"Child Love"

The paedophile agenda is based on the notion of "child love" - that is to say, they "love" children much more than the average person. They seem to think that if they convince people of this, that we will accept their perversion.

So it is astonishing to read the ways this band of child "lovers" will invade the privacy of - and even steal from - the very objects of their desire for their own selfish purposes.

Take this discussion on the Visions of Alice discussion forum as an example:

johninengland speaks of his 11 year old niece:

when she was younger i'd found a pair of her white cotton panties after she slept over one night, i had a good time with those, so i was happy when i found a pair of hers wrapped up in her school uniform while housesitting recently. they were used, so i was even happier, although i didnt mess them up, i still had a nice time

the_nnp2p_fan is unimpressed but needs suggestions:

I have a niece and I can easily go to her room and get stuff from her drawer, what can I do with them
Can you be creative

LuvPTs offers help to the poor unfortunates without nieces to rob:

For those of you that dont have a niece, a male friend with a LG
here is a suggestion. The trash bin at your local laundryman is a good place to find
a (worn) pair of LG panties.

Some may have the elastic band at the waiste or legs slighly
removed from the rest. Or the part that is sewed to place
the double lining at the croch. But who cares. They will serve
your purpose.

How does he know? Simple:

I have quite a nice collection. But I ONLY take the ones that
say "size 2T to 8" and that, obviously because of their size
belong to a LG not some old granny.
I get mine at a Laundrymat..next to a 7-11..where I buy
my smokes. From 9 pm to 10 pm there is hardly ever
anyone there.

and daughterdaughter....well, what can you say?

The nature of my job allowed me to work in people's houses when nobody was home and often times it was the same houses over and over. A few houses obviously had children and one of them in particular had a gorgeous LG....

You have no idea how tempted I was to snag a pair of panties from her drawer. One day I did - light purple with even lighter purple hearts. Cotton. I shoved them in my pocket and thought about them all day until I finally got home and was able to examine them. Looks like she had them for a little while from the almost completely white areas around the waistband and areas where her lil' cheeks would stress the fabric. They must've been tight on her body by now - ready to buy a size bigger. So, I doubt she'd miss them.

Unless they were her 'favorite' (I often dream they are) and she wonders where she left them and in some alternate reality her thoughts somehow come back to me.

These paedophiles are prancing around the internet claiming "child love" while denying these children their fundamental rights to privacy and property.

Acceptance? Not on my watch.

Interview: Dr Judith Reisman

Dr Reisman is the President of the Institute for Media Education. She has served as an advisor to various international governments and as an expert witness in many court cases. Further to this, she is the author of multiple journal articles and four books including Kinsey, Sex and Fraud and Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences. Dr Reisman has kindly agreed to speak with us today about Kinsey and paedophilia.




On your website, you refer to the "world according to Kinsey", can you explain the conditions of that world and whether they affect us today?

Alfred C Kinsey was the recognized "father of the sexual revolution" the creator of the return of "free love" for what had slowly become a fairly civilized society. In 1948 as he and his followers sold his "philosophy" of sex, intimacy and love worldwide, they reshaped our world. Even Margaret Mead, hardly a puritan, knew that Kinsey's phony "numbers" would wreck havoc with society. He could not distinguish between a woman "and a sheep," she noted.

Kinsey was himself a fanatic sexual psychopath, a bi/homosexual pornographically addicted adulterous sadomasochistic male with obvious proclivities for young boys, a man who solicited and directed the sexual torture of up to 2,035 infants and children as young as two months of age. Ask yourselves, in this era of Congressman-child molesters, what kind of justice can women and children expect from our elected officials and from those they appoint? Academicians, law enforcement, elected and pastoral officials will choose people likely to do as their “leaders” expect. Kinsey chose only disordered people to be near him, to do his research. That is normal. Elliot Ness wouldn't surround himself with Mafia men and Mafia men certainly wouldn't have an honest man nearby. That means the disease spreads—hire or appoint only those you know you can blackmail or control.

When adults are permitted to be narcissistic and self indulgent they naturally are abusive of those weaker than they. Kinsey was, on the evidence, the most important "philosopher" of the 20th and even the 21st Centuries. His philosophy of life was not original, not new, but very old. He revived the selfish gene philosophy, even largely repudiated by Darwin himself, and he and his patrons and followers have engrained their neo-pagan philosophy into all of Western society—not a small accomplishment for a lone sexual psychopath. We now have Kinsey’s philosophy operative everywhere we turn, from the kinds of media we view to the sodomies and promiscuity that is force fed to children in schools, the mass media, even some church venues, as well as the laws -- enforced or not. It's a Kinsey world.

