No Room For British Paedophiles

Derek Williams has been spared prison time after downloading an undisclosed number of child pornography images in England. Presiding Judge John Rogers cited overcrowded prisons in handing down the suspended sentence.

Williams had this to say:

You cannot blame the judge for what he's done. His hands were tied

Full story here

Is this truly the point we've reached - that a man who admittedly sexually exploits children can escape jail time due to sheer numbers in the prison system?

The reaction in Britain should be a clear signal to local and international governments that the overwhelming majority of society would much rather see a burglar walking down the street than a paedophile.

I strongly encourage our readers in the UK to voice your opinion on this sentence anywhere you can.

Three People Arrested for Sickening Child Porn

A Pennsylvania man, John Worman, and two women have been charged in a 53-count indictment with producing child pornography after more than one million images were recovered from a Delaware County computer.

"These defendants allegedly manipulated and abused children, even infants, to satisfy unimaginable perversions and they did it again and again and again," said U.S. Attorney Pat Meehan during a news conference on Thursday.

The abuse began as early as 1997 and lasted until 2006 and one of the youngest victims was only three-months-old. According to officials, there were at least 12 victims and over 1 million images of child exploitation found on Worman's computer, including 1,000s of videos Worman produced himself, committing sexual acts against children, like child rape. source

This monster raped and filmed infants. INFANTS.

Nothing could be more horrendous. This is why there should be a death penalty for child rapists and child pornography.

You may think that is too harsh for someone who is caught with child pornography on thier computer. I have witnessed the horror and destruction that monsters like this create. No amount of free speach claims or rationalization will ever justify this evil.

We are Warriors for Innocence. We stand between evil and the innocent. This is why. As long as there are monsters out there, we will never stop. I hunt and fight monsters. If I can help to get even one monster off the streets and away from kids, then it was worth any amount of effort.

Bigotry Pt 1

The most common allegation made against "antis" in paedophile circles is that we are bigots – most paeds would even go so far as to compare us to Nazis. Surely a group that is begging for acceptance and screaming bigot at everyone who disagrees with them, will be a model of acceptance and tolerance….right? Let's see.

First consider what bigotry means – briefly it means intolerance of other people.

To understand tolerance according to paeds, today we're going to consider some of the empathetic and tolerant things they say about individuals.

Here you'll find JD420 responding to someone who theorizes that "Girl Love" is a product of the feminist movement:

I've met a few that claim this, yet I find I have nothing but homicidal disgust for them, actually.

Kirklandwayne is a brave survivor of CSA and friend to AZ who is actively fighting CSA online. Santi states:

The piece of shit that I really hope is suffering more than anybody in the whole universe Kirklandwayne looks like a mike echols reborned. F--k, where the hell does this mishaped mosters arose?

And there are still twits that oppose eugenics and other forms of properly trimming the population.

It is a shame this bastard did not die or got maimed in the London bombings.

Oprah Winfrey, yet another survivor of CSA. Oprah has dedicated many programs to combating this problem.

Harbor boy says:

Oprah Winfrey is a very vindictive woman, which is why she has done so many programs about the "horrors" of pedophilia.

And in this thread

Abraxas denies her pain:

The fact that she refuses to reveal the alleged "molester" hints that
(1)he may not exist, (2) the "molestation" was more of a mutual exploration, (3) this is all a ruse to get publicity, especially for her pedophile hunts.

And Keating had this to say:

Oprah, for example, probably deserves to die if there was any justice in this world.

John Walsh has dedicated his life to catching criminals after he lost his 6-year-old son Adam in 1981. Adam's severed head was all that was ever recovered. Paedophiles are very tolerant of John:

Turtle says:

john walsh is a sorry scumbag. he used his sons death as a personal opportunity to elevate himself.

The Walker adds:

ego-maniacal opportunists like John Walsh will sell out their own dead children's memories in order to foster an atmosphere of hysterical hatred and fear-mongering.

Poopy head even started a poll on the following topic (and most members of BC agreed!):

I've never seen a man enjoying his little boy's death as much as John Walsh.

PPC sums up the paeds tolerance of Walsh here:

John Walsh is a psychopathic creep. Hope he will drop be dead then that would be good riddance of him

All this tolerance and we haven't even begun to talk about groups of people yet….please stay tuned for Part 2.

Thank You ~ From AZ

Absolute Zero would like to thank everyone who worked on getting GL Meister, aka Zlurker of Glorious Girls removed from Blogger.

To various bloggers such as ACME and all the individuals who worked on this, good people who put value on children's lives and safety we can and will continue to make a difference.

