Cause for concern?

In a recent discussion over on the absolute nothing blog, a couple of comments made by the poster WM, otherwise known as Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield really made me think about the kind of people we are dealing with here.

I have taken thousands of images of minors, throughout my life, and have never masturbated over one of them. However, once again, I reserve the right to do so, if I ever wished.

He reserves the right to take pictures of peoples children without consent, and then use them for masturbation if he wishes to, and he sees nothing wrong in that? The second comment is a real corker, not only does he flout his contempt for the legal system he mocks those he would abuse if he chose to, and he still says he's not a sociopath.

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email).

I will leave you with a final comment from him, bearing in mind this man feels he is unjustly labelled by me as a sociopathic paedophile, judge for yourself.

I have served my time. The job is done. Unless, of course, you mean ‘rehabilitation’, in the sense of being subservient to an unjust and ill-informed system? That is not my style, never was, never will be.

MySilentWar ~ Declares War

Some of you may remember My Silent War. We wrote a little about him HERE
He has a history of being conflicted you might say. But not so much that he won't come out in full support of his pedopal Rookieeee.

You see, he has a plan. He's going to follow in the footsteps of the black civil rights movement. He's staging a SIT-IN. That's right. Well, I'll let him tell you what that entails.

So, I'm going to issue a challenge to any website that might try to discriminate against us for who we are. We need go to sites like YouTube, that actively destroy our accounts and communities because a vigilante organization tells them to, and we need to start sitting in. We need to create accounts on sites who comply with moral bigotry, and explain that we are childlovers - as is our right - and we need to follow the Terms of service and the Law as is required of us. And if our accounts get deleted, our posts erased, our very presence denied: We need to make new accounts. And we need to keep doing this until it is realized that the effort to deny us our voice is more disruptive than anything that we will ever say.

And I need everyone else - anyone else - who supports the childlovers' RIGHT to free expression and speech, within the bounds of both law and Terms of Service, to sit with me.

He thinks they should let it be known that they "wont put up with being bullied."
In fact he wants to "stick it to the antis".

So what does he have up his sleeve? He feels certain organizations have discriminated against him and his brothers. He names off YouTube, Xanga, CafePress and Wikipedia. What does he want to do? Let's look at YouTube first....

Status: I've made an account that says I'm a GirlLover among other things, Links to my blog, and has the Brass Eye pedophilia episode and Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech as faves

Xanga:

Status: I've signed up for an account at Xanga, and will cross-post this current post to the Blog once I've finished writing.

Wikipedia:

Status: I changed my user page so that it complies with the ridiculous "public domain images only" rule. I'm also trying to be more active on Wikipedia in the wake of Rookiee's ban and subsequent shift towards POV in pedophilia-related articles.

CafePress:

Status: I am currently trying to organize the set up of a CL store on another service, Zazzle. Also, it's been pointed out to me that there's a GL merchandise store on CafePress, and has been there for a while. I wont risk the loss of this store by posting the URL on my public blog, though I will inform anyone who inquires through E-mail about the location of the store, if I can trust them.

OH, well have no fear, I'll help you out there.

Here's one of them


And this is an image he wants to use for merchandise to raise money for pedopurposes.

Information For New Readers (Top Post, Scroll Down for Updates)

I have recently received a significant number of enquiries from members of the media and other new readers about Absolute Zero. I have tried to collate a bit of this information here for your convenience.

The first post made on AZ can be found here. This will give you a basic background as to how and why the blog was established.

We do not collectively have any religious or political affiliation. In fact, we are a diverse group of individuals encompassing many social spheres. For example our membership body consists of a broad range of religious beliefs including:

Christian
Agnostic
Athiest
Jewish
Pagan

Despite our disparate beliefs and backgrounds, we have united in a common goal.

Our mission, as stated on our website is:

to monitor the activities of child predators, pedophiles and pro-pedophile groups. To report any discovered illegal activity to the appropriate authorities. To refute misrepresented pro-pedophile propaganda and educate the public with accepted scientific data and statistics.

Please feel free to contact us with any further enquiries you may have.

An Aussie Lesson

Reported by Sydney Morning Herald

A Sydney paedophile who murdered a man before raping his young stepdaughter will spend the rest of his life behind bars.

The NSW Supreme Court had jailed Jeffrey John Hillsley for 30 years for murdering a friend and then kidnapping and raping the man's 10-year-old stepdaughter.

