They're holding out for a Hero

"Experts have often wondered what proportion of men who download explicit sexual images of children also molest them. A new government study of convicted Internet offenders suggests that the number may be startlingly high: 85 percent of the offenders said they had committed acts of sexual abuse against minors, from inappropriate touching to rape."

Traffic in online child pornography has exploded in recent years, and the new study, some experts say, should be made public as soon as possible, to identify men who claim to be “just looking at pictures” but could, in fact, be predators.

Let's look at a few of these men.

First up we have actor Chris Langham

Sentenced to a mere 10 months in prison for downloading child pornography.

"Once the 43 days he has spent in jail since his conviction are taken into account, the actor will serve just over three and a half months."

Outrageous? You bet it is.

What was Chris looking at?

"One video found at his home featured a girl of eight who was being abused by her father and has since been rescued by police.

She had been subjected to what is known as 'level 5 abuse' - the most extreme level and which can include sadism and bestiality.

In the film she was bound, naked and blindfolded, and tied to a ceiling."

Next we have Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the the Virginia ACLU, youth sports coach and an advocate for unrestricted use of the Internet in public libraries was sentenced to seven years in federal prison for sadistic child pornography.

Charles Rust-Tierney, 51, pleaded guilty in June to downloading hundreds of pornographic images of children as young as 4. Authorities said Rust-Tierney used a computer in his 11-year-old son's bedroom to view the files, which included a six-minute video that depicted sexual torture of children, set to a song by the rock band Nine Inch Nails

And what have we here?

David Arthur Joy

A pedophile who campaigned for sex with children as young as four to be legal, now sentenced to an indeterminate jail term after he pleaded guilty to 11 counts of making or possessing indecent images of children.

David, a member of the notorious Pedophile Information Exchange or P.I.E. "also had a string of previous convictions for child sex offenses dating back to the 1970s and 1980s, including the attempted rape of a young girl and indecent assault."

Now, before you get all excited, no albertRoss wasn't busted in this raid. It's just that...well, his house looks just like David's.

"As part of coordinated raids on the remaining leading members of PIE, officers from Scotland Yard's Paedophile Unit swooped on recluse Joy's one-bedroom flat.

The property was so untidy that officers had to climb around rotting piles of newspapers, rubbish and clutter to find what they were looking for, the court heard.

They eventually unearthed some 1,129 indecent images involving children as young as one in innocent-looking files by his bed, between the pages of books, in magazines and on two home computers.

Several were in the very worst "level 5" category, which includes sadism"

And now meet David's friends

61-year-old Thomas Victor O'Carroll, an out of work journalist and 67-year-old Michael John De Clare Studdert , a retired Anglican minister, were arrested in January 2006 after the Met's Paedophile Unit conducted a series of co-ordinated searches and arrests.

O'Carroll is a high-profile activist who has campaigned to legitimise certain aspects of paedophilia and was the chairman of the now defunct Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) in the UK. He has latterly been a member of the International Paedophile Child Emancipation forum (IPCE).

During the arrest phase of the operation, a search of Studdert's extensive country home, and some 17 acres of grounds, uncovered two highly sophisticated hidden compartments within his bathroom One was hidden behind a false wall by the bath and the other was hidden in the eves of the house and accessed by a secret door opposite the toilet. The 'hides' contained a massive hoard of indecent images of children, believed to be his lifetime's collection, with images from the 1950's to modern day in a variety of formats.

The formats included videos, photographic slides, cine films, photographs, magazines and photographic negatives. In terms of formats it was the widest ranging personal collection of abusive material known to the Metropolitan Police Service ever attributed to one person.

Well what was the harm in that? They were only lookin' weren't they? That shouldn't be a crime should it? Why just last year after 125 men were arrested for possession of child pornography including infants so young they had pacifiers in their mouths *d* of boychat had this to say

So, instead of saying "ohmygawdtheyareabusinginfants thebastards!" the police and news should be saying "thank goodness these kids won't remember what happened."

Let's not forget that. Let's not forget how much the filthy pedophiles just love children. And while we're remembering that, let's also remember BoyChat's very own fallen heroes Camper and Jim Finn aka Jimf3. And let's also remember GirlChat's Infinity, Lux, Taf-Kat and Nigel Oldfield all guilty of exploiting children through the use of child pornography. Sweet little pics? Child-like images? Oh no. See, Taf-Kat had

many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine.