Absolute Zero applauds your efforts. Keep up the good fight!

UPDATE: ZLURKER RESPONDS

They have already failed...

Posted by zlurker on Thursday, January 25 2007 at 08:29:58am
In reply to The more we are silenced the louder we are. posted by Hierophant on Thursday, January 25 2007 at 01:22:00am

---

...because I have committed to establishing two new online, pro-pedo, identities before the end of the March to replace the one they worked so hard to eliminate. We can set them up much faster than they can get rid of them, or even find them, as I have no intention of linking them back to my former blog or to my zlurker identity.

The antis are the primary reason may pedos took to blogging in the first place. But that is typical of antis and oppressive governments — they actually create the very problems that supposedly concern them so much.

zlurker

Absolute Zero says to this loser: If we can't find you, no one else can either. That's all we asked for to begin with. If you are keeping your blog private you cannot commit pedo terrorism i.e. pedo activism. We got what we wanted. So, exactly who is the loser?

Urban Dictionary - The next stop for Pedophile Propaganda

Thanks to Riker at Section21 we have been tipped off to a new stop in the Pedophile Propaganda Campaign: The Urban Dictionary.

Once again, as with Wikipedia, the Pedophiles are off to spread lies and untruths in an obvious attempt to influence public opinion in their favor.

Please take a look at some of the propagandistic garbage definitions they have posted under Pedophile and Pedophilia, and do your part by voting them down in the ranks!

Many Thanks and a big Stetson Tip to Riker!

GL Meister ~ The Lurker

GL Meister runs the pedo blog Glorious Girls, and posts on GirlChat as Zlurker. He's a pedophile attracted to little girls. He's told different stories about his age of attraction AOA, but currently it's 2-14 years old. GL started his blog with the hope of luring in non-pedos to influence them with false information, but of course it attracts nothing but pedos. His plan failed. The one thing that is notable about Glorious Girls however is his consistent use of little girl 'modeling photos'. Gl is a kidder perver. He feels no guilt about doing this, I'd venture to say he feels no guilt about anything. Zlurker is totally self-absorbed.

Just a little background info on Zeeeelurker. According to him, he's in his late 30's, living in Western New York. He's married and has a young son and daughter. From here on his story becomes blurry, from his age when he lost his virginity and the age of children he's attracted to, to the fact that he first started masturbating to images of adult women at 10 or 11 according to which version you read. You just don't know which parts are true and which are lies. There's only one thing for sure. GL is a liar. So it only stands to reason that if he lies about insignificant things --wouldn't he also lie about what he did with his little "pedolicious crush" when he watched her change out of her swimsuit, or when he took her out on a "date?" Or how about when he changed his daughter's diaper and thought to himself "if they only knew"

GL came out of the toybox this year to his wife. Why? Why would he do that? Well, for one thing Lindsay told him to. But more importantly GL believes that coming out is the "ultimate form of activism." He also knew, so he says, before he did it that she wouldn't leave him. How could he know such a thing? I'm assuming she's an emotionally battered woman, just judging from the things he's written. And so GL just sticks it to her a little more. What possible benefit was it? He needed to feel accepted by someone. He needed to force his perversion on someone, without regards to their feelings. He needed validation. GL is self absorbed. He even plans to tell his Mother. He's not worried about her rejecting him though because if she doesn't accept what he tells her with love and support then he'll reject her! What a guy.

GL says he loves children. Yet his own children aren't enough to fulfill him. He doesn't love them in that way. His own kids are objects he uses to put him into contact with other young children....at church, soccer games, parks and playgrounds. He calls these GoM's. Girl ogling Moments. Each time he spends the day at the playground he rushes to GirlChat to brag. Not about the wonderful time he had with his child, but about each and every flash of panties he saw. "A day I had not been looking forward to turned into one of the best days I have had in many weeks."

Gl Meister, husband, father of 2, adult porn addict one day "accidentally" sees some child porn online. "I've never felt that way before!" The effect of seeing that little girl nude had such a profound effect on Zlurker that he set out to test the depths of his depravity. On Usenet groups he collects "child modeling" pics mostly of girls in "age appropriate underwear". "I probably have 300+ images alone just from Adie's Vogue Bambini collection". Girls mostly 3-10 years old. He particularly enjoys the images of Sandra, but states that he feels the images of her in thongs with legs spread wide are disrespectful.

"I stay away from the government run child porn sites"

Oh well! That's different then. He's told us enough that we know. He doesn't have to say it. Who's willing to bet how much child porn he's got? I'll give you 20 to 1.

