There are worse things in life

What do these men have in common?



Kenneth Stone


Corey Saunders


David Flavell

Before I answer that question, I'd like to go back a moment to the petition we talked about HERE. Alex Marbury and Paul Shannon want to reform sex offender laws. I'm sure you'll recall. Some of the things they called for was abolishment of age of consent laws and requiring children to be responsible for their own abuse. They also want to abolish the death penalty and life sentences. They want to abolish the sex offender registry and ban you from knowing if your neighbor is a convicted child molester under great penalties to you if you should find out. But they also want to abolish civil commitments. Because after all they've served their time. Haven't they? And according to Alex and Paul these changes are the only things that will keep people safe from sexual offenders.

Alex and Paul recently sponsored a rally to gain support for releasing violent sexual predators deemed at high risk to re-offend from their civil commitments. We didn't talk about this rally, because, well we wanted to see how it would go without our commentary. And one of the main speakers Tom Madison of SoClear Media Productions didn't want anyone to find out, which is comical really when you think about it. Have a rally to gain support but only let those who already support you know about it. Chalk one up for The Anti's.

If these people had a valid counter-argument for our opinions they would have WANTED us drawing attention to it. Nor would Alex and Paul make statements such as this

"Because a previous demonstraton in Ohio by sex offenders and their families was harrassed by bigots, you should be prepared for this possibility."

"Ask any friends you tell about this to keep the time and place of the rally confidential."

Hmmmm, harassment which consists of writing counter opinions and peacefully counter demonstrating. Seems to me these guys are flat out un-American. Not to mention whiney victim cryers. If we speak out about their rhetoric that makes us vigilantes. But of course we already knew this wasn't the brightest of the bright, eh? It's just merely another form of blame gaming which goes hand in hand with their distinct brand of mental illness.

Nevertheless, the rally went as planned. Very few people attended of course, mainly those who had a loved one confined at Coalinga State Hospital for violent sexual predators. And we didn't even have to hijack this rally for it to be an utter failure. Hey! Our strategy proved once again to be right on.

One of the attendees said that her loved one was confined there due to a sexual offense he committed while on parole for another sexual offense but then stated "He's no different than any other criminal, he's served his time". That's an example of an enabling apologist in denial.

These guys want out. They've tried lots of ways. They've held hunger strikes, seemingly oblivious to the obvious continued mentality of using manipulation as a tool. They refuse to accept treatment and they call the hospital a 'concentration camp'. I don't know about you, but if they want to hold a hunger strike I say more power to them. I'll put my support behind that, sure. Who do they think they are? What kind of sexual offenders would say "If you don't let me outta here I'm gonna quit eating"? My opinion is that it's the type of sex offenders who should be civilly committed to the Coalinga State Hospital for sexually violent offenders at a danger to re-offend. But, that's me.

Tom Madison disagrees however. From KMPH

But registered sex offender Tom Madison says, he doesn't think the extra treatment is worth the sex offender's time or the taxpayer's dollars.

"They simply want to get on with their lives, but the fear and hysteria is in the stratosphere today," said Madison.

Rather than talk about the predators that society is currently safe from - those being held at Coalinga. I think we should talk about violent sexual predators who were released from prison "after serving their time" - and despite evidence that they were still dangerous and likely to re-offend - were NOT civilly committed as requested. Let's talk about 3 of those. Released by the same judge. Judge Moses.

First up we have Corey Saunders, with previous convictions for rape of a child with force and assault and battery of a child, Judge Moses didn't believe the evidence that he was at a high risk of re-offending. No, he said, Corey hadn't re-offended in 7 years. Ignoring the fact that he was in prison during those 7 years. Corey raped a 6 year old boy in the library shortly after release.

Then we have David Flavell, who "had been arrested and convicted on a variety of sex offenses between 1996 and 2003, including masturbating in public, threatening children and brutally beating and attempting to rape a woman in Methuen. That 1996 attack took place just hours after he’d been arrested for masturbating in a department store." Judge Moses refused to commit him, he didn't believe he was dangerous. No, not David. He was arrested in January for peering into a womens restroom stall. "Flavell was carrying a backpack with three pairs of work gloves, a ski mask and a roll of duct tape and had put a magazine rack outside the ladies room to make it appear it was out of service"

How about the latest case of irresponsibility committed by Judge Moses. Kenneth Stone "In separate incidents in 1989, 1991 and 1995, Stone was convicted of indecent assault and battery on a person 14 or older and in May of 1991 and again in October of 1991 he was convicted of assault with intent to rape." Now in February, after Judge Moses ruled he was fit to be returned to society, Stone has been arrested for raping a man......less than three weeks after the Judge let him go free.

The issue

At issue is a state statute which allows the district attorney to petition to have sex offenders who’ve completed their criminal sentences declared sexually dangerous and civilly committed much the way a person deemed a danger to himself or others may be committed to a psychiatric hospital.

ABC Channel 6 news did an investigative report on Moses on Feb. 7, in which reporter Jim Hummel analyzed 42 sexually dangerous person petitions in Bristol County in the past seven years. Of those, judges granted the petitions half the time, Hummel reported.