And Nigel had

bestiality, heterosexual sex, cross-dressing, masturbation, torture, all ages of children

Maybe some of that had to do with Nigel being an

"exhibitionist cross dressing bisexual"

I don't know, he brags about it, and he's not even remotely sorry for it. Perhaps he simply can't decide which word is a noun and which is a verb.



He had this to say about it

• I had an unclean house
• I have been obsessed
• I had no sexual inhibitions whatsoever
• I am not going to attempt to frighten the reader into abstinence
• I hardly cared at all during the episode about these immense consequences, such was the power of the combination of contributing factors and the intensity
• I started to create the most offensive series of photo-realistic fabrications I could imagine
• I would describe it as though Evil was sat with me for a few weeks
• The biggest mistake I will ever make in my life, but I don't regret it

He doesn't regret it? Well, why would he? He doesn't believe he's done anything to regret. No, you see he's only sorry he got caught. Which sounds verrrrry familiar now that you mention it....could it be the Webmaster of Boychat perhaps?

"So let's say, for the sake of argument, that he really did have child pornography...The question is, "So what?" So, Jim got to see something that we all wish we could see.

So then... maybe Jim got to see it. Should I "cluck, cluck" and say, "Oh, how could you, Jim, you've let us all down?" No. What I would say if I knew Jim got a glimpse would be, "Way to go, boy." I'd give him a thumbs-up and, if I got a chance, I'd ask for a description.

You broke the law... but you didn't do anything I don't wish I could do, too. I won't... but damn, I wish I could

Some years ago, another good friend of mine IMed me and said, "Dylan, I'm in trouble. I got caught with a boy. I'm probably going to go to prison." I think I took him completely by surprise when my response was, "Good for you."

He asked, "You aren't mad?" I said that I was to some degree pissed about the things he and the boy would both have to go through as they were ground up by the system, but the fact that he had sex with a boy? "Are you kidding? You got some!

I've got to protect my own security--don't ask me to hold on to your CD collection while you're in jail, and for the love of Timmy, if you know you're doing something illegal, don't fucking tell me about it

As far as I'm concerned, if you go to prison for something involving a boy (or a photo of a boy, or a movie of a boy, or whatever), you're not a "fallen boylover." You are a hero boylover. You did it. You've been there, you've done that

When you outlaw who we are, we don't have any choice except to be a bunch of outlaws. Gimme me a break: let me write the laws for a while. I'll make heterosexual behavior illegal, and then we'll see how long everyone else can stay out of jail. Our boylove criminals aren't something to be ashamed of; they're something to be proud of!

Some people say that Dylan Thomas's influence is limited. They say that the vomit he spews forth on a regular basis would only influence pedoheads, and they're all deluded anyway. It's easy for Dylan to puff them up with baby raping pride. They'd do it anyway with or without him.

And while that in itself may be true, there are other borderline psychotics out there. Other unstable people. People who WANT so much to Believe that they latch on to this vomit spewing, ugly, pock marked little weasel of a man. They latch on....and they hang on for dear life. Sometimes they even spread his agenda around in seemingly unlikely places. But, that's another story.

Graphics courtesy of Jacey

Who are these men?

What do the following men have in common?

• Lindsay Ashford
• Tom O'Carroll
• Charles Rust-Tierny
• John Murray Melanson
• Damien Cole

Along with all the visitors we get here at this blog who arrive here under the most sickening of search terms.

• 10 year old boys pedo pictures
• cp innocent youth porn
• pedofilia photos kids
• pedofilia videos
• pedo vaginal penetration 3 year old
• child molesting pics
• pedofilia pics
• boylove videos
• pedofilia free video
• little pedo child pics
  
• young boys raped by pedophiles pics

Hey, I don't make this stuff up folks. Those are from just the last few hours and doesn't take into account all the pedo boy, pedo girl, pedo chat, pedo blog, pedophile, pedosexual pedo pedo pedo pedo until I could just GAG. But what do they have in common with the above and with these guys who have made these statements....

