Rounding up Sex Offenders

URGENT ALERT

We've got another Urgent Call to Safeguard Children from Reform Sex Offender Laws Campaign - better listen up and pay attention.

Act now!

You need to use situations as they occur, anything to make an argument appear more relevant. Yes please everyone, exploit Jaycee Dugard some more - one sex offender wasn't enough for a life time - you need to FLOOD THE INTERNET


So speaks the RSOL, Reform Sex Offender Laws Campaign. Heck they even tell you what to say

This article needs massive response. WE URGE ALL RSOL PARTICIPANTS TO WRITE ALTERNET AT ONCE!

The way we respond is to remove hundreds of thousands from the registry so the few who have been certified as truly dangerous by qualified professionals can be detained and treated until found no longer dangerous. Essentially, this would be to adopt the Canadian system, rather than the U.S. registry which destroys the lives of hundreds of thousands of non-dangerous people and their families, yet protects NO-ONE from real dangers. Alex Marbury and Kelly Piercy.

I'm just not understanding that. They want to round up sex offenders, detain and treat them until they are no longer "truly" dangerous? That just doesn't sound like them at all. Didn't they say

• Abolish all life-time civil commitment for sex offenders
• Abolish all laws that provide life in prison for sex offenders.

They lied!!!!! Now they want to round them up and "detain" them!!

The truth is that they'll say anything they think might convince people that they are something they aren't. They're all living - breathing contradictions. Their claim that the sex offender registry is what allowed Garrido to get by with holding Jaycee captive for 18 years. I'm sure you've heard the mantra

The truly dangerous are hiding in the registry

Of course that's not true. They aren't "hiding" they're right there where we can see them among all the other dangerous people who have created victims. Nor did GPS fail in this situation. The problem was Garrido wasn't wearing it in 1991. If he had been Jaycee would have been rescued immediately. There are over 22,000 registered sex offenders in California who are NOT on the public registry, because they are deemed low risk. There are less than 7,000 offenders in California wearing GPS monitoring. Some dumb ducks have taken that to mean that there are only 7,000 deemed dangerous in California. The truth is California uses GPS on offenders who are on parole. The cost is $6 a day versus $96 a day to keep them in prison. Parole allows an offender to complete his sentence outside of prison. Why would registered sex offenders complain about them having to wear GPS rather than spend their entire sentence in prison, and most of all why would they complain that GPS didn't help rescue Jaycee when he was not wearing it when he abducted her? The answer to all of this is that these people, these blame gaming fools thought they had an opportunity to exploit someone for their own gain. They chose the wrong story, again. And they chose the wrong state.

The mistakes made in this case are obvious: A judge who believed Garrido when he said he only raped because of the influence of drugs, so he gets his sentence reduced so he can gain access to drugs and victims again. Law enforcement who made the mistake of thinking since Garrido was in compliance that meant he was reformed. They took the deviousness and manipulative skills of a rapist for granted.

Sosen states that their goals are to abolish PUBLIC registration for sex offenders, and ALL registration for first time offenders. "All" meaning no law enforcement registration either. Interestingly enough Garrido was a first time offender..... you know the ones that keep offending but have only been caught once? I wonder if they'll rethink their idiotic ramblings? How about this one?

Long mandatory minimum sentences can have a number of negative consequences that serve to decrease, rather than increase, public safety.

I'm sure a lot of people would agree with the Sosenites on that one. Not allowing judges to be influenced and manipulated by rapists is dangerous you know. Long prison sentences make society more dangerous. We're much safer with them out of prison, without any community notification or restrictions.

It's all so simple I don't know why we didn't think of it ourselves.

Take a look at John Couey for example. For some reason Mary wouldn't mind him being on a registry. Of course she says that now - looking back with hindsight. The truth of the matter is, had Couey joined Sosen before he killed Jessica Lunsford Mary would have welcomed him with open arms and fought to get him off the registry just like she fought to get Garrido and the other 700,000 registered sex offenders she claims to represent off the registry.

Mary claims "prevention" is better. And of course monitoring sex offenders isn't prevention. No, Mary has given us very good tips for "prevention", so far her ideas include

• Teach kids to Just Say No to child sexual abuse
• Put labels on cell phones warning people they can be on a registry if they produce child pornography with it

Mary isn't interested in preventing sexual abuse. She's interested in preventing the prosecution of sex offenders.