You've spoken about the "international academic pedophile movement" you observed in 1977. Do you feel this group has gained momentum and what are the implications of such movement? Do you see any parallels between the Kinsey reports and the Rind et al study?

You know, I cannot address this question or that of the current Congressional expose without facing the fact that leadership in the effort to legalize child abuse comes largely from the male homosexual movement. At the 1977 conference it was largely male homosexual power—pederasty-- that was in evidence calling for child access. Just as Kinsey “normalized” adult access to boys so too did the Rind authors, the lead two of whom also were showcased in Paidika, The Journal of Paedophilia, a Dutch based publication, that has been advocating for an end to age of consent and "man-boy love" as their mission statement.

Male heterosexual abuse of women and girls skyrockets within any environment that demeans and degrades women. Of course, as pornography increased so too does heterosexual addiction to this erototoxin. Erototoxins are therefore causal in the increase of sex and non sex crimes against women and girls, wives, girlfriends, ones children, ones students, etc. (Depending on the data you use we can suggest well over a 1000% increase in sex crimes post 1948). So yes, it is only logical that Rind et al cite to Kinsey and all of his followers as "experts" in their bogus report.

Considering the direction of the paedophile movement in the 21st century, what do you consider the most compelling finding you made about Kinsey?

The most compelling finding is probably how dependent the entire "field" of human sexuality is upon Kinsey and his reputation. I admit to being surprised that I found no real support at all in the academic world for these obvious, well documented findings. Despite evidence, smoking guns galore, the Kinsey Institute continues unhindered, financed by state, federal and private foundation money. Now the merger of Big Pharmacology, Big Pornography, Big Sexology and Big Media is a multi billion dollar corporate merger. The money made of sexual dysfunction, depression, disease, abortion, and all of the fallout from that in STD vaccines mandated for children, etc., makes Big Tobacco look like a nursery school party.

So the cover–up, the "circle the wagons" mentality was perhaps the most significant “scientific” finding of all. Kuhn wrote about the “bandwagon” effect and that isn’t even the half of it. “Science” disappears when authorities think their reputations will be harmed as "experts." This has been THE major SCIENTIFIC finding. Kinsey's fraud, without question the most significant and influential scientific frauds in our century is untouchable! Just as Mead, Freud, Rodgers and Maslow and others were discredited, just as the evidence has discredited the entire sexual revolution, their academic fields, text books, grants, papers and professors soldier on, professing it never happened.

The Yorkshire Television documentary, Kinsey's Paedophiles even located a German Nazi who contributed his on going rapes to Kinsey but our media won't play the British documentary. The cowardice of the so called scientific community is palpable. Tragic indeed.

Thank you Dr Reisman for taking the time to speak with us.

Further details of Dr Reisman's life and work can be found here.

*Photograph used with express written permission from Dr Reisman.

Meatbag

Meatbag.

I would recommend we begin using this term regarding PedoFreaks (PFs).

Amongst the Star Wars fans, credit is given to HK-47 who refers to all humans as organic meat bags.



I refer to PFs as Meatbags because, in my estimation, they are nothing more than the merest of vertical bipedal lifeforms constructed, by some foul genetic miscreant activity, to become the lowliest of life forms extant on this planet -- therefore making them subject to the slings, arrows and barbs of something as simple as common sense.

They are constructed of tissue and muscle. Yet they have no soul.

Do I hear dissension?

BZ

Where the buck stops........

Guess what, folks? They think its our fault!!

After the recent execution style shooting of several schoolgirls in an Amish schoolhouse, STORY HERE and the news that the perpetrator claimed to have molested girls before, and the fact that he let all the boys go keeping only the girls inside, and the fact that he had come prepared for a seige stocked with all sorts of supplies including lubricant... I was curious what freakopaths would have to say about the matter.

Would they be worried that perhaps one of them would be capable of something like this? Would they condemn the man? Would they react with horror and disgust? As we've seen before they don't generally react the way the general public does, so it really came as no surprise to read what they had to say. And yet it is still so shocking.

Let's start with Dante. You see he believes it's the media's fault.

I seriously doubt that this twit's plea for attention would've taken the form it did if the Vultures hadn't been circling a similar site a few days earlier.

WM, Nigel Leigh Oldfield:

A normal MAA, tortured by thoughts he could not share, terribly transfers his anger to the taboo subject of his dreams?