Drifter:

"I would definitely have sex with any little girl I had a chance with, but would not rape one. I guess there really are those that want to admire but would never touch. Thats not me man, I will touch and touch and touch!!!!"

Taf-Kat:

"piled high, were the many CD's filled to bursting with my precious pictures, tens of thousands of them, all kinds, from innocent, fully clothed girls, through posed nudity, to the hardest cp you can imagine"

Camper:

"Hmmm....I generally find boys start 'turning my eye' at about age five"

Our desire for porn makes us use bad judgement sometimes

Olive freak:

"Having discovered a community of people who understand you, share those same likes and dislikes, and managed to live life without rape or molesting"

Viamund:

"The internet is a tool that is meant to be used for all manner of things. Personally I use it for research, activism, gaming and certainly online dating. I date boys aged 14 - 18 and I have met all my lovers over the past 6 years exclusively through internet dating sites"

Daniel:

"I am sexually attracted to children, but I am not a pedophile"

What can you say about men like this? Men like Daniel who wrote a complete guide to debate for pedophiles....taking them step by step through the process of proving that pedophiles are normal and child prostitution and child pornography should not only be tolerated and accepted but legalized! What can you possibly say? I can just imagine him trying to publish it.... Perhaps he could call it Pedo-Logic for Dummies?

What can you say about Camper who not only attempted to deceive society in general but actually pulled it off with the pedophile community. What can you say when the co-owner of BoyChat...the largest message board for boylover pedophiles is running from law enforcement for not only child pornography but the rape of a 5 year old boy? John Murray Melanson. Remember that name, you'll be hearing it again.

What can you say about Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU...with a history of attempting to legalize child pornography and allow access to it in public libraries, was anyone actually surprised? Were they surprised to hear that it wasn't lovely images of 'child models' but videos of young girls bound while being raped with screams coming from their mouths?

What can you possibly say about Tom O'Caroll that hasn't already been said? Repeated prison sentences for his deviant acts, his history with NAMBLA and horrendous writings in support of child molestation.

Lindsay Ashford, the sneaking cowardly webhost who distorts scientific studies by mixing the statistics to fit his agenda. Who maintains a website all pink and sugary to 'educate young girls' . Lindsay, of which I have seen scores of pedophiles say they were confused, they were looking for information and then they found Lindsay and all of a sudden they knew there was nothing wrong with them.........they had come home! Lindsay who lies about child pornography. Lindsay who lies about statistics. Lindsay who lies to his pedo pals, and to society. Lindsay who runs and hides from country to country.........all for his sexual desire of young girls. He denies any wrong-doing, but he can't very well say otherwise, can he?

What can you say about Damien Cole aka Rookieeee of the decimated Pedologues. Oh, well I think ILGO said it best when he whined about Rookiee losing his pedo terrorism hierarchy on the internet. "Many times I found myself disagreeing....but just as many times more I've nodded my head enthusiastically and said to myself 'Yes, that's exactly how it is!'"

Well, yes we see that Olive. That's part of the reason why Rookieeeee was dangerous, he encouraged, he reinforced and he helped you all maintain your cognitive distortions. If you listen to his pedologues, you also know that practically every guest he ever had either went on to a pedophile related criminal conviction or else they already had one under their belt. They were just one of the many who joined in when the pedo heads began to nod in unison. You should know, you were one of them....even as you claimed to NOT sexually offend against children ALL BECAUSE OF A MESSAGE BOARD! Oh Dear! You need a message board to keep you from raping babies Olive freak? Is that what your prior conviction was for? Oh, never mind, you took the plea.

And what do you say about Seamus? The GirlChat resident of how-to-hide-child-porn without giving your mother a stroke infamy...

"Now, a stranger just might stumble across the correct 75-character password which has been encryped by BestCrypt with a 448-bit algorithm, but not easily. Word on the street is that he will need every computer on Earth tied together, for longer than the age of the universe, to crack it."

What have you got to hide Seamus?

"BestCrypt has a system wherein you can hide a container within a container; nobody but you knows if there is a hidden container.

Create a container and fill it with borderline stuff: girls who have just turned legal age, for example.
Hide your sensitive files in another container which is hidden inside of that one.

If the authorities ask for a password, give them the password to the innocuous container; there is no way for them to know if that is all there is.