Let us continue our look at GL's fixation as he proceeds down that path from regular ol' family man to porn addict and self-actualized pedophile. Just how far will he go? How far will he push the limits and boundaries that society places upon him? Personally I have no doubt. We are currently watching his descent as it evolves. And since it has been determined that a man's fantasies are a much greater indicator of future actions than what they say, I think it would be very interesting to know what this man fantasizes about, don't you?

I only fantasize about consensual/mutually-desired sexual interaction, but were it not for the fact that even the thought of an LG being frightened or hurt makes me go limp my choice would be D. (occasionally fantasize about making a child participate in sexual activity against her wishes)

Zeeeelurker loves polls. When faced with lots of choices on the next fantasy poll he gets more specific. the choices were: A-fully clothed, B-underwear, C-nude, D-watching her masturbate, E-consensual sexual touching, F-getting/giving a consensual hand job, G-getting/giving oral sex, H-consensual anal/vaginal penetration, I-consensually breaking the cherry

With any girl in my AOA 2-14 I fantasize about 'A' through 'G'

With young teens he fantasizes about 'H' and 'I'

My main LG fantasies though are 'D', 'E' and 'G'. I really like 'G' when it involves removing her diaper first

What else is there to say about Zeeeelurker you may ask. I'll just leave you with some random remarks of his and let you figure him out for yourself. When you're through reading these comments from this obsessed, fixated pedophile please help us rid the blogosphere of this pedocrap. Go HERE and flag his blog. Then go HERE and click the TOS violation regarding the posting of images of little girls for the sole purpose of sexually arousing other pedophiles.

"losing her virginity" implies that something valuable has been lost. Whereas I see something valuable being gained.

When your AOA dips into the nepi range, changing diapers is not such a miserable chore as it might otherwise seem

I would like to see a new tradition where girls - around their sixth birthday or so - are given a nice set of dildos/vibrators that they can "grow into"

I wish I could act on my urges with a mutually consenting LG

I do not think we need to feel bad about giving in to the charms of beautiful girls. If we do not, then someone else will anyway

I regularly fantasize about the daughters of my neighbors, friends, cousins and co-workers. If I had nieces in my AOA I am sure I would fantasize about them as well

I just saw an absolutely gorgeous two year old today still in diapers and using a pacifier. My heart was thumping

The day I discovered Puella was one of the most important days of my life

I fantasize about little girls almost every day

Knowing how and when to make eye contact with the parents accompanying the LG is a skill at which I have become quite proficient

You owe yourself something after what you've been through. I suggest you go hang out at the playground - just do not look suspicious while you're there

I would not recommend bothering with a therapist. I do not see what a therapist is going to do for someone that the internet cannot do

Parents are afraid of their children seeing them have sex for a number of reasons. The parents shame of their own sexuality, embarrassment of their own bodies, and fear that their three year old daughter would ask if she could play too.....

Update: SUCCESS

~ PeeJ on NPR ~

BoyChatters are all abuzz! Here's why.....

Ethics of NBC's Sting Show 'To Catch a Predator'

Talk of the Nation, January 16, 2007 · The online watchdog group Perverted Justice lures sexual predators by posing as minors online and inviting them to meet up in person. And Dateline NBC's wildly popular "To Catch a Predator" series has captured audiences nationwide with a mix of fear and voyeurism.

Guests:

Douglas McCollam, attorney and contributing writer for Columbia Journalism Review

Chris Hansen, host of NBC Dateline series "To Catch a Predator"

Richard Rapaport, San Francisco-based freelance writer, author of "Dying and living in 'COPS' America" a critique of "To Catch a Predator."

Xavier von Erck, founder of pervertedjustice.com

National Public Radio discussed Dateline's To Catch a Predator series yesterday, the focus being was it ethical?

Listen to it HERE

For some unknown reason, yet predictably, these boyChatting perverts believe this radio show was favorable to them. They are all excited "Let's all send emails voicing our opinion! Let's try to get a boyLover interviewed on the show! A boyLovers perspective!"

So I would like to point out to these clueless perverts that not one single person on that show had anything good to say about YOU! In fact, every single person on that show agreed that pedophiles are sick and dangerous. In fact, some of the words the guests and the host used were "horrific, horrible, unsympathetic people to put it mildly, beyond the pale, and scum of the earth." So get a clue.

And while all the little pedo heads are writing their emails, we can be writing ours.

Send your opinions to
talk@npr.org

Incessant PedoBabble

Incessant PedoBabble sometimes does our work for us. Let's think about that a moment while we consider the internet baby-lusting activist Nihil Aeturnius.