Who is feeding this mentality? Let's see what pedophile activists have to say:

As already mentioned, there exist a number of well-regarded political movements that we can discreetly influence. Although they do not openly admit it, our influence will be vital to their long-term survival and development. And with power and connections of the kind we have not seen for decades, these groups are offering us a free ride, with minimal concessions in the long-run.

Central to the RSO movement are the families of Registered Sex Offenders, often cited as the unintended victims. However much some may dislike the nuclear family, no one is likely to lose an argument if their point of view serves its integrity.

Richard Kramer - self-identified pedophile and co-founder of B4U-Act, owner of MHAMic, and member of RSOL and BoyChat responds:

The fundamental issue we need to address is the defense of our humanity. We need to confront the stigmatization, demonization, and stereotyping that exists due simply to our attraction to children or adolescents, regardless of our behavior. To do this, we need to be honest about our sexuality. That's why I'm involved with B4U-ACT, and why, unfortunately, the "well-regarded political movements" listed in your editorial won't quite cut it, even though I agree with their goals. For example, the most successful RSO activist group, ReformSexOffenderLaws.org (RSOL), is opposed to the demonization and stereotyping of all groups, including pedophiles.

However, not everybody working for RSOL understands that, and a BL or GL working with RSOL would not be able to be honest about his sexuality.

Perhaps some Denial Therapy is in order

Just what we've been telling you!

I have addressed this issue before but this post from girlchat has brought up the importance of good judgment when bringing men into your life when you have children.

Help, how do I express my love 2 my LGF? Come out?

Posted by azure on Sunday, September 6 2009 at 07:02:48pm

---

...or, 'How do I develop our relationship?'

Hi gang, I'm struggling here and in love. Same thing.

You might remember my BLB I've spoken of before, such as at http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/476665.htm

To sum up, she's 10yo, and I get to hang out a lot with her as I'm in an adult relationship with another member of her family. She regularly tells me 'I wish you were my Dad', or likens me to a brother, and also a friend. She adores me, and I spend the whole day there being hugged and kissed.

It gets worse. Not only does this child hater/luster think its OK to fall in love with a 10yr old little girl but he thinks she is plotting their future:

It's come to the stage where I actually feel more love/lust or that 'new love' hormone rushing through me, for this LG, than I do for the person in her family to who I am 'really' involved with. The LG knows this, and has at times said to me, "I've already got a boyfriend", or, "you can't marry me you're going to marry her"! Along with the inevitable, 'you're too old!', comments...

But at times she regularly asks me to remind me how old I am (not that old!), or asks how long I'll live, or how old I'll be when she's 13 - like she has a plan for us, and is just working out if it'll work.

This is how the pedophile mind works. They twist a child's' innocence into something dirty and sexual with intentions of ruining that child's' innocence they delve into irrational thinking trying to reason away that underlying knowledge of "this is wrong".
Being a pedophile and lusting after children is something they know is wrong yet choose to keep on that road of child hate/lust.

So now he wants to tell this 10 yr old child that he loves her... like love like love you know lust.

So I just want/need advice on how to get these feelings out in the open:

Should I tell her how I feel for her, compared to my 'girlfriend'?
Should I say I love her more, and only stay with my 'girlfriend' as it allows me to see her?
Should I tell her if I left my gf, I'd never see her again?
Should I tell her how I hope in years to come we can be together properly?
Should I say anything else to develop our relationship?

I've only thought of saying the above, having first told her that what I am about to say is one of our secrets, and that she could never tell anyone, or even write it in a diary (!), even if that person promised not to tell. Only once I was sure she knew this was our true treasure chest of a secret (she likes that idea I think), would I go on.

But I am fearful, as at times when I have started to say something a little serious, she can revert to playing a 3yo and get all babyish. I know she has the potential to understand this 100%, but she's still on the brink.

So he is grooming her, its evident he is testing to see what she will do and how far she will go. A sensible adult would see this happening, but sadly, there are too many blind women willing to accept any man into their life.

And their children pay.

Plus I am concerned she is holding back from expressing too many feelings for me, because she knows I'm supposed to be in love with the other family member. In a way she doesn't want to invade that or tread on any toes. Yet at the same time, when we've had an argument (me and my GF), my LGF has said, "please don't split up"... I suspect because she knows if we did split up, I'd never she her again either.