I've been in and out of the UK frequently since that law was enacted; no problems"

Well. Well.
What could we say about Jason? You know Jason Masters the 'fiction' writer? We could say he likes girls....and little boys too. We could say he believes he's a girl trapped in a man's body. We could say he has bondage fantasies about tying up toddlers, or talk about his legal problems.

We could mention that it was reported in Relapse prevention with Sex Offenders

"the longer sexual fantasies are maintained and elaborated on, the greater the chance that the behavior will be acted out in real life"

"the more individuals engage in fantasy, the more motivating and more detailed the rehearsal may become, and the more able the individuals are to convince themselves to act out the behaviour in real life"

But I think we all already understand that.

We could talk about Infinity and his Child Porn problem. But then, they all have a bit of a problem with Kiddie Porn of one sort or another, don't they? We could talk about Dylan Thomas and his pro-child prostitution and child porn stand, or Robert Vann Smith aka Ghostwriters Mexican bust when he thought he'd just pass over the border and play with a boy or two for the weekend, or how about Lux? or Princesplaff? or Jeffrey W. Russell aka Jeffrey Gold and Matthew Fox of Sure Quality Radio sitting in custody awaiting trial for...oh what was it now? Sexual offenses against children? Distributing obscene material to a minor? What if we talked about Paul Edward Vose aka Slvrspun and the boy he terrorized....or his detailed instructions for hiding child porn? Or how about Bill Evans and his exploitation of an indigenous population of people....all for his sexual desires.

We could talk about their pedo distortions and how they claim they would never no never harm a child. "It was consensual!" Or another favorite they use "That child was only harmed because society told him he was!" We could go on and on and on and on but there's one question that begs to be answered.

What do these men have in common with the Lindsay Ashfords and the Rust-Tierney's of this world. Why, it's very simple.

They are all real men!

These men and others like them loudly and boldly proclaim that they are pedophiles. They inflict themselves upon society, upon our children! They demand to be accepted! They make all kinds of foolish demands actually, but one thing is for sure, they are out there with one purpose in mind......sexual gratification through the use of children.

So if you ever have cause to doubt, just remember that they LIE as a matter of course. They have reason to. Who are these men?

They are child predators and they are real. They are not just words on a computer screen, a nickname or a sigpic. They are child predators, whether they call themselves a Girl Lover, a Boy Lover, a Child Lover, a Pedophile, Pedosexual or MAA. These things they do are happening everyday and we need everyone working together, united, to deny them that ability There can be Absolute Zero Tolerance for those who prey on children and use them for selfish, sexual motives.

HT to Jacey for the awesome graphics!

It never stops!

I can guarantee that many pedophiles will never stop. No matter how much we watch or keep them on sex offender registries, they will not stop exploiting and using children.

The following post is evidence that so many pedophiles do not learn that their lusts and attractions are not right, but instead they go on to harm, exploit and lust over our children!

Here is Philosophy from girlchat :

Taking pictures of chilren
Posted by Philosophy on Monday, September 17 2007 at 10:53:08pm
Okay, so this has probably been asked here before, but I have never seen it. I just bought a very nice Digital camera, and I have been wanting to take some snap shots of some children playing. Just random photos in parks, at the beach, etc.

I know that there is no law preventing this, but do you suppose this is good idea?

This guy... I am sure he has heard that taking pictures is not a good idea otherwise he wouldn't be asking for permission...or is he?
He very well could be letting people know he has pictures. He could be waiting for someone with a daughter to invite him over. Whatever the case, we know it is of no good intention.


Here is a boychatter who will never learn. Bill Evans again, and again.

How many more victims does he need before he dies? How many more boys will feel him raping them before someone locks him up to stop him from preying on children once and for all?

Does Bill Evans have a new boy target?


Or is it made up for his buddies to fantasize about?
One never can be sure, especially in Bill's case.


Bill is a monster.

He was accused of sexual penetration to boy.
Here is a collection of posts from Absolute Zero United
A newspaper link about Mr. W.J. Evans of Boychat and other goodies that you can read up about.
Here he is, relocated to a new place, sitting in a mall... watching boys.
I am sure he was watching and looking "inviting" to the boy who he says sat down with him.
Bill is a predator. He needs to be kept away from all children!