Hillsley had previously served jail time for sex offences against three young girls.

He had been out of jail for less than two years when he bludgeoned his friend to death with a hammer at the man's Campsie home in 2003.

Over Christmas that year, Hillsley had stayed with the victim, who cannot be named, and returned to attack the 54-year-old as he slept on New Year's Eve.

He had sexually assaulted the man's stepdaughter during his earlier stay and, after the murder, abducted her at knifepoint and repeatedly raped her.

The girl managed to escape 16 hours later.

Hillsley, 54, pleaded guilty to murder, kidnap and four counts of aggravated sexual assault.

The case prompted calls from the NSW opposition for the "chemical castration" of offenders like him, and the crown appealed against the inadequacy of his minimum 25-year jail term.

Obviously, the crown won their appeal. In handing down the life sentence, the appeals judges said There are some crimes which are so wicked that a sentence less than a life sentence cannot adequately reflect the community interest in retribution and punishment. In our view, this murder is a crime of this kind.

This case raises some important issues. The most obvious being WHY was this paedophile free to murder, kidnap and rape when he'd already kidnapped/assaulted three little girls. Further to this, when released from prison on those charges, the ACT government issued a 'warning' to their NSW counterparts saying Hillsley was very likely to reoffend and extremely dangerous.

Yet he was allowed to savagely rape and murder.

Another major issue here is that we do not have publicly accessible sex offender registries. This is NOT a privacy issue, it is a safety issue. The majority of civilized human beings would much rather compromise a sex offender's privacy than a child's safety.

These laws simply MUST be changed to protect our children from monsters like Hillsley.

Please click here for a list of state and federal politicians who need to hear what we're all thinking:

Lenient sentencing and lack of publicly accessible sex offender registries is unacceptable.

Big Brother Danger

I recieved some info on a pedo posting over at a boy love forum. This pedovore is a college student. He was at his college and approached the Big Brother/Sister organization table.

"I talked with the people at the table, and my initial reaction was to sign up immediately; I have been looking for an opportunity to get a boy back in my life since I've left for college."

Oh, isn't this this is wonderful. NOT! Now pedovores are joining the Big Brother organizations to find new victims.

This pedovore goes on to say:

"... a few things that might worry me. They say there is a background check: what does such entail? Is it a normal crimial BG check or could they somehow get my online history?"

So, he has some incriminating info on his computer, hugh? I know some FBI people who would just love to see that info! Also, this cajunboi pedo-creep was more concerned about being a "agnotic"- (his spelling, isn't that great for a college student?)- than with being a pedovore and using the Big Brother organization to hunt for new victims!

I was disgusted to see the many responses to this post...

"Shiver" goes on to say: "Ive gone throgh their system before." .... "Thats no big deal. The church affiliation here doesnt make much Difference either. These days they will accept you if your a church goer or not, they dont have real issues with homosexuality either. They do a brief interview to get a feel for what kind of person you are and make sure your not crazy.Whatever you do, dont mention adult/youth relationships".


So now we need to work with the Big Brother organizations across the country to inform them of the pedovore's intent to use them for a hunting ground. I'm sure that the pedovores will read this and be outraged that I could even think that they would want to harm a child. Afterall, they just love children... right?

Let's take a breather!

How about some fun? I could use a chuckle myself. Anyone hanging around AZ for long has surely gotten a taste of the bizarre things the pedophiles say. So I've devised this little poll here, to let your voice be heard....who do you think is the most repulsive?

I couldn't fit them all in of course, so I've left some off. For instance Debatecrime / Lepidopterist / Winston Smith who is so dimwitted as to have nothing of value to say. His only purpose is stirring up trouble and then running to the pedo boards for rescue. Well, he was doing what he was able to do you might say.

Then there's Todd Nickerson. He's pretty much a lame - duck - pedo at best. His hands are tied concerning freakopathic activism. Why he's so busy doing free graphic work for GC to repay the Save the Children funds he stole to pay for his trip to Michigan and his new computer monitor, that he'll probably never be able to move out of his Grandma's trailor at this rate.

And there's more of course. Take Taf-Kat - John Hodson, for example, we talked about him HERE convicted of some 70,000+ child porn images, he believes it's a victimless crime, and should be legal. He denounces adult-child sexual contact however and recently left Girl Chat when Nihil and Enigma began their pedopathic campaign.