I hope you can help me take the right path, as some of you no doubt have past experience of this all already under your belts.

Of course he has no doubts. He is at a pedophile message board.


And more children pay.

Never Say Everything

Michael Melsheimer:

I have known Fred Berlin for more than 20 years. Do you know that he spoke against the reporting law in the state legislature of Maryland when it was first proposed in the late 80's? This was not a popular thing to do. I was with him when he did this.

Berlin says a lot of things publicly, so do people like ourselves. We never say everything.

shy guy:

NAMBLA was founded in late 1978 following a meeting of a group of gay community activists that had rallied to defend the Boston gay community against a media/legal attack by the local DA.

I should note that among the most influential early members was an anarchist ex-minister with a background of anti-war activism and writing as well as activism on economic justice issues

Michael Melsheimer of B4U-Act is the new breed of pedophile activist which attempts to ride the fence between what is acceptable (help pedophiles not offend) and a group of men who get together just to figure out ways to legalize boy raping. The name of his organization upsets the BoyChatters however. B4U-Act implies that Michael wants to help them NOT rape babies. This is unacceptable to the pedophiles. The truth is that Michael doesn't want to stop them at all. He merely wants to infest society with a bunch of crap. He wants the same thing he's always wanted. He just can't say it. He can't say it to us, he can't say it to the mental health community and he can't even tell the pedo groups that he's on their side. We'd find out if he did. He's sneaky that way.

Michael has found the way to sideswipe society he thinks. He's convinced the Baltimore Mental Health Community that he's something he's not. BoyChat doesn't know what to think of him and the Reform Sex Offender Law Campaign is loving him.

Follow along with some conversations from BoyChat. Some brand spanking new, some a little older. The language never changes but his mission is made clear - Nambla didn't work. We must try something new.

Michael Melsheimer:

B4U-ACT is doing great. I recently spoke with a person that had something to do with the starting of NAMBLA. He thought it looked good.

mvanhouten:

Does Maryland know you show your webpage to old NAMBLA founders for approval?

Does everyone who goes to LifeLine know that your goal for them is to 'eliminate offending?' Or is it your goal? And if it isn't, does Maryland know that too?

Oh what a tangled web we weave....

mvanhouten:

What exactly DID you acomplish? Your website still states your goal as 'eliminating offending'? How much offending do you think you eliminated (with the gracious help of this unnamed NAMBLA founder)?

Michael Melsheimer:

Your website still states your goal as 'eliminating offending'?

It certainly does not.

The term child molester is not in the B4U-ACT lexicon. We do have in our lexicon the term minor attracted person. B4U-ACT wants to work with any minor attracted person that seeks us out.

mvanhouten:

It's right on your site!
Here is a sentence from your report to Baltimore Mental Health Systems (22 June 2007)describing B4U-ACT's purposes:

"The report describes how improved communication would contribute to the prevention of offending, the prevention of harm to minor-attracted adults and adolescents, increased understanding by mental health professionals, and more effective and just policies."

But the question now is: why not just say it here too? Why deny it so adamently here at BoyChat? Because it's a lie you made to BMHS? Or, because you don't wish your potential clients here to know that is your goal?

Michael Melsheimer:

The report was dated 2007. It is part of our history, but the passage that offends you is no longer relevant to our site today. I can't change what is in our history and would be dishonest to try. It would be like BC editing their archives. Our site changed in December 2008 because of the statement you quoted.

Be assured you will find no current reference to prevention of offending. You can take that to the bank.

mvanhouten:

Why don't you post here and now that neither you nor B4U-ACT take a position on the appropriateness or inappropriateness of adult/minor intimacy?

Why not state that it is now NOT the goal of B4U-ACT to 'eliminate offending'?

Michael Melsheimer:

People sometimes say too much and destroy what they really want to do. I have already said a lot and don't want to say anymore.

mvanhouten:

Do you personally believe that any and all adult/minor sexual interaction qualifies as 'offending' and requires elimination?

Why can't you give straight answers to simple questions? It seems almost a pathology with you.

Michael Melsheimer:

People sometimes say too much and destroy what they really want to do. I have already said a lot and don't want to say anymore.