I will never stop believing that we can deal with sex offenders by locking them up in state prisons for their prison terms and then transferring them to facilities for life. They can be productive, and live kind of normally but only on those grounds. There are plenty of old state hospitals and old county ran buildings locked up and forgotten about. We can use them or rebuild on the land to make room for sex offenders. I am sure they can run with minimal expense if the pedophiles live in suites where they can function with no outside internet or shopping trips. Once their prison sentences are over they would go to these facilities, for the rest of their life.
They can make their own electricity, heat, most of the food or have it delivered, and the state would profit from their activities as well.

Then we will have no more victims of pedophiles? Sure we will ...but once caught and convicted they would be relocated for life.

Judge gives okay to lure children, as long as place has only four poles and a roof

Mitchell Pask was convicted in 1992 of sexual assault. But, that didn't stop him from walking past a group of preteen girls and after saying "'Look at those sexy little salty girls'", motioning one (who was 9) to follow him towards a shelter made of four poles and a roof at a local park.

The girl was smart enough to not follow him, police were smart enough to arrest him, and a jury was smart enough to convict him.

A judge however, believed that because the "shelter" was in view of a a street, and was a sort of "open air" shelter as we call them- that the crime for which Pask was charged- Wisconsin's child enticement statute- didn't occur.

After deliberating for just half an hour, a jury found 44-year-old Mitchell Pask guilty of trying to lure a 9-year-old girl to a park shelter for sex.

But after the verdict was read Wednesday, Judge Timothy Van Akkeren stepped in. In a rare move, he overturned it and found Pask, who was convicted of sexual assault in 1992, not guilty. The reason?

He said the park shelter wasn't secluded enough to satisfy Wisconsin's child enticement statute.

Of course, there is nothing to say that once Pask had her at the shelter- alone and in a more controllable situation- he wouldn't have attempted to get her to walk elsewhere with him. There is nothing to say that he wouldn't have diverted away from the shelter house and into another area. And, of course, there is nothing to say that he isn't sick enough to attempt to rape someone in a public place. But... at least he now has a good excuse for the next time he gets caught- "no, no judge... I was attempting to take her not into the woods, but to the open air shelter on the other side of the woods".

I've been watching...

I've been watching quietly as Jan Whateverthehellhernameis has went from being a lying, self serving annoyance to a stalking, crazy woman on a mission to land herself back in the big house. And, while watching and chatting with Stitches, I kept getting this creepy feeling that Jan/Amanda/Mrs. Hebephile reminded me of something.. but I just couldn't put my finger on just what it was. That's really been weighing on my mind. I mean, what exactly could a woman who uses "statistics" that are so far fetched that they are laughable, and who promotes the idea that sex offenders are just "misunderstood" and it's the general public who should be ashamed for misunderstanding them, who slithers around like the scum she is hiding behind the increasingly insane notion that she's not really a sexual deviant because her victim was 15 years old- possibly remind me of.

And then I figured it out...

'Cause everything that comes outta her hole is shit...

(this post dedicated to:
Stitches... keep up the good work
and
Jan... how freaking dare you be such a punk a** and claim to know so much while ignoring the real stats out there on your people who continue to commit heinous crimes against this nations young people? You wanna play with the big kids, learn the damn facts and how to accurately use them before you start swinging your hyped up bull about recidivism rates, and sex offender laws.)

Side note: I tend to specialize in studying sex crimes. The only thing that annoys me more than pedoscum, is those people who would willingly misinterpret studies in order to promote their "society is mean for not letting us continue to rape little kids" lectures.

Facts According to Jan

Originally posted on August 20, 2006

Jay Baskins, see HERE, tells us about this little thing called A FACTOID, which he defines as:

A statement of presumed fact that people believe to be true because they hear it repeated over and over

Does that sound familiar? Jay has an entire list of common factoids and he proceeds to dispel them one by one. So shall we.

Factoid #1:

The "pedophile" is set apart from most men because he finds children or adolescents sexually attractive.

Jay states that the ACTUAL fact is:

A study of randomly selected "normal" men at Kent State University (Hall, G. N., Hirschman, R, and Oliver, L. 1995) discovered that "20% of the current subjects self-reported pedophilic interest and 26.25% exhibited penile arousal to pedophilic stimuli that equaled or exceeded arousal to adult stimuli."