Paper-doll:

I think there would be a lot less mentally ill, or disturbed minor attracted adults if society didn't repress our orientation to such breaking points.

Todd:

I imagine that, in the wake of the extreme oppression of MAAs (and the consequent sexual repression by MAAs in denial), we will be seeing more of these kinds of shootings in the future. When will society get a clue?

Minstrel:

Tell someone he's a monster all his life, because he touched, or looked at, someone who was attractive to him, then look shocked when he becomes a monster 20 years later.

NO. Actually, Minstrel, I believe he said he had molested girls

the blame for every death including his own is the persecution of people who only want to show love and affection to the people they are attracted to.

Nickless:

Not that most pedosexuals would ever DO what this man did, but, just like contemplating suicide... who hasn't thought about it?

Appy:

I can imagine myself in another parallel universe and seeing myself just as angry, with the same feelings wishing to do those same things. Repression has deadly side effects as society is now finding to its horror.

Christopher:

Most likely, and I hate to say I told you so to the non-believers, his sexual feelings for girls and teenage girls that he was unable to express built up over a period of 20 years, until he finally snapped and went out on a rape/killing rampage. No one is that mentally strong that they can stay celibate for life. Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with 'child molestation' unless the child is threatened into it

Winston, as usual, replies to the best of his ability

Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies.....

Baldur:

sadly, they reap what they have sown. (The news media) will never admit to their own complicity in such crimes.

it does now appear that societal repression was a factor that contributed to his actions.

No telling what will happen now.

You got that straight!

You see, the pedovores out there in psycholand, think they can present a separate face to society, one that doesn't reveal their true freakopathic nature. They purposefully try to decieve, to pretend to be childlovers. While in the comfort of their pedoboards, this crap above comes out. Do they honestly think that anyone would read that and have acceptance and tolerance for them? They all come across as raging lunatics. NO, they'll never, ever be accepted or tolerated on any level. Read back at what they've written, and know that there is more, much much more. The only way to truly expose how utterly devious and devoid of basic humanity they really are..... is for you to read how utterly devious and devoid of basic humanity they really are.

Joseph Duncan.

Now and again, America is subjected to the acts of a criminal so profoundly depraved that it changes the way we view our fellow human beings.

Ted Bundy. John Wayne Gacy. Jeffrey Dahmer. Gary Ridgway. Dennis Rader. Richard Speck.

This pitiless club has a new member: Joseph Edward Duncan III.
As a teenager in Tacoma, Wash., Duncan raped and tortured a 14-year-old boy at gunpoint. Convicted as an adult, he spent 18 years in prison and was afforded many opportunities to overcome—or perhaps constrain—his psychopathic sexual urges.

Ultimately, all efforts failed.

After prison, Duncan enrolled in college in Fargo, N.D., registered as a sex offender and spent several years without any reported lapses.

But early last spring, he was accused of molesting a boy on a playground in Minnesota. Facing charges that almost certainly would have led him back to prison, Duncan vanished from Fargo in a stolen Jeep, just weeks before he was to graduate from North Dakota State University.

Three days later, authorities allege, Duncan turned up with a shotgun and carpenter's hammer at the home of Brenda Groene and her children near Coeur d'Alene, Idaho. He bludgeoned to death Groene, her son Slade, 13, and Brenda's boyfriend, Mark McKenzie.

He bound the woman's two youngest children, Dylan, 9, and Shasta, 8, and carried them away in his Jeep. He took them to a hideout in the Montana woods and used the children as sexual playthings for seven weeks before finally killing Dylan, officials allege.

He was arrested July 2 at a Coeur d'Alene restaurant while having breakfast with Shasta.

Following Duncan's arrest, it was discovered that he had been keeping an Internet diary of sorts, a web log, commonly referred to as a blog, in which he disturbingly implied that he had left a string of bodies following his release from prison.

"I got out and I got even," wrote Duncan in his blog. "But I did not get caught. So I got even again, and again did not get caught. I got even twice (actually more)."

Duncan also wrote of keeping a second diary, a secret diary written in code that provided more details of his horrible crimes.

"...the world will know who I really was, and what I really did..." he wrote. "...I am scared, alone, and confused, and my reaction is to strike out toward the perceived source of my misery, society. My intent is to harm society as much as I can, then die."

Duncan's writings were voluminous, and could easily fill a book. He also had an affinity for dressing in drag, and at one point in his life he posted as series of such photos of himself on the Internet and labeled them, "Jazzi Jet," and is an example of how he apparently views himself.