I suppose I could go on and on with these freaks, but instead let's skip to the poll. Choose the one you find The most repulsive. Hard to decide, I know, I know. If you have another choice not listed just add it to the comments, please.

Poll is in the side bar!

I'm a pedophile.

"I'm a pedophile. I've been a pedophile for 20 years. The only reason I'm charged with rape is that no one believes a child can consent to sex. The role of my ministry is to get these cases out of the courtrooms", Philip Distasio told the judge presiding over his trial in Cleveland earlier this month. He stands accused of the rape, kidnapping, gross sexual imposition, and pandering obscenity involving nine autistic boys he was home-schooling.

I cannot even begin to understand the mind of anyone who believes that children "consent" to sex. They do not "consent"... they do what they are told. Period. We raise our children to be respectful of adults, and to follow their directions. We tell our children that their teachers are to obeyed, and that their priests and ministers are to be looked to as examples of a good Christian.

We also tell them about "good" touches, and "bad" touches... but how can we rely upon children to decide between allowing a "bad" touch, or not following the directions of an adult?

When I was 5, I started kindergarten, just like many 5 year olds. The difference was that we were in a northern state, but I was being raised with southern values and rules. In other words, you were seen and not heard, and you ALWAYS, without fail, used "ma'am" and "sir" when addressing adults, and you NEVER lie- or else you get your butt beat. I would dread coming home from school every day, because my Dad would ask me if I said "Yes, ma'am" and "No ma'am" all day to my teacher. Every day, I would tell him the truth, "No, Daddy, I didn't", and I'd get my ass beat. He was furious.

At the end of the first week, my parents had a meeting with my teacher. Dad apologized profusely for my rude behavior. "We brought her up right- I don't know why she refuses to say 'Yes ma'am' and 'No ma'am' to you. She knows better than that!" My teacher replied, "OH! So that's why she keeps saying it... I keep telling her that a simple 'Yes' or 'No' will suffice, but every day she starts off 'ma'am'ing me, and I have to correct her."

They both thought they were doing the right thing... and I tried my best to follow their directions. I was afraid of the consequences of not obeying my Dad, but I also knew that if Dad found out I was disobeying the teacher, I'd be in even MORE trouble. Or at least that what my 5-year-old brain was telling me.

How do we, as adults, teach our children which kind of adult to believe and obey?
How do we, as adults, even begin to understand the mind of anyone who would believe that sexual conduct with minors is EVER legal, consensual, or acceptable? I really don't know.

Police Charge Coach In Child Sex Assault Case

HONOLULU - Honolulu police on Saturday charged a soccer coach accused of sexually assaulting a 7-year-old boy and infecting him with a sexually transmitted disease.

Fred Rames, 65, is a father of four and a foster parent. Rames is a coach with the Soccer Association for Youth.

Allegations of other sexual assaults are also surfacing against Rames, according to police.
Police said they are interviewing other children who said Rames sexually assaulted them.
Rames faces six charges of third-degree sexual assault.

Police are holding him on $150,000 bail.
SOURCE

Frederick Rames is a well-known and loved man in his community. Nobody KGMB9 talked to in Wahiawa could believe the 65-year-old soccer coach could have molested a seven-year-old boy.

"I've lived in this neighborhood all my life. I've played with his kids. I've played at his house. I don't believe anything you've just told me," Danielle Rapoza said.

But police say doctors recently diagnosed a seven-year-old boy with a sexually transmitted disease. This is when the boy told his doctor he was sexually assaulted by his soccer coach Frederick Rames.

Jed Tom is Rames' long-time friend and also a coach. He says Rames coaches kids of all ages and is a foster parent of three children who are in elementary and middle school.

Tom says Rames has fostered dozens of children over the years.
SOURCE


Oh great, this accused pedophile-rapist has fostered dozens of children over the years. I hope they find these kids and make sure they weren't victims too. The world is a sick place and we need to do whatever we can to keep our kids safe.

Rind Introduction

A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples by Rind Tromovitch & Bauserman was published in the July 1998 edition of Psychological Bulletin, published by the APA. Full text available here. It is commonly referred to as the Rind report or the Rind study . It is the single most important document in existence for the paedophile community because the authors assert that child sexual abuse (CSA) is not harmful to children – particularly to boys.