I don't know about you all but I've become rather weary of this continued FACTOID that keeps crawling out of pedovores mouths.

The result of this study WAS NOT that 25% of all men had a pedophilic attraction to children. The result was that these particular subjects had a higher than average arousability level. Meaning they could get turned on at the drop of a hat. In the authors OWN analysis of his study he stated various reasons, some of them being the high attrition rate when men found out about the penis straps they would have to wear all in order to get paid $40, to the fact that the author removed subjects from the study himself due to them not having a high enough arousability level to suit his purposes.

NOW, whether or not this was a valid and reliable study, is completely beside the point. The point is that the pedophiles, misinterpreted the results based upon that one sentence in the abstract and have used it so many times that they all believe it.

In other words Hall's study has become a FACTOID.


Now let us see who has bought into this.

Well we know that BlueRibbon the infamous Dad-beater and perver of his little brother's friends spread this around everywhere totally misinterpreting the data.

And now


WA LA


Jan Kruska of 'I'm not a pedophile' fame is just eating this pro-pedo propaganda up. And even linking to it!


What is wrong with you Jan? Those pesky pedophiles just keep getting in your way, don't they? I, for one, wonder why.

Jan said

"Anyone claiming to be a pedophile or that having a sexual preference for pre-pubescent children is "normal" or "acceptable" or engages in that type of behavior is SICK. I would be the first one to string the bastard up by the balls and cut his throat."

So my question is WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO PROVE IT'S NORMAL?

Unspinning the Spin

Who said this?

"While sexual abuse is despicable there are indeed things that are much worse in life. Most children do not die or become permanently disfigured as a result"

And

"Think of the child within the sex offender who is still hurting"

Jan Kruska said it, who else?

Jan, a board member of SoClear defined her purpose

"made it her mission to educate the public on the truth behind the headlines: To cut through the hype and spin to bring you the facts, un-tethered by political bias, affiliations, or agendas"

So that is what we are going to do. We're going to cut through the hype and spin....Unspinning Jan's spin.

We all watched her bimbo-headed temper tantrum over the last couple of weeks. We watched her flap and scramble attacking uninvolved individuals and stating unequivocally that they are guilty of sex offenses against children. No if's or maybe's about it from Jan. No, she stated it as fact.

Let's start right here with an article she wrote for American Chronicle. Since she's accusing AZ of belonging to Perverted Justice, and since she's mixing and matching her information however she sees fit, I believe it calls for some commentary, don't you?

She says that a report has been filed with the FBI and the CyberTipLine accusing PeeJ members of downloading child pornography. It quickly made it through the pedophile community who, having a warped mentality anyway, took it to mean it was true. So, I just want to take a moment and clear something up, you know so that we're all SO CLEAR

Jan Kruska is the only person who has made this asinine accusation

I could also report Jan to CyberTipline and the FBI for downloading CP

• If I did that, it would be true that I did make the report


• It wouldn't make it true that Jan did it however just because I said it

Jan, having claimed elsewhere that AZ is a blog belonging to PeeJ makes a rather bold statement in this article of hers.

Some interesting quotes gleaned from their websites include: “PRETEND to be child advocates” and “Don’t go posting a cp (child porn) pic somewhere to offend people, only to have your ip (address) logged and have yourself arrested. Learn the ways of staying anonymous online.”

Well that just sounds horrible, doesn't it? If Anti's are saying those sorts of things. And Jan obviously wants you to believe it's true, she repeated it on her website and made the words giant sized red bold to make sure everyone sees it. So by George, I'm gonna make sure they see it too.

Because, you see, Jan took those words right off of AZ. Yep, she got it right here

Words straight out of the mouth of a filthy pedophile.

Words that we were discussing.

Words that were referenced with a link to the author.

The quotes Jan used were found on AZ

You can read pedophile remarks on Anti Blogs

• Jan is either blind
  


• Or Jan is maliciously spinning the truth.

She's written an entire article about it, and she's trying to make sure everyone sees it. She has reported people to the FBI claiming that they download child pornography......based upon a pedophile she found us quoting and analyzing on AZ.

That's what unethical journalists do. They spin. And they spin. And they spin.

HT to Jacey for graphics!