At the time of this writing, the FBI as well as investigators in at least five states are continuing in their efforts to determine where Duncan might have been at any given time where any unsolved murders or rapes of children were committed. The investigation, while no longer in its infancy, is still continuing and new details will likely emerge as Duncan's case moves toward trial.

Duncan's trial date was originally slated to begin on January 17, 2006. However, according to the November 23, 2005 edition of The Seattle Times, First District Judge Fred Gibler vacated the January date and pushed his trial date back to April 4, 2006, in response to defense attorneys' requests for more time to prepare for trial.

I wonder how many of our pedo-freak comments are from future Duncans?

Update: COEUR D'ALENE, Idaho -- Federal prosecutors will seek the death penalty against the registered sex offender accused of abducting two children last year and killing one of them, the U.S. attorney's office said Tuesday.

Too late IMO, I think life in prison for the diddler would be a better punishment.
Inmates love the shorteye’s….

Prison Justice

CARLISLE, Indiana (AP) -- An inmate serving a life term for molesting and killing a 10-year-old girl named Katie somehow got "Katie's Revenge" tattooed across his forehead, and prison authorities were trying to determine how it happened.

The Indiana Department of Correction placed Anthony Ray Stockelman, 39, in protective custody away from the general inmate population last weekend after authorities discovered the tattoo, said Rich Larsen, a spokesman for the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility.

Stockelman was sentenced to life in prison after pleading guilty to abducting, molesting and killing Katlyn "Katie" Collman. Katie was missing for five days before her body was found January 30, 2005, in a creek about 15 miles from her home in the southern Indiana town of Crothersville.

Larsen refused to comment on what Stockelman has said about it or what else investigators have learned. He said he did not know how a picture of the crude tattoo was taken and distributed outside the prison, including on the Internet.

Collman's father, John Neace, said he heard about the tattoo from friends and believes it was the work of inmates.

"If I had to guess I'd say it's a statement from the inmates," he said Wednesday. Neace said he has no idea whether his late daughter's distant cousin, who is also serving time at Wabash, played any role.

Stockelman's tattoo, which covers nearly his entire forehead, has "KATIE'S" in large letters and "REVENGE" below in smaller letters.

The search for Katie, a bright child who enjoyed basketball and the Disney Channel, had consumed Crothersville. Police initially believed she was abducted and slain so she would not reveal methamphetamine activity in her neighborhood.

Investigators had interviewed Stockelman early on because he matched the description of a man seen with the girl. Then another man told police that he was involved in the murder.

That confession was eventually shown to be false as evidence pointed investigators back to Stockelman and DNA from the crime scene was found to match his.

A message seeking additional comment left Thursday for an Indiana Department of Correction spokesman was not immediately returned.

LMAO!!! If you think this is the end of his "punishment from the inmates" you have another thing coming. Usually this is like the torture phase of inmate justice, they will make him live with this for a while and then the really hard time will start for this freak.

It's times like these where I find myself routing for the convicts. Go get him boys!

A pedophile is lowest form of life on the planet, to take advantage of the innocence of the young is deplorable, and then to kill a child after your perverted act, makes you inhuman.
You should be recipient of the harshest punishment imaginable. Since our courts won't allow it in a civilized society, the prison population will exact the type of justice that only they can. I look forward to reading about the end of this freaks life I only hope it is recorded in all its graphic detail.

Zero Tolerance For Victims Who Become Predators

The revelation of sexually oriented instant messages and emails between Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) and a teenaged former page shows that paedophiles exist in all sectors of society, even our most "revered" institutions.

Ironically, Foley had himself sponsored tough legislation in Congress to protect children from sexual predators online.

Now comes the revelation that Foley had been molested by a Catholic priest when he was a teenager. I hope that's not true.

But it doesn't matter. It's no defense for what he's been up to the last few years; that it (his own molestation) was made public now seems to suggest he thinks it might be during, say, future legal action against him. And apparently being a victim of a sexual predator decades ago did not result in his feeling empathy for young people today.

Though, as his lawyer today stated, Foley had "no inappropriate sexual contact with any minor," he still may be guilty of a crime, as even solicitation of sexual activities is prohibited. Foley now claims to have problems with alcohol, but that would not turn him into a predator so much as bring out desires that were already within him.

And who knows what might have eventually happened had Foley not been found out. Years before the recently published emails were written some pages had been warned to steer clear of Foley. He may well have continued to the point where he acted on his proclivities in a very real way.

Some on the blogosphere already know my political orientation. But I'd be writing this post whether Foley's political affiliation were Red, Blue or Green. The truth is what matters most, not party loyalty.

