to leave his child with her grandparents while he stays at his girlfriends.
Because those people are not informed, and will believe anything this idiot says. But, you have to question his motives, and also what about the child porn he had when Jessica went missing?
And:
If this is about accountability, then why don't they further investigate the child porn Mark had on his machine when Jessica went missing? Mark is trying to be another John Walsh and exploit his daughters death to make some quick easy money, IMO.
And:
And why hasn't anybody brought up the issue that Mark had CHILD PORN on his machine when they checked it, yet it magically vanished?
And:
There was also child porn on his machine when Jessica went missing, which magically vanished. Why was he not investigated for that?
And:
I DEMAND "JUSTICE!" IF THIS MAN MUST FACE PRISON, THEN GO ARREST MARK LUNSFORD AND GIVE HIM A PRISON CELL RIGHT NEXT TO THIS MAN!
And:
Your whole family is a basket case!! You are just looking for a scapegoat to blame, when you are responsible for taking care of your children, not the police.
But the strangest one of all:
Why must people always find a SCAPEGOAT to blame instead of taking responsibility for their negligence and irresponsibility? Why? STOP PUSHING THE BLAME OFF TO OTHER PEOPLE FOR YOUR STUPIDITY!
Zman the king of blame gaming accusing other people of scapegoating? Now those are but a few of the examples, I could point you to well over 500 instances where he has said things like this. It is now rampant amongst the blame-gaming sex offender activists who no longer report it as "once there was a news story that said this" no, now it has become a cold hard 'FACTOID'.
A statement of presumed fact that people believe to be true because they hear it repeated over and over
And yet, way back when......Zman knew that it wasn't true.
Dear Mr. Gelman,
This is to confirm my prior representations to you that Mr. Lunsford's computer was seized from his home at the time of the disappearance as part of a routine investigation. The computer was examined by the Citrus County Sheriff's Office. They found no evidence of possession of child pornography on the computer. Please feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance.
Sincerely, Richard D. Ridgway Assistant State Attorney
Zman has known all along that what he was saying wasn't true, it just suited his purposes to say otherwise. He prefers to point at and blame other people for his predicament rather than himself. In fact, he just doesn't know WHO to blame, he just knows it's someone else not him. Never him. I guess everything that has befallen him is all the fault of the evil vigilante bloggers. Like perhaps Stitches who went to SOA and said "People can relate to Walsh and Lunsford, don't attack them or people will hate you for it" and was subsequently attacked for telling the truth. So then how would you explain this?
This is how you solve problems, all sides should get together, and as adults, talk about all the issues, good and bad, and help solve the problem, instead of passing blame from one side to the other. Maybe when Perverted-Justice, AbsoluteZeroUnited and others see this, then we can help solve the sexual abuse issues.
Hosted by: The Fallen One (ReFORM Radio)
Title: Ep. 8: Barriers to ReFORM Featuring "Valigator"
You can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe Valerie told you the same thing regarding the nasty things all the blame gamers say about Walsh and Lunsford. And of course you can correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears that SHE is one of the people trying to force sex offenders out of neighborhoods and under the Bridge. Perhaps you talked to the wrong person after all Zman? Oh and by the way, you left the background out of your "heartless bastards" graphic. No worries, I fixed it for you.
"What war? Well the war inside of every human being of course. It sounds so cliche, doesn’t it? Like no one has heard that phrase before."
So speaks William Adamson aka Crysta aka Crysta-Shard a former member of the defunct Butterfly Kisses, long time member of BoyChat and a prolific blogger.
William is a registered sex offender who likes little boys and little girls too. In fact it appears he'll try anything including disguising himself as a female pedophile and threatening to crash gay rights parades and force them to advocate for child molesters. He's obsessed with the topic of incest and claims to have started having "consensual" sex at the age of 7.
"First of all. I am a woman. Second, I am a pedophile i like boys and girls ages 7-16. Third, i have been with with both boys and girls as YFs and in some other ways. And finally fourth: listen up my phallis attatched friends, this is your wake up call.
I also want the BL community to just stop BSing themselves, and perhaps the world. Lets just face it folks, we want to fuck minors! YEAH! I said it, we want to have sexual intercourse with boys and girls, some as young as 4 yrs old! Yet i constantly read these posts on Boychat and other pedo-groups where we talk about the "beauty of boys", or of "our/my "love" for boys. This is a form of denial to me."
William may be a chronic liar but there's one thing he's consistent about and that's his desire to have sex with children, to abolish age of consent laws and to find him a husband so he can be a good wife to one man and they can reproduce and both have sex with their children.