Fame:

There is something called "politics", it a game which MM must play.

As things progress the politics change. Soon the word "offending" won't be used at all in b4uacts rhetoric.

Further, sexual activity with minors is illegal. It is irrelevant (to this discussion) whether it should be legal or not, the bottom line is that it is and b4uact must work within that framework. Neither b4uact nor the psychological community not the BL community at large wishes BLs to commit crimes for which they may go to jail.

You need to understand this.....as well as rhetoric and politics.

Fame:

If MM declared a position on the appropriateness of sexual acts here it may alienate those he works with since he has now taken on an agenda which is not a part of his organization.

mvanhouten:

What state agency would knowingly give someone money if they knew the effort he was putting into Lifeline/BoyChat?

Michael Melsheimer:

It is important for the MAA community to have contacts in organizations like Stop it Now. They have great influence on the legislative process, and we need to know them and they need to know us. Some of the people that work for these organizations are not anti MAA. It serves our community well to find, know, and work with them

mvanhouten:

I am all for advocating people break the law, especially when it comes to mutually agreeable activities.

Michael Melsheimer:

I was on the Sally Jesse Raphael show years ago with a NAMBLA person..... He influenced my life tremendously. NAMBLA made a lot of mistakes, but they supported BL's almost before there was anything else. Tom O' Carroll, PIE fame, is also one of my heroes. His book, Paedophilia - The Radical Case, certainly opened my eyes up to a lot of things, just as my travels to SE Asia did.

mvanhouten:

I ultimatley want to undermine the labels "child" and "adult" so that people will evenutally see a relationship between a 9 and a 29 year old with at least the same lack of concern as a relationship betwen a 39 and a 69 year old.

Michael Melsheimer:

I think that you are right. We do have to go slow and not take on a radical agenda. We could all learn well by what happened to NAMBLA.

As it relates to building bridges, you are right again. There is nothing more important for our community to do. It is the only way we are ever going to be able to get any possible acceptance in the larger community for who we are as human being and what we feel is right for children

Michael Melsheimer:

My organization is not going to say to offend.

I am a BL without regret and will always be a BL without regret. My life as a bl has been terrific. No one could ever make me say otherwise. This is even considering that I spent time in prison.

Our line in the sand has historically defeated us. We need to think about a new one.

Michael Melsheimer:

We need to come together as a community. But there is another choir we need to preach to. That choir is the larger community, and it can help make all our dreams come true. Our problem is that they aren't singing our song . The major job in front of us is to get them to sing it.

We have to be very careful at first as to what we say and do, so we can say do and say more down the road. We need to build bridges and coalitions. This means that we might have to cool it for the moment. Please note that I said for the moment.

Will Robinson:

I am continually amazed at the political skills (evasiveness?) of this B4U-Act organization.

Michael Melsheimer has my vote as one of the smoothest operators I've ever beheld.

Is he a great leader or the new "Tricky Dick" of pedo-politics?

Richard Kramer:

As you may know, B4U-Act is promoting communication between minor-attracted people and mental health professionals. The purpose of these services is NOT to "cure" us of our attraction to minors--we do NOT believe we are sick.

It comes as no surprise to us at Absolute Zero that this was B4U-Act's goal, we've been saying this all along, yet Alex Marbury, the coordinator behind the "Reform Sex Offender Laws" campaign, embraces B4U-Act and even describes pedophilia as an "important discussion" to educate activists on the benevolence of pedophiles.

This is a campaign being supported by sex offenders activists claiming to be "reformed." Groups like SOSEN and individuals like Mary Duval. msdxe3ct78

Crossing the Rubicon

Dec 10, 2003 at 09:08 PM
I am a being of thought,and now of action.
Of necessity I implement plans for the future, and follow them out, and perhaps, this course of action, fed by the madness in my mind and the fire in my veins, shall lead me to my pyrric victory.

--The Shadow of Souls

Eric Hansen aka TriedByConsience aka Shadow of Souls has been saying things like this for years. He's been in and out of mental hospitals and often speaks of creating battlefields and acts of war and gloriously magnificent feats of bravery and intellectual triumphs. He believes his situation to be similar to Jean Valjean.

The Sosenites consider him to be a "Constitutional expert". Eric thinks so too.