Let revelations of inappropriate behavior between adults and youths never be politically motivated; they should always be done first and foremost to protect the children.

The Trophy goes to Rookieeee!!

There are some of the opinion that you don't kick a dog when it's down.

There are others who believe that you don't let up when you have your opponent at a disadvantage, instead you make sure that he doesn't get back up.

You prance and gloat and use them as an example to anyone else who has the guts to try to pick up where their fallen hero left off. I belong to the second category.

Rookiee took a hard fall, he did. What is he doing now? Hiding of course. He explains on the pedovore message boards that he's scared. But it's not only anti's he's scared of, no. He's scared of what will come later.

He's scared of ending up like Kevin Brown and Lindsay Ashford, demonized by their own. LOL. Or even Jeffrey and Divinaw from Sure Quality Radio, (a pedophile rado show) now gone under after the recent arrest of those two guys for molesting boys. Or hey, how about Tom O'Carroll! He's even afraid of ending up like him "the moment he had some supposed child porn, he gets picked up by the police and is never heard from again?"

Well, Rookieeee, no one ever knows what the future holds. Are you in possession of child porn? Are you molesting boys? Do you have an IN YOUR FACE attitude? There you have it, Rookiee, you see, it's our kids! It's our children, Rookiee!! Can't you see that you will never be able to change anything, except of course for the worse.

Rookiee, says he's afraid of people chasing him down, of following him endlessly. I don't know about that, at the moment my own goal has been achieved. Rookiee is SILENT and that's what I was after. So, yeah I'll be watching, if only to make sure he stays that way.

Yet, even in Rookiee's darkest moment, his worst fear realized, he remains defiant. Although he knows that we know who he is, he still says "Kiss my ASS"

No thanks, Rookieeeee, I'm just gonna finish transcribing your pedologues. You see, somehow I just don't trust a pervert to tell the truth.

Oh and by the way, you won our contest for most repulsive visitor to AZ. You wear your distinction well I might add. I do approve.

1st Place Rookiee: 29%

2nd Place Lindsay Ashford: 24%

A Dash Of Reality

CAUTION: GRAPHIC TRUTHS WRITTEN HERE:

That I actually had to sully my keyboard and type the things that I did for my newest blogpost made me abandon my laptop and rush to the bathroom for the Irish Spring and some hot water. I even wanted to submerge my HP Pavilion zd8000 into a tub of Bactistat. Ewwww!

Most normal persons have no idea what we battle here at Absolute Zero.

Do they?

That I even lowered myself to respond to that "Nigel" excuse for a vertical biped made me question some of my inner, core values. Except that I felt compelled. Compelled to draw the distinction between, literally, Good and Evil.

I had to express that in my newest blogpost.

And though I haven't made my stance generally known, I am what I call a Post-9/11 Agnostic. Before that, I was a complete Atheist. I write this to let those readers know that my views have little if anything to do with the topic of "religion." But there is, I have realized, Right and Wrong.

And friends, fucking little boys and girls up the butt and in their mouths and their vaginas is so wrong as to upset even the most stern of "cultural expressionists."

And anyone, anyone at all, who cannot see and understand that, on its face, is a person so extremely devoid of humanity that there is, I believe, absolutely no possible repair.

No repair at all.

You have, in my opinion, totally and completely surrendered your Humanity Card.

And therefore, you reap what you sow.

BZ

Cause for concern?

In a recent discussion over on the absolute nothing blog, a couple of comments made by the poster WM, otherwise known as Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield really made me think about the kind of people we are dealing with here.

I have taken thousands of images of minors, throughout my life, and have never masturbated over one of them. However, once again, I reserve the right to do so, if I ever wished.

He reserves the right to take pictures of peoples children without consent, and then use them for masturbation if he wishes to, and he sees nothing wrong in that? The second comment is a real corker, not only does he flout his contempt for the legal system he mocks those he would abuse if he chose to, and he still says he's not a sociopath.

You must know, by now, that I will break laws that I view as unjust and I am willing to accept the consequences. And, no, the families, of which you speak would not have a cat-in-hells chance of legal action, even if I had pumped pints onto to their little cherubs (feel free to contact some and let them have my email).

I will leave you with a final comment from him, bearing in mind this man feels he is unjustly labelled by me as a sociopathic paedophile, judge for yourself.

I have served my time. The job is done. Unless, of course, you mean ‘rehabilitation’, in the sense of being subservient to an unjust and ill-informed system? That is not my style, never was, never will be.