Paedophiles will attempt to dazzle you with words like 'censored' and 'political persecution' but the flaws in this study defy all academic integrity and intelligence. Due to the significance of this document, we will be covering it in a series. In this introduction we will provide academic background and dispell the lies paedophiles attach to the report. In upcoming posts we will cover the technical flaws in design and contstruction of this meta-analysis.

Academic Background

Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis is a form of research whereby the researcher collects previous studies that have been performed on a particular topic to discover trends across the previous studies. A meta-analysis can add greatly to a body of knowledge assuming that it has been carefully designed so that errors in the previous studies are not carried forward and that errors are not intrinsic to the current study.

Peer Review

The peer review process is meant to assure the validity and integrity of academic publications; it is usually a good indication that the results of publication can be trusted. The process involves a group of colleagues reviewing a researcher's data and stating that the data supports the conclusion made by the author. Unfortunately, this process breaks down somewhat in a meta-analysis. As found by Whitely et al (1994), peers do not ordinarily have access to the original data contained in a meta-analysis. This means that in the case of this meta-analysis, instead of verifying the actual results, peers could only say that everything appeared to be accurate assuming that Rind et al constructed the report with integrity.

Paedophile Arguments

Paedopathetic statement #1

This is the only meta-analysis of it's kind.

Wonder what this is then.....

Jumper, S 1995 ‘A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship of CSA to Adult Psychological Adjustment’ Child Abuse & Neglect vol. 19, pp. 715-728.

Or this.....

Neumann, D, Houskamp, B, Pollock, V & Briere, J 1996 ‘The Long-Term Sequelae of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Women: A Meta-Analytic Review’ Child Maltreatment vol. 1, pp. 6-16.

Or even this.....

Oddone, E & Genuis, M (1996) A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of child sexual abuse National Foundation for Family Research and Education, Calgary, Canada.

Rind et al dismissed the previous meta-analyses because they all showed the significant damage caused by CSA.

Paedopathetic statement #2

The report was censored by Congress

Sorry wrong again. The report has not been censored by anyone. In fact the report is freely available through a variety of sources. Congress unanimously denounced the study stating that public policy should not be formed on such flawed, biased findings (House Con. Res. 107). The APA, responsible for the publication of the report, issued a statement to Congress apologizing for the publication full text here. APA CEO Raymond Fowler wrote this in the letter addressed to Tom Delay:

Additionally, concerns have been raised that the aforementioned article and the inferences drawn from it could be viewed as support for pedophilia and used by pedophiles as a legal defense. There is no defense for pedophilia; it is always wrong.

Paedopathetic statement #3

Rind et al are the only unbiased researchers in this field and/or Rind et al are victims of political persecution.

At least one author of this study (Tromovitch) was publishing in Paidika: The Journal of Pedophilia long before this study was ever conducted. The stated purpose of the journal is:

to demonstrate that paedophilia has been, and remains, a legitimate and productive part of the totality of human experience.

Shortly after the publication of the report, Rind, Tromovitch & Bauserman were keynote speakers at "The Other Side Of The Coin" - a paedophile activism conference in the Netherlands which was promoted this way:

expressly to throw light on the more positive side of adult-nonadult sexual contacts.

I contend that it is a self-evident truth that you cannot be an unbiased researcher and an activist in the same field.

This evidence is, on its own merits, enough to discredit anything Rind et al actually concluded. However, we will continue to bring you information on the technical aspects of the report and how the study was specifically designed to 'prove' what Rind et al were determined to conclude. In the next edition, we will cover what Rind et al chose to include/exclude in their data sample.

Action Alert

Perverted Justice is in the process of campaigning against companies that endorse Rookiee and his pedophile propoganda. Currently, PJ is specifically interested in Google/Blogger, and LibSyn who hosts his Pedologues Podcasts. CafePress was also contacted by PJ and has since shut down Rookiee's page along with YouTube and Xanga.

All members interested in helping with this campaign to actively address corporate association/endorsement of pedophilia, please go here to get the full details.

Please also take a moment to contact the relevant organizations to voice your opinions.

Administrative contact, LibSyn.org
Dave Chekan
bigpie@webmayhem.com
513 S Mathilda St
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224
USA
412-682-4456


Google/Blogger
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View
CA
94043
US
dns-admin@google.com
+1.6502530000


Members are also encouraged to join the PJ forums to gain further details on how they can help this cause.