Moses was the only judge who released every offender who came before him, a total of six, including Stone, Saunders and Flavell

THOSE are men who should have been civilly committed. Those are men just like those in Coalinga Hospital that Tom Madison feels we don't deserve protection from because

• A. It's not fair to the offender
• B. It costs too much money
  

Funny thing about that is, the only people complaining about how much it costs are sex offenders. Those of us who aren't sex offenders - 99.8% of the population....are more than willing to pay the price. Although, if they want to argue COST, I'd be more than happy to lobby for the death penalty for child molesters. Conviction.....appeal.....execution. That would certainly solve the problem of sexually violent deranged individuals. It'll save us money and they can't re-offend! I suppose one might say

"There are worse things in life than being on a sex offender registry"

or perhaps they might say

"There are worse things in life than being confined in Coalinga State Hospital for the sexually violent predator"

That logic is good enough for me because after all Jan Kruska says:

"While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life"

Graphics courtesy of Jacey

Zero tolerance for bad Judges/bad politicians

Now, I'm no conspiracy theorist by any means. Quite frankly, I put most of those people in the stupid category of whom I have zero patience for. Those who believe no man ever flew into the atmosphere to land on the moon or those who think the U.S. concocted the whole 911 attacks (as if our government is that clever and adept at keeping secrets). Nope, I don’t buy it. Go figure.

However, something smells rotten in Denmark, a country whose many values systems are coincidentally shared by those in Taxachussetts (MA). Both places seem to be full of sex offender, apologizing politicians and Judges.



Repeat Sex Offender
Corey Saunders

A recent example of this is a sex offender loving Judge who allowed a level 3 sex offender to go free after serving 7 years in prison. The Judge made his case by basically suggesting the sex offender was really a pretty good guy with a low IQ, who probably just had a bad day. He let this compulsive abuser of children go back into a free society, free to rape a random, small child again. Seems that the Judge pretty much dismissed any harm this creep inflicted upon the children he abused as ‘no big deal.

Now, back to the conspiracy theories...the Judge made special note that the child rapist had not sexually assaulted anyone in 7 years.

The DOJ (Department of Justice) would surely put that on their list of non re-offending sex offenders – skewing the recidivism rates. Put that one in the -- "Score one for the baby rapers" column too! For this child hating sociopath has gone 7 whole years without sodomizing a little boy. What a swell guy! Where’s the nearest daycare center to help this poor, sodomizing, violent, child hating baby raper out? A "decent" guy, the Judge might say, who just happens to love baby boys a little too much?? (Have we not heard this ad nauseam from the pedo activists who annoy us with their inane comments on this and who are driven insane by their need for the blood of a child?)

Of course, the Judge dismissed the many experts who warned of his high risk and likelihood to rape a child again.

Here's where you have to wonder where this jerk-off Judge got his law degree, or if he has enough brain cells to put his right shoe on the right foot:

THE CHILD RAPIST HAS BEEN IN FUCKING PRISON FOR THE LAST 7 YEARS YOU FUCKING MORONIC JUDGE!!!! (Hence, why he hasn’t raped a child in 7 years.)

And violently raping a random 6 year old is exactly what happened when this Judge opened his heart to this dangerous child predator and trusted him to have full access to OUR CHILDREN.

Less than a year after Superior Court Judge Richard Moses let the rapist go, Corey Saunders raped a 6 year old boy in a library - in the corner of a library, where it was reported by many Boston media outlets that the little boy, completely paralyzed with fear was forced to give the man his address and was told if he told anyone, he would go to his house and rape him again. Apparently, a librarian noticed something strange and alerted his mother. (Remember, the Judge said this man had a very low IQ and was sent him on his merry way, deeming him harmless.)

Now please take special note, the former Massachusetts Governor that appointed this Judge Moses, Jane Swift, is now campaigning for Republican Treason candidate, John McCain.

Why are ACLU/sex offender supporting politicians endorsing John McCain?

One has to wonder what would happen if the truth about level 3 offenders were made public? You see, the DOJ can’t accommodate all the child rapists in prisons. They don't have the room or the resources to deal with them and loopholes make it nearly impossible to institutionalize them, so the DOJ resorts to DISHONEST information and statistics, KNOWING FULL WELL that most child rapes are NEVER reported. Their “research” is solely based on the ones that are caught by on the RAPISTS FUCKING WORD!

If the librarian hadn't of come forward about that small boy at her MA library, and later Corey Saunders was asked by his parole officer if he had had contact with a child, what do you suppose his answer would be??

It is in the DOJ's best interest to sweep this problem under the rug and claim that the SOR is managing it, but the truth is, it's not enough. THE SOR is only a tiny piece of a large puzzle where every one of our accomplishments is met by many unscrupulous people -- bad politicians – who simply want to create the illusion that they are doing everything they can to protect children when they aren't.

It is 2008 and we are only recently holding those teachers accountable for sexually terrorizing their students. Seven states are currently implementing new laws to safeguard children against predators that go into the teaching profession, in order to have easy access to children. It's hard to believe that state laws would need to invented and created in order to keep predators from assaulting children without any repercussions. Too many teachers were sexually assaulting children and then going on to teach again (and getting amnesty from the SOR). As it stands now and before new legislature prevents the continuation of this egregious act of injustice, a teacher that sexually abuses a student can go quietly, move to another district, teach again and the previous school where the unofficial charges were made simply do not get passed onto the new school.

It's also hard to believe, that teachers are fighting this kind of accountability, complaining that it puts them under too much scrutiny. God forbid, teachers are scrutinized for professional accountability and entrusting our children's safety to them.

This is an outrage but alas, the doors are about to be closed for predators that use our tax dollars to abuse our children. One by one, loopholes will be closed. Laws will be changed. Politicians will be accountable and it’s easy to do too. The more the public knows, the more they demand justice and safety for our children. This is a non-partisan issue.

We are winning, but we are also working with some people in power that don't always have children's best interests in mind, but rather look for easy solutions to atrocities that they hope only will go unreported, under-reported and unnoticed.

AZ notices though, don't we?

And we will get others to notice too. Presidential candidates will be well vetted as to whether they will sacrifice our children to rapists or if they're committed to keeping them safe. AZ is WATCHING YOU!