I’ll say this much, I’d rather fuck my kid then have anyone else do it. Because i feel i would take my child’s feelings and needs into account
William doesn't like being a registered sex offender, he doesn't like the fact that his neighbors and other family members can find out about him even while posting continuously about his lust for small children in his life, including family members, the friends of family members and the family members of friends.
I've never molested, raped or even forced myself on a child. I've never even had to seduce a child. To tell the truth, all i had to do was ask. =P I'm not bragging, and i sure as hell ain't going into details.
Visit Wikisposure to learn more about this extremely dangerous pedophile
William C. Adamson II aka Crysta
Its just like one of the other posters said, "live like you wish to." You want a YF, go get one. You wanna fuck little boys then go find some. Stop moping around here looking for a way out. If you're old and can't get it up anymore then live with it.
Michael Melsheimer aka Lek is a sex offender and a pedophile activist member of BoyChat. He runs the website B4U-Act along with his pedophile activist BoyChat friend Richard Kramer. At one point Jon Schillaci aka Dylan Thomas acted as Michael's webmaster. Richard Kramer runs the website MHAMic ("Male Homosexual Attraction to Minors Information Center") which is an attempt to "educate" people that child sexual abuse isn't harmful. B4U-Act has partnered up with Reformsexoffenderlaws.org
Some of you have probably heard of the "Call to Safeguard our Children and our Liberties," a 1999 effort in Boston to fight against the demonization of sex offenders and the curtailment of civil liberties for people accused of sex crimes. The original group included some important peace activists, journalists, and academics.
On July 10, 2007 Paul Shannon had his article published on CounterPunch - An Urgent Call to Support the Well-being of Children and the Rights of Us All
In 1999, a group of us in Boston -- prominent political activists, civil libertarians, and workers in the mental health and legal systems, as well as teachers and others who work with children -- tried to draw public attention to this threat with a "Call to Safeguard our Children and Our Liberties."
The lives of many thousands of people have been unfairly ruined. And we have created a despised under-class labeled "sex offenders". All of these developments are justified under the high-sounding rhetoric of "protecting our children from sexual predators" despite the fact that most registered sex offenders have never committed sexual offenses against minors.
In 1999, a group of us in Boston.........
On August 13, 2007 Paul Shannon was interviewed by Daniel Tsang (we spoke of Here)
Last year, the brutal rape and murder of a young boy in Cambridge triggered a wave of indignation which targeted all 'pedophiles.' Supporters of the death penalty in Massachusetts used this case and almost prevailed. There were calls in public meetings to "find and kill all the pedophiles." Cardinal Bernard Law was quoted a saying, "This is the closest thing I've seen to a lynch mob since my days in Mississippi."
December 13, 2002
Cardinal Bernard Law was forced to resign in shame after it was revealed that he had covered up for child molesting priests and in fact had enabled their continued abuse of children by simply shuffling them from parish to parish for decades. Paul Shanley and John Geoghan are two of the priests who molested kids while the Church and Cardinal Law simply looked away.
June 29, 1998
A discussion group of about twenty people formed, hosted unofficially by a non-governmental organization. Participants included women who are incest and sex abuse survivors, boy-lovers, anti-censorship and civil liberties activists, feminists, gay and lesbian people, health-care workers, church activists, peace and social justice activists, academics, and those who work with prisoners.
We have met regularly for six months, sometimes almost as a kind of group therapy or consciousness-raising session, dealing with deep and justified angers and emotions. We continue to hold a wide range of views about children's sexuality and certainly about intergenerational sex.
Sincerely: Dr. Richard Pillard, Cathy Hoffman, Paul Shannon, Chris Tilly and others....
A discussion group of about twenty people formed, hosted unofficially by a non-governmental organization. Participants included women who are incest and sex abuse survivors, NAMBLA members, anti-censorship and civil liberties activists, feminists, gay and lesbian people, health-care workers, church activists, peace and social justice activists, academics, and those who work with prisoners.
We have met regularly for six months, sometimes almost as a kind of group therapy or consciousness-raising session, dealing with deep and justified angers and emotions. We continue to hold a wide range of views about children's sexuality and certainly about intergenerational sex
SIGNED: Dr. Richard Pillard, psychiatrist; Paul Shannon, educator; Cathy Hoffman, peace activist; Chris Tilly, economics professor; Marie Kennedy, community planning professor; Eric Entemann, mathematics professor; Tom Reeves, social science professor; Bob Chatelle, writer & anti-censorship activist; Jim D'Entremont, playwright and anti-censorship activist; Ann Kotell, health worker; Carol Thomas, social justice and religious activist; French Wall and Bill Andriette, gay writers and editors; Nancy Ryan, feminist activist; Dianne McLaughlin, community & criminal justice activist; Reebee Garofalo, popular culture professor; John Miller, economics professor; Molly Mead, urban social planning professor; John MacDougall, sociology professor; Laurie Dougherty, social science researcher & editor; and others...