He recently increased his rantings and ravings, but what wasn't clear was what his actual plan was. Was he going to attempt suicide again? Was he planning to pull a Walter Howard prediction and become a suicide bomber? Was he going to blow up a court house? Was he simply going to run?

Well yes, it does appear to be that simple, except he wasn't going to run, he was just going to walk straight in, refuse to register as a sex offender, and in a mighty display of mumbo-jumbo psychobabble throw Idaho into a state of shock and awe. Someone apparently failed to tell him that it wouldn't work that way.

Mary Duval, the COO of Sosen encouraged and supported his pre-meditated felony. Anyone with half a brain can see that he needs psychiatric help but Mary is so proud of his bravery that she just can't hardly speak. Yes, she's in awe and says that he's one of the most intelligent men she knows. That is the leadership occurring in the "Sex Offender Support and Education Network".

The issue here is not what Eric planned. Nor is it the hows and whys of it. Many disturbed people throughout history have plotted subversive acts; his behavior should come as no surprise. He's been talking about going out in a blaze of glory for over 6 years now. But Mary, a non-sex offender, in a leadership position - openly and brazenly agitating, condoning, supporting and actually encouraging criminal behavior at the very least is immoral - most likely illegal and completely irresponsible. If she wants to "lead" sex offenders she has an obligation. Part of that obligation is to be aware of who she is leading, dangerous behaviors they may be exhibiting that could put not only themselves but others at risk of harm, and directing unstable people towards the help they need. Did Mary, the COO of Sosen encourage him to get psychiatric help? Did she find appropriate resources for him, for example? Or did she even recognize his instability for what it was? Is she capable of recognizing it?

18-8311. PENALTIES. (1) An offender subject to registration who fails to register, verify his address, or provide any notice as required by this chapter shall be guilty of a felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison system for a period not to exceed ten (10) years and by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000).

Will Eric go to prison? I doubt it. Once he starts talking the judge will probably order a civil commitment hearing in which case he may be confined for the rest of his life. I repeat: Mary's behavior is beyond irresponsible and I believe exhibits a blatant disregard for the well-being of those she presumes to "lead".

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised by her behavior after her shocking attempts to prevent the sex offenders under the bridge from obtaining housing. Her instructions to them were to say "Hell no, we won't go". Did she lie when she said they were in a desperate situation? Did she lie when she said they needed out from under that bridge as quickly as possible? There are people finding them residences and while that doesn't end the larger problem of "where will sex offenders live" it does help the immediate problem. It's hot, it's filthy and "no human should have to live that way", but Mary would have them stay where they are. Why? Those men - without jobs - without residences - without even running water listen to Mary. They listen to Mary because they believe she has their best interest at heart. But I believe Mary is willing to use, exploit and hurt anyone in her attempt to induce a Revolution through her acts of sedition.

I believe there will have to be another coup in Sosen. The other members there who have honest and legitimate concerns and needs better wake up and quickly. Mary Duval is leading them straight into hell.

As Absolom once said:

In some cases the best way to protect your civil rights is to shut the fuck up.

A Real Cat-astrophe

Some people just have the worst luck, you know?

Case in point:

The Associated Press reports that a Florida man is blaming his cat for child pornography found on his computer.

48-year-old Keith Griffin claims that he was innocently downloading music when he left the room and his evil feline downloaded over 1,000 images of child pornography to his computer.

Now that's some bad luck right there.

Well frankly I don't think - um anyone - is going to believe you, Keith. So, here's my tip for you: make Mary Duval your spokesperson. Don't worry Keith, Mary can handle it - she's got it all worked out. By the time she tells everyone what a 'snot-nosed, teary-eyed victim' and 'evil vigilante troll' that damn cat is, you should have nothing to fear.

Ok enough of the charade. Everyone point and laugh.

The devil will look in my eyes...and be afraid

The Sydney Morning Herald, February the 22nd, 2008:

Queensland's top prosecutor has failed to obtain a criminal conviction against a medical student who offered to give an 11-year-old boy a "penis massage".

Pakistani student Shakeel Mirza, 26, was sentenced to 12 months probation in October last year after pleading guilty to one count of attempted indecent treatment of a child under 12.

A conviction was not recorded after the judge accepted it was a low-level sexual offence and that it was out of character.

