"What does this all mean in the context of this post? It means that if you're an adult, and a young girl under 18 flashes you, then you have no other recourse but to look like you didn't enjoy it, and you must immediately tell her to stop doing it and give her a lecture on how "inappropriate" the act was. In other words, you must act like a total prude. This doesn't send a positive message to the girl about her sexuality, it will really put a damper on her spirits if she wanted you to see her nude, and it may not lead to her trusting you more than the average adult, but the law (and your continued ability to see this girl) leaves you no other choice."Pedophiles always have a hard time separating reality from what they'd like to be reality (10 year old girls don't "flash"), but the message I want to talk about today is how Dissident takes this thinking error one step further. Going back to the start: Azures recent posts on GirlChat have been a series of "GirlMoments," where he boasts to his fellow perverts about having seen naked body parts of the 10 year old girl:
"She then came into my bedroom and said, "Is my top on properly? I can't figure it out!", and then with zero prompting, continued, "Oh fine I'll take it off!" - she clearly came in with that intention. Before I knew it she was topless, little micro-boobies right there. Of course I obligingly helped with the top, perhaps taking a little longer than normal due to being so flustered :)"
"Later I was in the bathroom and she came in, and showed great glee in going to the toilet in front of my very eyes. She even made a point of lifting her dress up high as she sat there. I could tell it was very calculated on her part.""She came in with that intention" "It was very calculated" - These are the text book cognitive distortions, now re-read this part of Dissident's post:
"you must immediately tell her to stop doing it and give her a lecture on how "inappropriate" the act was. In other words, you must act like a total prude. This doesn't send a positive message to the girl about her sexuality, it will really put a damper on her spirits if she wanted you to see her nude"And what does Dissident and the other freaks think is a positive message for a 10 year old girl?
That it's acceptable for adults to take advantage of her when she don't realize that she's being used? - that not only is it okay, but that it would "damper her spirits" not to?
This is how they convince themselves their behavior is acceptable: distortion upon distortion, lie upon lie: "the 10 year old wanted me to see her --> that's why it would hurt her if I told her to be more careful." Azure needs to remove himself from this situation immediately.