June 1998:
The real challenge is to support and expand programs for children and youth which develop caring, loving, thoughtful, whole human beings. Among these are day care, after-school care, sex positive sex education, and better training and pay for those who work with children.
The aim of all these programs should be to empower young people to learn to make their own decisions about their lives. Children and youth need to view themselves not as potential victims, but as part of a community which supports and nurtures them, encouraging them to speak up and act responsibly on their own beliefs.
July 10, 2007
* Children should be defined as persons under the age of puberty.
* Support broad sex education for children, and empower them to make their own decisions and stand up for their rights
July 10, 2007
Focusing on "saving" children from sexual molestation by strangers distracts us from far more serious forms of violence against children and young people. Most child abuse has nothing to do with sex. It is important to speak out against sexual harm, which has often remained hidden and denied within families and communities. However, non-sexual violence against children is at least as pervasive as sexual violence.
Sexual abuse has long remained hidden and denied within families and communities and churches. Define "far more serious abuse"? No one can define someone elses victimization for them. No one should imply that "While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life. Most children do not die or become permanently disfigured as a result" as some people have. For any event we can usually find something somewhere that is worse. To deny the significance of abuse and attempt to minimize the effects on the victim by pointing elsewhere is wrong. It is always wrong.
"Focusing on "saving" children from sexual molestation by strangers distracts us". Focusing on denial and rationalization and minimization and helping child molesters get away with it, seems to be distracting some people from doing anything for anybody except feeding into the cognitive distortions of people who don't feel what they do is wrong nor should they be punished or restricted. The vast majority of sexual abuse is committed by someone known to the victim. This can be anyone from a family member to a teacher or a Boy Scout leader or a Little League coach, a neighbor or a priest.
Perhaps the key to this panic about sex offenders is that they are often assumed to have raped children. That is, "sex offender" is often equated with a violent "pedophile." The term pedophile itself has become a stereotype of a person who violently rapes young children. In fact, the vast majority of persons attracted to children are not violent
The vast majority of pedophiles are rarely physically violent. The destruction is far deeper and longer lasting than physical wounds. It's one of the things that sets sexual abuse apart from other crimes. The fact that they aren't usually violent is how they continue to fly under the radar, through manipulation and grooming of their victims and the victims family but also those in authority who cover up for them.
The offender is a priest. He is friendly, reassuring, comforting, respectful, respectable, professional, knowledgeable, compassionate, caring – a good man. He is in a position of trust, leadership, authority. He targets one or two or 20 victims – male or female, pre or post pubescent or adult. He cultivates the target, preparing her or him: he invites confidences, offers friendship, creates or joins social opportunities. He offers camping trips, dinners, picnics, family visits. When he feels trusted enough he commits the abuses, assaults, violations. He gains silence through smooth talk, explanations, persuasion, threats, promises of harm. He continues the abuse until the victim is no longer accessible or until exposure is threatened or imminent.
His bishop hears of the abuse – in a letter, in whispers, in person, clearly, emphatically, repeatedly. The bishop ignores it. He knows a scandal will erupt if the abuse is revealed. He blames the victim, is in denial, treats it as an aberration, believes treatment is the answer, is blinded by his friendship with the offender, is an offender himself.
The bishop leaves the priest right where he is. Or he moves the priest to a new parish, church, hospital, school, nursing home. And warns no one.
Weeks, months, years later – continuously – the same priest abuses again. And a victim speaks up, asks for help, tells his story. The priest is surprised and wounded that anyone would suspect or accuse him. The bishop says, "He said he never did that." "He promised not to do it again." "He got treatment." The latest victims are stunned to learn that the priest had a known history of abuse and was allowed to harm them. The previous victims are stunned to learn that the priest was given more opportunities to victimize. Weren’t they promised he would be removed from his priestly duties?
Then comes doubt, denial, recrimination, victim blaming. All heads swivel toward the victim. And the questions begin: Why believe his story? Her story? Their stories? After all, the victim was pre-pubescent at the time and has an unreliable memory. The victim was post-pubescent and probably wanted, enjoyed, sought out, provoked the abuse. The victim is male; this must be a homosexual encounter. The victim is female; she seduced him, she wanted it. The victims must want money; they make up these stories to get a piece of the pie. And always: Why did she wait? Why didn’t he tell when it happened? Why now? The victim knows the subtext: "You are a liar. Priests tell the truth."