I wonder whether the judge would have thought Shakeel's offense was 'out of character' had he known that Shakeel had been posting on BoyChat for years under the screen name 'Greencrystal.' Postings like this...

Sometimes I think I am worse off for having come to BC-being here has made me into a bigger pedophile than what I ever was originally. its like smoking occasionally by myself, and then joinging a group of smokers, and thus becoming hooked on smoking.

Dude..you are far more honourable than me. Waay more. YOu see, if I were a counselor at camp, I would not do what you did..however, i would blatantly try to make friends with some of those boys for my own gain.

Yes, women want it all. Power in bed, power over boys, power over their lives, and to hell with men-

thats an exaggeration, but still.

and then women have the GALL to complain when they get raped.

hell, they deserve it.

After pleading guilty, the judge sentenced Shakeel to 12 months probation and ordered that no conviction be recorded so as not to 'hinder his future employment prospects.' This slap on the wrist did nothing to deter Shakeel, who continues to this day, three years after his original offense, to post on pedophile message boards about his lust for children.

I love boys. Its that simple. Sorry to the world, but hey, the world can go fuck itself- I love boys. i cant help it. I dont think there's a cure of it either.

We are all boylovers.

we are all child molesters.

the difference is simply how we feel on that particular day at that particular time in that particular circumstance..its just one SPECTRUM. And we, as human beings, simply "float" along the spectrum..sometimes we are more BL, other times more Child moester.

I went to see a movie today...schools out, plenty of kids around. I went to take a pee..a 12/13 year old walked in...turned his back to me and faced the urinal..I looked at his neck. succulent, soft...I love hairs on the nape of the neck. I wanted him. I wanted almost every boy I saw today.

And I'm angry. I'm hurt inside. I wanted to grab him, hold him, lick his neck, make him moan...run my hands through his hair, brush my fingers against his soft lips... I WANTED HIM!!!!!!

What the FUCK is wrong with me?

Like Michael Morrow, Phillip Distasio and Roger Keith Bloemers, Shakeel Mirza used a volunteer organization for disadvantaged children as an avenue to gain access to boys. This is where he came into contact with a child he later attempted to molest. Shakeel participated in a therapy program, but a lot of good that did him, he wrote this on BoyChat a week or two ago:

http://www.3news.co.nz/Govt-sued-over-alleged-child-abuse-in-former-Dept-of-Social-Welfare-homes/tabid/209/articleID/113273/cat/17/Default.aspx?ArticleID=113273


“Everyone time he came in to wake me up he’d either be sucking on my penis or masturbating me, and if I said anything he’d hit me,” said former home resident Brian Wilkinson.


Servers you right you fucker.
Burn. Let the whole bunch of cunts, fuckers, assholes and whatnot pedo bashers fucking burn.

I KNEW someone out there was taking my quota of sex. Now I know where it went *jealous*

And you think that's bad? To give you some idea of how sick Shakeel really is, he once wrote this on BoyChat:

What am I? Whatever it is, it is surely worse than death..but death is not a bad thing..it can be made sweet..the high pitched cries of a tortured child, the agnosied screams as i bite.. mayhaps the devil will look in my eyes..and he will be afraid.. God, you created me. YOu gave me this. I never wanted it, I NEVER ASKED FOR THIS FUCKING TORTURE!! Now You see what i do..see how I live. "You may not love God, but God still loves you" yeah fuck me. Would You feel good if I raped and hurt and killed children?? huh? WOULD YOU FEEL LIKE I HAVE FINALLY SERVED MY PURPOSE IN LIFE?? Thanks a fucking lot for giving this fucking hell to me!! I'm such a bastard..someone should shoot me. IF they can.. You God..grant me peace. amen. Greencrystal

This man belongs somewhere he can never touch another child, someone so bent on justifying pedophilia and sickness is beyond any help available, but instead the Australian judge which sentenced him to probation was more worried about affecting his 'future career prospects.'

'Slip a little powder in his milk'

Michael John Morrow A.K.A. Michael1016 A.K.A. Michael814 of Grand Junction, Colorado, used to post on many pedophile message boards, from places like BoyBliss and BoyMoment through to GirlChat and more. Morrow used to post about all sorts of things, let's take a look, shall we?