Lots of anti bloggers are sitting upright and paying attention to Nihil. AZ has written about him recently, as have Anti-Paedo. He deserves attention. Nihil is dangerous to children. He's just about as stupid as that idiotic coward Winston. The difference is that Nihil is more articulate. The difference is that Winston's yellow streak sent him hiding into the sidelines, whereas Nihil is too stupid to know when to be afraid. The difference is that Winston had nothing to say, he was best at pecking, harassing, and repeating useless scientific studies that didn't support what he was trying to support, whereas Nihil, who also misinterprets data, unfortunately has new ideas and he's not afraid to use them.

It's well known that Nihil is hostile towards parents. His beliefs can best be summed up this way:

"All parents are bad because they either neglect or control their children."

Nihil in his infinite wisdom, believes that not only does HE know what's in the best interest of children, but he will provide it for them in defiance of the parents wishes.

Looks like I'll have to start a Notable Nihil series. but for today I offer you his responses to a discussion on GirlChat regarding "openness within families & communities." Kea, who started the discussion, had this to say:

"as far as i am concerned, caregivers wishes are to be respected. this goes for everything. if they don't want her eating blue & yellow icecream, i won't buy it. i would break this rule if a child were in an abusive home situation & i wanted to help her, but thats all"

That sounds to me like Kea trying to pull the pedos back down to earth a bit. What does PedoBabbler Nihil have to say?

many if not most parents (In America, in modern society) fall into the following four categories

- Moronic
- Apathetic
- Controlling/Abusive
- Insane/Neurotic

With that in mind, if the girl I was seeing had parents who fell into those categories, I wouldn't give a shit what they thought

He rationalizes this position with this statement:

"There are many who want the best for their children, no matter what it is, and there are some who...don't. I support the former. I oppose the latter."

Nihil feels that he DOES know best. Nihil feels he has the right and the obligation to do as HE feels best with YOUR children. With that in mind, let's see what the other pedofreaks have to say.

Kea, who started the discussion says:

nihil_aeturnius, i wld feel uncomfortable maintaining the level of hostility you do here towards the families of children you love. i can't see how its going to help your cause.

Gryphon:

I would very much want you to give a shit about my thoughts on the matter; my daughter, my responsibility, not yours.

Dissident:

"These are common ways that parents go against the interests of their kids and try to exert control over them. I would indeed care what you thought, but I would NOT honor any attempts you might make to force your daughter into becoming the type of person YOU wanted her to become"

"I would tell them (parents) to go to hell"

Hierophant:

What the parents don't know won't hurt them,,,,

Eeyore:

Guardians are not always right. It's up to you to decide what's right and what's illogical

I would never just bow to a parent's wishes on anything they wanted for their child, especially when it's not what the child wants. I use my own sense of reason and morality based on the freedoms I think children deserve to have.

These statements were made by pedophiles. These statements were made by people who want you to accept them and entrust your children to them. These statements were made by people who want you to think of them as good people who are good for children. These statements were made by people who want society to give them legal access to your childrens bodies. These statements were made by selfish pedofreaks whose motivating drive in life is their own sexual pleasure. These statements were made by delusional people who will say anything to get in your kids pants. When someone like BB makes a comment like this:

"Nobody - and I mean absolutely nobody loves children more than a Child Lover."

We know exactly what BB is referring to. And when he states:

"I'd like to see a "normal" man give up all sexual contact with women in order to protect women from any damage that could result"

We can only shake our heads when all the little pedo heads start to nod.

Need I say more?

Another Fine Example

Child Porn Suspect Re-arrested, Charged of Sex With 5-Year-Old Girl

PINELLAS PARK, FL -- A man arrested last summer on child porn charges was under arrest on new charges of having sex with a 5-year-old girl, Pinellas Park police report.

Kenneth Halscott, 62, was being held at the Pinellas County jail on two felony counts.

Police say he was arrested last July following a traffic stop on Belcher Road for speeding 65 mph in a 45 mph zone. Police say Halscott threw a digital media card into the bushes, and it was found to contain child pornography.

In the car with him at the time was a five-year-old girl. They say she was a relative, and appeared on some of the images.

Police say his computer was examined by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, and the FDLE determined it contained images of "the defendant having sex with the 5-year-old victim."

Halscott was arrested Thursday afternoon and charged with two counts of capital sexual battery.

Source: Pinellas Park Police
Here

Tell me again how there is no connection between looking at child porn and acting on the impulses...... This is the reason for the fight.....


BTW, AZ crew sorry to have been absent for so long I've been busy as ____fill in the blank.