Diocese after diocese writes check after check for settlements, church spokespeople say the victim was seductive, compliant, unreliable, negligent, complicit, greedy, a liar. Lest we forget: the wrongdoers pay to buy silence or to comply with court orders – not to acknowledge, compensate, apologize or make whole.
And the beat goes on. The institution makes gestures toward new policy, new procedures, new personnel. The victims become exhausted, and finally are silent, in agony over the public dissection of their private torment. After following the story for days, weeks, months, the media loses interest and moves on to something new. All is still. And in that silence, rape and sexual abuse continues.
Anywhere people seek help, sanctuary, direction, advice – anywhere someone with authority, status or resources is in a position to guide, direct, or aid – that is a place of vulnerability and access. That is a place where the young, aged, female, disabled, incarcerated, infirm, disenfranchised are targeted by a predator. And the predator who is lauded, promoted, hidden and protected by the institution he represents is the most dangerous among us. He can prey with impunity.
Because we do not believe victims, because we do not believe such a nice man could have done that, because we do not sustain long-term interest in the story, we turn away, tune out, move on. We do not demand exposure and accountability; we do not stop the sexual abuse and rape of women and children.
We have cooperated, collaborated and compromised with those in positions of power. We have waited, patiently and furiously for change. We have reached across chasms of doubt, mutual suspicion, anger and angst to create allies in every institution in this country. We have tolerated continued abuse and continuous denial of its prevalence and impact.
We have cajoled, pleaded, persuaded, argued and worked tirelessly to move every institution toward an understanding of rape. What it is. How it harms the victim. How it harms all of us. We are tired of being patient. We are tired of ignorance. We are tired of denial. We are tired of excuses and lip service. We are tired of defense of the indefensible. We are tired of stonewalling, victim-blaming, confidentiality agreements that protect institutions and silence victims. We are tired of institutions protecting themselves instead of the people they are there to serve. We are even tired of apologies.
We want action. Meaningful action. Action to end sexual violence.
How to safeguard children? Reformsexoffenderlaws.org calls for abolishing every single law imaginable and then somehow believe they can disguise that as "safeguarding children". They call for the abolition of age of consent laws and just like the pedophile activists groups they try to disguise it in "liberation of children". What they are calling for is the very things that helped to create the decades-long sexual abuse of children within the Catholic Church. We have to move forward not back in time. Hysteria and panic did not create this problem. People who have no respect for children created it.
"On December 2, 1978, Tom Reeves of the Boston-Boise Committee convened a meeting called "Man/Boy Love and the Age of Consent." Approximately 150 interested people attended. At the meeting's conclusion, about thirty men and youths decided to form an organization which they called the North American Man/Boy Love Association, or NAMBLA for short."
Bill Andriette in The Guide, the Nambla Bulletin and IPCE - or 'International Pedophile and Child Emancipation' all report that Paul Shanley was not at the meeting that spawned Nambla. In fact, many pedophiles report that Shanley wasn't there. And yet, Bill Andriette says he was at the meeting on December 2, 1978. And Daniel Tsang reported the December 2, 1978 meeting is the one that spawned Nambla.
Bruce Steele says he's not sure which meeting Shanley attended but it wasn't THAT one. He says Shanley didn't promote pedophilia just simply the liberation of children.
And it was [that] group of people, including Daniel Tsang, who were the founders of NAMBLA. Shanley didn't attend that side meeting.
We don't know whether he was quoted accurately; we do know the article was written by Daniel Tsang, who was a proponent of intergenerational sex. The quotes were shocking, but he wasn't advocating the molestation of children.
Let's look at what he said. Along with a few other familiar names that were in attendance.
[Speech by Father Paul Shanley to the Psychological Panel at the Boston/Boise Committee conference on "Legal, Psychological, and Ethical Issues of Intergenerational Relationships," Community Church, Boston, December 2, 1978]
Dr. Richard Pillard: Organizer - Reform Sex Offender Law Campaign
"Just to keep there from being too much agreement on this panel, let me ask a devil's advocate question. Children are naturally obliging and want to do what older people expect of them. How can you keep a child from feeling exploited, or from being exploited, by an older person, particularly if he's quite young?"
Paul Shanley: Convicted child molester
"Just two brief reflections. Very often I find it's the man who is being exploited by the boy, and sometimes I think we have to help adult males to learn how to handle that situation. I think it was mentioned before that many kids in fact, most kids are very capable of handling themselves and they don't get exploited as often as we would like to think."