"He is beautiful, 13, sort of small for his age. He showed up at basketball practice in VERY TIGHT (mmmmm) speedos and a sleveless shirt. The speedos I took notice of for obvious reasons...and then, when he removed his sweat suit top, I was mezmerized. His arm pits had just enough hair to set me off (I won't be specific what that means), and I had to challenge him to a one v. one game until the other guys showed up. I got close enough to smell him, and it was even more beautiful that I could imagine."

"Sadly, my favorite boy, a gorgeous 13 year old, moved aobut a month ago, but before that he gave me many pleasureable times."

You see, aside from being a pervert, Morrow (like other pedophiles we know), volunteered as a 'mentor' in an organization set up to help boys "develop a positive self image, a sense of belonging and an acceptance of responsibility for their actions." Hardly the message a scumbag like Morrow would send to child as a mentor, or as a teacher:

I teach a weekly class to middle school kids (ages 12-14) and one another class to the same age group.

Morrow was a pedophile by his own admission:

Word pedophile does not faze me, might as well face up to it, actually.

Thanks to the Wikisposure project, that wasn't the only thing Morrow had to face up to. After Wikisposure volunteers collaborated with Law Enforcement, Morrow was arrested and convicted of possesing 13,000 child pornography photos. He's been sentenced to 84 months (seven years) in prison, but if you ask me, he got off far too lightly.

In the following chat log, he describes an experience he claims to have had with a 5-year old boy which he claims to have abducted while the boy was at school:

WARNING: This may contain triggers

Michael says (4:19 PM): this happened years ago
Michael says (4:19 PM): i was on a trip to idaho
Michael says (4:20 PM): i had cruised this school for two days...i was going to leave the enxt day and i figured, what the heck
Michael says (4:20 PM): i had my popper.s i have a rathter innocent looking car. and i knew that i could pick up this little boy
Michael says (4:20 PM): i had seen h im, looked at his body language
Michael says (4:21 PM): my divorce allowed me to be me
Michael says (4:21 PM): and i wanted this
Michael says (4:21 PM):if he had resisted much, i would not have done it
Michael says (4:23 PM): im safe. it was just a 30 minute thing. and i was headed out of town anyway. i took the boy back to the school
Michael says (4:23 PM): im not sure he told anyone. he may have
Michael says (4:23 PM): it's really he only time ive done anything quite that brazen

This next section of the chat log was said before the one above, but describes the same incident:

Michael says (4:01 PM): he is starting to cry, but i dont care
Michael says (4:01 PM): ive noticed him for weeks
Michael says (4:02 PM): i drive by the school almost every day and JO while i cruise it
Michael says (4:02 PM): he is the one i want...i want to suck him, and fuck him deep
Michael says (4:05 PM): i give him some ice cream
Michael says (4:05 PM): and slip a little powder in his milk
Michael says (4:05 PM): i want him relaxed

So "consensual" and "loving," but we already knew these people were like that. They use children to satisfy themselves. Morrow was never charged nor convicted for this crime, his victim is still out there.

As a final thought, Morrow once commented:

A support group for other boylovers (pedophiles) is very important, and I'm glad having been a part of several.

Rot In Hell, Fat Baby Fucker!

It seems a black flag is flying over at boychat.

AW, someone DIED?

Boo hoo, a child rapist died??

If there's a hell, I hope that Ghost Writer, the serial child molester, burns in it forever. He was a disgusting piece of shit who had many victims over the years, victims who have to live in their own private hell for the rest of their lives. The world was a much safer place when he was thrown in jail in Mexico, and now, it is a much BETTER place.

Fitting that the rapists on boychat call him family. They are all just alike, and I hope they all meet the same end: dead in jail.

Rot forever, Robert Vann Smith. No one will miss you except the criminals on pedophile websites. I, however, will have a nice rum daquiri for the occasion. :)

Sex offenders and pedophiles at girl chat

'Sancho Panza' a pedophile at girl chat writes up a post for the pedophile sex offenders that IPhone has an application that tracks sex offenders:

iPhone app tracks sex offenders
Posted by Sancho Panza on Wednesday, July 29 2009 at 12:37:43pm
"All 50 states in the US require those convicted of sexual offences to sign a register so that their whereabouts can be tracked and monitored. The information is also freely available online. ThinAir Wireless, the developer of the Offender Locator application [iTunes link], has used this database to build the tool."

Another giant step in the naming and shaming industry.

America, land of freedom, unfortunately only for those who never made a mistake. The rest will suffer for the rest of their lives...

*smashes i pod against wall*

He is obviously upset that Apple wants to help keep children safe with Offender Locator.

Again more proof that these self proclaimed "child lovers" are in fact "child haters" who do not care for children in the least.

When lgsinmyheart wrote

Wait a sec, guys!!
Posted by lgsinmyheart on Wednesday, July 29 2009 at 05:46:56pm
In reply to iPhone app tracks sex offenders posted by Sancho Panza on Wednesday, July 29 2009 at 12:37:43pm

Wasn't this just what we needed in order to find each other, party together, and plan the Revolution??? Just a couple days ago Stanhntii asked how can we meet each other; Apple provided the answer!!!!

I wondered then just how many of these pedophiles at girl chat are sex offenders? Does it matter? I think so. After all we know that the longer they are out of prison the more likely they will offend again. They cannot be trusted in society at all.
Even if Sancho Panza is not a sex offender he wants to smash his phone-- because
he could be one next....?

I KNEW there was a reason I never supported mac NT
Posted by kissbyalice on Wednesday, July 29 2009 at 01:20:09pm
In reply to iPhone app tracks sex offenders posted by Sancho Panza on Wednesday, July 29 2009 at 12:37:43pm
NT

kissbyalice has serious emotional issues along with his pedophilia habit he has no thought to those little girls he love(d)s so much to keep them safe from child rapists.

And you filthy pedophiles wonder why society hates you?

Don't pick up the soap!

The Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 is aimed at curbing prison rape through a "zero-tolerance" policy, as well as through research and information gathering. The act called for developing national standards to prevent and detect incidents of sexual violence in prison, making data on prison rape more available to prison administrators as well as making corrections facilities more accountable for incidents of prison rape.

I suppose I'm going to have to speak out against this law.

I want it abolished.

I want it gone.

* No law will stop someone who wants to rape a prisoner.
* It does nothing to prevent prison rape.
* Falsely accused prison rapists are taking the focus off the real danger.
* Identifying prison rapists makes them targets of prison vigilantes.
* This law makes prisoners less safe.
* It lumps prison rapists in with other rapists.
* It's nothing more than a Salem witch hunt.
* It's too expensive and will cause the system to implode on itself.
* It's nothing but hysteria and fear-mongering.
* It's a draconian law.
* Most prisoners don't rape other prisoners.
* It's causing prisoners to fear other prisoners.
* It's creating professional prison victims.
* The government cannot keep your prisoners safe.
* Instead of focusing on their rape we should LET THEM HEAL!
* There IS life after prison rape.
* These resources could be better spent elsewhere such as on families of prison rapists.
* Eventually prison rapists are going to snap. Would you rather have a raped prisoner or a dead prisoner?
* While prison rape is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life. Most raped prisoners do not die or become permanently disfigured as a result.

After the comments made at the recent Reform Sex Offender Laws RSOL Nambla Conference in Boston I realized that most prisoners aren't actually harmed by being raped, and even if they are they eventually get over it. Some even learn to forgive their rapist. The whole "prison rape" issue is overhyped.

A small number of victims are scarred for life, but most are not. The “scarred for life” is way over hyped, even some who endured extreme abuse are able to move on and lead a normal life without significant scars, even forgiving their abusers.....

Dr. Jerome Miller
Boston Conference 2009

Considering these new facts from the Nambla Conference of 2009, I propose we fight for the abolition of this useless, costly law that does More Harm than Good and spend that money in a better way, perhaps by providing economic support for true victims or education and support of prison rapists. One solution would be to support the prison rapist with positive reinforcement that what they did was not "bad", that it's their victims fault, that their victim should:

* be held accountable
* take responsibility
* forgive and forget

and the problem would be solved if only prison rape victims would do that. Most importantly we need to educate those who have been raped in prison to take responsibility for their own actions and stop picking up the soap.



Sex Offender Activists would be outraged if the public started advocating to abolish prison rape laws, yet when it comes to innocent children - this is the position they take.

* Every single argument I have made against this law is a statement they have made regarding sexually abused children.