Paul Shanley: Defrocked priest
"That word exploitative has been used. I would like to define that as using without caring. That's my understanding of "exploitative" sex. I think a lot of straight sex is exploitative. I think a lot of sex between parents is exploitative. And I think an awful lot of parents are predators. But whatever criteria you arrive at in deciding what sex between men and boys is exploitative, I think you could balance that against parents. You know, you can't abolish parenthood, and neither should you abolish man-boy sex simply because it might not live up to the highest ideal."
Tom Reeves:Pedophile Activist
"They are teachers and boy scout leaders and boys' clubs leaders!" he shouted pounding the podium with both hands. "The men who work with boys **** many of them, and thus obviously can be used against everybody but I think we have to say it - the motivation behind that work (has) a sexual and erotic element."
David Thorstad:Nambla Steering Committee
Said he was retracting his earlier statement.... that he was not a pederast. "I am very happy to say that over the summer that has changed and it wasn't due to my own initiative either. But just as it is with many men, I was seduced and picked up by a boy and I'm very glad he did it."
David Thorstad, founding member of Nambla. His free speech rights to promote baby raping were defended by John Reinstein (we spoke of here), of the ACLU - after a Nambla member raped and murdered Jeffrey Curley in Cambridge Massachusetts in 1997 after reading Nambla material. A few of the other men named in the lawsuit include Tom Reeves, Joe Power, Roy Radow, Tecumseh Brown, Bill Andriette, Jonathon Tampico, Chris Farrell, Dennis Bejin, Robert Rhodes, Peter Melzer, Rennato Corazza, Chuck Dodson and Leland Stevenson.
"NAMBLA claims that it has never advocated violence. Their denial, however, relies on an overly narrow definition. The cognitive and emotional violence done to a child's psyche has consequences more lasting than the tearing of bodily tissue. To a child, an adult's wiles can be more coercive than muscular force."
"To be an active pederast in the United States today is like being a Jew in Nazi Germany. The United States is becoming - perhaps already has become - a police state. "
It seems to me that just as we face the reality of a coterie of closet pederast priests and even bishops we need to face the reality of a coterie of closet pederast therapists and even psychiatrists. For example, the Chairperson of the Department of Psychiatry at Boston University Hospital, Dr. Richard Pillard attended the nascent North American Man-Boy-Love Association (NAMBLA) conference on "Man-Boy-Love."
Pillard, famous for his twin study that claimed to prove a genetic basis for homosexuality, urged his fellow NAMBLAlike delegates to welcome pederasty since, said Pillard, "Men and boys who love each other are engaging in a social experiment."
I could list criminal records of various Nambla members, including the defrocked and convicted priest Paul Shanley - crimes committed by men who claim to just love children and who don't believe it should be a crime to exploit and abuse a child for their own selfish twisted desires. But that would take too long. Instead I'll focus on Leland Stevenson who was released from prison in 1989 for a child pornography conviction, appeared in the ChickenHawk Nambla documentary in 1994 and was then convicted again in 1997 in Florida for possession of child pornography which included pictures of boys aged 8 to 10 years old.
It appears that they LIE when they say they "only" like teenagers. And it appears that they LIE when they say they aren't actually active. Who in their right mind would have believed that in the first place?
At its 16th membership conference, held in Chicago, August 7-9-1992, the North American Man/Boy Love Association unanimously adopted the following resolution:
“NAMBLA calls on the Boy Scouts of America to cease its discrimination against openly gay or lesbian persons in the appointment of its scout masters. This will permit scouts to be exposed to a variety of life styles and will permit more of those individuals who genuinely wish to serve boys to do so.”
I feel especially honored to have been asked to alert you of this resolution...I have also been a scout and a scout leader and share with so many in NAMBLA affection for the movement. We recognize, of course, that the action for which we call is inevitable. What a great added contribution your organization will make possible to all the boys and girls who participate in it when you take this step. May it be taken in the near future.
We share a common mission — to bring greater understanding and light and purpose to the young as they grow. We invite you to join with us in cherishing individual integrity, and in seeking the opportunity for every boy and girl in our country to find their own truth. We encourage you to help every person associated with your organization to be able to express those values from themselves which to them represent for themselves the Good, the True, and the Beautiful. As we work together toward these ends Light will guide our way. We express these sentiments most respectfully,
Very Cordially, Leland Stevenson Co-Recording Secretary, NAMBLA
(NAMBLA Bulletin, November 1992)
Tom Reeves:
"(1)The North American Man/Boy Love Association calls for the abolition of age-of-consent and all other laws which prevent men and boys from freely enjoying their bodies. (2) We call for the release of all men and boys imprisoned by such laws."
A community of individuals pledged to fight paedophiles on the web. We are committed to the safety and emotional well-being of all children. This site will serve as a resource for those committed to our fight wherever you may be in the world.
